35
Bicycle Facility Selection Guide Development Services Committee January 24, 2012 1

January 24, 2012 Selection Guide Bicycle Facility€¦ ·  · 2012-01-18Bicycle Facility Selection Guide Development Services Committee ... Bicycle Facility Selection Guide can be

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Bic

ycle

Fac

ility

Se

lect

ion

Gui

de

Dev

elop

men

t Ser

vice

s C

omm

ittee

Ja

nuar

y 24

, 201

2

1

Con

tent

sPu

rpos

e of

The

Sel

ectio

n G

uide

The

Thre

e -S

tep

Proc

ess

Bik

eway

Fac

ility

Typ

es

2

Purp

ose

of th

e Se

lect

ion

Gui

de

Cyc

ling

faci

lity

plan

ning

and

des

ign

has

been

evo

lvin

g ra

pidl

y, e

ven

sinc

e th

e To

wn

’s C

yclin

g M

aste

r Pla

n w

as

com

plet

ed.

•Th

ere

is n

o “fo

rmul

a” fo

r app

ropr

iate

bic

ycle

faci

lity

sele

ctio

n•

It is

a p

roce

ss th

at c

ombi

nes

an a

naly

sis

and

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

the

cond

ition

s of

the

loca

tion

bein

g co

nsid

ered

with

sou

nd e

ngin

eerin

g ju

dgem

ent

The

Bic

ycle

Fac

ility

Sel

ectio

n G

uide

can

be u

sed

to a

ssis

t To

wn

staf

f in

sele

ctin

g ap

prop

riate

bic

ycle

faci

litie

s fo

r To

wn-

owne

d lo

cal a

nd c

olle

ctor

road

righ

ts-o

f-way

.

3

Bik

eway

Fac

ilitie

s in

Roa

d R

ight

s-of

-Way

•C

yclis

ts v

ary

wid

ely

in le

vels

of s

kill,

exp

erie

nce

and

conf

iden

ce•

No

sing

le ty

pe o

f bic

ycle

faci

lity

desi

gn w

ill s

uit e

very

cy

clis

t •

Eng

inee

rs n

eed

to g

athe

r inf

orm

atio

n on

exi

stin

g an

d fu

ture

con

ditio

ns in

ord

er to

iden

tify

cycl

ist n

eeds

and

sa

fety

con

cern

s fo

r a g

iven

loca

tion

•Th

e ch

oice

to p

rovi

de a

sep

arat

ed v

ersu

s no

n-se

para

ted

faci

lity

is n

ot a

sim

ple

“yes

or n

o” a

nsw

er, i

t is

bas

ed o

n th

e co

nsid

erat

ion

of a

num

ber o

f fac

tors

de

scrib

ed in

the

slid

es th

at fo

llow

•C

riter

ia o

r thr

esho

lds

to s

elec

t one

faci

lity

type

ove

r an

othe

r nee

d to

be

flexi

ble

to b

e ab

le to

acc

omm

odat

e ea

ch s

ite’s

uni

que

set o

f circ

umst

ance

s•

No

faci

lity

desi

gn c

an o

verc

ome

a la

ck o

f ope

rato

r ski

ll or

lack

of a

ttent

ion

Thin

gs to

Rem

embe

r

4

Mar

kham

’s C

yclin

g N

etw

ork

5

6

The

Thre

e -S

tep

Proc

ess

St

ep 1

: Pre

-sel

ectio

n N

omog

raph

•C

olle

ct a

nd re

view

exi

stin

g an

d fu

ture

traf

fic v

olum

e an

d m

otor

veh

icle

ope

ratin

g sp

eed

data

•Pl

ot o

n N

omog

raph

•N

omog

raph

pro

vide

s a

gene

ralg

uide

for f

acili

ty ty

pes

to b

e co

nsid

ered

•C

ompl

exity

of i

nter

sect

ions

•O

n-st

reet

par

king

whe

re a

pplic

able

(e.g

. co

nfig

urat

ion,

dem

and,

turn

over

)•

Dire

ctne

ss a

nd c

onne

ctiv

ity w

ith o

ther

cyc

ling

faci

litie

s an

d ty

pe o

f cyc

ling

faci

lity

at c

onne

ctin

g po

ints

•Ty

pe o

f trip

gen

erat

ors/

dest

inat

ions

alo

ng th

e ro

ute

bein

g ex

amin

ed•

Pinc

h po

ints

(e.g

. brid

ges,

reta

inin

g w

alls

etc

.)•

Topo

grap

hy a

nd s

ight

line

s•

Ope

ratio

ns a

nd m

aint

enan

ce•

Surfa

ce q

ualit

y, e

tc.

