9
Ɉɛɪɚɛɨɬɤɚ ɤɨɧɫɬɪɭɤɰɢɨɧɧɵɯ ɦɚɬɟɪɢɚɥɨɜ ɜ ɦɚɲɢɧɨɫɬɪɨɟɧɢɢ 315 ɋɩɢɫɨɤ ɥɢɬɟɪɚɬɭɪɵ 1. Ƚɪɚɧɨɜɫɤɢɣ Ƚ. ɂ. Ɋɟɡɚɧɢɟ ɦɟɬɚɥɥɨɜ. Ɇ.: ȼɵɫɲɚɹ ɲɤɨɥɚ. 1985. 304 ɫ. 2. Ȼɟɡɴɹɡɵɱɧɵɣ ȼ. Ɏ. Ⱥɜɟɪɶɹɧɨɜ ɂ. ɇ. Ʉɨɪɞɸɤɨɜ Ⱥ. ȼ. Ɋɚɫɱɟɬ ɪɟ- ɠɢɦɨɜ ɪɟɡɚɧɢɹ: ɭɱɟɛ. ɩɨɫɨɛɢɟ. Ɋɵɛɢɧɫɤ, 2009, 185 ɫ. 3. ɀɦɭɪɢɧ ȼ. ȼ., ɋɚɥɶɧɢɤɨɜ ȼ. ɋ. ɗɧɟɪɝɟɬɢɱɟɫɤɢɣ ɤɪɢɬɟɪɢɣ ɨɰɟɧɤɢ ɷɮɮɟɤɬɢɜɧɨɫɬɢ ɪɟɠɢɦɨɜ ɪɟɡɚɧɢɹ // Ɏɭɧɞɚɦɟɧɬɚɥɶɧɵɟ ɢ ɩɪɢɤɥɚɞɧɵɟ ɩɪɨ- ɛɥɟɦɵ ɬɟɯɧɢɤɢ ɢ ɬɟɯɧɨɥɨɝɢɢ. 2010. ʋ 2. ɋ. 114—120. V. Zhmurin, V. Salnikov CRITERIA OF THE ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENCY OF PROCESS OF CUTTING The criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the cutting is discussed. The detailed analysis of each criterion is presented. The criterion of evaluation, which allowed fast correct cutting data, according to data collected from the control program CNC machine is pro- posed. Key words: high speed milling, the evaluation criteria of the cutting conditions, in- crease productivity, economic criteria, weight the criteria, energy criteria, limiting factors. ɉɨɥɭɱɟɧɨ 12.11.10 ɍȾɄ 658.562:001.893 