JARME-3-2-2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 JARME-3-2-2010

    1/9

    Dynamic Stability of FGM Cylindrical Shells

    F. Ebrahimi*

    *Department of Mechanical Eng.., University of Tehran, North

    Karegar Avenue, Tehran, Irantel/fax: +98 21 88 005 67

    e-mail:[email protected]

    Submitted: 23/03/2010Accepted: 16/04/2010

    Appeared: 29/04/2010

    HyperSciences.Publisher

    AbstractIn this study, a formulation for the stability of cylindrical shells made of functionally graded

    material (FGM) subjected to combined static and periodic axial loadings are presented. The properties are

    temperature dependent and graded in the thickness direction according to a volume fraction power law

    distribution. The analysis is based on two different methods of first-order shear deformation theory(FSDT) considering the transverse shear strains and the rotary inertias and the classical shell theory

    (CST). The results obtained show that the effect of transverse shear and rotary inertias on dynamic

    stability of functionally graded cylindrical shells is dependent on the material composition, the

    temperature environment, the amplitude of static load, the deformation mode, and the shell geometry

    parameters.

    Keywords:FGM, CST, Dynamic Stability, Cylindrical Shell.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Functionally graded materials are microscopically

    inhomogeneous materials. By choosing specific

    manufacturing processing, the property of the producedFGMs may vary from points to points or from layer to layers.

    Most importantly, certain properties (usually the desired

    ones) of the specifically produced FGMs are superior to those

    of corresponding homogeneous materials. Recent advance in

    the manufacturing technology has made FGMs morepreferential from both functionality and economy points of

    views. As a result, the usage of FGMs has been significantly

    broadened. For example, early successful applications of

    FGMs were reported as the high-temperature materials in

    nuclear reactors and chemical plants in Japan (Koizumi andNiino (1995)). Now, FGMs are also considered as potential

    structural materials for the future high-speed spacecrafts.

    Formulation and theoretical analysis of the FGM plates andshells were presented by Reddy (2004), Reddy and Chin

    (1998), Arciniega et al. (2007) and Praveen et al. (1999).

    Shell structure made up of this composite material (FGM) isalso one of the basic structural elements used in many

    engineering structures.

    Despite the evident importance in practical applications,investigations on the static and dynamic characteristics of

    FGM shell structures are still limited in number.

    Among those available, Loy et al. (1999) investigated the free

    vibration of simply supported FGM cylindrical shells, which

    was later extended by Pradhan et al. (2000) to cylindricalshells under various end supporting conditions. Gong et al.

    (1999) presented elastic response analysis of simplysupported FGM cylindrical shells under low-velocity impact.

    Ng et al. (2001) studied dynamic instability of simply

    supported FGM cylindrical shells, a normal-mode expansion

    and Bolotin method were used to determine the boundaries of

    the unstable regions. In all the above studies, theoreticalformulations were all based on classical shell theory, i.e.,neglecting the effect of transverse shear strains. Using Loves

    shell theory and the Galerkin method, Sofiyev (2005)

    presented an analytic solution for the stability behavior of

    cylindrical shells made of compositionally (or functionally)

    graded ceramicmetal materials under the axial compressive

    loads.

    This paper studies the effect of transverse shear and rotaryinertias on dynamic stability of the functionally graded

    cylindrical shells subjected to combined static and periodic

    axial forces, through a comparison of results obtained by

    using two different methods such as the first-order sheardeformation theory (FSDT) considering the transverse shear

    strains and the rotary inertias and the classical shell theory

    (CST). Material properties of functionally graded cylindrical

    shells are considered as temperature dependent and graded in

    the thickness direction according to a power-law distribution

    in terms of the volume fractions of the constituents. Theresults obtained show that the effect of transverse shear and

    rotary inertias on dynamic stability of functionally graded

    cylindrical shells subjected to combined static and periodic

    axial forces is dependent on the material composition, the

    temperature environment, the amplitude of static load, the

    deformation mode, and the shell geometry parameters. It is

    found that the effect of transverse shear and rotary inertias ondynamic stability of functionally graded cylindrical shells

    Journal of Advanced Research in Mechanical Engineering (Vol.1-2010/Iss.2)Ebrahimi / Dynamic Stability of FGM Cylindrical Shells / pp. 111-119

    111Copyright 2010 HyperSciences_Publisher. All rights reserved www.hypersciences.org

  • 8/14/2019 JARME-3-2-2010

    2/9

    subjected to combined static and periodic axial forces is not

    neglected in some cases. The new features of the effect of

    transverse shear and rotary inertias on dynamic stability of

    functionally graded cylindrical shells and some meaningful

    results in this paper are helpful for the application and the

    design of nuclear reactors, space planes and chemical plants,

    in which functionally graded cylindrical shells act as basicelements.

