Upload
lamkiet
View
223
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Col Mark D. LaViolette, USMCCapabilities and Acquisition Division (CAD)
Joint Staff, J‐8
Joint Capabilities Development and Acquisition
2010 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition
“Dual Use Combat Developers Panel”
2
Bottom Line Up FrontBottom Line Up Front (BLUF)(BLUF)
•
Balancing Act: –
Requirements, Resources, Acquisition
•
Big “A” vs. Little “A”–
Standard acquisition process slow but effective
–
Rapid Acquisition (e.g, JUONS) when appropriate–
Other avenues: JCTD
•
Resource Constrained Environment
3
Joint Staff J8 MissionJoint Staff J8 Mission
Assist in Delivering the Assist in Delivering the Right Mix of CapabilitiesRight Mix of Capabilitiesfor the Joint Force Commandersfor the Joint Force Commanders
RESOURCE
ALLOCATION
REQUIREMENTS
DETERMINATIONACQUISITION
• Requirement Determination ‐
Planning, studies, analysis, assessments• Resource Allocation ‐
Programming/Budgeting • Acquisition Execution ‐
Deliver the required capabilities
4
Challenge of Rapid AcquisitionChallenge of Rapid Acquisition
Future FocusedVery Structured ProcessEvolved RequirementsAnalysis of AlternativesLengthy DevelopmentHigh Visibility on ProgramLarge Investment
little little
Now focused
More ad hoc process
Broad requirement
Quick assessment of alternatives
Limited development
High visibility on results
Limited investment
Very Limited Feedback
Transition to Program of Record
5
JUON RobotsJUON Robots
•
10 Total CENTCOM JUONs–
C-IED related–
3 Active / 7 Fielded –
Additional robots included in surge requirements
•
Enhancements: –
Deployment systems from vehicles–
Detachable toolkits–
Long-range antennas–
Video capture
Talon RobotTalon Robot PackBotPackBotMARCBOTMARCBOT Devil Pup (SUGV 3000)Devil Pup (SUGV 3000)
6
New & Accelerated JCTD Process New & Accelerated JCTD Process
Selection Execution
Joint Capability Technology DemonstrationsJoint Capability Technology Demonstrations
(JCTD) (JCTD) Quarterly Starts / Transfer to POR as appropriateQuarterly Starts / Transfer to POR as appropriate
Quarterly ProgramReview Boards
Legacy Selection Process(includes JROC validation)
Legacy Execution Process
Start
Start
6 MOS 12 MOS 18 MOS 24 MOS
JROC
Selection Execution
Selection Execution
Start
Start
JROC
JROC
Candidate Decision Board• Executable (Tech Readiness Lvl
(TRL) 5-7)• Addresses valid need• OSD / DDR&E Chair• JS / J8 DDR –
CO-Chair
Program Review Board:• Transfer to Program Of Record (POR); or• Deliver residuals satisfying need; or• Terminate• Forward to JROC for validation
CUGVCUGVJCTD JCTD SuccessSuccess
7
297 328 365 377 400 411 432 480 513 531
72 91 79124
169187 149 128 50 50 50 50
589575561551542
?
1917
?
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Fiscal Year
TY $
in B
Base OCO Supplem ental
316345
437468 479
535
601
667 662659+
601 611 625
542+Projection*Projection*
639
Note:*FY10 OMB Budget Blueprint
297 328 365 377 400 411 432 480 513 531
72 91 79124
169187 149 128 50 50 50 50
589575561551542
?
1917
?
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Fiscal Year
TY $
in B
Base OCO Supplem ental
316345
437468 479
535
601
667 662659+
601 611 625
542+Projection*Projection*
639
Note:*FY10 OMB Budget Blueprint
Defense Funding
Federal Spending
M andatory
Net Interest
Non-Defense Discretionary
National Defense
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Fiscal Year
Perc
enta
ge o
f the
Fed
eral
Bud
get
PROJECTION
FY 1964
21%
6%
22%
51%
FY 2004
19%
55%
7%
19%
FY 2014
15%
58%
12%
15%
M andatory
Net Interest
Non-Defense Discretionary
National Defense
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Fiscal Year
Perc
enta
ge o
f the
Fed
eral
Bud
get
PROJECTION
FY 1964
21%
6%
22%
51%
FY 2004
19%
55%
7%
19%
FY 2014
15%
58%
12%
15%
Federal Deficit/Surplus
Defense as a Percentage of GDP
Downward Budget PressuresDownward Budget Pressures
Mounting deficits, interest payments & entitlement spending will result in downward pressure to defense budgets
Mandatory
Net Interest
Non-Defense Discretionary
National Defense
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1962
1965
1968
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
2010
2013
Fiscal Year
Fede
ral B
udge
t Per
cent
age
ProjectionMandatory
Net Interest
Non-Defense Discretionary
