July18, 2005Chair, IEEE 802.20 802.20 Opening July 2005 Plenary Session #15 Jerry Upton- Chair [email protected] Gang Wu – Procedural Vice Chair Eshwar

July18, 2005 Chair, IEEE 802.20

802.20 Opening July 2005 Plenary

Session #15

Jerry Upton- [email protected]

Gang Wu – Procedural Vice Chair

Eshwar Pittampalli – Liaison Vice Chair

Rao Yallapragada – Recording Secretary

802.20-05/47r1


6. Patents

IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard. This assurance shall be provided without coercion and prior to approval of the standard (or reaffirmation when a patent becomes known after initial approval of the standard). This assurance shall be a letter that is in the form of either

a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the patentee will not enforce any of its present or future patent(s) whose use would be required to implement the proposed IEEE standard against any person or entity using the patent(s) to comply with the standard or

b) A statement that a license will be made available without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination

This assurance shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal and is irrevocable during that period.

IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents

in Standards

Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – December 2002


Copyright

• Under the current US copyright law — the author of information is deemed to own the copyright from the moment of creation

• The IEEE Bylaws require copyright of all material to be held by the IEEE– Must consult with IEEE for re-use of copyright

material

• The IEEE Standards accomplishes transfer of copyright ownership through the Project Authorization Request (PAR) process


Inappropriate Topics forIEEE WG Meetings

• Don’t discuss licensing terms or conditions

• Don’t discuss product pricing, territorial restrictions or market share

• Don’t discuss ongoing litigation or threatened litigation

• Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object.

If you have questions,contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administratorat [email protected]

Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – December 2002


• No Electronic sign-in - - Manual Sign In Books

• 802.20 has 14 meeting slots you need to participate in 11 meeting slots to get participation credit.

• Attendees shall state their Affiliation in the manual sign in book per Appendix B of the 802.0 Version 1.0 Policies & Procedures (802.20 PD-05).This is a requirement for obtaining a voting token.

• 802.20 and 802.21 Grant Reciprocal Maintenance Attendance Credit in addition to .18 & .19, please state your home group when signing in

• Meeting Room - -Pacific Concourse West F&G

Logistics


IEEE 802.20 Affiliation and Attendance Sign In Monday Tuesday Wednesday ThursdayName: AM 1 XXXXXX

XXXXXX

Email: AM 2 XXXXXX

Organization: XXXXXX

PM 1

Affiliation or same as Organization:

PM 2

Signature: Please Initial the Time Slot you are Attending

Date:

802.20Attendance Sign In and Affiliation Statement

You must complete all information requested, sign and date. You only need to complete form once and then initial time slots.You receive extra credit for attending tutorials. Please note any attendance at Tutorials.Please Add the Number on your Badge next to your name.


APPENDIX B IEEE 802.20 WG Policies and Procedures V1.0Affiliation Statements Per ANSI essential requirements, if there is a requested from an interested party for identification of affiliation it shall be granted. The ANSI rules apply since IEEE 802 does not have any exception speaking

to this issue. Per the Chair of IEEE 802 and the Standards Association Board counsel, this procedure will be followed unless there is no request from an interested party. Procedure:1. All attendees shall state their affiliation using a manual sign in book provided at each Plenary and Interim Session. If the automated/electronic attendance system is updated for the appropriate record

field and instructions, the attendees shall use that system. 2. If an attendee is unable to comply with this procedure, the attendee shall notify the WG Chair. 3. Each attendee shall refer to the below ANSI Essential Requirements statement and use the below for guidance in complying with this procedure.

Affiliation and ANSI Essential Requirements On the Web at:http://public.ansi.org/ansionline/Documents/Standards Activities/American National Standards/Procedures, Guides, and Forms/ER2003.doc

“2.1 OpennessTimely and adequate notice of any action to create, revise, reaffirm, or withdraw a standard, and the establishment of a new consensus body shall be provided to all known directly and materially affected interests. Notice should include a clear and meaningful description of the proposed activity and shall identify a readily available source of information. In addition, the name, affiliation [2]

and interest category of each member of the consensus body shall be made available to interested parties upon request.”