Step

2: E

xam

ine

Oth

er F

acto

rs

•Sk

ill le

vel o

f ant

icip

ated

use

rs (e

.g.

novi

ce/re

crea

tiona

l vs.

ski

lled/

utili

taria

n)•

Num

ber o

f lan

es•

Traf

fic c

hara

cter

istic

s•

Num

ber a

nd fr

eque

ncy

of p

oten

tial

conf

lict p

oint

s (e

.g. d

rivew

ays/

entra

nces

an

d ro

ad in

ters

ectio

ns)

•Ad

jace

nt la

nd u

ses

and

lot p

atte

rns

•Fr

eque

ncy

of tr

ansi

t sto

ps•

Pede

stria

n sa

fety

•U

rban

Des

ign

•C

ollis

ion

patte

rns

Step

3: S

elec

t App

ropr

iate

Fac

ility

Typ

e •

Base

d on

resu

lts fr

om S

teps

1 a

nd 2

, plu

s so

und

engi

neer

ing

judg

emen

t

6

Step

1-P

re-S

elec

tion

Nom

ogra

ph

Sour

ce: M

RC

-Del

phi,

2011

(a m

embe

r of t

he M

MM

Gro

up)

7

Step

2: S

ome

Thin

gs T

o C

onsi

der W

hen

Exam

inin

g Fa

ctor

s An

ticip

ated

Use

rs a

nd S

kill

Leve

ls

•It

is u

sual

ly e

asie

r to

acco

mm

odat

e th

e ne

eds

of c

omm

uter

cyc

lists

on

road

s th

an o

n pa

thw

ays.

Com

mut

ers

gene

rally

pre

fer d

irect

con

tinou

s fa

cilit

ies

with

min

imal

del

ay, a

nd w

hen

ridin

g on

col

lect

or a

nd a

rteria

l ro

ads,

cyc

lists

tend

to b

e m

ore

com

forta

ble

on s

epar

ated

bik

e fa

cilit

ies

such

as

bike

lane

s, b

uffe

red

bike

lane

s or

som

e ot

her f

orm

of s

epar

atio

n.•

Nov

ice

and

recr

eatio

nal u

sers

pre

fer r

oute

s al

ong

quie

ter s

treet

s w

here

tra

ffic

volu

mes

and

spe

eds

are

low

er, e

ven

if th

ese

rout

es a

re le

ss d

irect

. Th

ey a

lso

pref

er s

epar

ated

faci

litie

s.

•C

onsi

der w

hat f

acilit

y ty

pes

exis

t or a

re p

lann

ed a

t the

end

poi

nts

of th

e se

gmen

t tha

t is

bein

g as

sess

ed.

Con

tinui

ty o

f fac

ility

type

is d

esira

ble.

If

this

can

not b

e ac

hiev

ed, c

aref

ully

sel

ect a

ppro

pria

te tr

ansi

tion

poin

ts a

nd

desi

gns.

8

Som

e Th

ings

To

Con

side

r Whe

n Ex

amin

ing

Fact

ors

Traf

fic C

hara

cter

istic

s an

d Ve

hicl

e M

ix

•W

here

ope

ratin

g sp

eeds

are

ver

y lo

w (i

.e. u

nder

30k

m/h

r.) b

icyc

les

and

mot

or v

ehic

les

trave

l at n

early

the

sam

e sp

eed

and

form

al b

icyc

le

faci

litie

s m

ay n

ot b

e ne

cess

ary.

•W

here

spe

ed d

iffer

entia

l bet

wee

n m

otor

veh

icle

s an

d bi

cycl

es is

less

th

an 2

0km

/hr.

full

inte

grat

ion

(sha

ring

the

road

) may

be

acce

ptab

le.