ɋ. ȼ. Ɍɭɥɶɱɟɜ, ɝɥ. ɬɟɯɧɨɥɨɝ (48753)46675, [email protected] Ɋɨɫɫɢɹ, Ⱥɥɟɤɫɢɧ, ɈȺɈ «Ɍɹɠɩɪɨɦɚɪɦɚɬɭɪɚ»), Ɉ. Ⱥ. əɦɧɢɤɨɜɚ, ɞɪ ɬɟɯɧ. ɧɚɭɤ, ɩɪɨɮ., [email protected] , Ⱥ. ɇ. ɂɧɨɡɟɦɰɟɜ, ɞɪ ɬɟɯɧ. ɧɚɭɤ, ɩɪɨɮ., (84872) 35-18-87, [email protected] Ɋɨɫɫɢɹ, Ɍɭɥɚ, ɌɭɥȽɍ) ɄɈɆɉɅȿɄɋɇȺə ɈɐȿɇɄȺ ɌȿɏɇɈɅɈȽɂɑɇɈɋɌɂ ȾȿɌȺɅȿɃ ɌɂɉȺ «ȼȺɅ» Ɋɚɫɫɦɚɬɪɢɜɚɟɬɫɹ ɩɨɜɵɲɟɧɢɟ ɤɚɱɟɫɬɜɚ ɤɨɧɫɬɪɭɤɬɨɪɫɤɢɯ ɩɪɨɟɤɬɧɵɯ ɪɟɲɟɧɢɣ ɜ ɦɚɲɢɧɨɫɬɪɨɟɧɢɢ ɧɚ ɨɫɧɨɜɟ ɩɪɨɜɟɞɟɧɢɹ ɤɨɦɩɥɟɤɫɧɨɣ ɤɜɚɥɢɦɟɬɪɢɱɟɫɤɨɣ ɨɰɟɧɤɢ ɬɟɯ- ɧɨɥɨɝɢɱɧɨɫɬɢ ɞɟɬɚɥɢ ɬɢɩɚ "ɜɚɥ", ɭɱɢɬɵɜɚɸɳɟɣ ɫɟɛɟɫɬɨɢɦɨɫɬɶ, ɬɪɭɞɨɟɦɤɨɫɬɶ, ɤɨɧ- ɫɬɪɭɤɬɨɪɫɤɭɸ ɢ ɬɟɯɧɨɥɨɝɢɱɟɫɤɭɸ ɭɧɢɮɢɤɚɰɢɸ ɷɥɟɦɟɧɬɨɜ ɞɟɬɚɥɢ. Ʉɥɸɱɟɜɵɟ ɫɥɨɜɚ: ɬɟɯɧɨɥɨɝɢɱɧɨɫɬɶ, ɬɪɭɞɨɟɦɤɨɫɬɶ, ɭɧɢɮɢɤɚɰɢɹ, ɩɪɨɟɤɬɢɪɨɜɚ- ɧɢɟ, ɜɚɥ. Ɉɛɟɫɩɟɱɟɧɢɟ ɬɟɯɧɨɥɨɝɢɱɧɨɫɬɢ ɤɨɧɫɬɪɭɤɰɢɢ ɢɡɞɟɥɢɹ ɧɚ ɷɬɚɩɟ ɩɪɨ- ɟɤɬɢɪɨɜɚɧɢɹ ɡɧɚɱɢɬɟɥɶɧɚɹ ɢ ɜ ɬɨ ɠɟ ɜɪɟɦɹ ɧɚɢɛɨɥɟɟ ɫɥɨɠɧɚɹ ɡɚɞɚɱɚ ɤɨɧ- ɫɬɪɭɤɬɨɪɚ. ȿɫɥɢ ɫɨɨɬɜɟɬɫɬɜɢɟ ɩɪɨɟɤɬɚ ɦɚɲɢɧɵ ɡɚɞɚɧɧɨɦɭ ɮɭɧɤɰɢɨɧɚɥɶ- ɧɨɦɭ ɧɚɡɧɚɱɟɧɢɸ ɥɟɝɤɨ ɨɰɟɧɢɬɶ ɨɛɴɟɤɬɢɜɧɵɦɢ ɱɢɫɥɟɧɧɵɦɢ ɩɨɤɚɡɚɬɟɥɹɦɢ, ɬɨ ɬɚɤɨɟ ɫɥɨɠɧɨɟ ɢ ɦɧɨɝɨɮɚɤɬɨɪɧɨɟ ɩɨɧɹɬɢɟ, ɤɚɤ «ɬɟɯɧɨɥɨɝɢɱɧɨɫɬɶ», ɜɟɫɶɦɚ ɡɚɬɪɭɞɧɢɬɟɥɶɧɨ ɨɰɟɧɢɬɶ ɤɨɥɢɱɟɫɬɜɟɧɧɨ. Ɉɬɫɭɬɫɬɜɢɟ ɨɛɳɟɩɪɢɧɹɬɵɯ

