27
January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report

January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

January 2008

Texas Regional Entity Report

Page 2: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

2

Performance Highlights

● ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06

● Scores for November indicate 34 non-wind-only QSEs passed and 1 non-wind-only QSE failed the PRR 525 measure

Page 3: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

3

Texas RE Monthly Summary

● For November………. Protocol & Operating Guides violations

• 1 new alleged

NERC Standards violations• 6 new alleged – all resulting from entity self-certifications

Reportable events• 1 Compliance Review in final stage

• 2 new events reported – Compliance Reviews initiated

12 NERC Spot-Checks Initiated

● NERC approved the Texas RE 2008 Compliance Enforcement Program Implementation Plan

Page 4: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

Texas Regional Entity

Report Details

Page 5: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

5

NERC CPS1 Performance

● ERCOT’s CPS1 Performance November Performance

• Monthly comparison♦ 2007: 112.06

♦ 2006: 131.96

• 12 month rolling average comparison♦ December 2006 November 2007: 128.24

♦ December 2005 November 2006: 142.77

● PRR 525 Performance Scores for November indicate 34 non-wind-only QSEs passed and 1

non-wind-only QSE failed the measure Scores posted on the ERCOT Compliance Website

• SCE Performance Scores

Page 6: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

6

ERCOT CPS1 Performance Comparison

100

110

120

130

140

150

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

CP

S1

Tre

nd

100

110

120

130

140

150

Dec'06-Nov'07 Dec'05-Nov'06 Dec'04-Nov'05 Dec'03-Nov'04

Start of SCE Performance MonitoringJanuary '06

Page 7: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

7

ERCOT CPS1 Year-to-Year Comparison

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Page 8: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

8

ERCOT’s CPS1 Monthly Performance

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

CP

S1

Av

era

ge

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

Monthly Avg 12 Mo Rolling Avg

Page 9: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

9

ERCOT CPS1 by Interval

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

CP

S1

Av

g %

Nov '07 Shaded Nov '06

06152215

0015

2315

1115815

1815

Page 10: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

10

QSE PRR 525 10-Minute Interval Scoring

17 1820

1820

18 18 18 1719 20 19 19

17 18

13

19

2426 27

30 30

35

32 32 31 3234 34

32 32 32 32 33 34 34 34 34 34

13 12 9

10

9 1210 10 12

11 10 11 1113 12

16

9

4

55

3 3

1

1 1 2 1

1 2

13 2 3 1

1 1

1 11

11

1

1 11

2 2 2 2 2 3 44 4

44

6 6

6

6 7 7 7

77

7

77

88 8 8 8

8 9

02468

101214161820222426283032343638404244

Nu

mb

er

of

QS

Es

Passing QSEs Failing QSEs Failing Wind

Page 11: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

11

November 2007 – SCPS2 Scores

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Pe

rce

nt

35 Non-Wind QSE's 9 Wind QSE's

Page 12: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

12

November 2007 Resource Plan Performance Metrics

DK BT DE IP AP AO HA BY BC JA AY AM AR BR HJ DF BP CI AE AD BJ BH JD CF ETResource Status 99 - 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 96 98 100 96 - 99 99 100 - 100 100 - 100 100 90LSL as % of HSL 93 - 99 98 98 94 97 98 100 99 100 100 99 97 - 96 99 96 - 95 99 - 94 98 100Day Ahead Zonal Schedule 94 98 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 100 95 100 100 98 97 100 100 94 - 100 100 100 100 100 96Adjustment Period Zonal Schedule 91 89 96 97 96 94 91 98 98 95 96 96 92 92 93 90 97 90 - 89 94 95 95 95 100Down Bid & Obligation 87 96 90 83 96 97 95 93 91 79 94 45 87 68 94 76 95 86 - 92 92 93 97 86 95Total Up AS - - 100 - 100 98 99 98 95 100 97 96 100 87 - 92 - - 100 - - - 97 100 96

DA GR GS BF BE EU JC BG CX FK HW IN IZ JB BX CC JE CD FS AC CQ IV IO FYResource Status 99 - - - - 100 - 99 100 100 100 99 100 - 100 99 - 99 100 100 99 - 100 -LSL as % of HSL 100 - - - - 100 - 100 100 100 100 98 96 - 99 100 - 97 99 100 98 - - -Day Ahead Zonal Schedule 95 97 96 98 99 - 100 98 100 99 100 100 99 - 100 92 100 98 98 100 99 100 - -Adjustment Period Zonal Schedule 92 97 92 97 95 94 96 97 97 96 94 89 99 97 96 97 100 94 89 99 97 98 - -Down Bid & Obligation 79 84 86 85 84 - 100 92 92 92 95 97 99 99 84 93 100 93 - 94 93 96 - -Total Up AS 88 - - - - - - 100 99 97 95 98 100 - 98 99 - 99 - - 99 - - 98

4 Consecutive Failing Scores 3 Consecutive Failing Scores

2 Consecutive Failing Scores 1 Failing Score

PARTYNAME

PARTYNAMEID

ID

Page 13: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

13

Registration Activities

● Organization registration issues continue to be addressed● Purchasing-Selling Entity (PSE) registration

Initially, registration notices sent to 33 entities Registration criteria used

• Entity operates as a Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) in the ERCOT Market• Entity shown on NERC TSIN (Transmission Service Information Network) List