•W

here

spe

ed d

iffer

entia

l is

grea

ter t

han

40km

/hr.,

mor

e se

para

tion

is

desi

rabl

e.•

Whe

re v

ehic

le o

pera

ting

spee

ds a

re v

ery

high

, fac

ilitie

s sh

ould

be

sepa

rate

d by

a b

uffe

r. A

ltern

ativ

ely,

a p

aral

lel r

oute

sho

uld

be s

ough

t. •

Whe

re h

eavy

com

mer

cial

veh

icle

and

/or t

rans

it vo

lum

es a

re h

igh,

co

nsid

er w

ider

on-

road

bic

ycle

faci

litie

s or

con

side

r sep

arat

ed fa

cilit

ies.

9

Som

e Th

ings

To

Con

side

r Whe

n Ex

amin

ing

Fact

ors

Num

ber a

nd F

requ

ency

of P

oten

tial C

onfli

ct P

oint

s an

d Ad

jace

nt L

and

Use

s

•C

ollis

ion

stat

istic

s su

gges

t tha

t cyc

lists

usi

ng b

oule

vard

trai

ls a

re m

ore

frequ

ently

invo

lved

in b

icyc

le/m

otor

-veh

icle

col

lisio

ns a

t int

erse

ctio

ns

com

pare

d to

cyc

lists

ridi

ng o

n ro

ad (e

.g. i

n a

bike

lane

).•

Rea

r-lot

ted

prop

ertie

s m

ay b

e go

od c

andi

date

s fo

r in-

boul

evar

d m

ulti-

use

path

way

s pr

ovid

ed th

at th

e nu

mbe

r of p

rivat

e en

tranc

es a

nd/o

r ro

ad in

ters

ectio

ns is

low.

•S

hare

d m

ulti-

use

path

way

s in

road

bou

leva

rds

will

incr

ease

the

expo

sure

to ri

sk/p

oten

tial f

or c

onfli

cts

betw

een

pede

stria

ns a

nd

cycl

ists

. Th

e po

tent

ial f

or c

onfli

ct m

ay b

e hi

gher

whe

re th

e pa

thw

ay is

m

ore

frequ

ently

use

d by

com

mut

er c

yclis

ts a

nd/o

r whe

re p

edes

trian

de

nsiti

es a

re h

igh.

10

Som

e Th

ings

To

Con

side

r Whe

n Ex

amin

ing

Fact

ors

On-

Stre

et P

arki

ng

•R

emov

ing

on-s

treet

par

king

to a

dd b

icyc

le la

nes

can

resu

lt in

re

sist

ance

from

loca

l lan

d ow

ners

eve

n if

the

dem

and

for o

n-st

reet

pa

rkin

g ap

pear

s to

be

low.

Whe

re p

arki

ng d

eman

d is

low,

exa

min

e op

portu

nitie

s to

rem

ove,

rest

rict

or re

loca

te p

arki

ng.

•W

here

par

king

turn

over

is h

igh,

add

ition

al b

uffe

r spa

ce b

etw

een

park

ing

and

bike

lane

s sh

ould

be

cons

ider

ed.

•B

ike

lane

s sh

ould

not

be

impl

emen

ted

adja

cent

to p

erpe

ndic

ular

or

angl

e pa

rkin

g un

less

par

king

can

be

reco

nfig

ured

.

Doc

umen

t the

ana

lysi

s up

on e

xam

inin

g ot

her f

acto

rs a

s th

is s

uppo

rts

the

ratio

nale

for f

acili

ty s

elec

tion.

This

is e

spec

ially

impo

rtan

t whe

n th

e fa

cilit

y ty

pe s

elec

ted

lies

at th

e m

argi

ns o

r out

side

the

faci

lity

type

sug

gest

ed b

y th

e no

mog

raph

in

Step

1.

11

Step

3-S

elec

t Bik

eway

Fac

ility

Typ

e

Gen

eral

ly H

ighe

r Vol

ume,

H

ighe

r Spe

edG

reat

er F

acili

ty S

epar

atio

n

Gen

eral

ly L

ower

Vol

ume,

Lo

wer

Spe

edLe

ss F

acili

ty S

epar

atio

n

Shar

ed S

pace

•S

igne

d-on

ly C

yclin

g R

oute

s on

a L

ocal

Roa

d (p

g. 1

4)•

Sig

ned-

only

Cyc

ling

Rou

tes

on W

ide

Out

side

/Cur

b La

ne (p

g. 1

5)•

Bik

eway

Bou

leva

rds

(pg.