    2. THEORETICAL FORMULATIONS

    A functionally graded materials cylindrical shell with meanradius of R, thickness h, and the length L is shown in Fig. 1.

    The displacement components in the x, and z direction aredenoted by u, vand wrespectively. The pulsating axial load

    is given by

    PtNNN doa cos+= (1)

    where P is the frequency of excitation in radians per unittime. The material properties of FGM cylindrical shells with

    both temperature dependent and position dependent are

    accurately modeled, by using a simple rule of mixtures for

    the stiffness parameters coupled with the temperature

    dependent properties of the constituents. The volume fraction

    is described by a spatial function as follows

    ( )+= 0,)21()( hzzV (2)

    where expresses the volume fraction exponent. The

    combination of these functions gives rise to the effectiveproperties of functionally graded materials. An FGMcylindrical shell that is metal rich at the inner surface and

    ceramic rich at the outer surface is considered as Type A. The

    corresponding effective material properties are expressed as

    ( )( )zVTFzVTFzTF mceff += 1)()()(),( (3)

    where effF is the effective material property of the FGM

    cylindrical shell, including the effective elastic modulus,

    effective mass density and effective Poissons ratio. cF and

    mF are the temperature dependent properties of the ceramic

    and metal, respectively . On the other hand, an FGMcylindrical shell that is ceramic rich at the inner surface and

    metal rich at the outer surface is defined as Type B, whose

    effective material properties are given by

    ( )( )zVTFzVTFzTF cmeff += 1)()()(),( (4)

    Based on the first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT),

    the equations of motion for an FGM cylindrical shell underaxially dynamic load are as follows (Timoshenko and

    Woinowsky-Krieger 1959)

    +=

    +

    121

    61 1

    IuIN

    Rx

    N(5)

    +=

    ++

    +

    2212

    2

    2

    16 11

    IvIx

    vNQ

    R

    N

    Rx

    Na

    (6)

    wIx

    wN

    R

    NQ

    Rx

    Qa

    =

    +

    +

    12

    2

    221 1

    (7)

    +=

    +

    1321

    61 1

    IuIQM

    Rx

    M(8)

    +=

    +

    2322

    26 1

    IvIQM

    Rx

    M(9)

    where 1 and 2 are the rotations of a normal to the

    reference surface, )3,2,1( =iIi is the mass inertia termsdefined as

    ( )

    = 2

    2

    2

    321 ),,1)((,,h

    h zzzIII (10)

    and )(z is the effective mass density of functionallygraded materials. The stress resultants of FGM cylindrical

    shells are given by

    Fig. 1. Coordinate system of the FGM cylindrical shell

    Journal of Advanced Research in Mechanical Engineering (Vol.1-2010/Iss.2)Ebrahimi / Dynamic Stability of FGM Cylindrical Shells / pp. 111-119

    112

  • 8/14/2019 JARME-3-2-2010

    3/9

    =

    6

    2

    1

    6

    2

    1

    6666

    22212221

    12111211

    6666

    22212221

    12111211

    6

    2

    1

    6

    2

    1

    0000

    00

    00

    0000

    00

    00

    DB

    DDBB

    DDBB

    BA

    BBAA

    BBAA

    M

    M

    M

    N

    N

    N

    =

    4

    5

    55

    44

    2

    1

    0

    0

    C

    C

    Q

    Q(11)