“[2] “Affiliation” refers to the entity that the consensus body member represents (which may or

may not be that person’s employer). If the consensus body member is serving in an individual capacity, then the name of the individual, that person’s employer, sponsor and interest category should be available. Contact information is not required.”

http://public.ansi.org/ansionline/Documents/Standards%20Activities/American%20National%20Standards/Procedures,%20Guides,%20and%20Forms/ER2003.doc




Objectives for the Session

1.Primary Objective is Closure and Approval of Channel Models Documents

2.Consensus on Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models Document

3.Consensus on Technology Selection Process


Proposed High Level Agenda – July 2005 Plenary, 802.20 Session #15 Hyatt Regency Embarcadero Center, San Francisco

Monday, July 18, 2005 11:00AM – 12:30PM

IEEE 802 Opening Plenary

Monday, July 18, 2005 12:30PM - 1:30PM

Lunch, no Joint Wireless Opening

Monday, July 18, 2005 1:30PM – 5:30PM Pacific Concourse West F&G (Break 3:30 – 4:00PM)

- Opening Session of 802.20 - - IEEE IPR rules and meeting conduct

- Logistics for the session - - Review of Proposed 802.20 Agenda - - Approval of Agenda including modifications - - Review and approve Mar. & May Minutes - - Review Other WGs and 802 Activities - - Update on 802.18 Activities

- Status Reports and Closure Process - - Channel Models Evaluation Criteria & Traffic Models

- Evaluation Criteria & Traffic Models

1:30-3:30pm 4:00-5:30pm

C802.20-05/47r1 Included agenda And Status reports C802.20-05/48 Other WG Activities

Monday, July 18, 2005 7:00PM - 9:00PM 802 Tutorials

Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:00AM - 12:00PM Pacific Concourse West F&G (Break 10:00 – 10:30AM)

Channel Models Contributions -PAS Model for Channel Models (R.Canchi) -Generation of Spatial Correlation Coefficients (R.Canchi) -Text for Correlation Matrix section (David Huo) - Channel Modeling (Ayman Naguib) Channel Models Review & Voting

8:00am- 8:45am 8:45am-9:15am 9:15am-10:00am 10:30am-11:00am 11:00am-12:00pm

C802.20-05/37 C802.20-05/38 C802.20-05/42 C802.20-05/32r1

Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:00PM – 5:30PM Pacific Concourse West F&G (Break 3:00 – 3:30PM)

Channel Models Review & Voting

Tuesday, July 19, 2005 7:30PM - 9:00PM 802 Tutorials


Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:00AM - 12:00PM Pacific Concourse West F&G (Break 10:00 – 10:30AM)

Evaluation Criteria & Traffic Models Contributions -VoIP Evaluation(R.Canchi) -Text for VoIP Model (David Huo) -Mobility Modeling Action Items (Rajat Prakash) -Text for System Level Simulator Calibration (David Huo) -Text for Link-System Interface (David Huo)


C802.20-05/36 C802.20-05/43 C802.20-05/39 C802.20-05/44 C802.20-05/45

Wednesday, July 20, 2005 1:00PM - 5:30PM (Break 3:00 – 3:30PM) 802 Social in the evening

Evaluation Criteria & Traffic Models Contributions - Evaluation Criteria Items (Jim Tomcik) Evaluation Criteria & Traffic Models Review & Voting

1:00pm-1:45pm 1:45pm-5:00pm

C802.20-05/40

Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:00AM - 12:00PM Pacific Concourse West F&G (Break 10:00 – 10:30AM)

Technology Selection Process Contributions - Technology Selection Process Doc. Update (Mark Klerer) -Technology Description Template (Jim Ragsdale) - MAC/PHY Specific Requirements (Dan Gal) - Compliance Table for TSP (Dan Gal) - Technology Selection Process Proposal (Dan Gal)


