Upload
mrpsravan
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 1/32
1
Job Evaluation and PayJob Evaluation and Pay
1
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 2/32
2
IntroductionIntroduction
To enhance efficiency and equity inTo enhance efficiency and equity incompensationcompensation Rank in JobRank in Job characteristics of the jobcharacteristics of the job
Rank in PersonRank in Person characteristics of the personcharacteristics of the person
Assignment of jobs into categories Assignment of jobs into categoriesfacilitates other personnel tasksfacilitates other personnel tasks
Understanding and ultimately describe theUnderstanding and ultimately describe the job content job content
Job descriptions must be maintainedJob descriptions must be maintainedregularlyregularly
2
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 3/32
3
Sources of InformationSources of Information
Old job descriptionOld job description Incumbent employeeIncumbent employee
Questionnaire designed to provide informationQuestionnaire designed to provide informationas to tasks, the amount of time spent, andas to tasks, the amount of time spent, andthe K S As needed to perform satisfactorythe K S As needed to perform satisfactory
Personal interviewsPersonal interviews
Supervisory interviewSupervisory interview
Determine the accuracy of informationDetermine the accuracy of informationprovided by employee & provide ownprovided by employee & provide ownassessment of new jobassessment of new job
Desk Audit Desk Audit work is observedwork is observed3
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 4/32
4
Four Techniques of Job AnalysisFour Techniques of Job Analysis
Jobs are evaluated by comparing them withJobs are evaluated by comparing them witheach or by comparing with an independent each or by comparing with an independent standardstandard
Jobs are evaluated as a whole or byJobs are evaluated as a whole or byexamining & comparing compensable factorsexamining & comparing compensable factorssuch as knowledge, working conditions orsuch as knowledge, working conditions orresponsibilitiesresponsibilities
Whole factor job approaches rely on anWhole factor job approaches rely on anentirely qualitative assessment entirely qualitative assessment
Factor based approaches generate numericalFactor based approaches generate numericalscores that represent the relative value of scores that represent the relative value of
jobs jobs 4
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 5/32
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 6/32
6
Grade Description or JobGrade Description or Job
ClassificationClassification Jobs are compared with evaluationJobs are compared with evaluation
standards which are written descriptionsstandards which are written descriptions
of job categories that form the basis forof job categories that form the basis forpaypay
Implementation requires the analyst toImplementation requires the analyst tosimply compare job descriptions with thesimply compare job descriptions with the
descriptions of pay grades and to place adescriptions of pay grades and to place a job into the grade that best matches the job into the grade that best matches the job duties and responsibilities job duties and responsibilities
6
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 7/32
7
Factor Based MethodFactor Based Method
Begins with the identification of benchmarkBegins with the identification of benchmark Identify job factors that justify compensationIdentify job factors that justify compensation Determine how much of the pay of eachDetermine how much of the pay of each
benchmark job is attributable to each of thebenchmark job is attributable to each of theselected factorsselected factors
Compare with the benchmark jobs factor byCompare with the benchmark jobs factor byfactorfactor
Compare with market Compare with market Advantages Advantages -- the exercise of judgment the exercise of judgment
DisadvantageDisadvantage complicatedcomplicated
7
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 8/32
8
Factor Point TechniqueFactor Point Technique
Jobs must be broken down intoJobs must be broken down intocompensablecompensable
Select and define compensable factorsSelect and define compensable factors
Weigh factors to determine the relativeWeigh factors to determine the relativeinfluence on the value of a jobinfluence on the value of a job
Identify & define specific level of eachIdentify & define specific level of eachfactor (3 knowledge levels)factor (3 knowledge levels)
8
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 9/32
9
Job PricingJob Pricing Job evaluation methods will produce a rankJob evaluation methods will produce a rank
ordering of jobs from most valued to least ordering of jobs from most valued to least
Information used to set pay levels based onInformation used to set pay levels based on
relative value and ensure internal & external payrelative value and ensure internal & external payequityequity
Survey employers as to similar jobsSurvey employers as to similar jobs
Number of pay grades reflects meaningfulNumber of pay grades reflects meaningfuldifference between levelsdifference between levels
Step increases that can be awarded asStep increases that can be awarded asincentivesincentives
9
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 10/32
10
Job Evaluation: Federal ServiceJob Evaluation: Federal Service
Classification Act of 1923Classification Act of 1923 applied to 10%applied to 10% The Act reinforced the concept of rank in job & set The Act reinforced the concept of rank in job & set
stage for expansionstage for expansion
Classification Act of 1949Classification Act of 1949 Consolidated the occupational series of the 1923Consolidated the occupational series of the 1923