    where ijA , ijB , ijD and ijC are ,respectively, the

    extensional, coupling, bending, and shear stiffness, which are

    given by

    ( ) )6,2,1(,),,1(,,2

    2

    2 == idzzzQDBAh

    h ijijijij

    222111 eff

    effEQQ

    == ,

    ( )eff

    effEQ

    +=

    1244

    )1(22112

    eff

    effeff

    A

    EQQ

    == , AQQ 4455=

    RzA += 1 ,)1(2

    66

    eff

    eff

    A

    EQ

    +=

    ==2

    2

    55552

    2

    4444 ,h

    h

    h

    h dzQCdzQC (12)

    where effE and eff are the effective elastic modulus and

    effective Poissons ratio of FGM cylindrical shells,

    respectively. is the shear correction factor introduced byReddy (2004) and is equal to 5/6 . The strains are expressed

    as

    x

    u

    =1 ,

    +

    = w

    v

    R

    12 ,

    +

    =

    u

    Rx

    v 16 ,

    += w

    R

    124 ,

    x

    w

    += 15 ,

    x

    = 11

    ,

    = 22

    1

    R ,

    +

    = 126

    1

    Rx

    (13)

    Utilizing Eqs.(5)-(9), (11) and (13), the equations of motion

    can be expressed in terms of generalized displacement

    ),,,,( 21wvu as follows

    += 121211 ),,,,( IuIwvuL

    (14)

    +=

    + 2212

    2

    212 ),,,,( IvIx

    vNwvuL a (15)

    wIx

    wNwvuL a =

    + 12

    2

    213 ),,,,( (16)

    += 132214 ),,,,( IuIwvuL (17)

    += 232215 ),,,,( IvIwvuL (18)

    By neglecting terms 2I and 3I involving in equations

    (5)-(9) and setting

    ,1x

    w

    = ,

    12

    =

    w

    R(19)

    the equations of motion based on a classical shell theory(CST) can be easily obtained.

    Here, the two ends of FGM cylindrical shells are consideredas simply supported, so that a solution for the motion

    equations (14)-(18) can be described by

    nxeAu mti

    mnmn coscos=

    nxeBv mti

    mnmn sinsin=

    nxeCw mti

    mnmn cossin=

    nxeH mti

    mnmn coscos1 =

    nxeK mti

    mnmn sinsin2 = (20)

    Fig. 2. Comparison of CST and FSDT unstable regions for a

    simply supported FGM cylindrical shell under

    combined static axial compressive loading and periodic

    axial loading ( m=1,2 , n=1,2,crNN 5.00= , L/R=1.0,

    T=300K,=1.0 , h/R=0.01).

    Journal of Advanced Research in Mechanical Engineering (Vol.1-2010/Iss.2)Ebrahimi / Dynamic Stability of FGM Cylindrical Shells / pp. 111-119

    113

  • 8/14/2019 JARME-3-2-2010

    4/9

    Fig. 3. Effect of thickness to radius ratio h/R on the first

    unstable region for a simply supported FGM cylindricalshell under combined static axial extensional loading

    and periodic axial load (m=1,2 , n=1,2 , crNN 5.00= ,

    L/R=1.0 , T=300K, =1.0 ).

    whereL

    mm

    = , n represents the number of

    circumferential waves and m represents he number of axial

    half-waves.

    Substituting Eq. (20) into Eqs.(14)-(18) and letting 0=dN

    in Eq.(1), yields

    =

    +

    +

    0

    0

    00

    0

    000

    000

    0000000

    000

    32

    32

    1

    21

    21

    2

    5554535251

    4544434241

    35340

    2

    333131

    2524230

    2

    1221

    1514131211

    mn

    mn

    mn

    mn

    mn

    m

    m

    K

    H

    CB

    A

    II

    II

    III

    II

    TTTTT

    TTTTT

    TTNTTT

    TTTNTT

    TTTTT

    (21)

    where ijT is given in appendix A.