C802.20-05/46 C802.20-05/35 C802.20-05/26r1 C802.20-05/41 C802.20-05/72r5

Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:00PM - 5:00PM Pacific Concourse West F&G (Break 3:00 – 3:30PM)

-Work Items Beyond Technology Selection (Dan Gal) Review and Voting of Documents, as necessary New Business Next Meeting Planning Close and Adjourn

1:00pm- 1:30pm 1:30pm- 4:00pm 4:00pm-4:15pm 4:15pm- 4:45pm 4:45pm – 5:00pm

C802.20-05/49


Process for this meeting:

1. Review Status of the Document

2. Take New Contributions related to the Document

3. Review each Section of the Document - - reach consensus and approval - - refer back to previous Contributions relevant to the section

4. Seek drafting Ad-Hocs if needed

5. Sections with Options will be voted via Straw Polls and then Motions…”July Voting”..move forward.

6. Sections need 75% approval. Overall Document needs 75% approval.

7. Use this process for Evaluation Criteria and Channel Models

Document Closure Process


Status of Channel Models and

Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models documents


Version 9r1 is the current document for this Plenary:

Open Items:

1. Acceptance of the text changes made by Ayman per 05/32r1 Ver9r1.

2. Agreement on Setting a Center Frequency for all technology proponents - - see editor’s notes in the document

3. Decide if the Indoor Pico Channel Scenario is needed or not. If needed then TBDs need completion. See Editor’s notes in the document.

4. Take New Contributions related to the Document.

5. Seek drafting Ad-Hocs if needed

Channel Models Document - Status


Current Version is 16r1:

1. Version 16 was a very large cleanup and has been available for a month.

2. Last revision only addressed editorial fixes including table/figure numbers and table of contents, etc.

3. A large Number of Open issues (many with options and many with TBDs)

4. New contributions address some items

Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models Document


Current Version is 16r1 – Open Issues #1


1.Traffic Modelsa.VoIP model:

i. Simple version as currently stated in the document.ii.Simple version plus using one voice codec - - AMR proposediii.More complex version using voice quality testing

b.Gaming model:i.Single Party gaming modelii.Multi-player gaming model

1.Multicast/Broadcast model (Multicast is a “shall” requirement.):i.Need a proposed modelii.Or Proponents can just show support in the proposal and members will need to judge.iii. Or Re-open Systems Requirements and eliminate the requirement

i.Video Conferencing - - needs a model or deleteii.Audio Streaming - - needs a model or deleteiii.Traffic Mix - - agree upon definition and then a mix:

i.Simple Mix (Dan Gal proposal) ii.Complex Mix (other option in document but not filled in)iii.Current proposed definitioniv. Different Definition




1.Mobility Modeling - - Section 5.4a.Clarification of outstanding action items from contributorb. Or Approve the current version

2.Channel Mix - Section 9.1a.Delete the section (10 people at May Interim voted to delete and 1 voted No)b.Create a mix proposal based upon the 3 or 4 Channel models

3.Control Signaling Modeling – Section 5.51.Delete2.Propose an approach

a.System Calibration – Section 8 (still awaiting an agreed set of text from David Huo and Arak

Sutivong based upon contribution C802.20-04/83r6.) 1. Needs for contributions and clarifications2.Develop a proposal at the meeting




1.Phases of Evaluationa.Options for the Phases

i.Separate Phase 0 for calibration, then Phase I and Phase IIii.Phase I and Phase II as currently outlined in the documentiii.Others, for example Collapse Phase I and Phase II into one submission, then only address questions or issues from the group

b.Need Specifics in each Phase (a number of TBDs remain):i.Still need further contributions and discussionii.Accept proposals at the meeting for resolution

a. Link Budget Template – Section 11 needs resolutionb.Capacity Performance – Section 14 needs review and discussionc.Fairness Criteria – Section 15

i.Delete the additional TBDs on fairness by application type or specific applicationii.Propose additional Fairness Criteria for some applications such as Gaming

i.Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments – Section 16 needs text on unpaired block assignments and further reviewii.Also a number of Editors notes and other consistency checks