Upload
tamah
View
27
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Council of Europe. European Union. Conseil de l'Europe Union européenne. Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries. Judiciary. Independence Professionalism Efficiency Accountability Transparency. Topics. judiciary. General purpose. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Joint Programme
Enhancing judicial reform in the
Eastern Partnership countries
Conseil de l'Europe Union européenne
Council of Europe European Union
Topics
Judiciary
Independence Professionalism Efficiency Accountability Transparency
General purpose
Support judicial reform in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine
judiciary
Sources
Case law of ECtHR
Venice Commission
CEPEJ, CCJE, CCPE
Execution of judgments of the ECtHR
Implemented or ongoing CoE/EU Joint Programmes and CoE VC in the six countries
judiciary
Objectives
Challenges vs European standards on judiciary: identification
Solutions: finding
Recommendations: dissemination and follow-up
judiciary
Activities
Working groups with experts
WGs conclusions 'dissemination
Raising public awareness
Steering Committee
judiciary
Expert working groups: regional think-tanks
1.WG “Independent judiciary”:
Sub-groups: Judicial self-governing bodiesCareer of judges and prosecutors
2. WG “Professional judiciary”:
Sub-groups: Legal professionalsTraining of judges and prosecutors
3. WG “Efficient judiciary”:
Sub-groups: Financing of judiciaryBacklog
judiciary
A. Expert working groups
Purpose: weaknesses and lacunae within topics: identification
Who: CoE experts; professionals from participating countries: representatives of MoJ, Supreme Court, Judicial Council, Bar Association
Subject: European standards and countries’ own experience: discussion
Outcome: best practice and recommendations: formulation
judiciary
B. Dissemination and follow-up
Purpose:
Identifying areas where progress is needed Proposing measures: adjusting national policies
By means:
Policy round tables Translation and publication: WG recommendations
judiciary
C. Public awareness measures
Purpose: Raising awareness about Project’s findings Reinforcement of national ownership
Who:
Legal professionals, NGOs, professional associations
judiciary
D. Steering Committee
Purpose: Guidance, supervision and results review
Who: Beneficiary countries Council of Europe European Commission
judiciary
Activities
Next steps:
Members of WGs and sub-groups: Appointment
CoE experts for WGs: Appointment
Meeting representatives of beneficiary institutions (early May 2011)
judiciary
On behalf of Legal and Human Rights Capacity Building Department
of Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs
Thank you for your attention
For further details about the project please contact:[email protected]
http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/capacitybuilding/