    To solve the equations of motion containing the dynamic

    load dN , a solution is sought in the form shown below

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    5

    1 1 1

    5

    1 1 1

    coscos)(

    ),()(

    j m n

    mmnjmnj

    j m n

    mnjmnj

    nxAtq

    xUtqu

    (22)

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    5

    1 1 1

    5

    1 1 1

    sinsin)(

    ),()(

    j m n

    mmnjmnj

    j m n

    mnjmnj

    nxBtq

    xVtqv

    (23)

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    5

    1 1 1

    5

    1 1 1

    cossin)(

    ),()(

    j m n

    mmnjmnj

    j m n

    mnjmnj

    nxCtq

    xWtqw

    (24)

    =

    =

    =

    =5

    1 1 1

    1 ),()(j m n

    xmnjmnj xtq

    =

    =

    =

    =5

    1 1 1

    coscos)(j m n

    mmnjmnj nxHtq

    (25)

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    5

    1 1 1

    5

    1 1 1

    2

    sinsin)(

    ),()(

    j m n

    mmnjmnj

    j m n

    mnjmnj

    nxKtq

    xtq

    (26)

    where )(tqmnj is a generalized co-ordinate, and mnjU , mnjV

    , mnjW , xmnj and mnj are the modal function of FGM

    cylindrical shells with simply supported ends, under the

    axially static load 0N . Substituting Eqs.(22)-(26) into

    Eqs.(14)-(18), yields

    mnjmnjmnjmnj

    mnjxmnjmnjmnjmnj

    HIUI

    WVUL

    2

    2

    2

    1

    1 ),,,,(

    =(27)

    mnjmnjmnjmnjmnjm

    mnjxmnjmnjmnjmnj

    IVIVN

    WVUL

    22

    21

    20

    2 ),,,,(

    =

    (28)

    mnjmnjmnjm

    mnjxmnjmnjmnjmnj

    WIWN

    WVUL

    2

    1

    2

    0

    3 ),,,,(

    =

    (29)

    xmnjmnjmnj

    mnjxmnjmnjmnjmnj

    IUI

    WVUL

    3

    2

    2

    4 ),,,,(

    =(30)

    mnjmnjmnj

    mnjxmnjmnjmnjmnj

    IVI

    WVUL

    3

    2

    2

    5 ),,,,(

    =(31)

    Eqs. (14)- (18) may be rewritten as

    Journal of Advanced Research in Mechanical Engineering (Vol.1-2010/Iss.2)Ebrahimi / Dynamic Stability of FGM Cylindrical Shells / pp. 111-119

    114

  • 8/14/2019 JARME-3-2-2010

    5/9

    Fig. 4. Unstable region versus axial compressive loading crNN0 for a simply supported FGM cylindrical shell under

    combined static axial compressive loading and periodic axial loading ( m=1,2 , n=1,2 , L/R=1.0 , T=300K,

    =1.0 , h/R=0.01).

    Table 1. Comparison of the points of origin P1 for a simply supported silicon nitride-nickel FGM cylindrical shell underaxial extensional loading

    P1 (Type A) P1 (Type B)

    Present Ng et al. (2001) Present Ng et al. (2001)

    0 10.955 10.956 10.778 10.774

    0.5 10.896 10.894 10.849 10.849

    1.0 1.0867 10.865 10.883 10.883

    5.0 10.809 10.805 10.936 10.937

    10 10.795 10.791 10.945 10.946

    10.778 10.773 10.955 10.946

    ( )( )=

    =

    =

    =++5

    1 1 1

    21

    20coscos

    j m n

    mmnjmnjmnjmnjmnj nxHIAIqq (32)

    ( )( )=

    =

    =

    ++5

    1 1 1

    21

    2sinsin

    j m n

    mmnjmnjmnjmnjmnj nxKIBIqq

    =

    =

    ==+

    5

    1 1 1

    2

    0sinsincosj m n

    mmnjmnjmd nxqBPtN

    (33)

    ( )=

    =

    =

    +5

    1 1 1

    12 cossin

    j m n

    mmnjmnjmnjmnj nxCIqq

    =

    =

    =

    =+5

    1 1 1

    2 0cossincosj m n

    mmnjmnjmd nxqCPtN

    (34)

    ( )( )=

    =

    =

    =++5

    1 1 1

    32

    20coscos

    j m n

    mmnjmnjmnjmnjmnj nxHIAIqq (35)

    ( )( )=

    =

    =

    =++5

    1 1 1 32

    20sinsin

    j m n mmnjmnjmnjmnjmnj

    nxKIBIqq (36)

