90
January, 2014 Career Development Proving our Value - Getting Much Closer

January, 2014. National research agenda to better understand “what works” in career services 3 calls for proposals from HRSDC over 6 years Source

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • January, 2014
  • Slide 2
  • National research agenda to better understand what works in career services 3 calls for proposals from HRSDC over 6 years Source of major international envy among Career Development Practitioners (CDPs) and Researchers Evidence-Based Research in Canada 2
  • Slide 3
  • Ethics: Clients deserve interventions that have demonstrated success Confidence: Practitioners should know that a given intervention will result in a predictable outcome Security: Being able to provide evidence of success increases ability to obtain and keep funding for services and secure jobs for CDPs/Employment Counsellors Why Evidence-Based Practice? 3
  • Slide 4
  • Outcome-focused intervention Evidence of client change contrast with Client flow Ease of access Practitioner time use Its easy to measure variables that dont address client change Why Evidence-Based Practice? 4
  • Slide 5
  • 5
  • Slide 6
  • Highlight results of 3 recent research projects: What have we learned? Explore how a select number of LMI and career development resources could be integrated into everyday evidence-based practice Explain where we are now and next steps Direct you to additional research studies Session Objectives 6
  • Slide 7
  • What evidence do you currently collect? What is done with the evidence currently collected? 7 Before we start.
  • Slide 8
  • What did the research do? What was learned? What was most surprising? What are the implications for practice? Reflective Questions. 8
  • Slide 9
  • R ESEARCH P ROJECT #1: A SSESSING THE I MPACT OF LMI ON C AREER D ECISION M AKING AND W ORK S EARCH Research Team Canadian Research Working Group in Evidence- Based Practice (CRWG), Canadian Career Development Foundation (CCDF) In partnership with New Brunswick Post-Secondary Education & Labour, Saskatchewan Advanced Education, Employment & Labour 9
  • Slide 10
  • WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? There is very little literature about the direct contribution of LMI to employment/career decision-making ( Savard & Michaud, The Impact of LMI on Career Decision-Making Process: Literature Review, FLMM, 2005) Several questions remain unanswered: How do people actually use LMI? What (if any ) assistance would be helpful? 10
  • Slide 11
  • RESEARCH QUESTIONS If client needs are assessed and clients are given LMI consistent with their needs, To what extent does assistance by a service provider enhance their effective use of LMI? OR To what extent is independent self-help a sufficient process for clients to use LMI effectively? 11
  • Slide 12
  • METHOD We prepared guided LMI packages (take- home booklets and Resource Centre binders) on: Career Decision Making: Know yourself Know the Labour Market Put it all Together Job Search: Check for Fit Get Ready Search for Work Get a Job 12
  • Slide 13
  • All participants in the study: Received a needs assessment interview & completed an initial, pre-program survey Received an LMI package specific to their identified employability need Were randomly assigned to either a self- directed intervention delivery method or an assisted self-directed intervention delivery method. Were given an orientation to the Resource Centre which they could freely use on their own Completed a pre and post-pre survey Received a cash honorarium and certificate of participation 13 INTERVENTION
  • Slide 14
  • The self-directed group: worked independently for 3 weeks, making use of the materials and the Resource Centre returned in Week 4 for their exit interview 14 INTERVENTION (CONT)
  • Slide 15
  • The assisted self-help clients received: two additional AIS (Advice and Information) interviews (20-30 minutes) in weeks 1 and 3 focused on helping them understand, interpret and apply the LMI to their own situations and /or access additional LMI returned in Week 4 for their exit interview 15
  • Slide 16
  • SAMPLE BY PROVINCE ProvinceIntervention Type Delivery Total IndependentAssisted Saskatchewan CDM201535 JS232548 Province Total434083 New Brunswick English CDM281543 JS121325 Province total402868 New Brunswick French CDM151732 JS11920 Province total26 52 Total for 3 groups10994203 16
  • Slide 17
  • WHAT DID WE MEASURE The Dependent Measures for the data analysis were: General ability to use LMI Knowledge Clear vision of what I want in my career future Knowledge of print and online resources Skill Have effective strategies for keeping myself motivated Have a realistic action plan Personal Attributes Optimism about what lies ahead re meeting my career goals Confidence in my ability to manage future career transitions 17
  • Slide 18
  • EXAMPLES OF QUESTIONS USED IN PRE AND IN POST- PRE SURVEYS Knowing what you know now, how would you rate yourself before the workshop, and how would you rate yourself now? Before Av e After Ave 1.A clear understanding of what I need to do to move forward in my career. 2157481691.5713286653 3.11 2.A clear vision of what I want in my career future. 24374039111.8417296351 3.03 3.Reviewed my past work, education and experience so that I know what skills and strengths I have. 11335735142.0523216856 3.15 4.A list of possible options that may fit with what I want in my career future. 2349472391.6414256654 3.12 5.Knowledge of print and online resources that help me to research career/employment options. 3255421651.3811215374 3.32 6.Confidence that career-related employment opportunities actually exist that fit with what I want in my career future. 1941582581.75110275855 3.03 18
