Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Budget and Planning Subcommittees Meeting Agenda March 29, 2017
1:45 -3pm – Room 610 Haaren Hall
1. Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2017. Proposed minutes are attached. 2. Budget and Enrollment Presentation and Discussion. Steve and Mark will review the
Powerpoint attached here. 3. Space Utilization Task Force Presentation.
Joint Meeting: SPS – FPS Minutes
March 29, 2017
Present: Jane Bowers, Steven Titan (FPS Chair), Catherine Alves, Ric Anzaldua, Ned Benton, Jeffrey Brown, Jim Cauthen, Kinya Chandler, Brian Cortijo, Angela Crossman, Cheryl D’ Antonio, Dana Davies, Sandrine Dikambi, Jay Hamilton, Karen Kaplowitz, Tom Kucharski, Anne Lopes, Virginia Moreno, Jenise Reyes, Alena Ryjov, Michael Sachs, Douglas Salane, Will Simpkins, Raj Singh, Chinua Thomas and Alison Orlando (Recorder)
1. Approval of Minutes from January 10, 2017. Minutes were approved as proposed. 2. Budget and Enrollment Presentation and Discussion. Steve T. began the presentation
by updating the committee on the budget. He explained that the college is projected to have a surplus of $482,443 for FY 2017. This is a change from the FY 2017 Plan that was approved by the BPC that projected a surplus of $17,426. The main reason for the increased surplus is $2,273,000 in revenue that the college will receive from the Department of Corrections (DOC) for the use of North Hall. Steve T. then explained the surplus is not more than $482,443 because the college did not realize savings for the proposed hiring freeze or for the reduced number of sections for adjuncts. Jim C. asked why the FY 2017 Plan approved by the BPC accounted for $30,648,206 in administrative costs but the updated 2017 projections account for $35,483,968 in costs and the projections for FY 2018 rise to $38,173,494. Steve T. said that he would come back to the committee with an answer to this question. Steve T. then spoke about the FY 2018 budget. We are looking at a $5.6 million deficit if the tuition increase does not go into effect and a $2.5 million deficit if the increase is implemented. He explained that the proposed $250 annual tuition increase will only yield $166 for John Jay due to the TAP Gap. Steve T. then spoke about balancing the budget; possible ways to increase revenue include increasing enrollment and retention rates. Dana D. then presented the enrollment section of the presentation. She first spoke about recruitment, and the demographics of New York State (NYS) where most of our students are from. She explained that the high school graduate trends in NYS reflect national trends, and there are shrinking demographics which reflects the challenge of recruiting. However, the number of non-white graduates from NYS Public Schools is increasing. This is a positive for John Jay as we are a diverse institution, and can take advantage of this growing population. Dana D. went over the enrollment summary for spring along with our fall new student enrollments and targets. Tom K. explained that there have been instances where we have hit our enrollment targets but lost money because of the type of students that enrolled. He said it would be helpful if we could break down this information by in-state and out-of-state students. Dana D. said this was a good point, and that we are doing a lot of work with out-of-state and international students. She then spoke about summer and winter enrollments which are up. She finished the presentation by going over slides that focused on admissions applications. She explained that she is cautiously optimistic about undergraduate admissions applications for fall, and that we are up 4% in transfer applications from this point last year. There was then a brief discussion on retention.
3. Space Utilization Task Force Presentation. Raj S. introduced Jeff B. who gave the presentation. Jeff B. started with an introduction and an explanation on why the task force came to fruition. He then went over a series of slides that in sum explained what the taskforce learned about space at the college, and recommendations by the task-force. Recommendations from the task force included adding classrooms and conference rooms to VEMS, having an events handbook along with a FAQ about reserving space, and having
an Events Review Committee. Anne L. commented that these recommendations represent one view and not all of the task force agreed on these recommendations. In particular, she feels the event review committee could be problematic. Angela C. gave feedback from the Council of Chairs. She explained the academic department conference rooms are heavily used and that having these conference rooms allows the departments not to use other space in the college. She explained that the flexibility for the departments to use their conference rooms is important, and this would be hindered if the conference rooms were on VEMS. Jim C. agreed and suggested starting with putting the classrooms on VEMS and see how that works out. Ned B. said feedback from the Faculty Senate included that they were not in favor of putting the conference rooms on VEMS and there was puzzlement on how this approach happened without SPS engagement. He explained that it is frustrating that an ad-hoc committee was created to bypass the governance structure. He also wanted to know how this approach was decided as the college has big space problems that are not being engaged. Steve T. explained that there has been a complete inventory of space; he understands it is a big issue and there is a space shortage. However, this is a separate space issue. Jay H. said that a title change for the taskforce would distinguish that this is a separate issue. He also felt that the issues coming up could have been avoided if the department chairs, and SPS committee was involved from the start. Raj S. said this was a learning experience, but a lot of work went into the process and some of it can be used. Angela C. suggested putting up a list on VEMS of space that is available but cannot be booked through VEMS along with contact information on who to call to book those rooms. Raj S. said that what they are trying to do is to encourage some sharing to make the space we have work. It was decided that there would be an ad-hoc meeting of the SPS to discuss these issues before the taskforce takes their findings to the President.
