2
John Parks Federal Jurisdiction and Income Tax Loophole Folks, I think we might have a blockbuster: UPDATE: I have received a couple mails saying things did not go well with John Parks, I have not confirmed things went bad but will say this: It is risky to go against a corrupt system that is in no way following the law, no matter how right you are. About this topic, Wayne wrote: Jim, regarding the article you just posted by Anonymous, about Federal Jurisdiction and Income Tax. This is not something new. I explain this very point in my book, It's Not The Law, and I believe I explain it clearly. People just need to read it; perhaps two or three times. Our only hope is that more people will figure out the simple truth, and stop believing the lies of our enemies. Lately I have been thinking a lot about the fraud I discovered in federal gun laws, and how so many gun owners are behaving like complete dupes in believing dumb stuff they are told. Exposing this fraud was the reason I set out to write that book, but nobody seems to "get it." Rather, they choose to believe attorneys, and wicked judges. The Second Amendment was never meant to be something a judge could override with a ridiculous interpretation. With a little more understanding more of us would be laughing in their faces. Wayne Barbuto Blockbuster post follows: True "Income tax" and "Federal Jurisdiction loophole found, and it appears to be something that will actually work: Anonymous wrote: I just found your site a couple of days ago by a link someone put in a comment. I am writing for the first time. I don't know if you know about this or have ever covered it, but I feel that the whole world should know this information. I found some very valuable information that virtually no one is covering that would put an end to many problems in our country (i.e. Hammond case, Bundy case, taxes, gun control, loss of rights, etc.). It could take down the Federal Reserve and our government, at least partially, through the court system. The link I have contains a very long explanation with PDF linked documents.

John Parks Federal Jurisdiction and Income Tax Loophole.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

John Parks Federal Jurisdiction and Income Tax Loophole

Folks, I think we might have a blockbuster:

UPDATE: I have received a couple mails saying things did not go well with John Parks,

I have not confirmed things went bad but will say this: It is risky to go against a corrupt

system that is in no way following the law, no matter how right you are.

About this topic, Wayne wrote:

Jim, regarding the article you just posted by Anonymous, about Federal Jurisdiction

and Income Tax. This is not something new. I explain this very point in my book, It's

Not The Law, and I believe I explain it clearly. People just need to read it; perhaps two

or three times. Our only hope is that more people will figure out the simple truth, and

stop believing the lies of our enemies.

Lately I have been thinking a lot about the fraud I discovered in federal gun laws, and

how so many gun owners are behaving like complete dupes in believing dumb stuff

they are told. Exposing this fraud was the reason I set out to write that book, but

nobody seems to "get it." Rather, they choose to believe attorneys, and wicked judges.

The Second Amendment was never meant to be something a judge could override with

a ridiculous interpretation. With a little more understanding more of us would be

laughing in their faces.

Wayne Barbuto

Blockbuster post follows:

True "Income tax" and "Federal Jurisdiction loophole found, and it appears to be

something that will actually work:

Anonymous wrote:

I just found your site a couple of days ago by a link someone put in a comment. I am

writing for the first time. I don't know if you know about this or have ever covered it, but

I feel that the whole world should know this information.

I found some very valuable information that virtually no one is covering that would put

an end to many problems in our country (i.e. Hammond case, Bundy case, taxes, gun

control, loss of rights, etc.). It could take down the Federal Reserve and our

government, at least partially, through the court system. The link I have contains a very

long explanation with PDF linked documents.

In a nutshell, a man in Texas, named John Parks Trowbridge, Jr., had an IRS tax case.

His ranch had a lien placed on it. He went through the court system all the way to the

supreme court and has apparently won. What he found out is that the federal and US

district courts, both criminal and civil, have no jurisdiction outside of DC and the

Territories (Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, etc.).

How he did this was in the following manner: He petitioned the court to prove

jurisdiction, and the judges did not respond. Basically they were pleading the 5th by not

responding. He took this case to the Supreme Court twice, and they refused to hear

the case both times. For any of these judges to respond, would prove fraud on their

part because they know they cannot prove jurisdiction. This would amount to a death

sentence for them for treason to the Constitution.

The reason this fraud has gone on so long is that when the US incorporated itself,

congress changed the meaning of the word "state" in the laws. So when "state" is used

now, to them, it means United States, Incorporated, making you a resident of DC.

Since no one in the general public is aware of this, when we use the word "state", we

mean Alabama, Minnesota, etc. However, because we don't know this and proceed to

do business with the feds we are consenting to being a resident of Washington, DC.

The key here is that, according to a Supreme Court case that he located and

presented to the court, you cannot reside in two places at once. You cannot live in both

your town in a state and also live in DC at the same time and the feds cannot treat you

as such (as long as you make them aware that you know this secret). So you must

never use the word "state" in written documents or verbally with the feds or they have

you trapped. As long as you let them know that you know, they will never continue a

case, because to do so would let the cat out of the bag, and the public would be

informed of the enormous fraud.

Can you imagine the impact this would have on our county? How many people would

no longer have to pay taxes to support the Federal Reserve bankers? How many

people would be let out of prison? How much property would have to be returned to the

people? How angry would the American public be for the fraud perpetrated on them

their entire lives?

This information needs to spread far and wide. How fast can we take back our

country? As fast as this information can be circulated throughout this country.