21
KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION Externalities in Benefit Cost Tests

Kansas corporation commission

  • Upload
    hammer

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Kansas corporation commission. Externalities in Benefit Cost Tests. EXTERNALITIES: DRAWING THE LINES. External to What? Changing Notions of Insult/Value Assessing Damages Assigning Costs. WATER. (LESS) WATER. AIR. CLIMATE. HEALTH. Concerns Asthma Stroke Heart Attack Lung Disease - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Kansas corporation commission

KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION

Externalities in Benefit Cost Tests

Page 2: Kansas corporation commission

EXTERNALITIES: DRAWING THE LINES External to What? Changing Notions of Insult/Value Assessing Damages Assigning Costs

Adapted from Koomey and Krause, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1997

Page 3: Kansas corporation commission
Page 4: Kansas corporation commission

WATER

Source: USGS Circular 1268, March 2004

Page 5: Kansas corporation commission

(LESS) WATER

Source: NOAA

Page 6: Kansas corporation commission

AIR

Source: Brian McLean, U.S. EPA, "Experience with Cap-and-Trade Programs"

Page 7: Kansas corporation commission

CLIMATE

Slide from Jon Anda, President of Environmental Markets Network

Page 8: Kansas corporation commission

HEALTH

Concerns Asthma Stroke Heart Attack Lung Disease Mercury Poisoning (especially in utero) Insect-borne Disease (changing pathogen

vectors)

CDC, ALA, ACS, EPA, Harvard School of Public Health

Page 9: Kansas corporation commission

IT’S NOT ZERO…

WHAT’S THE RIGHT COST?

Page 10: Kansas corporation commission

EXTERNAL TO WHAT?

STAGES OF ENERGY SOURCES (“INTERNAL”) Exploration/Evaluation Harvesting Processing/Refining Transportation/Distribution Storage Conversion (electric generation) Marketing End UseHoldren, John P., "Energy and Human Environment: The Generation and Definition of

Environmental Problems," in Goodman, Kristoferson, Hollander: Academic Press.

Page 11: Kansas corporation commission

EXTERNAL TO WHAT?

PHASES WITHIN A STAGE Research Development/Demonstration Commercial Construction Operation and Maintenance Dismantling Management of Long-Lived Wastes Environmental Controls Regulation and Monitoring

Holdren, John P., "Energy and Human Environment: The Generation and Definition of Environmental Problems," in Goodman, Kristoferson, Hollander: Academic Press.

Page 12: Kansas corporation commission

INSULTS

To Physical Health and Human Environment Resources Used (land, water, energy) Material Effluents (Nox, SO2, CO2) Other Physical Transformations (dredging) Socio-political Influences (politics,

employment)

Holdren, John P., "Energy and Human Environment: The Generation and Definition of Environmental Problems," in Goodman, Kristoferson, Hollander: Academic Press.

Page 13: Kansas corporation commission

PATHWAYS

Convert Insults to Stresses Media (air, water, ice, soil, rock, biota) Processes (evaporation, diffusion,

conduction)

Holdren, John P., "Energy and Human Environment: The Generation and Definition of Environmental Problems," in Goodman, Kristoferson, Hollander: Academic Press.

Page 14: Kansas corporation commission

STRESSES

Physical or Social Consequences of Insults Magnitudes of Consequences Temporal Distribution of Harm Spatial Distribution of Harm Coincidence of Risks and Benefits Scaling (linear or nonlinear) Resistance to Remedy Irreversibility Visibility of Harm

Holdren, John P., "Energy and Human Environment: The Generation and Definition of Environmental Problems," in Goodman, Kristoferson, Hollander: Academic Press.

Page 15: Kansas corporation commission

DOING THE MATH

EC= EF x HR x VED

EC = Externality Cost in ¢/kWhEF = Emission Factor, in lbs/Btu of fuel

consumedHR = Heat Rate of power plant, in Btus/kWhVED = Value of Environmental Damage, in ¢/lb

Page 16: Kansas corporation commission

PITFALLS IN ANALYSIS

Inconsistent Boundaries Average v. Marginal Comparisons Illusory Precision Stochasticity “What’s Countable v. What Counts”

Page 17: Kansas corporation commission

IMPLICATIONS FOR BENEFIT/COST Estimating value of externalities

challenging and not strictly necessary Societal Cost Test problematic Total Resource Cost Test more

conservative and, at this time, sensible Many states have years of experience,

results Ratepayer Impact Measure: Would new

generation withstand this test? Emphasis on lower bills

Page 18: Kansas corporation commission

EFFICIENCY AS A RESOURCE

Efficiency is properly treated AS new generation assuming: Verified, permanent reductions Performance standards

Reasonable savings estimates: Years of empirical savings data by program is available

Ratio of benefits:costs – 2:1 or even 3:1 has been achieved elsewhere As long as efficiency is the least cost

resource, it should be pursued

Page 19: Kansas corporation commission

If we choose not to provide incentives for investor-owned utilities that, added to avoided costs, rival ROI for new generation, then we need to look closely at the following map:

Perverse Incentives

Page 20: Kansas corporation commission

STATES WITH PUBLIC BENEFIT FUNDS

Page 21: Kansas corporation commission

Nancy Jackson Executive Director jackson@climateandene

rgy.org (785) 331-8743 www.climateandenergy.o

rg