Upload
rosemary-morton
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
John Basbagill
Integrating Life Cycle Assessment into Early Stage Building Design
November 27, 2012
Agenda
Design Problem
1
Method2
Results
3
4
Conclusions5
Research Question
2 of 21
Research Question
How can BIM-enabled life cycle environmental impact feedback help designers understand which design choices contribute to a building’s carbon footprint?
3 of 21
1
Scope
4 of 21
1
3: Cost
Pre-operational
CO2e
Energy simulation
MRR Schedule
Pre-operational
cost
Operational CO2e
Operational cost
Life-cycle CO2e
Life-cycle cost
Feedback processor
• MDO• Sensitivity
analysis• Design space characterization
1
2 3
4 1,4
2 5
5
6
1 = DProfiler2 = Athena, SimaPro3 = eQUEST
4 = CostLab5 = Excel6 = ModelCenter
Software Implementation Key
Building information
model1
Method
2: Operational
1: Embodied
Research Phases
5 of 21
2
3 Design ProblemSCOPE
Housing buildings
OBJECTIVE
Provide LCA feedback on design choices
CONSTRAINTS
(1) Gross floor area(2) Location
(1) Number of buildings(2) Orientation(3) Number of stories(4) Footprint(5) WWR(6) Materials(7) Building component sizing
5.81E21
VARIABLES
DESIGN SPACE SIZE
6 of 21
(1) Number of buildings: 3 or 4
VARIABLES
(3) Number of stories: 5, 6, 7, or 8
(2) Orientation: 0-360°
(4) Building footprint: H-shape
Design Problem
(6) Materials
(7) Building component dimensional sizes
3
(5) Window-to-wall ratio (WWR)
7 of 21
(1) Number of buildings: 3 or 4
VARIABLES
(3) Number of stories: 5, 6, 7, or 8
(2) Orientation: 0-360°
(4) Building footprint: H-shape
Design Problem
(6) Materials
(7) Building component dimensional sizes
3
(5) Window-to-wall ratio (WWR)
WWR = 0.15
8 of 21
(1) Number of buildings: 3 or 4
VARIABLES
(3) Number of stories: 5, 6, 7, or 8
(2) Orientation: 0-360°
(4) Building footprint: H-shape
Design Problem
(6) Materials
(7) Building component dimensional sizes
3
(5) Window-to-wall ratio (WWR)
WWR = 0.50
9 of 21
(1) Number of buildings: 3 or 4
VARIABLES
(3) Number of stories: 5, 6, 7, or 8
(2) Orientation
(4) Building footprint: H-shape
Design Problem
(6) Materials
(7) Building component dimensional sizes
3
(5) Window-to-wall ratio (WWR)
Cladding (7)Substructure (2)Partitions (5)Flooring surface (8)Floor structure (12)Column and beams (10)Window assembly (5)Wall structure (6)Wall finishes (2)Roof (50)Mechanical systemRoof assemblyStairsDoors
MATERIALS (# CHOICES)
CladdingFlooring surfaceCeilingWall finishesSubstructureWindow assemblyMechanical systemElectrical systemPlumbing system
THICKNESSES (2 CHOICES EACH)
Basbagill J, Flager F, Lepech M, Fischer M. Application of life cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Building and Environment 2012 (in publication). 10 of 21
3 Design space characterization
PROCESSING SOFTWARE
ModelCenter
VARIABLES
Discrete: 22
Continuous: 1
10,000
Orthogonal array: 9,409Latin hypercube: 591
5.81E21
23!
