Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Combating the nurse shortage
Market-savvy healthcare organizations have imple-
mented workforce development strategies to address the
existing and projected labor shortages. This helps organi-
zations determine where their strategic priorities lie. The
recent economic downturn will have lasting effects.
The recession, which officially started in December
2007, has affected the job market. Picture the current
state of the nursing shortage as a tsunami. The first thing
that happens in a tsunami is that the water on the beach
rushes away from the shore.
Nurses are filling current vacant positions en masse.
Nurses who had planned to retire, work only part-time,
or reduce their hours find they have had to change
their plans. They are staying and taking on full-time,
rather than part-time, positions (Buerhaus, 2009).
“As RN spouses lost their jobs (70% of RNs are mar-
ried) or wor-
ried that they
might be laid off,
many non-work-
ing RNs rejoined
the workforce”
(Buerhaus).
With RN va-
cancies being filled at an exceptional rate, organizations
might have an urge to ease their recruitment and reten-
tion efforts. This is exactly the wrong strategy to take.
As the economy begins to adjust, the tidal wave will
hit. The impact of the tsunami wave depends on how
quickly the economy recovers.
Organizations can’t
afford to simply react to
the workforce shortage.
Instead, they must take
steps to reduce the effects
of the shortage on their
organization.
> continued on p. 2
IN THIS ISSUE
p. 3 Best practiceExamine missed opportunities for rapid response by looking at one facility’s story of improving its rapid response team process.
p. 5 Patient safetyDiscover how interpreters can help overcome linguistic and cultural barriers.
p. 7 Transformational leadershipUnderstand how a blog can help strengthen the communication between CNOs and their staff.
p. 9 Hand hygieneLearn from two facilities that share their approach to improving hand hygiene compliance through spies, marketing, and monetary incentives, raising rates as high as 98%.
p. 12 Tip of the monthDevelop realistic goals while promoting performance excellence.
S t r a t e g i e sJune 2010 Vol. 10, No. 6
After reading this article, you will be able to:
➤ Discuss ways organizations can combat the RN
shortage
We’re seeking experts for books, audio conferences, and seminars
Writing books and articles for publication or speaking
on audio conferences, Webcasts, and at seminars are great
ways to share your industry knowledge with peers.
With the guidance of a solid publishing company, you’ll
see your thoughts and tips become beacons to others in
your field.
We’re always looking for new authors, speakers, and re-
viewers. For more than 20 years, HCPro has been a leading
provider of integrated healthcare information, education,
training, and consulting products.
Contact me at [email protected] and let me know your
areas of expertise and interests in nursing.
—Sincerely,
Sarah Kearns
Editorial Assistant
Page 2 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com June 2010
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Nurse shortage < continued from p. 1
If the economy recovers quickly, jobs will be rapid-
ly added back to the market. Many nurses who had to
come back to work or work more hours to supplement
the family income will leave the job market (Buerhaus).
Nurses who postponed retirement may stay in the mar-
ket a little longer than anticipated to rebuild their retire-
ment incomes, but they will also leave (Buerhaus).
What about the new graduates coming out of nursing
school? In a down economic climate, employers are able
to be more selective when posting positions.
When employers were faced with a lack of experi-
enced nurses applying for jobs in specialty areas (e.g.,
emergency room or neonatal ICUs), they had no choice
but to take on new graduate nurses (Clavreul, 2009).
If the economy recovers at a slower pace, nurses will
not leave the workforce. This means that new graduates
will continue to have difficulty finding jobs unless they
are willing to be flexible and work in a more generalist
role. Whether the economic recovery is fast or slow, it will
have long-lasting effects on healthcare organizations.
Organizations cannot afford to simply react to the
workforce shortage. Instead, they must take steps to re-
duce the effects of the shortage on their organization and
take an aggressive stance on recruitment and retention
strategies. The financial viability of an organization de-
pends on it.
Case in point: The cost to fill an RN position due to
turnover is between $82,000 and $88,000 (Jones, 2008).
RN vacancy rates have an even greater financial effect
on organizations. Costly approaches to filling the void in-
clude using agency/traveler temporary nurses, manda-
tory/voluntary overtime, closing patient units, and/or
diverting patients to other facilities (Jones). n
Editor’s note: This article is based on information found in
the book Nursing Orientation Program Builder: Tools for
a Successful New Hire Program. For more information, visit
www.hcmarketplace.com.
ReferencesBuerhaus, P.I. (2009). “The shape of recovery: Economic im-plications for the nursing workforce.” Nursing Economic$ 27(5): 338–336.
Clavreul, G.M. (2009). “Why nursing school grads have trouble finding jobs.” WorkingNurse.com. Retrieved No-vember 3, 2009, from www.workingnurse.com/articles/Why-Nursing-School-Grads-Have-Trouble-Finding-Jobs.
