26
KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY LECTURE 1 Readings: Parsons, pp. xv- xviii, 1-16; Goldhamer, p. 7-27.

KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

  • Upload
    jason

  • View
    38

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY. LECTURE 1 Readings: Parsons, pp. xv-xviii, 1-16 ; Goldhamer, p. 7-27. Agenda. Course Overview Hours Photocopies Assignments Readings (To be Decided) Topic: What is public policy? Website: http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~myildiz/. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

LECTURE 1Readings: Parsons, pp. xv-xviii, 1-

16;Goldhamer, p. 7-27.

Page 2: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Agenda Course Overview

Hours Photocopies Assignments Readings (To be Decided)

Topic: What is public policy? Website:

http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~myildiz/

Page 3: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

GoldhamerHistorical Background: WHY

Good decision-making dominates material force “Information is power”

Ruler as a lonely and isolated (wo)man Providing political wisdom and moral

instruction The leaders’ dependance on advisors

Especially when they are young & inexperienced

Page 4: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Historical Background: WHAT

The Advisor Definition

No well-established meaning Not strictly defined by law or custom Teaching kings what to do and what not to do

Great variety of roles Friend, educator, conscience, eyes & ears,

executor...

Page 5: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Historical Background:WHO

Man of religion as moral and political advisors

Separation of the favorite & mistress from the advisor Clashes between these groups

Today, the mass media become the critics and admonishers of political leaders

Page 6: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Historical Background: HOW Tasks of the Advisor

1. Advising on specific problems of public policy

2. Educating the leader in a way to improve his/her own judgement and knowledge

3. Criticizing the leader’s own ideas and plans

Page 7: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Historical Background: HOW The word “wazir” derives from the

words “help”and “load” (Ibn Khaldun) Help carry the rulers’ burdens Close personal relationship with the ruler

Oral and/or Written Advice E.g. “Mirrors of Kings”: Books of Instruction

Need for governing information Advisors may filter and interpret information

reaching the political leader Establishment of spy networks

Page 8: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

ParsonsPublic Policy Studies Interdisciplinary (multi-disciplinary)

Integrates knowledge from different disciplines Public adm., political science, sociology, psychology,

economics & management Multi-method

Qualitative and quantitative Problem-focused, action-oriented

Analyzes public choices & decision-making We expect governments to have policy

Page 9: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

What is public policy? Focuses on the public & its

problems What governments do, why they do it

& what difference it makes? How issues & problems are defined &

constructed How they are placed on the political &

policy agenda

Page 10: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

PUBLIC POLICY FRAMEWORK What is a public?

The idea of public policy presupposes that “ there is a sphere or domain of life which are so designated as public, as opposed to private”.

The public comprises that dimension of human activity which is regarded as requiring governmental or social regulation or intervention, or at least, common action.

People as a whole “Res publica” in Romans: the “public thing”: Buildings,

property, funds and other physical resources involved in the performance of public office vs. “Res priva”

Public versus Private Different but related

Page 11: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Hannah Arendt’s Analysis of the Dichotomy in Greeks Public

Polis Freedom Male Equality Immortality Open

Private Household Necessity Female Inequality Mortality Closed

Page 12: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

PUBLIC Not only government units and officers

Elected, appointed and contracted Public purposes of non-governmental actors

Hospitals and schools built by private persons and firms (e.g. public-private partnerships)

Elements of civil society Member serving organizations: e.g. Political parties Public serving organizations: TEMA E.g. Reports of associations

Page 13: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

PUBLIC POLICY FRAMEWORK What distinguishes public problems?

Scale/ Bigness: Problems confronting whole populations

Complexity: Many different views and preferences

Actors: Public, Private and Civil Society Sectors; and

multiple combinations Question: How much government is

required?

Page 14: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

ACTORS OF PUBLIC POLICYPublic Sector

Civil SocietyThe Third Sector

Private Sector

Use of various combinations

• Three sectors compete & cooperate for doing public work•How much government is required? At which level?

Page 15: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Kaynak: B. Ayman Güler, http://politics.ankara.edu.tr/~bguler/kytk-semasi.pdf, (26.02.2007)

Page 16: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

YÖNETİM BİRİMLERİ (2008) Taşra Birimleri

81 İl 850 İlçe

Yerel Yönetim Birimleri 81 İl 3.000 civarı Belediye 16 Büyükşehir Belediyesi 35.000 Köy

Page 17: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

POLICY PROCESS What is it?

A cyclical problem-solving activity Analytical, legislative, budgetary and

administrative steps Why is it complicated?

Diverse population, many stakeholders Frame the issues differently

Special-interest groups; Different priorities, gridlock

How to discover the collective will in diversity?

Page 18: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

POLICY CYCLE

In the real world, there are no defined or distinct phases.

Page 19: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Different Approaches to Government Involvement

Thomas Hobbes 17th C. `Leviathan`

Adam Smith, 18th C. `The Wealth of Nations` Invisible hand

Alexis De Tocqueville, 19th C. `Democracy in America` Power of associations

Page 20: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Degree of Government Involvement in Economy

Limited Involvement Adam Smith, Wealth of

Nations Invisible hand

Government is best when it does the least

The aggregate of people’s self interests make up of the public interest

(clear distinction & well-defined boundary)

Larger Involvement Hobbes

Public order Reasons

Externalities Monopolies Imperfect Information

Some Actions Break up monopolies

Page 21: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Historical Development Woodrow Wilson (1880s)

Distinction between politics & administration Bureaucracy as a defender of public interest

Weber (Early 1900s) Bureaucratic rationality

Simon & Lindblom Irrationality & bounded-rationality

Public choice/ New Right literature Bureaucrats have distinct goals of their own The relationship between public & private is best

defined by the market & freedom of choice

Page 22: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Harm, Utility & Market Failure Criteria

The private is that sphere which did no harm to others (J. S. Mill)

The greatest happiness to the greatest number (Mill & Bentham)

The role of the state is to manage the public and its problems so as to deal with those aspects of social & economic life which markets are not capable of solving (Keynes, Roosevelt-New Deal)- 1950s to 1970s

Page 23: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

New Right After the “stagflation” of the 1970s,

beginning from the 1980s: New Right The attempt to use public policy to

promote the public interest was wrong (Hayek & Friedman)

New Right’s recipe is to expand the use of the market mechanism

New Public Management”

Page 24: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

Some reasons of why we need government intervention Externalities Public Goods Monopolies Imperfect Information

Page 25: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

PUBLIC GOODSRIVALRY NON-RIVALRY

(If one person consumes it, the amount available remains the same )

EXCLUDABLE

PRIVATE GOOD( A car)

TOLL GOODS(Cable TV)

NON- EXCLUDABLE(Non-payers cannot be excluded from the benefits )

COMMON POOL GOODS(Trees in a forest)

PUBLIC GOODS(National SecurityClean air)

Page 26: KAY 386: PUBLIC POLICY

How to “sell” policy to the public?

Policy involves creating a plausible story which secures the purposes of the policy maker.

In liberal democratic systems, political elites have to give rational reasons for what they propose or what they have done.

Claim of legitimacy