Judy v. Obama Motion for Reconsideration 12-5276

7/31/2019 Judy v. Obama Motion for Reconsideration 12-5276

1/7

___________

No. 12-5276

___________

IN THE

Supreme Court of the

United States

Cody Robert Judy,

Petitioner,

v.

Barrack ObamaBrian Kemp

Respondent(s)

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court for the Eleventh

Circuit

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

CODY ROBERT JUDY

Pro sePetitioner3031 So. Ogden Ave.

Suite 2

Ogden, UT. 84403

www.codyjudy.us

(801)497-6655

[email protected]

__________

MICHAEL JABLONSKI Counsel of Record forBARACK OBAMA260 Brighton Road NE

Atlanta, GA. 30309-1523

404- 290-2977

[email protected]

CAM-ANH LE Crt. of State acting as Counsel of Record forBRIAN KEMP

VINCENT ROBERT RUSSOExecutive Office 214 State Capital

Atlanta GA. 30334

[email protected] ,

[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


2/7


3/7

being removed from the Justices until the following Session which was a manipulation of

the election suited strategically in the Defendants favor ultimately breaking restraint of

the political doctrine question that favored the Defendant from the get-go.

Further proof of this exists in that the Case Weldon v. Obama was given a case number 2

weeks prior to Petitioners caseJudy v. Obama. Now the Weldon appeal was also from

the Georgia Supreme Court. Petitioner beliefs that theJudy case was finally given a case

number because the Weldon case from Georgia was granted a case number, and would

provide a cover for dismissing his case due to an unqualified or non-competitive standing

issue.

There was no monetary damages that was asked for or that accrued in Weldon v. Obama

case as compared to the 20 MILLION DOLLARS worth of damages accrued inJudy v.

Obama making the 2 cases completely different, and showing a complete lack of justice

in that all the lower Courts systematically considered the two cases together in their

judgment, an unprecedented and extreme injudicious action that represented such a far

and wildly odd departure from Justice that it would be considered a para-normal

abrogation of justice suited in the extremes of say sentencing 1st degree murder felony

cases with the same penalty as misdemeanors cases.

On September 6th

,2012 Petitioner CODY ROBERT JUDY submitted a letter to Chief

Justice John Roberts RECONSIDERATION: Standing Mixed up in Conference Sep.

24th Judy v. Obama 12-5276 & Emergency Motion not ruled upon violating Court

procedure. This was not docketed by the Court Clerks, and is nowhere to be seen on the

RecordJudy v. Obama 12-5276.

Further prejudices are provided upon the record of injustice, for example: Due to the

Court Clerks mistake of not grantingJudy v. Obama a case number before Weldon v.

Obamawith no legal excuse, Mr. Judy was forced into the Fall Session of the Courts


4/7

Conference schedule. Because Petitioners case is/was/ and continues to be suited in the

terms of the 2012 ELECTION, with him as a candidate in the same party contesting the

very eligibility of Barack Obama, with the consideration of election dates, Petitioner

submitted an EMERGENCY MOTION governed by the Court procedure July 30th,2012

also with a letter to the Clerk, that was not posted as such by the Court Clerk on the

docket, but rather posted on the docket for the Public as an addition or supplemental

Brief to the WRIT OF CERTIORARI, rather than an EMERGENCY MOTION that

took precedence over and above body of the case.

As such the EMERGENCY MOTION was not ruled upon, never has been ruled upon,

and because it was not ruled upon, warrants a complete RECONSIDERATION by the

Justices of the Court without the hindrance or cover ofWeldon v. Obama suited as a

distraction or subversion by which justice could so easily be sacrificed on the altar

representing a disembowelment and quartering of all the United States Supreme Court

Justices.

In 2011 it was published and made known to the United States that the 10th

Circuit had

dismissed Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama due to what the defense called no active Presidential

Candidate, holding that if an active candidate with competitive standing filed that the

qualifications of a candidate as a natural born citizen challenged might be undertaken

as a judicial contemplation on the merits of precedent, otherwise, no such contemplation

could possibly be justified by the Courts.