Jones, C.B. (2008). “Revisiting nurse turnover costs: Adjusting for inflation.” Journal of Nursing Administration 38(1): 11–18.
Editorial Advisory Board Strategies for Nurse Managers
Group Publisher: Emily Sheahan
Editorial Assistant: Sarah Kearns, [email protected]
Shelley Cohen, RN, MSN, CENPresidentHealth Resources Unlimited Hohenwald, TN
Marie Gagnon, DM RN, B-C, MS, CADAC, LISAC, CISMDirectorBaptist Health System School of Nursing Abrazo Health Systems Phoenix, AZ
June Marshall, RN, MS ANCC Magnet Recognition Program® Project DirectorMedical City Hospital Medical City Children’s Hospital Dallas, TX
David Moon, RN, MSDirector of Recruitment Summa Health System Akron, OH
Bob Nelson, PhDPresidentNelson Motivation, Inc. San Diego, CA
Tim Porter-O’Grady, DM, EdD, APRN, FAAN Senior PartnerTim Porter-O’Grady Associates, Inc. Atlanta, GA
Dennis Sherrod, EdD, RN Forsyth Medical Center Distinguished Chair of Recruitment and Retention Winston-Salem State University Winston-Salem, NC
Strategies for Nurse Managers (ISSN: 1937-7673) is published monthly by HCPro, Inc., 200 Hoods Lane, Marblehead, MA 01945. Subscription rate: $99 per year. • Copyright © 2010 HCPro, Inc. All rights reserved. Except where specifically encour-aged, no part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without prior written consent of HCPro or the Copyright Clearance Center at 978/750-8400. Please notify us immediately if you have received an unauthorized copy. • For editorial comments or questions, call 781/639-1872 or fax 781/639-2982. For renewal or subscription information, call cus-tomer service at 800/650-6787, fax 800/639-8511, or e-mail [email protected]. • Visit our Web site at www.hcpro.com. • Occasionally, we make our subscriber list available to selected companies/vendors. If you do not wish to be included on this mailing list, please write to the marketing department at the address above. • Opinions expressed are not necessar-ily those of Strategies for Nurse Managers. Mention of products and services does not constitute endorsement. Advice given is general, and readers should consult professional counsel for specific legal, ethical, or clinical questions. MAGNET™, MAGNET RECOGNITION PROGRAM®, and ANCC MAGNET RECOGNITION® are trademarks of the American Nurses Creden-tialing Center (ANCC). The products and services of HCPro, Inc., and The Greeley Company are neither sponsored nor endorsed by the ANCC. The acronym MRP is not a trademark of HCPro or its parent company.
Disclosure statement: The SNM advisory board has declared no financial/commercial stake in this activity.
If it’s been more than six months
since you purchased or renewed your
subscription to SNM, be sure to check
your envelope for your renewal notice or call customer
service at 800/650-6787. Renew your subscription early
to lock in the current price.
Don’t miss your next issue!
June 2010 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com Page 3
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Bourg teamed up with two colleagues, Julie Benz,
RN, MS, clinical nurse specialist, and Melissa Richey,
RN, BS, clinical nurse for trauma services, to educate
the staff at SACH to be more knowledgeable about when
to call the RRT and more comfortable in doing so.
Working with the Wells Center in Colorado, a facility
that provides state-of-the-art patient simulation tools,
Bourg, Benz, and Richey rented a simulation-training
dummy.
“Wells Center supplied us with the simulation man-
nequins, along with the nurse driver,” says Bourg. “But
we were able to use our own nurse educators and ad-
vance practice nurses to help facilitate the groups.”
The nurse driver helped run the simulation, but
SACH staff wrote the script for the missed opportunity
scenarios. During the simulation training, a nurse per-
formed an assessment of a patient. Then, based on what
the nurse observed, he or she called an RRT.
“The purpose of the simulation training is to help the
nurses recognize the signs and symptoms, identify the
patients at greater risk, and then distinguish if they need
to call an activation of the RRT,” says Bourg.
The staff members at SACH first participated in the
simulation training in July 2008. Between August and
December 2008, the women analyzed missed opportu-
nities that took place after the simulation training and
saw a drop in the number.
Results not typical from simulation training
or education
Bourg’s team discovered that when the nurses ap-
propriately identified a patient in need of an RRT, there
were acute changes in the patient’s condition. But
when the changes to the patient were not as acute and
more subtle, the nurses did not notice them quite as
readily.
Over the past five years, rapid response teams (RRT)
have been brought to the forefront of American hospitals.
In 2004, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI)
launched its 100,000 Lives Campaign, of which RRTs were
a focal point, and in 2008, The Joint Commission added a
National Patient Safety Goal requiring hospitals to have a
process to recognize and respond to patients who are dete-
riorating. Those requirements are now located in standards
PC.02.01.19, HR.01.05.03, and PI.01.01.01.