1
Current Budget Projections FY 2016 Final FY17 Plan Approved By BPC
FY2107 Projection Updated
FY 2018 No Tutition Increase, Includes 10.41% Collective Bargining Increase
FY 2018 with $250 Tutition Increase, Includes 10.41% Collective Bargining Increase
FY 2019 No Tutition Increase, Includes 10.41% Collective Bargining Increase
FY 2019 with $250 Tutition Increase, Includes 10.41% Collective Bargining Increase
BUDGET ALLOCATION AND REVENUE Final CUNY Values 3/8/2017 CUNY Revenue Target $86,683,359 $85,844,000 $85,619,000 $85,844,000 $87,074,523 $85,844,000 $88,554,790 Avg Enrollment ((Fall + Spring)/2) 11,201 10,794 10,993 10921 10,921 10,971 10,971 Base Allocation: $89,996,351 $88,153,158 $86,732,237 $92,545,157 $92,545,157 $92,545,157 $92,545,157 Lump Sum Allocations $2,133,923 $2,516,987 $652,663 $652,663 $652,663 $652,663 $652,663 Additional Allocations $6,414,035 $4,588,474 $11,898,409 $5,923,180 $5,923,180 $5,923,180 $5,923,180 NYC Budget Initiatives $1,405,000 $3,770,000 $3,506,700 $3,506,700 $3,519,000 $1,405,000 NYS Retro & Ratification Bonus $13,621,285 Jan Apr Collective Bargaining Increase $3,092,185 Labor Reserve Allocation $2,906,460 $2,906,460 Current Year Gross Tuition Revenue above CUNY Target ($1,134,846) ($3,870,041) ($838,012) ($1,029,400) ($231,547) ($1,952,529) $383,397 COMPACT FUNDING $2,253,376 $0 $5,271,716
TOTAL BASE BUDGET ALLOCATION $100,315,923 $95,700,038 $118,928,767 $101,598,300 $104,649,529 $100,687,471 $106,181,112 Prior Year Cutra Balance $1,830,740 $1,717,875 $2,068,540 $482,443 $482,443 $0 $0
TOTAL ADDITIONAL REVENUES $1,830,740 $1,717,875 $2,068,540 $482,443 $482,443 $0 $0
TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATION $102,146,663 $97,417,913 $120,997,307 $102,080,743 $105,131,971 $100,687,471 $106,181,112
EXPENDITURES Personnel Services (PS) : $71,956,400 $70,778,662 $91,266,141 $80,830,884 $80,830,884 $81,230,884 $81,230,884 Faculty $0 $36,410,518 $36,942,952 $38,663,428 $38,663,428 $38,663,428 $38,663,428 Administrative Staff $0 $30,648,206 $35,483,968 $38,173,494 $38,173,494 $38,573,494 $38,573,494 ECP $0 $3,719,938 $3,721,795 $3,993,961 $3,993,961 $3,993,961 $3,993,961
Retro & Ratification Bonus $15,117,425 Adjuncts: $13,257,520 $11,770,649 $16,326,640 $14,950,908 $14,950,908 $14,950,908 $14,950,908 Teaching Adjuncts / CLTs $11,482,969 $12,909,000 $14,241,078 $14,241,078 $14,241,078 $14,241,078 CETs $287,680 $478,531 $709,829 $709,829 $709,829 $709,829
Retro & Ratification Bonus $2,939,109 Temp Services: $5,435,840 $5,528,218 $6,711,675 $5,729,424 $5,729,424 $6,113,509 $6,113,509 College Assistants $4,625,616 $4,568,512 $4,901,286 $4,901,286 $5,285,371 $5,285,371 Non-Teaching Adjuncts $902,602 $765,492 $828,138 $828,138 $828,138 $828,138
Retro & Ratification Bonus $1,377,671 Projected Collective Bargaining Increase $2,906,460 0 0 0 0
TOTAL PS $90,649,760 $90,983,989 $114,304,456 $101,511,215 $101,511,215 $102,295,300 $102,295,300 OTPS $6,173,285 $5,967,195 $6,173,285 $6,173,285 $6,173,285 $6,173,285 Strategic Investments Initiative $243,213 $243,213
TOTAL OTPS $6,243,510 $6,416,498 $6,210,408 $6,173,285 $6,173,285 $6,173,285 $6,173,285
TOTAL FINANCIAL PLAN EXPENDITURES $96,893,270 $97,400,487 $120,514,864 $107,684,500 $107,684,500 $108,468,585 $108,468,585
YEAR END BALANCE $2,346,933 $17,426 $482,443 ($5,603,757) ($2,552,529) ($7,781,114) ($2,287,473)
2
What Helped Balance the FY17 Budget?