  • Slide 19
  • Changes in competency self assessments: Pre program: 30% and 58% of the respondents rated competency Not OK 5% rated their competency as Exceptional Post program: 1% 9% rated competency Not OK 39% rated their competency as Exceptional The amount of change was similar across all three dimensions of the survey, knowledge, skills, and personal attributes all demonstrated about the same amount of change. 19 DESCRIPTIVE RESULTS
  • Slide 20
  • DESCRIPTIVE RESULTS (CONT.) Of particular note are items that suggest increased ability to self- manage their careers, such as: A clear understanding of what I need to do to move forward in my career. A clear vision of what I want in my career future. Effective strategies for keeping myself motivated to achieve my career/employment goals. Confidence in my ability to research career, employment, and training options that are available Confidence in my ability to manage future career transitions. 20
  • Slide 21
  • DIFFERENTIAL RESULTS-TOTAL SCORE Both CDM and JS groups had significant increases across time Change in CDM group was significantly larger than in JS group Participants in the JS group had higher scores than participants in the CDM group, likely indicating that JS participants were more familiar with using LMI before the project began. Participants receiving assistance demonstrated greater change across time than did those in the independent mode Participants receiving assistance demonstrated greater change across time than did those in the independent mode Similar pattern for all subscales 21 For group as a whole: significant increase in overall ability to use LMI significant increase in overall ability to use LMI neither intervention was more conducive to one manner of delivery compared to the other neither intervention was more conducive to one manner of delivery compared to the other
  • Slide 22
  • To what extent would you say that any changes in the ratings on the previous pages are a result of your participation in this research project, and to what extent were they a function of other factors in your life? 22 mostly other factors somewhat other factors uncertain somewhat this program mostly this program English33154780French0012526 Program ATTRIBUTION FOR CHANGE
  • Slide 23
  • Overall,no significant differences in the results of the anglophone and francophone samples with the exception that assisted francophone clients reported increased gains over the anglophone clients although both groups reported more positive change in the assisted condition. 23 STUDY REPEATED IN FRANCOPHONE NEW BRUNSWICK
  • Slide 24
  • FOLLOW UP INTERVIEWS (1 WEEK AND 4 MONTHS AFTER INTERVENTION) I was surprised at how much information there was Initially I thought I could not do this, but I found out I could Theres a lot to learn I got more focused on my goal I got clearer about what I wanted to do 24
  • Slide 25
  • CLIENT CRITICISMS The program needed to be longer given the number of resources available. (222) Working full time made it very hard []. With a little more help it would have been much easier (242) There was too much information and that made making a career decision more difficult [] very hard to do this alone (209) 25
  • Slide 26
  • WHAT DID PRACTITIONERS SAY? The structure helped me be more focused and concrete I never really thought about intake of clients as assisted or self- helpnow its built into every intake I do I used to be maternal and forget that it was the clients decision and I got more involved than I needed to. Now I ask the clients to be more responsible Now I give more homework tasks and Im more specific. The clients felt more focused and so do I 26
  • Slide 27
  • WHAT DID THE RESEARCH DO? Isolated LMI as an intervention Isolated giving information and advice from employment counselling Organized LMI into a career development learning sequence Tested self-help versus a combination of self- help, information giving and advice 27
  • Slide 28
  • WHAT WAS LEARNED? Tailored LMI embedded in a learning process results in knowledge and skill acquisition as well as the capacity for self-management LMI appropriate for a clients specific need (opposed to general LMI) appears to support engagement and action For many clients, a little (or no) professional LMI support is enough Structure and timelines appear to motivate action and a sense of progress Giving clients hands-on tools appears to motivate more than money 28
  • Slide 29
  • WHAT WAS MOST SURPRISING The extent of positive client change in knowledge, skill and personal attributes in both conditions of self-help and supported self-help The value clients placed on the LMI materials and the degree to which they used them The positive impact of organized LMI and LMI specific to client need versus generalized LMI 29
  • Slide 30
  • WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE? To be discussed.. 30
  • Slide 31
  • Drs. Dave Redekopp and Bryan Hiebert Alberta Human Services Manitoba Entrepreneurship, Training and Trade Canadian Career Development Foundation (CCDF) Research Project #2: Assessing the Impact of Career Resource and Supports Across the Employability Dimensions 31
  • Slide 32
  • There is very limited research about the direct contribution of career development learning resources on client progress toward or achievement of employability. There are many assumptions made about self-help resources but very little actual evidence of their impact. There is much talk about labour market attachment but on investigation it remains a very wooly construct. 32 What is the Problem?