Both of these initiatives sparked interest in RRTs
among hospitals, especially at St. Anthony Central Hos-
pital (SACH) in Denver, which began to develop its own
RRT in conjunction with the IHI initiative.
However, in 2008, SACH officials began to notice a
trend of patients who were meeting the criteria for RRT,
but for a variety of reasons, the team was not called.
A subgroup of 17 missed opportunities (including
deaths) was identified in the first half of 2008. With the
help of simulation training and debriefing interviews,
SACH was able to lower that number to nine for the sec-
ond half of 2008 out of 2,400 trauma-related admissions
for the year. That number was cut again for 23 total missed
opportunities and no resulting patient deaths out of about
2,400 trauma-related admissions in 2009.
Education and simulation training
In 2008, Pamela Bourg, RN, MS, ANP, CNS, direc-
tor of trauma services, first noticed a trend developing
across the trauma patients at SACH. There were particu-
lar instances where patients met the criteria for an RRT,
but nurses were not calling a team to follow through.
Best practice
Colorado hospital evaluates ‘missed opportunities’ in rapid response teams
> continued on p. 4
After reading this article, you will be able to:
➤ Identify the training techniques used by SACH to
educate staff on rapid response teams
Page 4 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com June 2010
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
on missed opportunities. It is also helpful to take opportu-
nities to encourage staff members and let them know that
by calling the RRT, they did the “right thing.”
For example, one facility Duncan worked with had a
trophy that rotated between units based on which unit had
the most calls for an RRT and the least amount of codes.
“Staff members may work for three months and nev-
er call a team, but if they see a graph showing the calls
other units have made, or see fellow staff members get-
ting gift cards to coffee shops for calling the most RRT,
it reminds them that the rapid response system is still in
place and rescuing patients,” says Duncan.
Even if it is not clear what is wrong with the patient,
but there are some subtle changes, it’s important to com-
municate to staff that it is always good to have another
set of eyes on the patient, says Duncan.
“If the RRT comes in and assesses the patient occa-
sionally, additional information can be gathered or there
can be a quick consult or discussion of opportunities to
help the patient,” says Duncan.
This tactic is also beneficial because if for some rea-
son the nurse calls the RRT again, the team will know
the patient has had previous issues and may work more
quickly to assess and intervene.
Looking to the future of missed opportunities
Bourg says SACH will now use simulation training
with staff every quarter, as opposed to once per year.
“The simulation training has provided the most bang
for the buck,” says Bourg. “It has shown staff members
to no longer consider the least-case scenario, but to in-
stead look into the worst-case scenario.”
Even though SACH saw a reduction in missed oppor-
tunities in 2009, the number was still too high, she says.
“In 2010, we look to better our number and eventually
get down to zero.” n
Source Adapted from Patient Safety Monitor (Briefings on Patient Safety), April 2010, HCPro, Inc.
Even though the number of missed opportunities de-
creased toward the end of 2008, as 2009 began, Bourg
watched the numbers increase, despite staff members
having gone through simulation training. “We sat down
and knew there were other issues we needed to identify
because the numbers were increasing,” she says.
At first, Bourg thought it might have something to do
with new graduates working at SACH. But after looking
at things more closely, she discovered that other factors
contributed to the missed opportunities.
“In addition to the huge changeover we saw at SACH,
staff members who had been with us for over two years
were failing to activate an RRT,” says Bourg.
In hopes of improving the number of missed opportu-
nities, Bourg and her colleagues went back and began in-
terviewing staff members who failed to activate an RRT.
They developed a debriefing tool using a variety of nurs-
ing literature to help understand why nurses were failing
to activate the RRT.
“We try to make sure that when a missed opportuni-
ty presents itself, we contact the nurse within 24 to 48
hours to ask them more about the situation,” says Bourg.
When a nurse has a missed RRT opportunity, an ad-
vance practice nurse conducts a debriefing interview,
not the manager.
During the interview, the nurse is asked questions
about what was going on at the time of the missed op-
portunity, what kind of patient report he or she received
from the previous nurse, whether there were competing
priorities, and so on.
“We are not trying to assign any blame,” says Bourg.
“We are trying to create a culture of safety so people are
willing to come forward and give us the information to
help make our practice better.” In addition, staff went
through simulation training again in July 2009.
More ways to encourage the activation of RRT
IHI faculty member Kathy Duncan says the education
SACH provides for nurses is a good way of cutting down
Rapid response < continued from p. 3
June 2010 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com Page 5
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
supervisor of Community House Calls/Interpreter Services
at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle.
Harborview has used its Community Health Calls
program to help bridge linguistic and cultural barriers
for 16 years.
Originally established to serve the county’s East Af-
rican and Cambodian refugees, the program has since
expanded to provide services to patients that speak
Spanish, Vietnamese, and Somali.