Judy v. Obama provided that KEY ingredient with a 20 MILLION dollar campaign and

contributions coming in from all over the United States of America from concerned

citizens actively building and contributing their hard earned dollars in determination that

existed in the root Constitutional demand that the Office of the President of the United

States of America only be occupied by a natural born citizen. Barack Obama is not a

natural born citizen, and the legislative precedent has thwarted every and any attempt to


5/7

amend the Constitution in its demand for such. The Judicial Branch has an obligation and

judicial duty of upholding the legislative Branches demand, or declaring it

Unconstitutional with more respect and honor than a cowardice DENIAL, stamped with

unprecedented prejudice representing a slithering creeping consummate beheading Lady

Justice in front of the Citizens of the United States simply wanting their vote to count on

an eligible candidate.

If thats too much to ask for, or for some God forsaken reason is too beneath the Justices

of the Court to consider worthy their devout consideration, then Petitioner prays to God

with the fervent religious sentiment and protections granted him to do so, that every one

of those Cowardice Bastards of Hell will be slaughtered in the disrespectful way in which

they have treated their offices, and that in every orifice of their body, a copy of the

Constitution will be stuffed, that through the timeless eternities of the after-life they may

gaze down upon their bodies and always remember the reasons that they met such

gruesome fate. They simply didnt take seriously enough their jobs, and that rather than

resign their duties to worthy and choice men and women, they chose of their own free

will and volition to desecrate the highest office of the land, protected by the Supreme

Law of the Land, scratching their memories into the annals of history as DOMETIC

ENEMIES of the United States of America.

If Petitioner, the Contributors to his campaign, and all the Democratic Party, and

Citizenry voting for Barack Hussein Obama under the dereliction and auspices of the

most corrupt forgery and fraud every perpetrated upon the Citizenry of the Untied States

of America, are to be subjected to such horror and blatant discrimination, prejudice,

malcontent, and utter corrupt usurpation of justice, then, in the spirit of JUSTICE FOR

ALL, would not the Justices themselves consider their decision equal to such a fate as

the Petitioner has outlined?


6/7

While there is no other Court to appeal this decision to, and We The People in this action,

have done all in our power to appeal to the reason and sensibility of our own law, and

heretofore finding no answer of integrity, justice, and honor, we must sentence this

application to God, the Creator of Heaven and Earth, with our most humble supplication,

that we should be held blameless before him, and that our record stands as a witness

against you as Tyrants of the Supreme Law of the Land, and that while you may escape

the edicts of men you will not escape his eye, and that the very Earth under you may open

her mouth wide and bury you alive, unless you hearken to your sensibility, and reason,

and regain your faculty of mind which at the very least shows honorable courtesy to

entertain the MOTIONS presented.

Signed and Submitted this Nov. 1st, 2012-11-01 /s/ Cody Robert Judy

Petitioner/pro se/CODY ROBERT JUDY


7/7

DECLARATION OF MAILING

I do hereby declare under penalty of law certify that I mailed, via 1st class U.S. Mail and

Email, a true and correct copy of the forgoing

1- MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF WRIT OF CERTIORARIPostage pre-paid, to the RESPONDENT(s), by and through Counsel(s) of

Record at: Attorney for RESPONDENT: Esquire Mr. Michael Jablonski forBarack Obama and Cam-Anh Le Esq. &Vincent Robert Russo counsel(s) for

secretary of State Brian Kemp, at:

1-Michael Jablonski Esq. 2221 Peachtree Rd. Suite D418 Atlanta, GA. 30309-1523 (404)290-

2977 [email protected]

2-Secretary of State Brian Kemp Georgia Secretary of States OfficeExecutive Office 214 State

Capital Atlanta GA. 30334- [email protected] , [email protected]

3- Solicitor General of the United States at, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania

Ave., N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001

4- Sam Olens-Office of the Attorney General 40 Capitol Square, SW Atlanta, Ga 30334. Phone:

(404) 656-3300 Email:[email protected] Robert Judy 3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2 Ogden,UT. [email protected]

(801-497-6655

6-U.S. Supreme Court 1First Street N.E. Washington D.C. 20543 ts

[email protected]

On this the 1ST Day of NOVERMBER, 2012.

Signature of Mailer __/s/__Cody Robert Judy______
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

Documents

Judy v. Obama Motion for Reconsideration 12-5276