statute into the GS systemstatute into the GS system
Considers: Nature of work, amount of supervision,Considers: Nature of work, amount of supervision,
guidelines available, importance & scope of decisions,guidelines available, importance & scope of decisions,supervisory authority, technical skills, experience andsupervisory authority, technical skills, experience andqualificationsqualifications
10
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 11/32
11
Narrative Job DescriptionsNarrative Job Descriptions
Statement of major duties/responsibilitiesStatement of major duties/responsibilities
Includes kind & degree of supervisionIncludes kind & degree of supervision
Description of the controls over positionDescription of the controls over position
How work is assigned, kind of supervision,How work is assigned, kind of supervision,kind of review givenkind of review given
Statement of special qualificationsStatement of special qualifications K S As, certification, licenseK S As, certification, license
11
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 12/32
12
Factor Evaluation SystemFactor Evaluation System Relies on 9 factorsRelies on 9 factors
KnowledgeKnowledge
Supervisory controlsSupervisory controls
Guidelines availableGuidelines available Complexity of workComplexity of work
Scope & effect of workScope & effect of work
Personal contactsPersonal contacts
Purpose for contactsPurpose for contacts
Physical demands of jobPhysical demands of job
Nature of work environment Nature of work environment
12
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 13/32
13
Job Evaluation & ClassificationJob Evaluation & Classification
IssuesIssues Systems brought order to misleading jobSystems brought order to misleading jobtitles, inequitable pay, uninformedtitles, inequitable pay, uninformedrecruitment & selection processrecruitment & selection process
National Academy of Public AdministrationNational Academy of Public Administrationmaintains that the design & administration of maintains that the design & administration of
job evaluation systems should promote the job evaluation systems should promote theaccomplishment two objectivesaccomplishment two objectives
Support efforts to treat job applicants andSupport efforts to treat job applicants andemployees equitably and impartialemployees equitably and impartial
Designed to promote effective and efficient Designed to promote effective and efficient agency performanceagency performance
13
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 14/32
14
Criticisms of Job EvaluationCriticisms of Job Evaluation
SystemsSystems Use of professional/managerial judgment orUse of professional/managerial judgment ordiscretiondiscretion
Decisions based on factual inaccuracies orDecisions based on factual inaccuracies ormisrepresentationsmisrepresentations
Discretionary nature allows for organizational biasDiscretionary nature allows for organizational bias
OverOver--grading errors traceable to managersgrading errors traceable to managers
High level pressure on analystsHigh level pressure on analysts
G
rade creep refers to unplanned rise in level G
rade creep refers to unplanned rise in level OverOver--grading of levelgrading of level
Inflated job descriptions/manipulated jobInflated job descriptions/manipulated jobevaluationsevaluations
Making job evaluation negotiableMaking job evaluation negotiable14
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 15/32
15
Managerial ConcernsManagerial Concerns
Classification standards are complexClassification standards are complex
Central personnel agencies provide littleCentral personnel agencies provide little
leadership & are resistant to changeleadership & are resistant to change Process is burdensome and unintelligibleProcess is burdensome and unintelligible
Supervisors pressure analyst to overSupervisors pressure analyst to over--gradegrade
Rank in position approach is too rigid andRank in position approach is too rigid and
inflexible, neglecting employees impact inflexible, neglecting employees impact Classification plans & position descriptions areClassification plans & position descriptions are
out of dateout of date
15
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 16/32
16
NAPAs ReformsNAPAs Reforms
Authorizing significant delegations of Authorizing significant delegations of authority to line managersauthority to line managers
Broad banding or consolidation of existingBroad banding or consolidation of existinggrades into 3grades into 3--4 grades with wise ranges4 grades with wise ranges
Allowing skills Allowing skills--based pay differentialsbased pay differentials
RankRank--inin--job model could be replaced by job model could be replaced byrankrank--inin--personperson
Shift design of grading systems to agencyShift design of grading systems to agency
Allow more agency level discretion Allow more agency level discretion16
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 17/32
17
RankRank--inin--Person SystemPerson System
Restricted services, FBI, CI A, CBIRestricted services, FBI, CI A, CBI
Police departments combine it with jobPolice departments combine it with jobbased modelbased model
Emphasis placed on general skills and theEmphasis placed on general skills and thepotential to continuously developpotential to continuously develop
May be more flexible, adaptable, and fit May be more flexible, adaptable, and fit within centralized structurewithin centralized structure
Favorably reviewed by MSPBFavorably reviewed by MSPB17
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 18/32
18
FragmentationFragmentation
A policy option supported by those who A policy option supported by those whobelieve that a single classification systembelieve that a single classification system