Harborview employs 50 state-certified medical in-
terpreters that speak 26 languages and serve a patient
population that
speaks 80 lan-
guages. Harbor-
view had more
than 100,000 in-
terpreter encoun-
ters in 2009.
When Harbor-
view has a patient that speaks a language that is not in
its medical interpreters’ repertoire, it gets help from an
outside interpreter service agency. Facilities that do not
have interpreters on staff should at the very least have
access to a strong telephone interpreter service, says
Bogomolov. Facilities should never rely on a patient’s
family members or a bilingual staff member in another
department to provide interpretive services. “There are
issues of bias, performance, patient safety, and confiden-
tiality,” she says.
The National Standards on Culturally and Linguistical-
ly Appropriate Services (CLAS) do not allow a patient’s
family members to interpret medical instructions unless
the patient specifically requests that they be allowed to
do so.
For more information on the CLAS standards, visit the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Web
site at http://hcpro.com/url/1230.
Nearly half of U.S. physicians say language and cul-
tural barriers are at least minor obstacles to providing
high-quality patient care, according to a study released
by the Center for Studying Health System Change, a
nonpartisan policy research organization located in
Washington, DC.
The study highlights the need for healthcare providers
to address non-English-speaking patients, especially as
the percentage of non-English speakers rises.
The latest U.S. census data, collected in 2000, says
47 million residents over the age of five (18% of the to-
tal population) speak a language other than English at
home. In 1990, 31.8 million residents (14%) reported
they did not speak English at home, and in 1980, 23.1
million residents (11%) did the same.
Considering communication is at the heart of what
staff members do, staff leaders should treat solving
the problem of language and cultural barriers as a top
priority.
Such obstacles “can lead to wrong clinical paths and
poor outcomes, even disastrous outcomes,” says Barbara
Bogomolov, RN, MS, BSN, manager of refugee health
and interpreter services at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a mem-
ber of BJC HealthCare,in St. Louis.
Use interpreters to bridge communication gaps
Patients rely on staff—such as nurses and case manag-
ers—to explain forms such as the Important Message from
Medicare, provide instruction on performing post-dis-
charge tasks, and ensure their concerns are met. However,
many facilities lack resources to address non-English-
speaking patients, says Bria Chakofsky-Lewy, RN,
Patient safety
Interpreters help overcome linguistic and cultural barriers
> continued on p. 6
After reading this article, you will be able to:
➤ Develop a process that addresses non-English speakers
➤ Choose a qualified interpreter
The latest U.S. census data,
collected in 2000, says 47
million residents over the
age of five (18% of the
total population) speak a
language other than English
at home.
Page 6 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com June 2010
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
to advance effective communication and cultural
competence.
The Joint Commission plans to release those stan-
dards this year for use in 2011. In the meantime, it has
created a crosswalk between the CLAS standards and
existing Joint Commission standards, which is available
at http://hcpro.com/url/1229.
During its regular accreditation, The Joint Commis-
sion will review the medical record to evaluate a facil-
ity’s ability to facilitate non-English speakers.
Facilities should develop a process to make sure that
they properly document encounters with non-English
speakers, Bogomolov says.
When patients are registered or admitted to Barnes-
Jewish, they are asked what race and ethnicity they
identify with and what language they prefer to use for
communicating with healthcare providers.
Staff enter these data into patients’ permanent records,
so the questions are asked only once, and information
flows down to the inpatient charts.
Based on the data, staff can determine whether inter-
pretive services are required to bridge cultural or linguis-
tic barriers.
“There should never be a situation where you cannot
communicate with a patient,” Bogomolov says. n
Source Adapted from Case Management Monthly, April 2010, HCPro, Inc.
Facilities can also take advantage of interpreters as
a source of cultural information. “It’s not all about lan-
guage. We are used to Western-educated patients un-
derstanding their rights and obligations to make choices
for themselves, but many [patients] come from cultures
where that is not normal or appropriate,” Bogomolov says.
Tip: Staff should have a pre-conference with inter-
preters before they interact with patients. During that
time, interpreters will learn what the expectations are
for the medical encounter, and they can alert health-
care providers of any cultural barriers that may obstruct
those expectations.
Choose an interpreter
Interpreters should have credentials or some other
means of displaying competence in both languages. Keep
in mind good interpreters don’t necessarily provide word-
for-word translations. Sometimes medical terms have no
direct translation.
“There is no word in Somali for MRI,” Chakofsky-
Lewy says.
Although they do not need to possess a strong clinical
competence, interpreters should have enough familiarity
with medical terminology to be able to create word pic-
tures that the patient can understand.
To make sure that patients comprehend the informa-
tion, it is best to ask them to explain what they have
been told in their own words, Chakofsky-Lewy says.