•DOC North Hall - $2,273,000 (FY17) • Ratification Bonus and Retro payment - $19,434,205 According to
CUNY this will be covered be a combination of the $5.8M labor reserve set-aside by CUNY and $13.6M promised by the Governor
• Contractual Increase (Jan & April) - $3,092,185 According to CUNY this will be covered by CUNY
3
With an increase of $2.2M from DOC why is the surplus only $500K? • Did not realize savings for proposed hiring freeze ($1M) • Did not realize savings in reduced number of sections for Adjuncts
($750K)
4
NYC Funding
5
Looking Forward for FY18
Current FY18 Budget Projection
FY 2018 with $250 Tutition Increase, Includes 10.41% Collective Bargining Increase
BUDGET ALLOCATION AND REVENUE CUNY Revenue Target $87,074,523 Avg Enrollment ((Fall + Spring)/2) 10,921 Base Allocation: $92,545,157 Lump Sum Allocations $652,663 Additional Allocations $5,923,180 NYC Budget Initiatives $3,506,700 Current Year Gross Tuition Revenue above CUNY Target ($231,547) COMPACT FUNDING $2,253,376
TOTAL BASE BUDGET ALLOCATION $104,649,529 Prior Year Cutra Balance $482,443
TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATION $105,131,971
EXPENDITURES Personnel Services (PS) : $80,830,884 Faculty $38,663,428 Administrative Staff $38,173,494 ECP $3,993,961 Adjuncts: $14,950,908 Teaching Adjuncts / CLTs $14,241,078 CETs $709,829 Temp Services: $5,729,424 College Assistants $4,901,286 Non-Teaching Adjuncts $828,138
TOTAL PS $101,511,215 OTPS $6,173,285
TOTAL FINANCIAL PLAN EXPENDITURES $107,684,500
YEAR END BALANCE ($2,552,529) 7
Assumptions for FY18 & FY19
• Staffing levels remain unchanged from current approved positions • Adjunct staffing levels remain constant • Energy Savings targets at $2M • DOC North Hall Revenue ends 12/31/17 ($721K) • DOC Cadet Corps and Captain Training program increases in size
• (FY17 = $792K,FY 18 = $2.08M, FY19 = $2.814M)
• Leadership Changes (Travia) • No supplemental funding from RF
8
Challenges Faced in FY18 & FY19
• Collective Bargaining Increase not covered by Governors Proposed Budget (approximately $10M)
• The proposed $250 annual tuition increase only yields $166 for John Jay
• Additional Revenue from tuition Increase = $1.8M
9
TAP GAP Based Upon Historical Waivers, John Jay would receive 66.7% of the Tuition Increase $250 * 66/7% = $166 annually
81.9% 81.8% 79.7%
78.7% 78.3% 73.9%
66.7%
Weighted Average 77.9%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Hunter Queens Baruch Lehman Brooklyn City JOHN JAY
% Tuition Increase Returned to College
% of Compact Invest to Tuition Increase (Calculated as Base Compact Investment / Revenue from FA2015 Increase)
10
Ways to Balance the Budget
Formula for a Balanced Budget
• Revenue = Expenditures
• To balance the budget three options exist: • Increase revenue • Decrease expenses • Combination of both
12
Increasing Revenue
Increase Enrollment
Additional Revenue from Increasing Size of Freshman Class
Freshman Class Size FTE Worth Additional Revenue Support Costs
Additional Net Revenue
1500 $6,580 1600 $6,580 $658,000 $0 $658,000 1700 $6,580 $1,316,000 $250,000 $1,066,000
Additional Revenue By Increasing Retention Increase in Retention Rate FTE FTE Worth
Additional Revenue
0.50% 35 $7,472 $265,206 1% 71 $7,472 $530,411 2% 142 $7,472 $1,060,822 3% 213 $7,472 $1,591,233
14
Enrollment Management
New York State High School Graduate Trends
The total number of graduates is projected to increase by 0.9% between 2011-12 and 2024-25, the next highest year for New York.