    Journal of Advanced Research in Mechanical Engineering (Vol.1-2010/Iss.2)Ebrahimi / Dynamic Stability of FGM Cylindrical Shells / pp. 111-119

    115

  • 8/14/2019 JARME-3-2-2010

    6/9

    Making use of the orthogonality condition, Eqs.(32)-(36) are

    simplified to

    0

    000

    000

    000

    000

    cos

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    22

    2

    22

    5

    2

    1

    5

    2

    1

    5

    2

    1

    5

    2

    1

    5

    1

    1

    =

    +

    NN

    d

    N

    NN

    q

    M

    q

    q

    Q

    Q

    Q

    PtN

    k

    k

    k

    q

    M

    q

    q

    m

    m

    m

    (37)where

    In the above formula, the coefficients of mode shapes IA, IB , IC , IH and IK can be obtained from Eq. (21).

    Based the CST and the orthogonality condition, Eq.(37) can

    be simplified to

    =

    +

    0

    0

    0

    000

    000

    000

    000

    cos

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    22

    222

    3

    2

    1

    3

    2

    1

    3

    2

    1

    3

    2

    1

    3

    1

    1

    M

    q

    M

    q

    q

    Q

    Q

    Q

    PtN

    k

    k

    k

    q

    M

    q

    q

    m

    m

    m

    NN

    d

    NNN

    (40)

    where

    The coefficients IA , IB , IC in Eqs.(40) can be obtained

    from Eq.(24). Equations (37) and (40) are in the form of a

    second order differential equations with periodic coefficients

    of the Mathieu-Hill type. Using the method presented byBolotin (1964), the regions of unstable solutions are

    separated by periodic solutions. As a first approximation, the

    periodic solutions with period 2T can be sought in the form

    where Ia and Ib are arbitrary constants. Substituting

    equation (42) into equations (37) and (40), and equating the

    coefficients of the 2sinPt and 2cos Pt terms, a set of

    linear homogeneous algebraic equations in terms of Ia and

    Ib can be obtained. The conditions for non-trivial solutions

    for the linear homogeneous algebraic equations are

    Each unstable region is bounded by two lines which originate

    from a common point from the P-axis. The branches emanate

    ( ) ( )[

    ( ) ( ) ( )]

    ( )[ ]2

    1212

    2

    2

    32

    2

    321

    2

    21

    2

    21

    2

    ,

    2

    IIIImI

    III

    IIIII

    IIIII

    CIKIBIBLQ

    mk

    KIBIHIAICI

    HIAIKIBIl

    m

    ++=

    =

    ++++

    ++++=

    (38)

    );5(5),2(35

    ),1(45:),(),(

    );5(55),2(25

    ),1(15:)1,2(),(

    );5(5),2()3(5

    ),1()4(5:),1(),(

    );5(10),4(9),3(8

    ),2(7),1(6:)2,1(),(

    );5(5),4(4),3(3

    ),2(2),1(1:)1,1(),(

    22

    2

    ==

    ===

    =+=+

    =+==

    ==

    ===

    ===

    ====

    ===

    ====

    jNjN

    jNINNnm

    jNjN

    jNInm

    jNjN

    jNINnm

    jjj

    jjInm

    jjj

    jjInm

    (39)

    ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]

    ( )[ ]2

    2

    11

    2

    2

    21

    21

    21

    3,...,3,2,1

    ,2

    ,

    ,2

    NI

    CIBIBL

    Q

    mk

    CIAIBIlm

    IIImI

    III

    IIII

    =

    +=

    =

    ++=

    (41)

    2cos

    2sin

    Ptb

    Ptaq III += (42)

    02

    1

    4

    1 2=+ IdIII QNkmP

    (43)

    02

    1

    4

    1 2=++ IdIII QNkmP (44)

    Journal of Advanced Research in Mechanical Engineering (Vol.1-2010/Iss.2)Ebrahimi / Dynamic Stability of FGM Cylindrical Shells / pp. 111-119

    116

  • 8/14/2019 JARME-3-2-2010

    7/9

    at 0=dN from the I2 . The left and right branch

    correspond with

    )0(24

    24

    >

    =

    +=

    d

    I

    IdII

    I

    IdII

    Nm

    QNkP

    andm

    QNkP

    )0(24

    24