Document encounters with non-English speakers
The Joint Commission (formerly JCAHO) is de-
veloping hospital accreditation standards that aim
Interpreters < continued from p. 5
Online access to nursing CEs
New! Take your quarterly continuing education (CE) quiz-
zes online and receive instant access to your CE certificate!
The Strategies for Nurse Managers continuing ed-
ucation quarterly quizzes are now available online. Visit
www.StrategiesForNurseManagers.com and go to the “on-
line learning” page. The Q2 quiz is available now.
Forgotten your username and password? Call HCPro’s
customer service representatives at 800/650-6787.
Relocating? Taking a new job?
If you’re relocating or taking a new job and would like
to continue receiving SNM, you are eligible for a free trial
subscription. Contact customer serv ice with your moving
information at 800/650-6787.
June 2010 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com Page 7
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
The hope was to use the blog as a direct communica-
tion tool. But the first post received only 19 responses.
“We needed to increase awareness the blog existed,”
says Latty. “So we focused our efforts on communication.”
Posts were also used to educate as well as thank
staff members. For example, one post talked about the
daunting task of implementing the electronic medical
record (EMR).
“We recently implemented the EMR, and the last blog
talked about that, discussing how there might be bumps
in the road and thanking everyone for doing their part,”
says Latty.
Technological requirements
Setting up the blog was simple. St.Vincent had the
blog up and running in less than one day with the help
of the organization’s IT department.
It was so convenient, in fact, that it led to one of the
first lessons of creating a blog: Have a communication
plan in place.
“One thing we realized—and it’s still a pretty new
blog—is that if you don’t keep the posts current, people
stop going to the site,” says Latty.
And given how busy every CNO is, finding time to
write blog posts on a regular basis can be tough. Although
they may not take much time, they do require a good deal
of thought.
“In hindsight, because the idea surfaced quickly and
there was so much excitement, we didn’t spend much
time planning what the process would be, what the
purpose would be for the blog,” says Latty.
She suggests spending some time with all the parties
involved in conceiving and maintaining the blog to cre-
ate a plan and goal before implementing it.
“Do that up front,” says Latty. “Two questions we en-
countered later were: Do people know about it? And
what is our plan for keeping it current?”
There are a number of methods organizations can
use to help demonstrate visibility of their CNO, and with
readily available, user-friendly technology all around us,
something as simple as blogging can turn into a road of
communication between the CNO and the staff. St.Vincent
Indianapolis Hospital, for example, turned to the nursing
portal on its intranet.
“This is our one-stop shop for nurses,” says Sallie
Latty, MA, BSN, RN, MRP coordinator at St.Vincent.
“We were looking at ways to meet the needs of a young-
er generation.” That younger generation would be more
tech-savvy and more likely to look for updates through
electronic means, such as a blog.
It’s not a small task to reach all of the organization’s
nurses, either—there are 2,300 nurses at St.Vincent,
1,500 of those at the bedside.
Although talking leadership into adopting new or
different technology options can be a challenge in
healthcare settings, this was not the case at St.Vincent.
It didn’t take any convincing to get the CNO to partici-
pate in a blog.
“Our CNO loved it the minute the idea popped up,”
says Latty. “There was no need for encouragement—
she was really excited about it.”
Choosing content
The blog’s content started directly.
“The very first blog posted was meant to gain feed-
back on how the nursing staff wanted our CNO to be
visible in the organization,” says Latty. “Did they want
[her] to have public forums, tours of their units, shadow
nurses—what were their thoughts?”
Transformational leadership
To blog or not to blog: CNO connects with staff nurses
> continued on p. 8
After reading this article, you will be able to:
➤ Develop a blog in order to communicate with your
CNO
Page 8 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com June 2010
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
The shadowing experiences eventually became part
of the blog.
“[The CNO] schedules four-hour blocks of time to
work alongside a nurse—it allows her to come into con-
tact with physicians and ancillary staff as well as all of
the situations that nurse encounters,” says Craig.
This sort of shadowing gives the CNO an opportunity
to see the nurse’s perceptions of the organization, the pa-
tient’s perceptions of the nursing staff, and a chance to
evaluate the processes being used, Craig says.
The blog is only one example of the CNO’s methods
for improving visibility to the staff. “[Our CNO] has a
routine article in our Nursing at a Higher Level newslet-
ter,” says Latty.
A presence in every meeting
The CNO attends every meeting she is requested to at-
tend, when possible. “Whether a unit has asked her to
be at a staff meeting or other opportunities to encounter
staff, she is always willing to change her schedule to do
so,” says Latty. Because of shared decision-making, staff
nurse participation on many committees has increased,
giving staff further opportunity to interact with the CNO
and other nursing leaders.
“Our CNO also conducts periodic nursing forums.
They’re usually planned around a topic or communica-
tion item she wants to get the message out about,” says
Craig.