• Entity schedules transactions across a HVDC tie

● ERCOT PSE registration being removed● Load-Serving Entity (LSE) registration to be addressed● Joint Registration of some entities likely

Page 14: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

14

NERC Functional Entity Types

DP – Distribution Provider GO – Generator Owner GOP – Generator Operator TO – Transmission Owner TP – Transmission Planner

RC – Reliability Coordinator BA – Balancing Authority TOP – Transmission

Operator PA – Planning Authority TSP – Transmission Service

Provider RP – Resource Planner PSE – Purchasing-Selling

Entity

Page 15: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

15

Compliance Process Flowcharts

● NERC Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program – Reliability Standards Link to NERC Reliability Flowcharts

● ERCOT Compliance Process – ERCOT Protocols and Operating Guides Link to Protocols & Guides Flowcharts

Page 16: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

16

2008 Audits by Registered Function

97

13 12

1

23

0

5

10

15

20

25

GOP GO RC BA TOP TO TP DP

Scheduled On-Site Visit Completed Report Issued

Page 17: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

17

2008 Compliance Audits Scheduled by Entity

34

2

7

2

5

443 3

5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Scheduled On-Site Visit Completed Report Issued

Page 18: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

18

2008 Audit Schedule

● The 2008 Texas RE Audit Schedule is available here.

Page 19: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

19

Compliance Reviews of Events by Month

3

5

7

5

32 2

12 2

3

2

1

1 3

1

1

21

1

1

12

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

Reviewed Ops Only Report Investigation

Page 20: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

20

Violations of ERCOT Protocols

34

8

3 3

9

4

2

1 1

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

Confirmed - Mitigated Confirmed - Mitigation in Progress Alleged

4

8

3 3

9

7

3

0

1

0

1

Page 21: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

21

Violations of NERC Standards Reported by Month

64

2

17

2210

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

Alleged Confirmed - Mitigation in Progress Confirmed - Mitigated

0 0 0 0

2

6

1 2

17

0

6

Page 22: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

22

NERC Standards Self-Certification

● NERC Registered Entities NOT audited in 2007 required to self-certify to the actively monitored Reliability Standards applicable to their Registration(s) 165 Total Registered Functions 99.4% overall response 1 outstanding response

• Entity is challenging their registration

Page 23: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

23

NERC Standards Self-Certification

● To date, 25 alleged violations identified (September, October, & November) 9 FAC-008 – lack documented process

• 3 GOs

6 FAC-009 – lack documented process• 3 GOs

4 CIP-001 – lack documented process• 1 GOP

3 IRO-004 – lack documented process• 2 GOs; 1 GOP

3 PRC-005 – relay maintenance delinquent• 1 TO; 2 GO

Page 24: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

24

NERC Standards Self-Certification Violation Details

Std Qty Req'mt VSL VRF Time Horizon Impact Category

PRC-005 2 R2 Moderate Lower LT Plan Minimal TechPRC-005 1 R1.1 Lower High LT Plan Minimal AdminFAC-008 3 R1 Severe Lower LT Plan Minimal AdminFAC-008 3 R2 Severe Lower OP Plan Minimal AdminFAC-008 3 R3 Severe Lower OP Plan Minimal AdminFAC-009 3 R1 Severe Medium LT Plan Minimal AdminFAC-009 3 R2 Severe Medium LT Plan Minimal AdminIRO-004 3 R4 Not Spec High OP Plan Minimal AdminCIP-001 1 R1 Lower Medium LT Plan Low AdminCIP-001 1 R2 Lower Medium LT Plan Low AdminCIP-001 1 R3 High Medium LT Plan Low AdminCIP-001 1 R4 Lower Medium LT Plan Low AdminTotal 25

Violation Risk Factors

0 5 10 15 20 25

Admin

Training

Tech

High

Medium

Low er

Violation Severity Level

0 5 10 15 20 25

Admin

Training

Tech

Severe

High

Moderate

Lower

Not Spec

Page 25: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

25

NERC Standards Self-Reported ViolationsPre-June 18th

Mitigation Plan Status

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

PR

C-0

18

-1

CIP

-00

1-1

FA

C-0

08

-1

PR

C-0

01

-1

FA

C-0

09

-1

VA

R-0

02

-1

PR

C-0

05

-1

TO

P-0

02

-2

TO

P-0

01

-1

TO

P-0

03

-0

PR

C-0

04

-1

IRO

-00

4-1

CO

M-0

02

-2

FA

C-0

02

-0

BA

L-0

05

-0

IRO

-00

1-1

MO

D-0

10

-0

MO

D-0

12

-0

TO

P-0

06

-1

FA

C-0

01

-0

TP

L-0

03

-0

TP

L-0

04

-0

Nu

mb

er

of

Vio

lati

on

s

Mitigation Plans Completed Mitigation Complete This Month Mitigation Plans In Progress

Page 26: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

26

Risk Factors for Self-Reported NERC Standards Violations Pre-June 18th

High, 36, 19%

Medium, 58, 30%

Lower, 100, 51%

Risk Factors are being assigned to each NERC Standard as part of the Standard Development Process

Page 27: January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – 112.06 ●Scores

27

NERC Standards Self-Reported Violation Categorization Pre-June 18th

23 55 53

10 5 1

31 43

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Admin

Training

Tech

High

Medium

Lower

Violation Risk

Factors