16
New York State Public High School Graduates
From 2012-13 to 2031-31: White graduates will change from 55% to 43% Non-white graduates will increase from 45% to 57%
17
Spring 2015 Spring 2016 Projected
Spring 2017 Spring 2017 Preliminary
Difference to Spring 2016
Difference to SP17 Targets
N N N N N % N
New Freshmen 61 24 50 46 22 92% - 4
New Transfer 1,031 936 1,022 1,128 192 21% 106
New Degree Graduate 247 296 353 330 34 11% - 23 Continuing Undergraduate Student 10,512 10,321 10,024 9,950 - 371 -4% - 74
Continuing Graduate Student 1,342 1,329 1,345 1,316 - 13 -1% - 29
Total Headcount
Total Undergraduate 12,514 12,156 11,911 12,164 8 0% 253
Total Graduate 1,711 1,695 1,816 1,794 99 6% - 22
Total College 14,225 13,851 13,728 13,958 107 1% 230
Total FTE
Total Undergraduate 9,899 9,823 9,504 9,683 - 140 -1% 179
Total Graduate 1,003 1,008 1,083 1,060 52 5% - 23
Total College 10,902 10,831 10,587 10,743 - 88 -1% 156
Spring 2017 Enrollment Summary
18
Fall New Student Enrollment and Targets
Fall2010
Fall2011
Fall2012
Fall2013
Fall2014
Fall2015
Fall2016
Fall2017
Freshmen (Financial Plan) 2,015 1,766 1,908 1,861 1,763 1,489 1,523 1,500Freshman (Target) 1,523 1,700Transfer 1,167 1,368 1,621 1,723 1,530 1,771 1,795 1,850New Graduate 495 550 496 493 482 467 532 592
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
19
10-Year Trend in Summer Course Enrollment: Summer 2007-Summer 2016
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Clas
s Sec
tions
Tota
l Cla
ss E
nrol
lmen
t
Total Class Enrollment Class Sections
20
Winter Course Enrollment: Winter 2005-Winter 2016
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Clas
s Sec
tions
Tota
l Cla
ss E
nrol
lmen
t
Total Class Enrollment Class Sections
21
Profile of Non-SEEK Freshmen
939 951 953
963 979
989 992 82.2
82.9 83.3 83.5
84.1 84.7 84.8
75.0
77.0
79.0
81.0
83.0
85.0
850
900
950
1,000
1,050
1,100
Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016
CAA
SAT
22
CUNY-Wide Spring Total Headcount
John Jay CUNY-Wide Highlights: • First-time freshman number is the
largest increase at CUNY senior colleges, over 2016 at 91.7 percent
• New transfer numbers is the largest
increase at CUNY senior colleges, over 2016 at 20.5 percent
• New graduate numbers is the largest
increase at CUNY senior colleges (with the exception of School of professional studies), over 2016 at 10.8 percent
23
Undergraduate Admissions Applications
15991
8433
1763
15668
8549
1489
16276
7556
1523
17580
5392
1650
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
Applied Admitted Enrolled
Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Fall 2017
Fall 2017 Data as of March 1, 2017 Fall 2014 – 2016 data is year-end
*Projected Fall 2017 Enrollment number 24
Undergraduate Freshman Application Choices
5861 5746 5819
6680
2294 2257 2260 2526
2180 2182 2364 2415
2886
2145 2296 2382
1905 1872 1898 2143
1458 1375 1546 1679
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2014 2015 2016 2017
Choice 1 Choice 2 Choice 3 Choice 4 Choice 5 Choice 6
Fall 2017 Data as of March 1, 2017 Fall 2014 – 2016 data is year-end
Of the total students enrolled in Fall, 64% come from 1st choice applicants 25
CUNY-Wide Fall 2017 Transfer Applications Percent Increases over Fall 2016 (as March 13)
-5%
-3%
-1% 0%
-3%
4%
1% 1%
-4%
-8%
-6%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
Baruch Bklyn City CSI Hunter John Jay Lehman MedgarEvers
NYCCT Queens York
Percentage Increase/Decrease
Baruch Bklyn City CSI Hunter John Jay Lehman Medgar Evers NYCCT Queens York