Finally, sometimes visibility can be as simple as being
out among the staff.
“Sometimes it’s a small thing that helps with expo-
sure,” says Latty. “Going to the cafeteria might seem
like a little thing, but when you do that along with all
these other pieces, it helps associates feel like they know
who the CNO is, especially in a large organization like
St.Vincent.” n
Source Adapted from HCPro’s Advisor to the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®, April 2010, HCPro, Inc.
Staff reaction
The blog had the potential to reach those staff mem-
bers who can be the most difficult for CNOs to find.
“We felt the blog would be a good way to communi-
cate with staff that might be on the night shift, or week-
ends only,” says Pat Craig, MSN, MBA, RN, FACHE,
an MRP coordinator at St.Vincent. “These are times
when leadership isn’t always personally available.”
The CNO also started to receive direct e-mails from
staff who did not want to post feedback publicly. However,
those who do leave public comments can do so anony-
mously. “Staff have the option of leaving their name or
not,” says Latty.
Concerning public posts, two unexpected develop-
ments occurred:
➤ Those who left comments were more often than not
middle-aged nurses, not the younger generation
St.Vincent expected to see when the blog was first
conceived
➤ Non-nurses discovered the blog and were able to
comment as well—and they did
“It’s interesting to have non-nurses responding,” says
Latty. In fact, the blog received one suggestion from a
member of the security staff on how to improve collabo-
ration between nursing and security that turned out to
be worth exploring.
Increased visibility
The CNO traveled the floors, encouraging staff mem-
bers throughout the implementation process. The blog
provided a way for the CNO to reach out to staff to con-
vey her experiences and thank them for their efforts. It
also gave the CNO a chance to discuss her experiences
and observations after shadowing a nurse.
“One of the things a hospital [on the journey to ex-
cellence] has to do is show evidence of visibility of nurse
leaders,” says Latty. “You have to demonstrate and de-
scribe how you do that at an excellent level.”
To blog or not to blog < continued from p. 7
June 2010 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com Page 9
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Using hand hygiene spies
A common method to track hand hygiene com-
pliance and improve rates is the use of hand hygiene
“spies” or “secret shoppers.” Both Texas Children’s and
Abington Memorial have used spies to kick-start their
programs.
When she first started, Collette Hendler, MS, RN,
CIC, infection preventionist at Abington Memorial,
said she used hospital volunteers and physicians wait-
ing for residency
as hand hygiene
spies, but soon
found she needed
more observations
than they could
provide.
Roughly two
years ago, Hendler formed a team of hospital employees
whose “regular work flow allows them to be in all areas
of the hospital so they are not noticed.”
These spies remain anonymous so employees aren’t
aware of when they are being watched or who is watch-
ing them.
At first, employees were not happy with the thought
of colleagues spying on them, and even refuted the col-
lected information when it came back unfavorable. Ini-
tially, compliance rates were around 34%.
“But if a nurse manager would say to me he didn’t be-
lieve my data, I would tell him to do it himself and see
how his data compared to ours,” Hendler says.
“In the one particular case, he came down halfway
through the day and said he couldn’t take it anymore and
believed our numbers were what they were,” says Hendler.
Jeffrey Starke, MD, director of infection control at
Texas Children’s, took a similar approach four years ago,
The perennial problem in healthcare facilities around
the country usually comes back to a very simple 30-sec-
ond procedure.
Ask any infection preventionist (IP) about his or her
major focus on hand hygiene compliance and you’ll
likely hear a number of strategies, obstacles, or frustra-
tions with getting staff members to comply with hand
hygiene best practices. Hand hygiene compliance rates
vary from facility to facility, and even from unit to unit.
There are three main methods for measuring hand
hygiene compliance, according to The Joint Commis-
sion’s (formerly JCAHO) monograph Measuring Hand
Hygiene Adherence: Overcoming the Challenges:
➤ Direct observation
➤ Measuring product use
➤ Conducting surveys
However, measuring compliance is just half the battle
for IPs. Improving compliance is another challenge. Part
of the Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goal
NPSG.07.01.01 requires facilities to set goals for improv-
ing hand hygiene rates, and it’s a continued focus of Joint
Commission surveyors (see the December 2009 Briefings
on Infection Control for more info).
Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston and Abington
(PA) Memorial Hospital have both improved their com-
pliance rates through a variety of successful strategies,
from marketing to monetary compensation.
Hand hygiene
Improving hand hygiene compliance rates with marketing, accountability, and incentives
> continued on p. 10
After reading this article, you will be able to:
➤ Identify proven methods to improve hand hygiene
compliance
➤ Explain how monetary incentives improved rates at
Texas Children’s Hospital
“ We try and do things that
are funny, things that are
serious, just try to shake
it up so people look at the
screen savers and there is
some message going on.”