16)

•E

dge

Line

s (p

g. 1

7)•

Sha

rrow

Mar

king

s (p

g. 2

0)•

Pav

ed S

houl

ders

(pg.

22)

Ded

icat

ed S

pace

•B

ike

Lane

s (p

g. 2

3)Se

para

ted

Faci

litie

s•

Buf

fere

d B

ike

Lane

s (p

g. 2

8)•

Cyc

le T

rack

s (p

g. 2

9)•

In-B

oule

vard

Mul

ti-us

e P

athw

ays

With

in th

e R

oad

Rig

ht-o

f-Way

(pg.

33)

•M

ulti-

use

Pat

hway

s O

utsi

de th

e R

oad

Rig

ht-o

f-Way

(p

g. 3

4)

12

Bik

eway

Fac

ility

Typ

es

13

Sig

ned-

only

bic

ycle

rout

es o

n lo

cal

road

s sh

ould

be

supp

orte

d by

ed

ucat

ion

prog

ram

min

g fo

r bot

h cy

clis

ts a

nd m

otor

ists

.

Rou

tes

shou

ld u

se a

ppro

pria

te a

nd

cons

iste

nt d

esig

natio

n bi

cycl

e ro

ute

sign

type

s, s

uppl

emen

ted

by “S

hare

th

e R

oad”

sig

ns.

Sign

ed-o

nly

Cyc

ling

Rou

tes

on a

Loc

al

Roa

d (S

hare

d Sp

ace)

Shar

ed s

pace

on

a lo

cal r

oad

Elo

ra, O

N

14

Sign

ed-o

nly

Cyc

ling

Rou

tes

on a

Wid

e O

utsi

de/C

urb

Lane

(Sha

red

Spac

e)S

igne

d-on

ly b

icyc

le ro

utes

on

wid

e lo

cal r

oads

or l

ower

vo

lum

e co

llect

or ro

ads

prov

ide

shar

ed s

pace

for

cycl

ists

and

mot

or v

ehic

les.

Can

ofte

n be

retro

-fitte

d on

a

4-la

ne c

ross

-sec

tion

by

narr

owin

g th

e in

side

trav

el

lane

s.

Con

side

r “S

hare

the

Roa

d”

sign

s an

d/or

sha

rrow

m

arki

ngs

at p

inch

poi

nts

to

mak

e bo

th c

yclis

ts a

nd

mot

oris

ts a

war

e of

nar

row

zo

nes.

Shar

ed s

pace

on

a w

ide

lane

Elo

ra, O

N

15

Bik

eway

Bou

leva

rds

(Sha

red

Spac

e)A

sign

ed-o

nly

bicy

cle

rout

e on

loca

l roa

ds

that

usu

ally

par

alle

ls a

n ar

teria

l roa

d w

ith

impo

rtant

des

tinat

ions

.

Des

ign

stra

tegi

es a

nd e

lem

ents

are

em

ploy

ed to

enc

oura

ge th

roug

h-tra

vel f

or

cycl

ists

and

ena

ble

them

to m

aint

ain

mom

entu

m, y

et d

isco

urag

e or

rest

rict

thro

ugh

trave

l by

mot

oris

ts.

Sour

ce: F

unda

men

tals

of B

ikew

ay B

oule

vard

Pla

nnin

g an

d D

esig

n, 2

009

. 16

Inn

es R

oad

Bla

ir

Road

Phot

o C

redi

ts:

MM

M L

td.

Sig

ned-

only

cyc

ling

rout

es m

ay b

e su

pple

men

ted

with

edg

e lin

es.

Edg

e lin

es a

re p

rimar

ily a

dded

for

traffi

c ca

lmin

g pu

rpos

es, b

ut m

ay

also

ben

efit

cycl

ists

.

On-

stre

et p

arki

ng is

usu

ally

not

di

srup

ted

In s

ome

inst

ance

s th

is m

ay b

e a

usef

ul fi

rst s

tep

tow

ards

im

plem

entin

g fu

ture

bik

e la

nes

whe

re th

e re

mov

al o

f on-

stre

et

park

ing

is a

n is

sue

with

ne

ighb

ourin

g re

side

nts,

yet

par

king

de

man

d is

low.