DESIGN SPACE SIZE
DECISION SEQUENCES
NUMBER OF RUNS
SAMPLING ALGORITHM
11 of 21
Pre-operational
CO2e
Energy simulation
MRR Schedule
Pre-operational
cost
Operational CO2e
Operational cost
Life-cycle CO2e
Life-cycle cost
Feedback processor• MDO•
Sensitivity analysis
• Design space
characterization
1
2 3
4 1,4
2 5
5
6
Building information
model1
4 ResultsPro
bab
ility
(%
)
Impact (kg CO2e)
150,000
260,000
200,000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Impact Distributions18
DECISIONS REMAINING
DECISIONS MADE
Number of buildingsNumber of floorsOrientationWWRShapeMaterialsSize
Total Impact
1. Orientation = 323 to 356°
POSSIBLE VALUES0-360°
Orientation = 323 to 356°
SUB-DECISIONS
CURRENT DECISIONOrientation = 323 to 356°
n/a
KEY
12 of 21
4 ResultsPro
bab
ility
(%
)
Impact (kg CO2e)
150,000
260,000
200,000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Impact Distributions18
DECISIONS REMAINING
DECISIONS MADE
Number of buildingsNumber of floorsOrientationWWRShapeMaterialsSize
Total Impact
1. Cladding material = steel
POSSIBLE VALUES
Cladding material = steel
SUB-DECISIONS
CURRENT DECISIONCladding material = steel
claddingsubstructurepartitionsfloor surfacefloor structure
columns & beamswindowswalls structurewall finishesroof
steel, vinyl, stucco, brick, wood, limestone, concrete
Cladding material = vinyl
KEY
13 of 21
4 ResultsPro
bab
ility
(%
)
Impact (kg CO2e)
150,000
260,000
200,000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Impact Distributions18
DECISIONS REMAINING
DECISIONS MADE
Number of buildingsNumber of floorsOrientationWWRShapeMaterialsSize
Total Impact
1. Number of floors = 6
POSSIBLE VALUES
KEY
Number of floors = 5
SUB-DECISIONS
CURRENT DECISIONNumber of floors = 6
Number of floors = 6
n/a
5, 6, 7, 8
Number of floors = 7
Number of floors = 8
14 of 21
4 ResultsPro
bab
ility
(%
)
Impact (kg CO2e)
150,000
260,000
200,000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Impact Distributions18
DECISIONS REMAINING
DECISIONS MADE
Number of buildingsNumber of floorsOrientationWWRShapeMaterialsSize
Total Impact
1. Number of floors = 6
POSSIBLE VALUES
KEY
SUB-DECISIONS
CURRENT DECISIONNumber of floors = 6
Number of floors = 6
n/a
5, 6, 7, 8
15 of 21
4 ResultsPro
bab
ility
(%
)
Impact (kg CO2e)
150,000
260,000
200,000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Impact Distributions18
DECISIONS REMAINING
DECISIONS MADE
Number of buildingsNumber of floorsOrientationWWRShapeMaterialsSize
Total Impact
1. Number of floors = 6
POSSIBLE VALUES
KEY
SUB-DECISIONS
CURRENT DECISIONOrientation = 323 to 346°
Number of floors = 6
n/a
0-360°
Orientation = 323 to 346°
2. Orientation = 323 to 346°
16 of 21
4 ResultsPro
bab
ility
(%
)
Impact (kg CO2e)
150,000
260,000
200,000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Impact Distributions18
DECISIONS REMAINING
DECISIONS MADE
Number of buildingsNumber of floorsOrientationWWRShapeMaterialsSize
Total Impact
1. Number of floors = 6
POSSIBLE VALUES
KEY
SUB-DECISIONS
CURRENT DECISIONCladding material = steel
Number of floors = 6
Orientation = 323 to 346°
2. Orientation = 323 to 346°
3. Cladding material = steel
Cladding material = steel
steel, vinyl, stucco, brick, wood, limestone, concrete
claddingsubstructurepartitionsfloor surfacefloor structure
columns & beamswindowswalls structurewall finishesroof
17 of 21
4 ResultsPro
bab
ility
(%
)
Impact (kg CO2e)
150,000
260,000
200,000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Impact Distributions18
18 of 21
5 Conclusions
Developed BIM-enabled life cycle environmental impact feedback method
Accounted for embodied and operational impacts
Parametrically control many design inputs
Designers visually understand effect of design choices:
influential versus non-influential
positive or negative building componentsmaterialsdimensional thicknesses
19 of 21
5 Future Work
Model does not account for:
coupled inter-life-cycle-phase design decisions
solar heat gain coefficient (glazing)
coupled variables
shading (fins, overhangs)
insulation
cladding material
glazing material + glazing thickness
Insulation material + insulation thickness
cladding material + cladding thickness
cladding thickness
roof thickness
wall structure thickness
20 of 21
5 Future Work
Impact Reduced/$
% Reduction
A: SubstructureB: ShellC: InteriorsD: Services
10 20 30 40 50
piles
mat foundation
footing
columns and beams
roof
floors
cladding
mechanical
electrical
conveying
fireplumbing
partitions
wall finishes
doors
flooring
ceiling
15
21 of 21
Questions?