  • Slide 33
  • Developed comprehensive career development coaching guides (way beyond LMI) covering all employability dimensions excepting career growth: CAREER DECISION MAKING: Not yet clear about work/learning goal; needs to understand personal skills, interest, values and personality and more about different potential occupations in order to develop a vision for a preferred future SKILLS ENHANCEMENT: Has career goal, but needs to explore skills and qualifications needed for the work they want and how to acquire them JOB SEARCH: Has career goal and necessary skills/qualifications for desired work; needs skills, strategies and tools necessary to conduct a successful job search JOB MAINTENANCE: Has difficulty keeping work; may need to address personal/life issues (e.g. health, behaviour, transportation, child care) or may need to work on the skills/attitudes required for success at work. The last part of this Guide is appropriate for someone already working, but wanting to improve their chances of keeping the job. 33 This Study
  • Slide 34
  • Randomly assigned clients to one of two treatment conditions: Practitioner launched Practitioner launched (in which they had their needs assessed, were oriented to the appropriate Guide and then worked independently with their Resource Guide for 4 weeks) Practitioner launched and supported Practitioner launched and supported (in which they also worked with their Career Consultant for 4 weeks of regular services (i.e. 2-4 sessions on average) using the Guide as appropriate but not restricted in their interventions Examined differential impact across treatment conditions on client knowledge, skills, personal attributes and labour market outcomes 34 This Study
  • Slide 35
  • Self Help Index(self-help-o-meter) to see if: The propensity for self-help can be measured The ability to self-help affects client outcomes Labour Market Attachment Index to see if: Specific variables related to the clients work history and life situation can be measured These variables affect client outcomes Developed Two New Indices
  • Slide 36
  • If clients are given a comprehensive needs assessment to determine their employability need(s), what is the differential effect of independent and consultant-supported career development resources on clients who are weakly attached to the labour market versus those who are strongly attached to the labour market? Will all clients demonstrate positive change? Will clients who are strongly attached to the LM show more positive change? Will clients who are supported by a consultant show more positive change? Will weakly attached clients struggle more in the independent condition? 36 Research Question
  • Slide 37
  • ProvinceDimensionDelivery Alberta = 115CDM = 35Independent = 17 Supported = 18 SE = 25Independent = 16 Supported = 9 JS = 42Independent = 21 Supported = 21 JM = 13Independent = 10 Supported = 3 Manitoba = 113CDM = 44Independent = 21 Supported = 23 SE = 19Independent = 10 Supported = 9 JS = 43Independent = 23 Supported = 20 JM = 7Independent = 4 Supported = 3 Totals Total sample = 228 CDM = 79 (35%) SE = 44 (19%) JS = 85 (37%) JM = 20 (9%) Independent = 122 (54%) Supported = 106 (46%) 37 Sample Composition
  • Slide 38
  • DeliverynBeforeAfterTotal PLR3423.71(11.38)45.50(10.93)34.60 PLSR3824.92(11.41)49.05(8.86)36.99 Total7224.35(11.98)47.38(9.98) Key Findings Career Decision Making Total Score Summary: Main Effect for Delivery: F(1,70)=1.32; p=.26 Main Effect for Time: F(1,70)=253.72; p