Edge

Lin

es (S

hare

d Sp

ace)

17

Ret

ro-fi

tting

for E

dge

Line

s(G

eorg

etow

n O

N)

18

Ret

ro-fi

tting

for E

dge

Line

s(G

eorg

etow

n O

N)

19

Shar

row

Mar

king

s (S

hare

d Sp

ace)

Cle

ar p

avem

ent m

arki

ngs

and

sign

s illu

stra

te th

e co

ncep

t of

“sha

re th

e ro

ad” w

ithin

spa

ce-

conf

ined

road

way

s.

Pav

emen

t mar

king

s in

dica

te

appr

opria

te p

ositi

onin

g fo

r cy

clis

ts.

Cyc

lists

alig

n th

eir f

ront

w

heel

with

the

poin

t on

the

chev

ron.

Esp

ecia

lly u

sefu

l in

cong

este

d ar

eas

whe

re tr

affic

is g

ener

ally

m

ovin

g sl

owly

(e.g

. a “d

ownt

own”

st

reet

).20

Shar

row

Mar

king

s (S

hare

d Sp

ace)

With

out O

n-st

reet

Pa

rkin

g

With

On-

stre

et

Park

ing

Offs

et e

ncou

rage

s cy

clis

ts to

m

aint

ain

a cl

ear d

ista

nce

from

op

en d

oors

of p

arke

d ca

rs.

Offs

et e

ncou

rage

s cy

clis

ts to

m

aint

ain

an a

ppro

pria

te

dist

ance

from

the

curb

.

21

Pro

vide

a s

pace

for c

yclis

ts o

n ru

ral c

ross

-sec

tion

road

s (w

ith

shou

lder

s, n

o cu

rb a

nd g

utte

r).

Whe

re m

otor

veh

icle

spe

eds

or

volu

mes

are

hig

h, a

wid

er

shou

lder

and

/or p

aint

ed b

uffe

r en

able

s m

ore

sepa

ratio

n be

twee

n th

e cy

clis

t and

mot

or

vehi

cle,

and

als

o re

duce

s th

e im

pact

of w

ind-

shea

r on

the

cycl

ist.

Rum

ble

strip

s ca

n be

add

ed to

th

e pa

inte

d bu

ffer a

s an

ad

ditio

nal c

ue, p

rovi

ded

that

th

ere

are

clea

rly m

arke

d br

eaks

at r

egul

ar in

terv

als,

al

low

ing

cycl

ists

to m

ove

in o

r ou

t of t

he p

aved

sho

ulde

r are

a to

ove

rtake

slo

wer

mov

ing

cycl

ists

or t

o m

ake

a le

ft tu

rn.

Pave

d Sh

ould

ers

(Sha

red

Spac

e)

Pain

ted

buffe

r whe

re

mot

or v

ehic

le s

peed

an

d/or

vol

ume

are

high

22

A de

dica

ted

faci

lity

loca

ted

in

the

trave

lled

porti

on o

f the

ro

adw

ay fo

r one

-way

cyc

list

traffi

c.

Mot

or v

ehic

les

are

not

typi

cally

allo

wed

to d

rive,

par

k or

sta

nd in

a b

ike

lane

, but

rig

ht tu

rnin

g m

otor

veh

icle

s ca

n en

ter t

he la

ne a

t in

ters

ectio

ns to

com

plet

e th

eir

turn

.

Ens

urin

g co

nsis

tenc

y in

the

desi

gn a

nd s

igni

ng o

f bik

e la

nes

and

othe

r bik

eway

fa

cilit

ies

is c

ruci

al to

edu

cate

an

d in

form

cyc

lists

and

m

otor

ists

on

thei

r pro

per u

se.

Bik

e La

nes

(Ded

icat

ed S

pace

)

A w

ider

bik

e la

ne is

nee

ded

besi

de p

arke

d ca

rs

23

Ret

ro-fi

tting

G

eorg

etow

n, O

N: E

xist

ing

•4

lane

col

lect

or•

On-

stre

et p

arki

ng p

erm

itted

, but

low

dem

and

•H

igh

oper

atin

g sp

eeds

24

Scen

ario

1B

ike

lane

s w

ith o

n-st

reet

par

king

one

sid

e

25

Scen

ario

2B

ike

lane

s w

ith o

n-st

reet

par

king

two

side

s

26

Wat

erlo

o, O

N

Bik

eway

Des

ign

Sele

ctio

n fo

r Urb

an (C

urb

and

Gut

ter)

