Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Crossed Products and Noncommutative Dimensions
Jianchao Wu(joint with Ilan Hirshberg)
Penn State University
Fields Institute, Toronto, August 4, 2017
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 1 / 12
Nuclear dimension and the Elliott classi�cation program
Winter and Zacharias developed a kind of dimension theory for (nuclear)C∗-algebras. dimnuc : CStarAlg→ Z≥0 ∪ {∞}. Some basic properties:
X topological space ⇒ dimnuc(C0(X)) = dim(X) (covering dim.).X a metric space ⇒ dimnuc(C
∗u(X)) ≤ asdim(X) (asymptotic dim.).
dimnuc(A) = 0 ⇐⇒ A is AF (= lim−→(�n.dim. C∗-alg)).A Kirchberg algebra (e.g. On) =⇒ dimnuc(A) = 1.Finite nuclear dimension is preserved under taking: ⊕, ⊗, quotients,hereditary subalgebras, direct limits, extensions, etc.
Theorem (Gong-Lin-Niu, Elliott-Gong-Lin-Niu,Tikuisis-White-Winter,. . . , Kirchberg-Phillips, . . . )
The class of unital simple separable C∗-algebras with �nite nuclear
dimension (FAD) and satisfying UCT is classi�ed by the Elliott invariant.
Crossed products are a major source of interesting C∗-algebras. We ask:
Question: When does FAD pass through taking crossed products?
More precisely, if dimnuc(A) <∞ & Gy A, when dimnuc(AoG) <∞?Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 2 / 12
dimnuc(A) <∞¾when?=⇒ dimnuc(AoG) <∞
A prominent case is when A = C(X) for metric space X and G is noncpt.
Theorem (Toms-Winter, Hirshberg-Winter-Zacharias)
If Z y X minimally and dim(X) <∞, then dimnuc(C(X)o Z) <∞.
Hirshberg-Winter-Zacharias provided a more conceptual approach byintroducing the Rokhlin dimension (more on that later).
Note: If X is in�nite, a minimal Z-action is free.
Theorem (Szabó)
If Zm y X freely and dim(X) <∞, then dimnuc(C(X)o Zm) <∞.
Theorem (Szabó-W-Zacharias)
If a �nitely generated virtually nilpotent group Gy X freely anddim(X) <∞, then dimnuc(C(X)oG) <∞.
{F.g. vir.nilp. gps}Gromov= {f.g. gps with polynomial growth} 3 �nite gps,
Zm, the discrete Heisenberg group{(
1 a c0 1 b0 0 1
): a, b, c ∈ Z
}, etc.
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 3 / 12
Theorem (Szabó-W-Zacharias) repeated
F.g. vir.nilp. Gy X freely & dim(X) <∞ ⇒ dimnuc(C(X)oG) <∞.
Ingredients in the proof:1 The Rokhlin dimension dimRok(α), de�ned for a C∗-dynamical systemα : Gy A, where G is �nite (H-W-Z), Z (H-W-Z), Zm (Szabó),residually �nite (S-W-Z), compact (Hirshberg-Phillips, Gardella), R(Hirshberg-Szabó-Winter-W), ...
Theorem (Szabó-W-Zacharias)
dim+1nuc(Aoα,w G) ≤ asdim+1(�G) · dim+1
nuc(A) · dim+1Rok(α) .
2 The marker property (and the topological small boundary property),studied by Lindenstrauss, Gutman, Szabó, and others.
Theorem (Szabó-W-Zacharias)
F.g. vir.nilp. Gαy X freely & dim(X) <∞ ⇒ dimRok(Gy C(X)) <∞.
3 Bound asdim+1(�G) for f.g. vir.nilp G (S-W-Z, Delabie-Tointon).Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 4 / 12
Parallel approaches
Similar approaches make use of other dimensions de�ned fortopological dynamical systems, e.g.,
dynamical asymptotic dimension DAD(−) (Guentner-Willett-Yu),amenability dimension dimam(−) (G-W-Y, S-W-Z, afterBartels-Lück-Reich), and(�ne) tower dimension dimtow(−) (Kerr).
They are closely related through intertwining inequalities such as:
Theorem (Szabó-W-Zacharias)
dim+1Rok(α) ≤ dim+1
am(α) ≤ dim+1Rok(α) · asdim
+1(�G) .
Remarkably, the original motivations for introducing dimam and DADwere to facilitate computations of K-theory for AoG, in order toprove K-theoretic isomorphism conjectures (the Baum-Connes
conjecture and the Farrell-Jones conjecture).
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 5 / 12
The case of �ows
When G = R y X continuously, we also have
Theorem (Hirshberg-Szabó-Winter-W)
If R y X freely and dim(X) <∞, then dimnuc(C(X)oR) <∞.
Ingredients in the proof:
1 The Rokhlin dimension dimRok(α) de�ned for any C∗-�ow α : R y A.
Theorem (H-S-W-W)
dim+1nuc(Aoα R) ≤ 2 · dim+1
nuc(A) · dim+1Rok(α) .
