10
UNCLASSIFIED 1 UNCLASSIFIED 1 Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations Ms. M. R. Shephard Deputy Director, Joint Concept Development & Experimentation

Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

  • Upload
    alka

  • View
    127

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations. Ms. M. R. Shephard Deputy Director, Joint Concept Development & Experimentation. 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 1

UNCLASSIFIED

1

Joint Concept Development & Experimentation –

Future Joint Operations

Joint Concept Development & Experimentation –

Future Joint Operations

Ms. M. R. Shephard Deputy Director,Joint Concept Development & Experimentation

Page 2: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 2

UNCLASSIFIED

The United States Joint Forces Command provides mission-ready Joint capable forces and supports the development and integration of Military, Government, and Multinational capabilities to meet the

present and future operational needs

of the Joint Force.

Joint Forces Command Mission

Page 3: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 3

UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Enterprise Customers define problem sets, provide

operational context, & help identify solutions Partners bring capabilities, technologies,

SMEs and shared experimental objectives Executed through a collaborative enterprise

approach

Addressing DOD’s Most Pressing Warfighter Challenges Focus on clear and precise problem

identification / definition Involve key stakeholders, partners, and

transition agents from the beginning Identify & evaluate potential solutions Rapidly transition successful solutions to

drive change

Joint Concept Development and Experimentation

Page 4: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 4

UNCLASSIFIED

2

UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

State Competitor

Red Red Red

BlueBlue BlueBlue BlueBlue

Fragile State Globally Networked Non-State Actor

NCA / NSCNCA / NSC COCOMs

Services

Interagency

InternationalOSD/CJCSOSD/CJCS

Higher Authority Panel

Wargame StructureWargame Structure

Capstone Concept for Joint Operations

CCJO Wargame

Set in 2020

Key Risk Areas: • Changing global nuclear landscape• Gain and maintain access• Integration of 'whole of nation' • Situational understanding• Digital dependence• Battle of the narrative

Results applied to inform QDR and DoD Decision Making

Results applied to inform QDR and DoD Decision Making

National Security Challenges• Win Nation’s Wars• Deter Aggression• Develop Cooperative Security• Defend Homeland• Respond to Civil Crises

Joint Force must achieve:• Unity of Effort• Joint Synergy• Freedom of Action• Influence over Perceptions

Chairman’s vision • An instrument of national power• Integrated operations in a complex & uncertain future

• Understand, Arrange, Assess & Rearrange• Combine & adapt: combat, security, engagement,

and relief and reconstruction• Create greater balance, adaptability and versatility

Page 5: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 5

UNCLASSIFIED

Solutions for the Future Joint Force

Page 6: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 6

UNCLASSIFIED

• Developed & validated Computer Network Measures of Performance/ Effectiveness

• Evaluated & refined Cyberspace Ops Crisis Action Planning Template

• Developed & validated manning model and estimate for offensive operations

• Based on operational plans• Approved by JROC, included in FY11-15

GDF Update

• Leveraged experts from NSA, JFCC-NW, DoD CIO, Joint Staff, DIA, JTF-GNO, COCOMs and Services

• Products providing pre-doctrinal basis for cyberspace operations: • Cyberspace Operations Crisis Action Planning Template• Computer Network Attack Measures of Performance and Measures of Effectiveness

Guide

Cyberspace Operations Experimentation

Page 7: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 7

UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance

Constructive Simulations Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Live Simulation (EC10)

Each Experiment planned to build on the previous Experiment driving towards increased validity for real-world operations

Experimental Rigor is being applied to the JIPS effort to provide a traceable, logical, and operationally valid path to recommendations

M&S environment based on real world processes, capabilities, and environments

Measures solutions against a baseline representing current persistent surveillance practices

Runs are executed with varied combinations of scenarios, weather, and sensor packages

Human decision-making introduced to further test solutions

Builds on Constructive Simulation results Solutions carried forward Additional solutions which

require human input are tested

Premier ISR event for DoD High visibility capstone event

to demonstrate JIPS solutions JIPS leverages EC10 as a

high fidelity HITL environment

Page 8: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 8

UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Targeting Proof of Concept

• Developed and validated solutions to deficiencies in joint targeting process

• Cross cutting initiatives to improve training and education, JFC targeting support, and automation

• Joint Targeting Support Center (JTSC) concept

• Leveraged Service, Combat Support Agency, COCOM, Joint Staff experts

• LOE validated value of centralizing select joint targeting functions

• VCJCS implemented following recommendations:• Institutionalization of Cross-Cutting Initiatives (JS/J7)• Organizational CONOPS (JFCOM)• Capabilities Based Assessment on organizational and functional solutions in the

CONOPS (STRATCOM)

Military Problem: Deficiencies in 1) the availability and placement of sufficiently trained targeting personnel; 2) targeting automation systems interoperability; 3) the management of the DoD targeting enterprise; 4) and the management of targeting support prevent the efficient execution of the joint targeting cycle as necessary to meet Joint Force Commander requirements. [Based on CFWG Study]

Military Problem: Deficiencies in 1) the availability and placement of sufficiently trained targeting personnel; 2) targeting automation systems interoperability; 3) the management of the DoD targeting enterprise; 4) and the management of targeting support prevent the efficient execution of the joint targeting cycle as necessary to meet Joint Force Commander requirements. [Based on CFWG Study]

Page 9: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 9

UNCLASSIFIEDP

RO

BL

EP

RO

BL

EMM

SO

LU

TIO

N I

DS

OL

UT

ION

ID

EX

PE

RIM

EN

EX

PE

RIM

EN

T/

T/

EV

AL

UA

TE

EV

AL

UA

TE

TR

AN

SIT

ION

TR

AN

SIT

ION

Improving Interagency IntegrationImproving Interagency IntegrationComprehensive Approach Experimentation

POLICYJOINT AND NATO DOCTRINE

CONOPs

Multinational Experiment 5

TRAINING

• Stability Operations• Security, economic, infrastructure, rule of

law, and governance sector reform• Interoperability, collaboration, unity of effort

• Systems integration• Strategic planning and implementation• Knowledge development• Information activities

ICAF USG Planning Framework

Architecture

MPICE

JFC Handbooks

CIP/CIME

Multinational Interagency

Strategic Planning Guide

Unified Action

S/CRS PLANNING FRAMEWORK

Building Toward a “Whole of Government” ApproachBuilding Toward a “Whole of Government” ApproachBuilding Toward a “Whole of Government” ApproachBuilding Toward a “Whole of Government” Approach

HANDBOOKS

FEB08, Strategic Planning & Shared Assessments MIE

APR08, Cooperative Implementation Planning MIE

JUN08, Comprehensive Approach Seminar

DEC08, Enabling Capabilities-Info Sharing MIE

Coherent Vision

Community of Interest

Collaboration Environment

CONOP/Handbk Development

ExperimentationAnalysis

Refinement

• NSPD-44• DODD 3000.05• SSTRO/HD CS JOC• HSPD-5

• NSPD-44• DODD 3000.05• SSTRO/HD CS JOC• HSPD-5

Page 10: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations

UNCLASSIFIED 10

UNCLASSIFIED