Cro

ss S

ectio

n R

oads

Mot

or V

ehic

le A

DT

(2

Lane

)<5

0050

0-1,

000

1,00

0-2,

000

2,00

0-5,

000

5,00

0-10

,000

>10,

000

Mot

or V

ehic

le A

DT

(4

Lane

)N

/AN

/A2,

000-

4,00

04,

000-

10,0

0010

,000

-20,

000

>20,

000

Mot

or

Vehi

cle

Spee

d

40 k

mSL

WO

LW

OL

WO

LBL

=1.5

mN

ot A

pplic

able

50 k

mSL

with

sig

nW

OL

BL=1

.5m

BL=1

.5m

BL=1

.8m

BL=1

.8m

60 k

mW

OL

BL=1

.5m

BL=1

.5m

BL=1

.8m

BL=1

.8m

BL=1

.8m

or

PS=2

.4m

70+

kmBL

=1.5

mBL

=1.5

mBL

=1.8

mBL

=1.8

mBL

= 1.

8m o

r PS

=2.4

m

SUP

or

PS=3

.0m

BL=

Bicy

cle

Lane

, SL=

Shar

ed L

ane,

WO

L= W

ide

Out

side

/Cur

b La

ne, S

UP=

Sha

red-

Use

Pat

h, P

S= P

aved

Sho

ulde

r

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta D

OT

Bik

eway

Fac

ility

Des

ign

Man

ual,

Mar

ch 2

007

Exam

ple

of S

ugge

sted

Min

imum

Fa

cilit

y Ty

pe a

nd W

idth

s

27

Buf

fere

d B

ike

Lane

Toro

nto,

ON

Buf

fere

d B

ike

Lane

s (D

edic

ated

Spa

ce)

Buf

fere

d bi

ke la

nes

prov

ide

addi

tiona

l spa

ce/s

epar

atio

n

betw

een

the

cycl

ist a

nd m

otor

ve

hicl

es.

They

sho

uld

be c

onsi

dere

d on

hi

gh v

olum

e, h

ighe

r spe

ed

road

s.

28

A bi

cycl

e fa

cilit

y th

at c

ombi

nes

the

user

exp

erie

nce

of a

se

para

ted

path

with

the

on-

road

infra

stru

ctur

e of

a

conv

entio

nal b

ike

lane

.

Cyc

le tr

acks

pro

vide

spa

ce

that

is in

tend

ed to

be

excl

usiv

ely

or p

rimar

ily fo

r bi

cycl

es, a

nd a

re

sepa

rate

d fro

m m

otor

veh

icle

tra

vel l

anes

usi

ng d

iffer

ent

desi

gn te

chni

ques

suc

h as

pa

rkin

g la

nes,

bol

lard

s, c

urbs

, m

edia

ns o

r a c

ombi

natio

n th

ereo

f.

Cyc

le T

rack

s (S

epar

ated

Fac

ility

)

Pain

ted

buffe

r and

pl

ante

r box

es

crea

tes

sepa

ratio

n

Pain

ted

buffe

r and

fle

xibl

e/re

mov

able

bo

llard

s cr

eate

se

para

tion

29

Cyc

le T

rack

s (S

epar

ated

Fac

ility

)

Cyc

le tr

acks

can

be

eith

er o

ne-

way

or t

wo-

way

, on

one

or b

oth

side

s of

a s

treet

, and

are

se

para

ted

from

veh

icle

s an

d pe

dest

rians

by

pave

men

t m

arki

ngs

or c

olor

ing,

bol

lard

s,

curb

s/m

edia

ns o

r a

com

bina

tion

of th

ese

elem

ents

.

Two-

way

Cyc

le

Trac

k

One

-way

C

ycle

Trac

k w

ith

rolle

d cu

rb

30

Cyc

le T

rack

s (S

epar

ated

Fac

ility

)

Laur

ier A

ve.,

Otta

wa,

ON

Sep

arat

ed C

yclin

g Fa

cilit

y P

ilot

Pro

ject

, im

plem

ente

d in

201

1.

Util

izes

pai

nted

buf

fers

, pai

nted

bu

ffers

with

flex

ible

bol

lard

s,

rem

ovea

ble

barri

er c

urbs

, and

pl

ante

r box

es in

var

ious

lo

catio

ns a

long

cor

ridor

.