26
Embracing the Philosophy of Shared Space and Multi-purpose Room Utilization
March 29, 2017
SPACE UTILIZATION TASK FORCE
Overview
1. Purpose
2. Findings
3. Recommendations
2
3
Introduction
Justice for All
Virtual Event Management System (VEMS)
President’s Listening Tour
Improved utilization of college space for college purposes
Improved transparency
Space Utilization Task Force
Task Force Membership
Raj Singh (Chair) AVP for Administration Catherine Alves Student Athletics Director Jeffrey Brown Director of Theater and Events Support Services Anthony Carpi Dean of Research/Associate Provost Brian Cortijo Enrollment Registrar Specialist Kathryn Cousins Executive Director of Development Cheryl D’Antonio Administrative Events Manager Anne Goon Administrative Superintendent – Custodial Services, Laborers Marc Harary Director of Space Planning & Capital Projects Anne Lopes Dean of Graduate Studies/Associate Provost of Strategic Initiatives Daniel Matos Registrar William Pangburn Administrative Director Vincent Papandrea Admissions Director Michael Rohdin Academic Program Director Michael Sachs Assistant Vice President/Dean of Students Nicole Simon Director of Strategic Initiatives William Simpkins Student Career Program Senior Director Daniel Stageman Research Programs Director Chinua Thomas Broadcast Associate III – Audio Visual Services
4
TERMS OF REFERENCE:
Executive Summary 5
Develop processes for improved coordination for space utilization
Improve efficiency in determining the time of regular annual events
Develop strategies to enhance events planning
Develop procedures for reserving space
Clarify the decision making process relating to space reservation
Committee Meetings/Outreach 6
Meetings - 9
Open Forum for Students
Open Forum for Faculty & Staff
Faculty Senate
Provost Advisory Council and Council of Chairs Student Council Sub-Committee
7
What We’ve Learned
A Shift in Philosophy is Needed
Growth in number of campus organizations
Increase in programming/events requiring space
Loss of North Hall
Tendency to over-reserve or hold space when in
reality…
Pre-Booked Fall 2016 Events
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
StudentActivities
CollegeGovernance
AcademicAffairs
President'sOffice
ResearchCenters
CUNY ExternalAffairs
Rentals OAR
Num
ber o
f Eve
nts
User Group / Department
Fall 2016 Events Pre-Booked PRIOR to Opening of the Calendar
But it’s not all about Event Space 8
254 - Student Activities 99 - College Governance 58 - Academic Affairs 15 - President’s Office 12 - Research Center 12 - CUNY 11 - External Affairs 7 - Rentals 5 - OAR Office for the Advancement Of Research
473 – TOTAL
The Plight of the Registrar The Classroom Conundrum
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday SundayPeriod 1 69 65 64 65 20 11 0Period 2 103 100 98 99 26 22 0Period 3 100 104 104 100 52 31 0Period 4 99 104 104 103 55 30 1Period 5 99 104 104 100 10 4 0Period 6 99 88 104 84 9 0 0Period 7 94 98 102 89 6 1 0Period 8 55 52 58 50 0 1 0Period 9 12 10 13 10 0 0 0
Num
ber o
f Cla
ssro
oms
Spring 2017 Sections Running in Regular Classrooms as of 12/14/2016
9
Period 1 - 64% 8:00am – 9:15am Period 2 - 96% 9:25am – 10:40am Period 3 - 98% 10:50am – 12:05pm Period 4 - 99% 12:15pm – 1:30pm Community Hour 1:40pm – 2:55pm Period 5 - 98% 3:05pm – 4:20pm Period 6 - 90% 4:30pm – 5:45pm Period 7 - 92% 5:55pm – 7:10pm Period 8 - 52% 7:20pm – 8:35pm Period 9 - 11% 8:45pm – 10:00pm
85% National Threshold for Critical Overuse
104 Total Classrooms