simply cannot effectively address HRsimply cannot effectively address HRneeds & human capital strategies under allneeds & human capital strategies under allcircumstancescircumstances
Efforts to deal with problems of Efforts to deal with problems of conventional systems have dealt withconventional systems have dealt withflexibility, responsiveness, understandingflexibility, responsiveness, understanding
18
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 19/32
BroadBroad--bandingbanding
Makes it easier for managers to designMakes it easier for managers to designand interrelate positions around workand interrelate positions around work
Facilitates recruitment on basis of Facilitates recruitment on basis of occupations and career planning andoccupations and career planning andmakes moving people less complicatedmakes moving people less complicated
19
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 20/32
20
China Lake DemonstrationChina Lake Demonstration
Project Project OPM evaluations showed it was successful inOPM evaluations showed it was successful in
improving personnel management improving personnel management
Simplified and delegated classification procedures,Simplified and delegated classification procedures,dramatically reduced time neededdramatically reduced time needed
Reduced conflicts between personnel specialists andReduced conflicts between personnel specialists andmanagersmanagers
Unclear which of the reforms at China Lake (newUnclear which of the reforms at China Lake (newperformance appraisal, pay for performance, higherperformance appraisal, pay for performance, higherpay, broadpay, broad--banding) is responsiblebanding) is responsible
Useful way of expanding the authority of lineUseful way of expanding the authority of line
managersmanagers20
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 21/32
21
Issues Regarding Pay in theIssues Regarding Pay in the
Public ServicePublic Service Public sector pay is a political outcomePublic sector pay is a political outcome
It is also a collective bargaining issueIt is also a collective bargaining issue
Unions and employees want more, management Unions and employees want more, management wants to give lesswants to give less
Pay has to be competitive to attract and retainPay has to be competitive to attract and retaingood employeesgood employees
Different plans have been createdDifferent plans have been created
Pay rates should be comparable with privatePay rates should be comparable with privatesector for similar jobs in similar marketssector for similar jobs in similar markets
(prevailing rate)(prevailing rate)21
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 22/32
22
Prevailing RatesPrevailing Rates
Supply and demandSupply and demand
Prevailing rate surveys are usedPrevailing rate surveys are used
Salary based on average competitive pay
Salary based on average competitive pay Other jobs are placed base on their valueOther jobs are placed base on their value
in relation to the benchmarksin relation to the benchmarks
Allows employers to acquire and retain HR Allows employers to acquire and retain HRwithout paying more than they need towithout paying more than they need to
identify & pay the going market price for aidentify & pay the going market price for aset combination of K S Asset combination of K S As
22
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 23/32
23
Public Sector PayPublic Sector Pay Groups actively seek to have pay decisionsGroups actively seek to have pay decisions
made in their favormade in their favor
Politicians have to decide to fund a programPoliticians have to decide to fund a program
or achieving comparable payor achieving comparable pay Legislators more generous to lower ranksLegislators more generous to lower ranks
More numerous, exert more political pressureMore numerous, exert more political pressure
Pay for non managerial employees set Pay for non managerial employees set through collective bargainingthrough collective bargaining
23
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 24/32
24
Government PayGovernment Pay
24
Legislators dont like paying executives moreLegislators dont like paying executives morethan they makethan they make
Slow increases & presidential action hasSlow increases & presidential action hasmaintained a gap in pay for certain jobsmaintained a gap in pay for certain jobs
Salary compression is result of caps on topSalary compression is result of caps on top
salaries and problems with grade creepsalaries and problems with grade creep Net effect is to flatten pay structure, graduallyNet effect is to flatten pay structure, gradually
closing the gap between higher and lower levelsclosing the gap between higher and lower levels
Makes it difficult to recruit and retain highlyMakes it difficult to recruit and retain highly
qualified administrators and technical personnelqualified administrators and technical personnel
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 25/32
25
Recent Developments in FederalRecent Developments in Federal
ServiceService Federal pay differed from private sectorFederal pay differed from private sector
based on locationbased on location
Private sector paid more than federal government Private sector paid more than federal government in 90% of the casesin 90% of the cases
Private sector enjoyed competitive payPrivate sector enjoyed competitive payadvantages in over 20% of the casesadvantages in over 20% of the cases
Prior to 1990, the federals government couldPrior to 1990, the federals government couldonly vary its GS pay by locality by offeringonly vary its GS pay by locality by offeringspecial rates which had to be approved byspecial rates which had to be approved by