—Collette Hendler, MS, RN, CIC
Page 10 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com June 2010
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Texas Children’s took a similar approach two years
ago, focusing on marketing its hand hygiene campaign
rather than just educating employees.
The marketing team brought in an outside consul-
tant who helped develop a campaign called “Hy-Five”
aimed at patients and families as well as physicians and
employees.
The campaign increased compliance to approxi-
mately 80%, and as a result, Texas Children’s won the
Child Health Corporation of America’s National Qual-
ity Award.
“Executives love marketing, and so they know that
these data are looked at by outside agencies that are
looking at us and are doing rankings, and so they know
that they can look people in the eye and say, ‘We real-
ly believe in quality; here is the data and the awards to
back it up,’ ” Starke says.
Relying on incentives and accountability
Starke says even though Texas Children’s reached
80%, getting over that last hurdle to the 90th percentile
took additional facilitywide motivation.
“We said we needed to do a little better, and I’m a big
believer in incentives,” Starke says. “I think we are all in-
fluenced by the same things as other people.”
Texas Children’s has an employee bonus program
called P3. Previously, all incentives were based on finan-
cial numbers and volume, but Starke went to his admin-
istration and talked it into making hand hygiene part of
the bonus program for employees. Then he took it one
step further and made it part of the administrators’ bo-
nus program as well.
“I know this sounds trite, but we convinced them
that it was the right thing to do,” Starke says.
“We said, ‘What’s good for the goose is good for the
gander,’ and once you agree to do this for the employees,
how can you possibly exempt yourselves? [We were] sort
of trying to create a ‘just culture,’ and I think this is a very
important part of ‘just culture,’ that administrators be just
but with one exception: He hired outside infection control
professionals to come in as hospital employees and anon-
ymously observe hand hygiene. These spies found that
Texas Children’s hand hygiene rate was around 50%.
“These are folks that are totally unknown to the people
in the institution,” Starke says. “This is also completely un-
known to hospital administration. People think adminis-
tration messes with this, but it’s entirely controlled by IC.”
Creating a buzz
Obviously, these rates were not good enough for
each respective facility. Now that the spies had been
dispersed to collect data, the message needed to be
clear and consistent.
Both facilities turned to their marketing teams to cre-
ate more buzz around hand hygiene compliance and of-
fer daily reminders to staff members.
“I actually probably have something that a lot of other
hospitals don’t have, and that’s that I have my own PR
person who is assigned to the hand hygiene project and
I work very closely with him and he comes up with a lot
of creative ideas,” Hendler says.
One of those ideas included screen savers with hu-
morous or provoking messages. One included a picture
of a young patient that read, “You could kill him with
your bare hands.” Another was a spoof of the “Sham-
wow” infomercial that read “Hand-wow.” These ap-
proaches raised compliance rates to 88%.
“We try and do things that are funny, things that are
serious, just try to shake it up so people look at the screen
savers and there is some message going on,” Hendler says.
Hand hygiene < continued from p. 9
Contact Editorial Assistant Sarah Kearns
Telephone 781/639-1872, Ext. 3298
E-mail [email protected]
Questions? Comments? Ideas?
June 2010 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com Page 11
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
[infection prevention] falls down, is not making execu-
tives responsible.”
Abington Memorial is also in the process of imple-
menting an additional accountability program because
compliance rates have begun to plateau at 80%.
Although it isn’t fully implemented, this new program
will continue tracking compliance with spies, but manag-
ers will hand out index cards.
If an employee has practiced good hand hygiene, the
index card will enter that person in a prize raffle.
Employees who are observed not washing their hands
will receive an infraction. After three infractions, those
employees will receive a letter warning them about their
noncompliance.
Hendler made it clear that contrary to an article in
Philadelphia Inquirer, employees would not lose their jobs
for noncompliance, but they would be held accountable.
Abington Memorial also took an approach that has
been used in many other healthcare facilities in an at-
tempt to personalize the infections that result from im-
proper hand hygiene.
In one staff meeting, the hospital’s chief of staff, John
J. Kelly, told a story about Catherine “Pat” Zakrzewski,
a patient that underwent an amputation and ultimately
died from a MRSA infection that could have been pre-
vented through hand washing.
“[She] was one of our physicians’ mothers, and it
really got personal and hit home with a lot of people,”
says Hendler. n
Source Adapted from Briefings on Infection Control, April 2010, HCPro, Inc.
as responsible for these things as the frontline employ-
ees are.”
The incentive was not an all-or-nothing approach;
the facility had to meet a 95% compliance rate for em-
ployees and administrators to get that portion of their
bonus, while other factors contributed to other portions
of their bonus.
“I mean, what does CMS do?” says Starke, referring to
the CMS never events. “CMS is setting a financial incen-
tive, so I don’t see how this is any different than that, ex-
cept we are controlling it.”
