22
Johne’s Disease Update: Steve Hendrick, DVM, DVSc Thursday, April 14 th , 2005

Johne’s Disease Update:

  • Upload
    renate

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Johne’s Disease Update:. Steve Hendrick, DVM, DVSc Thursday, April 14 th , 2005. Outline:. Johne’s Disease Background Impact on Production Risk Factors Conclusions. Johne’s Disease:. Johne’s Disease:. Ontario Cows: 2.2%, Herds: 10% ( Tremblay et al., 2001) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Johne’s Disease Update:

Johne’s Disease Update:

Steve Hendrick, DVM, DVSc

Thursday, April 14th, 2005

Page 2: Johne’s Disease Update:

Outline:

Johne’s Disease Background Impact on

Production Risk Factors

Conclusions

Page 3: Johne’s Disease Update:

Johne’s Disease:

Page 4: Johne’s Disease Update:

Johne’s Disease:

Ontario Cows: 2.2%, Herds: 10% (Tremblay et al., 2001) Cows: 7% (McNab et al., 1991)

Atlantic Provinces Cows: 16% (McKenna et al., 2004) Cows: 1.6%, Herds: 17% (VanLeeuwen et al., 2001)

Alberta Cows: 7% (Sorensen et al., 2003)

Page 5: Johne’s Disease Update:

Prevalence:

50 randomly selected dairy herds:

Milk Serum

Cow-level: 1.7% 2.6%Herd-level*: 18% 30%* 2 or more positive cows per herd

Page 6: Johne’s Disease Update:

Johne’s Disease:

Production limiting disease Milk production, longevity,

fertility, milk quality International trade barriers Crohn’s Disease ???

Page 7: Johne’s Disease Update:

Production:

Milk Production Decreased:

Nordlund et al., 1996;

Sweeney et al., 1994 Increased:

McNab et al., 1991; Benedictus et al.,

1987

Culling Increased risk

Wilson et al., 1993

Page 8: Johne’s Disease Update:

305-day Milk Production:

Variable: Estimate (kg)

SE: P-value:

fecal culture positive -548 193 <0.01*

milk ELISA positive -464 188 0.01*

serum ELISA positive -173 154 0.26

Controlled for: parity, DIM, SCC-LS, and herd.* significant at p<0.05

Page 9: Johne’s Disease Update:

Culling:

Variable: Hazard Ratio:

P-value:

fecal culture positive

3.2 <0.01*

milk ELISA positive 2.3 <0.01*

serum ELISA positive

1.7 0.05*Controlled for: parity, DIM, milk production, pregnancy status, SCC-LS, and herd.* significant at p<0.05

Page 10: Johne’s Disease Update:

Partial Budget: Assumptions:

100 cow dairy herd 10% fecal culture positive

10 infected cows + 90 non-shedding cows annual culling rate of 30% average milk price = $60/HL cost of a replacement heifer = $1,200 slaughter value:

non-infected cows: $200 Infected cows: $0

Page 11: Johne’s Disease Update:

Partial Budget: Culling:

1. Non-infected herd: 30% of 100 cows = 30 cows

2. Infected herd: 30% of 90 non-shedding cows = 27 cows 90% of 10 fecal positive cows = 9 cows

6 additional culls 6 x $1,200 per heifer = $7,200 extra for

replacements 9 infected culls:

9 x $200 opportunity cost = $1,800 Sub-total = $9,000

36 cows

Page 12: Johne’s Disease Update:

Partial Budget: Milk Production:

550 kg (5.5 HL) of lost milk for each infected cow (fecal culture)

10 cows x 5.5 HL/cow x $60/HL = $3,300

Total: $9,000 + $3,300 = $12,300 equates to $123 per cow ($100 USD)

$100-200 USD per cow (Ott et al., 1999) $49 per cow (Chi et al, 2002)

Page 13: Johne’s Disease Update:

Other Johne’s Frustrations: Treatment:

None are efficacious and cost-effective Diagnosis:

Sub-clinical infections: difficult to identify - all tests lack

sensitivity

Prevention and Control: What are the important control points?

Page 14: Johne’s Disease Update:

Johne’s Risk Factors:

Calf housing and feeding Calving pen cleanliness Herd size and purchased replacement

cattle History of clinical disease Housing of periparturient cows Soil type or pH Access to wildlife Cow nutrition and water sources

Page 15: Johne’s Disease Update:

Variable: OR: P-value:

Background:Previous Diagnosis of Johne’s DiseaseMilk production (10 BCA points)

3.40.9

<0.01<0.01

Rumensin given to cows within last five yearsa 0.5 0.04

Pre-weaning Heifer Calves:Calves kept in hutches 0.5 0.03

a evaluated both premix and controlled-release capsule usage

Johne’s Risk Factors:

Page 16: Johne’s Disease Update:

Variable: OR: P-value:

Background:Milk production (10 BCA points)

0.9 <0.01

Calving Pen:Calves removed >1 hrSpringing Heifer Cleanliness:- Manure on hip, belly & udder

2.7

1.9

0.05

0.07

In herds with a history of Johne’s disease:

Risk Factors:

Page 17: Johne’s Disease Update:

Variable:a OR: P-value:

Background:Purchase replacement cattle

3.2 0.05

Rumensin given to cows within last five yearsa 0.3 <0.01

Pre-weaning Heifer Calves:Calves kept in hutches

0.2 <0.01a evaluated both premix and controlled-release capsule usage

In herds with no prior history of Johne’s disease:

Risk Factors:

Page 18: Johne’s Disease Update:

Take Home Message:

Prevalence of Johne’s disease in Ontario: Higher than previously

reported 1 out of 3 farms are infected

Page 19: Johne’s Disease Update:

Take Home Message:

Production Impacts: Milk: loss of 150 to 550 kg (2-6%) Culling: removed 2 to 3 times faster

Partial Budget: ~$120 per cow in the herd

Page 20: Johne’s Disease Update:

Take Home Message:

Prevention: avoid purchase of replacement cattle

Control: maternity pen:

reduce time in maternity pen by calf heifer rearing:

housing of heifer calves springing heifer cleanliness

monensin sodium usage ???

Page 21: Johne’s Disease Update:

Acknowledgements:

Ontario Dairy Producers Veterinary Practitioners Advisory Committee:

Dr. Todd Duffield, Dr. Dave Kelton, Dr. Kerry Lissemore, Dr. Ken Leslie, Dr. Marie Archambault

Technical Assistants

Page 22: Johne’s Disease Update:

Questions?