2 The existence of �long thin covers� on �ow spaces ,due toBartels-Lück-Reich and improved by Kasprowski-Rüping.
Theorem (Bartels-Lück-Reich, Kasprowski-Rüping, H-S-W-W)
R y X freely and dim(X) <∞ ⇒ dimRok(Gy C(X)) <∞.
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 6 / 12
Non-free Z-actions ⇒ Problem: dimRok(α) =∞, but...
Theorem (Hirshberg-W)
Z y X loc. cpt Hausd. with dim(X) <∞ ⇒ dimnuc(C0(X)o Z) <∞.
=⇒ Examples of groups C∗-algebras with �nite nuclear dimensions
dimnuc(C∗(Z2 oA Z)) <∞, where A =
(2 11 1
)∈ SL(2,Z). This is an
example of a group which is polycyclic but not nilpotent.
dimnuc(C∗(L)) <∞ for L = Z2 o Z = Z
⊕Z
2 oshift Z (lamplighter gp).
Both are QD but NOT strongly QD (⇒ have in�nite decomposition rank)!
Theorem (Eckhardt-McKenney without �virtually�, E-Gillaspy-M)
dimnuc(C∗(any f.g. vir.nilp. gp))
(≤ dr(C∗(any f.g. vir.nilp. gp))
)<∞.
Theorem (Eckhardt)
Decomposition rank dr(C∗(Zm oA Z)) <∞ ⇔ Zm oA Z vir.nilpotent.
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 7 / 12
For �nitely generated G, we have
virtually nilpotent GEckhardt-Gillaspy-McKenney
*2jr
True for G = ZmoAZ(Eckhardt)
��
dr(C∗(G)) <∞
��
virtually polycylic G
��elem. amenable G
with �nite Hirsch length
True for G = AbelianoZ(Hirshberg-W)
*2jr
???
dimnuc(C∗(G)) <∞
Remark: dimnuc(C∗(Z o Z)) =∞. Z o Z also has in�nite Hirsch length.
Question (Eckhardt-Gillaspy-McKenney)
For f.g. group G, dr(C∗(G)) <∞ ⇒ G is virtually nilpotent?
Question
What is the relation between elementary amenable groups with �niteHirsch length and groups with �nite nuclear dimension?
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 8 / 12
Non-free �ows
Theorem (Hirshberg-W)
R y X loc. cpt Hausd. with dim(X) <∞ ⇒ dimnuc(C0(X)oR) <∞.
Rough sketch of the proof: Pick a �threshold� R > 0 (to be determined).
X≤R := union of (periodic) orbits of lengths ≤ R, andX>R := union of (possibly non-periodic) orbits of lengths > R.
invariant decomposition X = X≤R tX>R ⇒ Exact sequence
0→ C0(X>R)oR→ C0(X)oR→ C0(X≤R)oR→ 0
Fact: dimnuc <∞ passes through extensions ⇒ Look at the two ends!1 R y X≤R is well-behaved (in particular, X≤R/R is Hausdor�) ⇒
dim+1nuc(C0(X≤R)oR) ≤ 2 dim+1(X≤R) ≤ 2 dim+1(X).
Important: This bound does not depend on R!2 Fact: dimnuc <∞ is a �local approximation� property ⇒ when R is
chosen large enough (depending on the desired precision of the localapproximation), R y X>R behaves like a free action for the purposeof the approximation ⇒ We mimic the approach for free actions.
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 9 / 12
Application: C∗-algebras for line foliations
A line foliation on X consists of an atlas of compatible charts of the form(0, 1)× U .
(Figures taken from Groupoids, Inverse Semigroups, and their Operator Algebras by Alan Paterson)
Fact: each leaf of a line foliation ∼= R or S1.A �ow R y X without �xed points an orientable line foliation.Orientation for a line foliation = global choice of directions for all lines.
Theorem (Whitney)
Every orientable line foliation is induced by a �ow R y X.Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 10 / 12
A line foliation F on X de�nes an equivalence relation ∼F on X of�being on the same leaf�.
X/ ∼F is typically pathological.
Connes: consider the �noncommutative quotient�; more precisely,consider C∗(GF ), the groupoid C∗-algebra of the holonomy groupoid
GF associated to F .The K-theory of C∗(GF ) plays a fundamental role in the longitudinal
index theorem (Connes-Skandalis).
Proposition
If F is induced from a �ow R y X, then C∗(GF ) is a quotient ofC0(X)oR.
Theorem (Hirshberg-W)
For any orientable line foliation F on X with dim(X) <∞, we havedimnuc(C
∗(GF )) <∞.
Proof: dimnuc(C∗(GF )) ≤ dimnuc(C0(X)oR) <∞.
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 11 / 12
Thank you!
Jianchao Wu (Penn State) Crossed Products and NC Dimensions Toronto, August 4 12 / 12