OPM (applied to 2,500GS
employees)OPM (applied to 2,500GS
employees)25
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 26/32
26
Comparability Act of 1990Comparability Act of 1990
Compromise between comprehensiveCompromise between comprehensivereform and actions designed to reachreform and actions designed to reach
comparability and incrementalcomparability and incrementaladjustmentsadjustments
President retained across the board hikesPresident retained across the board hikes
Federal Pay Council was createdFederal Pay Council was created Nine member panelNine member panel
Three neutral expertsThree neutral experts
Six employees organization representativesSix employees organization representatives26
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 27/32
27
FEPCA PrinciplesFEPCA Principles
Equal pay for substantially equal workEqual pay for substantially equal work Pay distinctions based onPay distinctions based on
work/performancework/performance
Pay should be comparable with nonPay should be comparable with non--federal rates for the same workfederal rates for the same work
Disparities between federal and nonDisparities between federal and non--
federal employees should be completelyfederal employees should be completelyeliminatedeliminated
FEPCA Provisions on page 151FEPCA Provisions on page 151
27
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 28/32
28
Federal Blue Collar PayFederal Blue Collar Pay
Coordinated Federal Wage SystemCoordinated Federal Wage System Corrected the payment of different wages forCorrected the payment of different wages for
same occupationssame occupations
Provided for common set of policies andProvided for common set of policies andoperating proceduresoperating procedures
Covered 185K employees in 2004Covered 185K employees in 2004
Allows for considerable union influence Allows for considerable union influence
Union and management are represented onUnion and management are represented onlocal wage survey committeelocal wage survey committee
28
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 29/32
29
Union Impact Union Impact
The spread of bargaining improved theThe spread of bargaining improved thepay of workers in occupations such as:pay of workers in occupations such as:police, fire, teachers and nursespolice, fire, teachers and nurses
State & local often moved unilaterally toState & local often moved unilaterally to
upgrade payupgrade pay State & local pay raises have kept up withState & local pay raises have kept up with
inflation during the 60s, kept pace in theinflation during the 60s, kept pace in the70s and forced to concentrate on70s and forced to concentrate on
protecting jobs & fighting proposed cutsprotecting jobs & fighting proposed cuts Two important areas are: comparableTwo important areas are: comparable
worth and pay for performanceworth and pay for performance
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 30/32
30
Comparable WorthComparable Worth
Illegal to pay women less than men for theIllegal to pay women less than men for thesame worksame work -- different than work of different than work of comparable valuecomparable value
Advocates argue that public employers Advocates argue that public employersshould implement a system based on equalshould implement a system based on equalpay for work of equal valuepay for work of equal value
Critics argue it would force employers toCritics argue it would force employers tooverpay for skills in ample supply andoverpay for skills in ample supply andunderpay for scarce and essential humanunderpay for scarce and essential humanresourcesresources
30
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 31/32
31
Comparable Worth (cont)Comparable Worth (cont) Washington v GuntherWashington v Gunther court ruled that unequalcourt ruled that unequal
pay for men & women for work of equal valuepay for men & women for work of equal valuewould be a cause for action under CRAwould be a cause for action under CRA It did not endorse the concept It did not endorse the concept
Courts usually allow employers defense that Courts usually allow employers defense that they pay prevailing ratesthey pay prevailing rates Washington was first state to recognized sexWashington was first state to recognized sex
discrimination and conduct a study of genderdiscrimination and conduct a study of genderbased pay disparitiesbased pay disparities
The move was ultimately squashed by the Court The move was ultimately squashed by the Court of Appealsof Appeals Intentional discrimination not establishedIntentional discrimination not established Discriminatory intent not inferred by statisticalDiscriminatory intent not inferred by statistical
evidenceevidence
8/8/2019 Job Evaluation and Pay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/job-evaluation-and-pay 32/32
32
Skill Based PaySkill Based Pay
Pay is keyed to one or more of followingPay is keyed to one or more of following Depth of skill, or (science, law, engineering)Depth of skill, or (science, law, engineering)
Breadth of skill which involves rewardingBreadth of skill which involves rewardingemployees for having knowledge and skills inemployees for having knowledge and skills inareas of organizational activity related to theirareas of organizational activity related to their
jobs (more flexible and able to self manage) jobs (more flexible and able to self manage)
Vertical skills or the ability to self manage in Vertical skills or the ability to self manage insuch areas as scheduling work, leading groupsuch areas as scheduling work, leading groupproblem solving meetings, training,problem solving meetings, training,consulting, and coordinating other groupsconsulting, and coordinating other groups