Since implementing this incentive, compliance rates
at Texas Children’s have stayed between 95% and 99%,
Starke says. Simultaneously, bloodstream infection rates
have plummeted.
Although Starke admits there are other factors to ac-
count for this reduction, it has helped set the culture and
emphasize infection prevention.
“It’s not like there are administrators browbeating
people,” Starke says. “It’s not like people are up there go-
ing, ‘If you don’t do this, we can’t vacation this year.’ It’s
creating the same culture and expectations at every level
of the organization, and I think that’s sometimes where
Upcoming WebcastJune 17, 2010—Horizontal Hostility in Nursing: Proven
Organizational Strategies for Effective Communication
and Collaboration (SKU061710)
For more information, call HCPro’s customer service
representatives at 800/650-6787 or visit
www.hcmarketplace.com.
Establishing healthy competition
Focusing on the culture of hand hygiene at Texas Chil-
dren’s Hospital in Houston has resulted in some tangible
results, says Jeffrey Starke, MD, the facility’s director of
infection control.
The hospital now tracks days without bloodstream infec-
tions on every floor to give employees a goal to work to-
ward. In this case, the goal is to continue the number of
days without a bloodstream infection. Hand hygiene is part
of the central line bundle to prevent bloodstream infections.
The facility’s pediatric ICU just went 291 days without
a bloodstream infection before recently recording one.
Even the neonatal ICU, which is notoriously difficult to
keep infection-free, has gone 40 days without a blood-
stream infection. “It’s a question of engaging people,
making it part of their professional pride, and rewarding
them for a good job,” Starke says.
Page 12 www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com June 2010
© 2010 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
ReferenceNational Institute of Standards and Technology (n.d.) “Baldrige in Health Care: Performance Excellence Delivers World-Class Results.” U.S. Department of Commerce. www.baldridge.nist.gov.
Source Shelley Cohen, RN, MSN, CEN, Health Resources Unlimited, www.hru.net. Adapted with permission.
As managers and leaders, we all want to improve our
patient outcomes while balancing staff satisfaction. This
is something that we strive for, even though it is not an
easy task and many obstacles surround us.
When trying to improve quality as well as productivity,
keep in mind the Baldrige Quality Program that offers cri-
teria you can follow as you work toward achieving your
goals of excellence. The Baldrige Quality Program offers
staff and leader progress surveys to use within your organi-
zation, which will help provide a dose of reality for all.
Misperceptions can quickly defuse any energy gained
in your progress for achieving excellence. Use the follow-
ing survey criteria to guide the evaluation of your status
as well as assist in developing some realistic goals:
➤ Achieve superior healthcare outcomes and service
delivery outcomes
➤ Attain positive patient-/customer-focused outcomes
➤ Achieve significant gains in financial and market
outcomes
➤ Know your strongest assets
➤ Demonstrate your ability to operate as a leader
through organizational effectiveness outcomes
➤ Realize leadership and social responsibility outcomes
through your role modeling
➤ Cultivate a results-driven environment n
Tip of the month
Promoting performance excellence
Web site spotlight
Do you know a fellow nurse that goes beyond the call of duty
or a nurse manager who had a positive effect on your experience as a nurse? Do
you want to show your appreciation, but don’t know how? Now you can, by nominating them for
HCPro’s 2010 Nursing Image Awards! The award honors nurses whose leadership,
teamwork, or clinical expertise embodies an image of nursing excellence and contributes to improving patient
care, quality outcomes, nurse satisfaction, and the healthcare environment.
As a newsletter subscriber, you have
FREE access!
Check out our blog,
The Leaders’ Lounge
www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com
SNM Subscriber Services Coupon Your source code: N0001
Name
Title
Organization
Address
City State ZIP
Phone Fax
E-mail address(Required for electronic subscriptions)
q Payment enclosed. q Please bill me.q Please bill my organization using PO # q Charge my: q AmEx q MasterCard q VISA q Discover
Signature(Required for authorization)
Card # Expires(Your credit card bill will reflect a charge to HCPro, the publisher of SNM.)
q Start my membership to www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com immediately.
Options No. of issues Cost Shipping Total
q Electronic 12 issues $99 (SFNME) N/A
Sales tax (see tax information below)*
Grand total
Order online at www.hcmarketplace.com.
Be sure to enter source code N0001 at checkout!
Mail to: HCPro, P.O. Box 1168, Marblehead, MA 01945 Tel: 800/650-6787 Fax: 800/639-8511 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.hcmarketplace.com
For discount bulk rates, call toll-free at 888/209-6554.
*Tax InformationPlease include applicable sales tax. Electronic subscriptions are exempt. States that tax products and shipping and handling: CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NC, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV. State that taxes products only: AZ. Please include $27.00 for shipping to AK, HI, or PR.