Pai

nted

zon

es a

t int

erse

ctio

ns

assi

st c

yclis

ts w

ith 2

-sta

ge le

ft tu

rns.

One

-way

C

ycle

Trac

k w

ith

land

scap

ed

med

ian

for

sepa

ratio

n

31

Cyc

le T

rack

s (S

epar

ated

Fac

ility

)

Mon

trea

l, PQ

Two-

way

C

ycle

Trac

k w

ith

land

scap

ed m

edia

n fo

r sep

arat

ion

Two-

way

C

ycle

Trac

k w

ith o

n-st

reet

par

king

as

a bu

ffer

Em

erge

ncy

vehi

cle

acce

ss,

acce

ss to

tran

sit s

tops

, acc

ess

for p

ara-

trans

it ve

hicl

es, w

inte

r m

aint

enan

ce a

nd s

now

sto

rage

ar

e al

l im

porta

nt c

onsi

dera

tions

w

hen

desi

gnin

g cy

cle

track

s.

32

In-b

oule

vard

mul

ti-us

e pa

thw

ays

(with

in ro

ad ri

ghts

-of-w

ay) a

re

usef

ul fo

r bot

h pe

dest

rians

and

cy

clis

ts a

long

pop

ular

com

mut

er

rout

es.

They

can

be

used

in

plac

e of

a s

idew

alk.

A go

od fa

cilit

y ty

pe w

here

ther

e is

am

ple

right

-of-w

ay, a

low

fre

quen

cy o

f int

erse

ctio

ns a

nd

driv

eway

s, a

nd a

djac

ent l

and

use

or lo

tting

pat

tern

that

min

imiz

es

the

pote

ntia

l for

con

flict

with

pe

dest

rians

.

Not

a g

ood

choi

ce fo

r hig

h de

nsity

dev

elop

men

t with

nar

row

fro

ntag

es.

Mul

ti-U

se B

oule

vard

Tra

ilAu

rora

, ON

Mul

ti-U

se B

oule

vard

Tra

ilTo

ront

o, O

N

In-B

oule

vard

Mul

ti-us

e Pa

thw

ays

(Sep

arat

ed F

acili

ty)

33

Mul

ti-us

e pa

thw

ays

outs

ide

of

the

road

righ

t-of-w

ay a

re a

n in

tegr

al p

art o

f a c

ompr

ehen

sive

cy

clin

g ne

twor

k.

Pla

ced

in g

reen

way

cor

ridor

s an

d ot

her l

inea

r cor

ridor

s (h

ydro

, ga

s, li

ght r

ail a

nd lo

w v

olum

e ra

il), t

hese

pro

vide

crit

ical

co

nnec

tions

for r

ecre

atio

nal,

novi

ce a

nd c

hild

cyc

lists

.

Mul

ti-us

e Pa

thw

ays

outs

ide

of R

oad

Rig

hts-

of W

ay (S

epar

ated

Fac

ility

)

Mul

ti-U

se T

rail

with

Rai

lG

uelp

h, O

N

Etob

icok

e C

reek

Tra

ilM

issi

ssau

ga, O

N

Tham

es V

alle

y Pa

rkw

ayLo

ndon

, ON

Tran

s C

anad

a Tr

ail

Pet

erbo

roug

h, O

N

34

Sum

mar

y

Step

2E

xam

ine

Oth

er

Fact

ors

Step

3S

elec

t App

ropr

iate

Fa

cilit

y Ty

pe

Step

1P

re-s

elec

tion

Nom

ogra

ph

The

Bic

ycle

Fac

ility

Sel

ectio

n G

uide

can

be u

sed

to a

ssis

t Tow

n st

aff i

n se

lect

ing

appr

opria

te b

icyc

le fa

cilit

ies

for

Tow

n-ow

ned

loca

l and

col

lect

or ro

ad

right

s-of

-way

.

•Th

ere

is n

o “fo

rmul

a” fo

r app

ropr

iate

bi

cycl

e fa

cilit

y se

lect

ion;

and

•It

is a

pro

cess

that

com

bine

s an

an

alys

is a

nd u

nder

stan

ding

of t

he

cond

ition

s of

the

loca

tion

bein

g co

nsid

ered

with

sou

nd e

ngin

eerin

g ju

dgem

ent.

35