National Defense
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1962
1965
1968
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
2010
2013
Fiscal Year
Fede
ral B
udge
t Per
cent
age
Projection
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
Surp
lus
/ Def
icit
as %
of G
DP
ProjectionProjection
40-year average(1969-2009):
-2.6%
FY08 – $459BFY09 – $1552BFY10 – $1449BFY11 – $1173BFY12 – $939B
Federal Surplus / Deficit
-1,600
-1,400
-1,200
-1,000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
TY $
in B
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
Surp
lus
/ Def
icit
as %
of G
DP
ProjectionProjection
40-year average(1969-2009):
-2.6%
40-year average(1969-2009):
-2.6%
40-year average(1969-2009):
-2.6%
FY08 – $459BFY09 – $1552BFY10 – $1449BFY11 – $1173BFY12 – $939B
Federal Surplus / Deficit
-1,600
-1,400
-1,200
-1,000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
TY $
in B
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
VIETNAM (1968)8.9%
KOREA (1953)11.7%
GULF WAR (1991)4.4%
WWII (1945)34.5%
REAGAN BUILD UP (1986)6.0%
GDP (CY00 $B)% of GDP
FY10*4.8%
(CY00 $B)
Projections:FY10-19 GDP and DoD % based on OMB and CBO projections
Key Summary• FY10 (3.7% Base & 4.8%
including OCO / Supp):─ GDP: $14,439B (CBO est.)─ Base: $531B─ OCO / Supp: $161B
FY15**3.7%
ProjectionProjection
Notes:*FY10 DoD funding includes $161B for OCO & Supplemental**FY12-15 DoD funding includes $50B/year for OCO
OMB
CBO
(% of GDP)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
VIETNAM (1968)8.9%
KOREA (1953)11.7%
GULF WAR (1991)4.4%
WWII (1945)34.5%
REAGAN BUILD UP (1986)6.0%
GDP (CY00 $B)% of GDP
FY10*4.8%
(CY00 $B)
Projections:FY10-19 GDP and DoD % based on OMB and CBO projections
Key Summary• FY10 (3.7% Base & 4.8%
including OCO / Supp):─ GDP: $14,439B (CBO est.)─ Base: $531B─ OCO / Supp: $161B
FY15**3.7%
ProjectionProjection
Notes:*FY10 DoD funding includes $161B for OCO & Supplemental**FY12-15 DoD funding includes $50B/year for OCO
OMB
CBO
(% of GDP)
8
•
J‐8 committed to fielding right mix of Joint capabilities
•
Use rapid acquisition process when appropriate
•
Balancing priorities is critical
ConclusionConclusion
RESOURCE
ALLOCATION
REQUIREMENTS
DETERMINATIONACQUISITION
11
JROCApprove
JIC JIC
CBACBA PlanICD
Capability Gap Validation
Technical Approach
Refine & Produce System
JCBReview JCB
Approval
JROCApprove
ICD
ChangeDOTmLPF
RiskOK
GapValidated
DCR
Done
Additional Analysis
JROCApproval
CDD
KPPs
KSAs
CostSchedule
Risk
Affordability
CPDCDD
ProductionWeaponSystem
Performance
Engineering & Manufacturing Dev Produce & DeployMilestoneMilestone
BBMilestoneMilestone
CC
JCBReview
JCBReview
MilestoneMilestoneAA
TechnologyDevelopment
LRIP FRP
OSDServicesDecision MeetingsJS/COCOMS
CBA
ICD
MDD
Mat’l
SolutionAnalysis
Capability Based Assessment and Acquisition ProcessesCapability Based Assessment and Acquisition Processes
12
Rapid Fielding FrameworkRapid Fielding Framework
GENERATIONPHASE
VETTINGPHASE
EQUIPPINGPHASE
OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT PHASE
Force Commander Identifies Urgent Need
Combatant Staff determines themost suitable process
COCOM CoS certifies and submitsto Joint Staff (DJ-8 RMD)
J-8 RMD Receives and verifies that JUON meets submission criteria
JUON is reviewed and routed
Solutions are identified
JRAC determines a resourcing Strategy.
Interim Sponsor creates a Simplified Acquisition Plan
Procures and deliver solutionto the Warfighter
Provide Progress Reports On Performance, Cost, and Schedule
Interim Sponsor sustains solutionand monitors performance fortwenty- four months
Interim Sponsor, COCOM, andFCB prepare Capability Review to Address final disposition of fieldedsystem.
SPEED IS LIFE
JUON Process Consists of Four Phases:
13
•
JCTD Historical PerspectiveAll JCTDs: 2006 – Present, DDR&E Funding
6 Mos
$10M
$20M
$30M
$40M
42 Mos30 Mos12 Mos 18 Mos 24 Mos 36 Mos 48 Mos
Legacy JCTD ProcessFY10 Interim JCTD ProcessFY11+ New JCTD Process
APP
AD
AS
PHPG
JFPA
SS
TISC
CA
BLE
JMEW
S
CH
AMP
CH
AMPI
ON
Med
usa
JSuW
CO
RPO
RA
L
PGSS
JRaD
S
CSE
JMD
SE
FITE
OB
1N
ZP
AW
SSC
AMS
PAW
SR
IOH
TVSF
Com
mon
Gro
und
MA
DSS
C2
Gap
Fill
er
Cla
ssifi
ed
SFO
B
DW
NSL
DSS
CD
-CIE
R2T
DFW
APK
WS
TED
SSe
a Tr
acke
rOP3
D
PEO
PLE
ISO
MPEA
K
IRIS
GO
Pre-FY10 JCTD
FY10 JCTD
FY11+ JCTD