Jurnal Arie Suseno Dr Eny

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/26/2019 Jurnal Arie Suseno Dr Eny

    1/7

    Professional Med J 2015;22(10): 1298-1303. www.theprofesional.com

    GESTATIONAL DIABETES

    1298

    The Professional Medical Journal

    www.theprofesional.com

    GESTATIONAL DIABETES;TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF METFORMIN WITH INSULIN INDIABETES MELLITUS IN TERMS OF FETOMATERNAL OUTCOME

    Tayyaba Majeed1, Rabia Adnan2, Irum Mubshar3, Hamis Mahmood4, Kanwal Saba5,

    Sardar Fakhar Imam6, Muhammad Al-Fareed Zafar7, Mulazim Hussain Bukhari8

    ORIGINAL PROF-3019

    ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare the efcacy of Metformin with insulin in gestationaldiabetes mellitus in terms of fetomaternal outcome. Study Deign: Randomized clinical

    trial study. Setting: Lady Aitchison Hospital Lahore. Period:January 2014 to March 2015.Methodology: Total 500 pregnant females with GDM were included in the study through non-probability, consecutive sampling. Patients were divided into 2 equal groups (A: B). Patientsin group A were given tablet metformin 500 mg by oral route and group B was administratedregular injection Insulin by subcutaneous route. Results: The mean age of females was32.146.13 years. The mean gestational age was 31.073.8 weeks. There were 78 (15.6%)females who had 0 parity, 107 (21.4%) females had parity 1, 175 (35%) females had parity2, 95 (19%) females had parity 3, 33 (6.6%) females had parity 4 and 12 (2.4%) females

    had parity 5.There were 54 (10.8%) cases had PTB, out of which 12 (4.8%) had PTB withmetformin while 42 (16.8%) had PTB with insulin. There were 115 (23%) neonates requiredNICU admission, out of which 37 (14.8%) neonates with metforminand78 (31.2%) neonateswith insulin. There were 87 (17%) neonates who had neonatal hypoglycemia, out of which23 (9.2%) neonates with metformin and64 (25.6%) neonates with insulin. The difference wassignicant between both groups for all fetal outcomes (P

  • 7/26/2019 Jurnal Arie Suseno Dr Eny

    2/7

    Professional Med J 2015;22(10): 1298-1303. www.theprofesional.com

    GESTATIONAL DIABETES

    1299

    2

    decrease the incidence of fetomaternal complica-tions. The previous study has shown thataggres-sive management in women with GDMreduced

    birth weight and macrosomia in infants borntomothers who were exposed to the interventioncompared with women who had received routine

    care.6

    Therefore, measures such as dietary modi-cation, exercise, oral hypoglycemic agents, andinsulin are imperative to reduce the complica-

    tions.7

    When the above-mentioned measures do notfulll the criteria to control blood glucose levelsin pregnant women, the use of subcutaneous in-

    sulin therapy is the standard approach for man-agement of GDM.8,9,10 However, insulin use hasits own set of problems including multiple daily

    injections, the risk of hypoglycemia and maternalweight gain.11 It needs to be altered dependingon the patients weight and height, glucose lev-

    els and activity levels.12

    The issues relating to pa-

    tients education and compliance as well as the

    cost of insulin should be considered. These ar-

    guments place oral hypoglycemic therapy intofavors for women with GDM,.13 However, it isimportant to take into account fetomaternal im-

    pact of oral hypoglycemic agentsfor the womenwith GDM. Metformin, which is used for T2D, is

    a foremost choice. Metformin has been found tohave a transplacental transfer rate of 1016%14,15this raises possible concerns about risks of fetal

    anomalies, and undesirable effects for mothersand the newborns after delivery limiting its role

    The safety and use of Metformin in pregnan-cy is under consideration. But the inferencesdrawn from variety of trials, which are underpow-

    ered,16,17,18,19 lack the ability to dene the relativerisks and benets ofmetformin for GDM.

    The rationale of this study was to compare theefcacy of metformin with insulin in terms of feto-maternal outcome in gestational diabetes melli-

    tus. There is variability in the literature that is pub-lished internationally. The study results may ormay not differ from international data due to poor

    compliance and genetic variation from patient topatient, in the light of which new suggestions will

    be made for the liberal use of metformin in popu-

    lation and to minimize the use of parenteral ther-apy (insulin).

    OBJECTIVE

    To compare the outcome of Metformin with insulin

    in gestational diabetes mellitus.

