Kapolei Middle SchoolSchool Improvement Team

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT TEAM

(Data Team)

John Okinaka – HSA CoordinatorKeli Silva – English-Language Arts Dept ChairBobbi-Lynn Kupihea-Char – HSA CoordinatorWendy Cabebe – Social Studies Dept Chair

Meghan Schultz – SPED Dept ChairCharles De Ville – Science Dept Chair

Teresa Gagnon – Math Dept ChairLauren Fagaragan – Elective Dept Chair

Why We Do What We Do …

•Data

•Data Team

•School Improvement Team

•KMS Reform Model

•Monitoring Formative Instruction

•SAMS - Student Academic Monitoring System

Percentage Trend in Reading Proficiency

  01-02 (30%) 02-03 (30%) 03-04 (30%) 04-05 (44%) 05-06 (44%) 06-07(44%) 07-08(58%) 08-09(58%) 09-10(58%) 10-11(72%)All Students 38% 42% 40% 45% 39% 64% 72% 76% 76% 66%Disadvantaged 29% 28% 35% 27% 28% 55% 59% 60% 62% 56%Disabled 4% 9% 7% 4% 8% 16% 23% 35% 31% 21%ELL n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aAsian/Pacific Islander 37% 39% 39% 43% 37% 65% 71% 75% 75% 65%Black n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aHispanic n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 68%Native American n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aWhite 49% 55% 34% 60% 45% 65% 74% 83% 81% 77%

Percentage Trend in Math Proficiency

  01-02 (10%) 02-03 (10%) 03-04 (10%) 04-05 (28%) 05-06 (28%) 06-07(28%) 07-08(46%) 08-09(46%) 09-10(46%) 10-11(64%)All Students 14% 11% 11% 17% 17% 29% 33% 45% 49% 45%Disadvantaged 9% 8% 8% 9% 10% 19% 26% 31% 35% 33%Disabled 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 3% 9% 16% 11% 11%ELL n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aAsian/Pacific Islander 15% 12% 10% 17% 17% 29% 33% 45% 48% 44%Black n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aHispanic n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 43%Native American n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aWhite 13% 12% 17% 24% 21% 36% 38% 48% 62% 57%

Percentage Trend in Retention Rate ( <5% )2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2011-2012

7% 7% 4% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0%

•04-05 HSA Scores: Reading 45% & Math 17%

•05-06 School Improvement Team• Focus: Articulation• Curriculum Mapping – align

curriculum to standards• Constructed Response – complex &

school-wide focus on a common formative assessment

• HSA Data – creating target groups

Data Drives Us . . .

• Proficiency Data Trends in Reading

• 06-07 Change in testing providers (Harcourt AIR)HSA scores increased from 39% to

64%

• 07-08 Accelerated Reading introducedSchool-wide Reading (AR) Time

• 08-10 HSA scores increased to 76%

• 10-11 HSA scores decreased to 66%Testing format changed, paper/pencil

onlineScheduling logistics & proficiency

option

• Proficiency Data Trends in Math

• 06-07 HSA scores increased from 17% to 29%Common Constructed ResponsesAccelerated Math introduced

• 07-08 HSA scores increased to 33%Singapore Math introduced

• 08-09 HSA scores increased to 45%Block Scheduling implementedSchool-wide Morning Math

• 09-10 HSA scores increased to 49%Progression Mapping

• 11-12 FASTT Math & Fraction Nation Implemented

KMS Data Continues to Improve Despite Challenges• 09-10 Furloughs

• HSA scores increased despite fewer instructional days

• Prioritized curriculum

• Multi Track• Less instructional days• HSA testing logistics• Multi track calendar vs. traditional school

calendar

School Improvement Team

(SIT 2.0)• 99-04 1 Curriculum Coordinator• 05-06 SIT

• 4 Core Dept Chairs• HSA Test Coordinator• Data Liaison• Focus - standards implementation

• 07 – Present• Target Groups: well below approaching• Curriculum school-wide initiatives: Literacy & Math

• SPED & Elective Dept Chairs – later included

SIT’s Responsibilities• Professional Development (Training)• Mentor• AFP• Collect & Interpret Data • School-wide Support Program Administrators (AR, Achieve3000, AM, FASTT Math & Fraction Nation)

• Curriculum Coordinators• Facilitate Articulations• Other Duties as Assigned by Administrator

KMS Reform ModelFocus on Literacy

• Vision: “Students will be enthusiastic readers who comprehend at grade level or higher”

• ALL Content Areas Focus On: Reading Skills & Strategies, Content Vocabulary, use of Thinking Maps & Text Structures

• Literacy Programs: Accelerated Reading & Achieve 3000

• Math Programs: Accelerated Math, Singapore Math, FASTT Math & Fraction Nation

• AVID – Cornell Note Taking, Inquiry

Additional ReformsAIR Quarterly Assessments

• item analysis• inter-rated scoring of CR items

DSI /Unit Bldg

Conversion to Block Schedule

Partnership with Southern Regional Educational Board’s (SREB) Making Middle Grades Work (MMGW) network

State Strategic Plan & WASC – Increase Rigor – Trained & Implemented Thinking Maps

Kapolei Middle School Data Teams Model*

Administration / School Improvement Team/ SCC•WASC Data

•SAMS (Achieve, FasttMath, Fraction Nation, Accelerated Reader, HSA)•Mentorship Program

•MMGW Data

Departments•Common Assessment Data

•Benchmark Summatives•Specific Departmental Data

•HSA•Student Grades

Grade Level Teams•HSA

•Student Readiness•Student Grades

•Student Portfolios•Intervention Effectiveness

Classroom Data •Assessment Data

•Infractions•Fraction Nation

•FasttMath•Student Grades

•AR Goals•Achieve

•HSA

Data Driven Decision Making1. Find the data2. Analyze the data in REAL time3. Prioritize needs analysis- 4. Set, review, or revise annual goals- 5. Identify specific strategies 6. Determine results indicators:

Data Teams1. Collect and chart data.2. Analyze data and prioritize needs.3. Set, review, and revise incremental SMART Goals.4. Select common instructional strategies.5. Determine results indicators.6. Monitor and evaluate results.

What do we as a system need to do to leave no child behind?

What do we need to do collaboratively to help our school meet

its goals?

What do I need to do with my kids to

help my team meet its goal?

Where do we as a school need to focus our time, energy and resources to help our school meet its goal?

*For details refer to the KMS Data Team Model Table.

MonitoringFormative Instruction

HSA Student Plan for ImprovementSAMS (Student Academic Monitoring System)

All StudentsNot Met 66% Met 73%

Disadvantaged Not Met 56% Met 63%

Disabled (SPED) Not Met 21% Not Met 23%

Limited English (ELL) n/a n/a

Asian/Pacific Islander Not Met 65% Met 70%

Black n/a n/a

Hispanic Not Met 68% Met 85%

Native American n/a n/a

White Met 77% Met 85%

SY 2010-2011(72%) SY 2011-2012 (72%)

READING

MATH

All Students Not Met 45% Met 51%

Disadvantaged Not Met 33% Met 43%

Disabled (SPED) Not Met 11% Not Met 10%

Limited English (ELL) n/a n/a

Asian/Pacific Islander Not Met 44% Met 50%

Black n/a n/a

Hispanic Not Met 43% Met 44%

Native American n/a n/a

White Not Met 57% Met 60%

SY 2010-2011 (64%) SY 2011-2012 (64%)

Mahalo