K i b k h d e b l j Z l m j u F.: . 1985. · \ _ k v f Z a Z l j m ^ g b l _ e v g h h p _ g b l v d h e b q _ k l \ _ g g h. H l k m l k l \ b _ h [ s _ i j b g y l u o B a \ _ k

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

315

1. . . . .: . 1985.304 .

2. . . . . . . -: . . , 2009, 185 .

3. . ., . . // -

. 2010. 2. . 114—120.

V. Zhmurin, V. SalnikovCRITERIA OF THE ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENCY OF PROCESS OF CUTTINGThe criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the cutting is discussed. The detailed

analysis of each criterion is presented. The criterion of evaluation, which allowed fast correctcutting data, according to data collected from the control program CNC machine is pro-posed.

Key words: high speed milling, the evaluation criteria of the cutting conditions, in-crease productivity, economic criteria, weight the criteria, energy criteria, limiting factors.

12.11.10

658.562:001.893. . , . (48753)46675, [email protected]

, , « »),. . , . , ., [email protected],. . , . , ., (84872) 35-18-87, [email protected]

, , )

« »

- " ", , , -

.: , , , -

, .

- – -

. -,

, « »,.

. . 2011. . 3

316

--

( ) -.

, ( -, , , , -

) kN . -

N ., , ,

, , -

. 14.201–83 " -

" , .

, . --

: C , k k .

31

32 kkN . (1)

2/3 1/3 -, 14.201–83 , -

.

. :

TCCC , (2)

C , - (, ),

" " , -, -

, -Ra :

n

j

jjlnlRa

Ra1

, (3)

317

jRa – j ; jl – j -; n – ; l –

. [1]:

,100/1 'p KkTC (4)

T[2]:

1ktRaSMT

n

i

ci

bi

ai

y , (5)

- , ; p –, ;

– , ; 'K – ,%; n – ( );k – , ; M –

, ; iS – i , 2;

iRa – i , ; it – i, ; n – ; a , b , c , y –

, -.

. k

in

ik

nk

1i

1 , (6)

n - ;i

k - -i ,

( , ):

:

,,0,06,1,25,0

,12,1,5,0

,25,1,75,0

,6,1,1

iN

i

Ni

Ni

Ni

D

D

D

D

k (7)

. . 2011. . 3

318

:,,0

,22,5,0,12,1

i AA

k i

i(8)

i – ; 2,1 AA – 8593 – 81. (1,6; 1,25…)

8032-84. ( ,

, ) . ,

1i

k , - 0i

k . [3] ,

-, -

. , -

:n

jiji n 1

1 , (9)

.,1,%5,0

ij

, , -, (45 % -

) . -

-, . , -

-.

, – -.

, -) M . -

M . k -k k :

319

kkk . (10)

-,

.,

, , .

.-

.

( , , , , , ,

) . - ( , LD ) i

i

i

k

jj

id

kD

1

1 ,i

i

k

jj

iL

kL

1

1 , (11)

i – ; ik – -, i ;

ii ld , – j .i

ld , d ( LD, ) :

22min lLdDi iii. (12)

, .

: ; -; ; -

( . 1-3). 0,84,

.-

– , .

. . 2011. . 3

320

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

.1. (Nk=0,318)

321

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

. 2. (Nk=0,238)

. . 2011. . 3

322

00,050,1

0,150,2

0,250,3

0,350,4

0,45

. 3. (Nk=0,175)

323

, - « ».

1. : .. . .: , 1990.

2. . ., . . -

// .2006. 1. . 22-25.

3. . . - [ ]: . . /

. . . . , 2004. URL:http://graphpowernstu.ru/wolchin/umm/eskd/index.htm. . 0320400632.

S. Tulchev, O. Jamnikova, A. InozemtsevINTEGRATED MANUFACTURABILITY ESTIMATION OF A SHAFT CLASS

PART'SThe article deals with engineering solution quality increase in machine building in-

dustry on base of the qualimetric estimation of a shaft class part's manufacturability, thatconsidering the cost, the manufacturing content, engineering and technological unification ofthe part' elements.

Key words: manufacturability, manufacturing content, unification, engineering,shaft.

07.12.10