    PATIENTS AND METHODS

    This randomized controlled trial study was carriedout on 500 pregnant women with GDM admitted

    in the antenatal ward of Lady Aitchison Hospitalfrom Jan 2014 to March 2015. Written informed

    consent was obtained. The women were included

    in the study through non-probability, consecutivesampling.

    Demographic information on all variables includ-ed; patients age, gestational age, body mass in-dex and maternal weight gain during pregnancy

    were noted. The patients were divided in to twoequal groups (A & B) by randomization. Patientsin the group A were given tablet metformin 500mg

    by oral route and group B was administrated in-jection regular insulin by subcutaneous route.Maternal BSL (2 levels i.e. BSF, 1 hour post pran-

    dial) were done hospital laboratory until deliveryand dose of metformin and insulin was adjusted

    according to BSL. Fetal monitoring was done byultrasound in the third trimester for fetal weightevaluation. The women between 20-45 years of

    age and GDM, gestational more than 20 weekswere included in the study and women who wereknown diabetic, with history of recent myocardi-

    al infarction and twin pregnancy were excludedfrom the study.

    The women were evaluated for outcome measureswhich were Preterm delivery (It will be consideredif birth is at

  • 7/26/2019 Jurnal Arie Suseno Dr Eny

    3/7

    Professional Med J 2015;22(10): 1298-1303. www.theprofesional.com

    GESTATIONAL DIABETES

    1300

    3

    RESULTSWe conducted this trial with 500 females includ-ed in the study with the mean age of 32.146.13

    years. The mean gestational age was 31.073.8weeks 24-38weeks). There were 78 (15.6%) fe-males who had 0 parity, 107 (21.4%) females had

    parity 1, 175 (35%) females had parity 2, 95 (19%)females had parity 3, 33 (6.6%) females had pari-

    ty 4 and 12 (2.4%) females had parity 5.

    The mean weight of females before treatment

    was 70.1810.96 kg, which was increased to73.1411.49 kg after treatment. The overall meanchange in weight of females was 2.961.90kg.

    There were 114 (22.8%) females had normal BMI,213 (42.6%) were overweight and 173 (34.6%)

    were obese.

    With metformin, the mean weight of females be-fore treatment was 69.6210.93kg, which was

    increased to 72.0511.73 kg after treatment,with the mean weight change of 2.441.81kg. With insulin, the mean weight of females

    was 70.7510.98kg, which was increased to74.2411.16 kg, with the mean weight change of

    3.491.84 kg. Thus after treatment the differencewas signicant (P

  • 7/26/2019 Jurnal Arie Suseno Dr Eny

    4/7

    Professional Med J 2015;22(10): 1298-1303. www.theprofesional.com

    GESTATIONAL DIABETES

    1301

    Study groupTotal

    Metformin Insulin

    Neonatalhypoglycemia

    Yes23

    (9.2%)64

    (25.6%)87

    (17%)

    No227

    (90.8%)186

    (74.4%)413

    (83%)

    Total250

    (100%)250

    (100%)500

    (100%)

    Table-III. (Comparison of neonatal hypoglycemia)

    DISCUSSIONIn this trial we observed that the mean age of32.146.13 years. The mean gestational age

    was 31.073.8 weeks 24-38weeks). There were78 (15.6%) females who had 0 parity, 107 (21.4%)

    females had parity 1, 175 (35%) females had par-

    ity 2, 95 (19%) females had parity 3, 33 (6.6%)females had parity 4 and 12 (2.4%) females had

    parity 5.

    The mean weight of females before treatment

    was 70.1810.96 kg, which was increased to73.1411.49 kg after treatment. The overall meanchange in weight of females was 2.961.90kg.

    There were 114 (22.8%) females had normal BMI,213 (42.6%) were overweight and 173 (34.6%)

    were obese.

    With metformin, the mean weight of females be-fore treatment was 69.6210.93kg, which was

    increased to 72.0511.73 kg after treatment,with the mean weight change of 2.441.81

    kg. With insulin, the mean weight of femaleswas 70.7510.98kg which was increased to74.2411.16 kg, with the mean weight change

    of 3.491.84 kg. Thus after treatment the differ-

    ence was signicant (P

  • 7/26/2019 Jurnal Arie Suseno Dr Eny

    5/7

    Professional Med J 2015;22(10): 1298-1303. www.theprofesional.com

    GESTATIONAL DIABETES

    1302

    5

    obtained as signicant (P

  • 7/26/2019 Jurnal Arie Suseno Dr Eny

    6/7

    Professional Med J 2015;22(10): 1298-1303. www.theprofesional.com

    GESTATIONAL DIABETES

    1303

    6

    Ebeling T, et al. (2011)Metformin should be consid-ered in the treatment of gestational diabetes: apro-spective randomised study.BJOG 118: 880885.

