20
This article was downloaded by: [University of Strathclyde] On: 02 December 2014, At: 03:37 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Divorce Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wzjd20 Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence Erik Sorensen MS a & Jacquelin Goldman PhD b a graduate studen, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, 32610-0165 b Professor, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, 32610-0165 Published online: 11 Sep 2009. To cite this article: Erik Sorensen MS & Jacquelin Goldman PhD (1989) Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence, Journal of Divorce, 12:4, 69-87, DOI: 10.1300/J279v12n04_05 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J279v12n04_05 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http:// www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

This article was downloaded by: [University of Strathclyde]On: 02 December 2014, At: 03:37Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

Journal of DivorcePublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wzjd20

Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary PhysicalResidenceErik Sorensen MS a & Jacquelin Goldman PhD ba graduate studen, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida,Gainsville, FL, 32610-0165b Professor, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainsville,FL, 32610-0165Published online: 11 Sep 2009.

To cite this article: Erik Sorensen MS & Jacquelin Goldman PhD (1989) Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary PhysicalResidence, Journal of Divorce, 12:4, 69-87, DOI: 10.1300/J279v12n04_05

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J279v12n04_05

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

Page 2: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 3: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 4: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 5: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 6: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 7: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 8: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 9: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 10: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 11: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 12: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 13: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 14: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 15: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 16: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 17: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 18: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 19: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014

Page 20: Judicial Perceptions in Determining Primary Physical Residence

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f St

rath

clyd

e] a

t 03:

37 0

2 D

ecem

ber

2014