Classroom Utilization
10
Minimize the Hours of Unused Classroom Utilization
After Add/Drop Dates Classrooms to be place
into VEMS
Clubs and Organizations to use classrooms during community hour to free up Event Space for full-day events and conferences
An Inventory of Conference Rooms 18 Academic Conference Rooms
■ History Conference Room 8.65.36 NB 16/20
■ Latin American Studies 8.63.33 NB 12
■ Philosophy Conference Rm. 8.63.24 NB 14
■ Political Science Conf. Rm. 9.66.00 NB 12
■ Student Affairs Conference Rm. L.65.08 NB 12/23
■ Anthropology Conf. Room 9.63.24 NB 20
■ Psychology Conference Rm. 10.65.36 NB 28
■ Academic Advising L.73.11 NB 12
■ Math/C.S. Conference Rm. 6.63.37 NB 12
■ Africana Studies 9.63.37 NB 12
■ Science Conference Room 05.66.01 NB 16/35
■ Interdisciplinary Studies 06.65.33 NB 25
■ English Dept. Conf/Class Rm. 07.63.41 NB 15
■ Provost Conference Room 620 HH 12
■ Undergraduate Studies 531 HH 20
■ SEEKI Conference Room 431 HH 20
■ PhD Conference/Class Room 636 HH 20
■ Acad. Ops/Inter. Affairs 606.01 BMW 8
11
Department Room Bldg Seats Department Room Bldg Seats
And There’s More… 16 Administrative Conference Rooms
■ DoIT Conference Room L2.63.07 NB 8
■ DoIT Conference Room L2.63.16 NB 6
■ Facilities Conference Room. L2.68.01 NB 8
■ Wellness Counseling Conf. Rm. L.68.05 NB 12/20
■ Career Services Conf. Rm. L.72.23 NB 20/24
■ Finance and Administration 9.65.17 NB 12
■ Office of Legal Services 622.04 HH 8
■ 54th Street Annex 702 54th 25
■ OAR & Sponsored Programs 601.01 BMW 6
■ Marketing and Development 608.04 BMW 6
■ Center for Internal HR 603.02 BMW 8
■ Research and Eval. Center 605.02 BMW 8
■ Off. of Space Planning & CP 606.09 BMW 8
■ Prisoner Reentry 609.12 BMW 8
■ John Jay Online 610.04 BMW 6
■ Adult Cont. & Prof. Develop. 612.02 BMW 8
12
Department Room Bldg Seats Department Room Bldg Seats
And Then There’s Even More… 3 Student Life/Government Conference Rooms
13
Student Life Conference Rm. L2.70.03 NB 25
Student Life Conference Rm. L2.70.13 NB 20
Student Government Conf. Rm. L2.69.08 NB 40
Department Room Bldg Seats
Events Handbook Strategies to Enhance Event Planning
14
A step-by-step guide detailing the required procedures for reserving space for the following user groups: Student Clubs & Organizations Faculty/staff seeking to host an event Faculty/staff seeking to book a conference Partnerships Sponsored Organizations CUNY and External Clients
FAQs A Layman’s Guide to Why Things Are the Way They Are 15
Transparency 2.0 A sampling of Questions Why do we need procedures to use space on campus? I see empty rooms all the time – Why can’t I just use them?
I followed your directions, browsed the available rooms, and wasn’t able to reserve the space. - What did I do wrong? What qualifies as a “major” and/or “recurring” event? - My event is major to me!
16 16
Calls for An Event Review Committee
Establish Events Review Committee
Criteria for approval to include:
Advancement of College Mission and Goals
Impact on Students, Faculty, and Staff
Attendance
Activity
Timeframe
Expense
Revenue Potential
Seriously - An Event Review Committee?
17 17
YES! We’re Serious ERC Improves Transparency!
Size and make-up of the Committee
Representative from each division and student and faculty rep/s. Approval by President
Last minute requests or emergencies
Approval by the President
Annual / recurring events Reviewed if in conflict or if substantially
changed
18
THE END
18
Embracing the Philosophy of Shared Space and Multi-purpose Room Utilization