Avdelningen för vetenskapshistoria

the epistemological value of gen-erality has long been thought as con-stitutive of scientific practice. How-ever, does this mean that generality has been understood uniformly? To this question this lecture replies in the negative. The argument relies on two main examples, and also comparison between them and other cases. One of the examples is taken from the math-ematical corpus that has come down to us from ancient China. It gives us the opportunity to examine different practices of generality with respect to numbers and operations. This exam-ple raises the theoretical problem of analyzing how actors understood and practiced generality, when generality can mainly (but not only) be grasped through its effects on the mathemati-cal knowledge presented in a certain number of writings, and practices that can be restored relying on these writ-ings. The second example will take us

to 19th century Europe, inviting us to examine how actors understood and practiced generality in geometry. These examples will illustrate how one can gain a finer-grained understanding of the meanings and values actors attached to generality in scientific practice, if we focus on epistemological cultures, in a sense that will be discussed. The local approach to generality that this lecture advocates will also allow us to highlight actors’ philosophical work on generality. Bringing this work to light enables us to grasp how a philosophical work carried out in a specific mathematical context was read as such and adopted in anoth-er mathematical context, where it ena-bled practitioners to achieve major new scientific developments. In other words, the lecture illustrates how practices and understanding of generality circulate across epistemological cultures. Finally, in the two main examples examined, generality will appear as an element in

a set of epistemological values. We will conclude with a consideration of how actors appear to have understood the relationships between various episte-mological values and also the structure of these sets of values.

karine chemla, Senior Researcher at the French National Center for Scien-tific Research (CNRS), in the laboratory SPHERE (CNRS & University Paris Diderot), focuses, from a historical an-thropology viewpoint, on the relationship between mathematics and the various cultures in the context of which it is prac-ticed. Chemla co-edited recently The Oxford Handbook of Generality in Mathematics and the Sciences (with R. Chorlay and D. Rabouin, Oxford Univer-sity Press, 2016), and Cultures without culturalism: The making of scientific knowledge (with Evelyn Fox Keller, Duke University Press, 2017).

KARINE CHEMLA

Hans Rausing Lecture 201727 november kl. 18.15Lokal: Universitethuset, sal IX

The Motley Practices of Generality in Various Epistemological Cultures