9
K-T Points Design Choices

K-T Points Design Choices

  • Upload
    aspen

  • View
    30

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

K-T Points Design Choices. Scan Parameters. Phantom @7T, sagittal 2D 64x64 B-S B1 map 5mm slice resolution Ran many iterations of kzfast3d_1ch.m to explore the design space and its predicted output B1 B0 inhomogeneity is ignored. Design Requirements. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: K-T Points Design Choices

K-T Points Design Choices

Page 2: K-T Points Design Choices

Scan Parameters

• Phantom @7T, sagittal• 2D 64x64 B-S B1 map• 5mm slice resolution• Ran many iterations of kzfast3d_1ch.m to

explore the design space and its predicted output B1

• B0 inhomogeneity is ignored

Page 3: K-T Points Design Choices

Design Requirements

• Choose parameters that has best uniformity given these constraints:– TR < 5ms– Max FA >= 60 deg.– SAR, need to figure out how to relate computed

RF power to this

Page 4: K-T Points Design Choices

Partial Dependence on # Subpulses and RF Power Penalty

Page 5: K-T Points Design Choices

Questions

• What is the criterion used for uniformity?• Given a # of subpulses and their width, should

the error criterion be monotonically increasing with greater RF penalty?– Will always be achieving less uniformity, so 1st

term is always increasing, can weighted RF power term be any smaller with a change in penalty?

Page 6: K-T Points Design Choices

Partial Dependence on Subpulse Width and RF Power Penalty

Page 7: K-T Points Design Choices

Partial Dependence on # Subpulses and Subpulse Width

Page 8: K-T Points Design Choices

# Subpulses vs. RF Power Penalty with Subpulse Width changing in time

Page 9: K-T Points Design Choices

Conclusions

• 12-18 subpulses• 1-7 RF penalty• 0.12-0.2 ms subpulse width, but depends on

B0