    14. Nanovskaya TN, Nekhayeva IA, Patrikeeva SL, HankinsGD, Ahmed MS(2006) Transfer of metformin acrossthe dually perfused human placental lobule.Am J Ob-stet Gynecol 195: 10811085.

    15. Kovo M, Haroutiunian S, Feldman N, Hoffman A, Glezer-man M (2008)Determination of metformin transferacross the human placenta using a duallyperfusedex vivo placental cotyledon model.Eur J Obstet Gy-necol Reprod Biol136: 2933.

    16. Tertti K, Ekblad U, Vahlberg T, Ronnemaa T (2008) Com-parison of metforminand insulin in the treatment ofgestational diabetes: a retrospective, case-controls-tudy.Rev Diabet Stud 5: 95101.

    17. Balani J, Hyer SL, Rodin DA, Shehata H (2009) Preg-

    nancy outcomes in womenwith gestational diabetestreated with metformin or insulin: a case-controlstudy.Diabet Med 26: 798802.

    18. Goh JE, Sadler L, Rowan J (2011) Metformin for gesta-tional diabetes in routineclinical practice.Diabet Med

    28: 10821087.

    19. Rai L, Meenakshi D, Kamath A (2009) Metformina con-venient alternative toinsulin for Indian women withdiabetes in pregnancy.Indian J Med Sci 63: 491497.

    20. Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP.

    Metformin versus Insulin for the treatment of gesta-tional diabetes.N Engl J Med.2008;358(19):2003-15.

    21. Balsells M, Garca-Patterson A, Sol I, Roqu M, Gich I,Corcoy R. Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin forthe treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematicreview and meta-analysis.BMJ. 2015;350:h102.

    22. Hughes R, Rowan J. Pregnancy in women with Type 2diabetes: who takes metformin and what is the out-come? Diabetic medicine.2006;23(3):318-22.

    23. Niromanesh S, Alavi A, Sharbaf F, Amjadi N, Moosa-vi S, Akbari S. Metformin compared with insulin inthe management of gestational diabetes mellitus:A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res clin Pract2012;98:422-429.

    24. Mesdaghinia E, Samimi M, Homaei Z, Saberi F, Moosa-vi S, Yaribakht M. Comparison of newborn outcomesin women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated

    with metformin of insulin: A randomized blinded tri-al.Int J Prev Med 2013;4:327-333.

    25. Spaulonci C, Bernardes L, Trindade T, Zugaib M, Fran-cisco R. Randomized trial of metformin vs insulin inthe management of gestational diabetes.Am J Obst

    Gynecol 2013;208: Mar 21. pii: S0002- 9378(13)00296-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.022. [Epub ahead of print

    26. G Juan, L Qing, F Ling. Metformin vs Insulin in man-agement of gestational diabetese: a meta anal-ysis.PLoS ONE 8(5): e64585. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064585

    AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTION DECLARATION

    Sr. # Author-s Full Name Contribution to the paper Author=s Signature

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    Tayyaba Majeed

    Rabia Adnan

    Irum Majeed

    Hamis Mahmood

    Kanwal Saba

    Sardar Fakhar Imam

    Muhammad Al-Fareed Zafar

    Mulazim Hussain Bukhari

    Principal researcher and

    collection of data

    Designed the researchProtocol

    Helped in designing the

    research protocolGive the computer help

    Did the statistical analysis

    Helped is weiting andnalizing the manuscriptHelped is weiting andnalizing the manuscriptSupervised the research

  • 7/26/2019 Jurnal Arie Suseno Dr Eny

    7/7

    C o p y r i g h t o f P r o f e s s i o n a l M e d i c a l J o u r n a l i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f P r o f e s s i o n a l M e d i c a l J o u r n a l a n d

    i t s c o n t e n t m a y n o t b e c o p i e d o r e m a i l e d t o m u l t i p l e s i t e s o r p o s t e d t o a l i s t s e r v w i t h o u t t h e

    c o p y r i g h t h o l d e r ' s e x p r e s s w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n . H o w e v e r , u s e r s m a y p r i n t , d o w n l o a d , o r e m a i l

    a r t i c l e s f o r i n d i v i d u a l u s e .