cluster with security fencing and play area. The kitchen is adequate but with some barrier free circulation and restroom issues. The multi-purpose room is also adequate but without stage and storage for tables and chairs. The administration office and nurse's room are small for the needs and without sufficient storage.

Paving within the campus common area is concrete with some minor path of travel issues. The paved outdoor activity area is adequate and in fairly good condition. The play fields are also in fairly good condition although flat withsome drainage problems. The site is well lighted, allowing for some evening use.

Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, James Marshall Elementary School appears to be in generally good condition. The school should be suitable for further modernization especially for the fields and Multi-Purpose Building.

Narrative SummaryThe site is approximately 8 acres in an area of fully developed suburban neighborhoods and is adequate for an elementary school serving 405 students. James Marshall was redeveloped in 2000 with recently modernized portable classrooms and significant site upgrades. The administration and multi-purpose building, originally built in 1976 was substantially modernized at that time.

There is ample parking for staff and visitors with good access to and from Goethe Road. Both bus and parent drop off however, is along the school entry walk in the main parking lot with circulation through the lot. There is no designated barrier free drop off space and the lack of properly constructed curb ramps at the drives to and from the parking lots and within the lots create path of travel issues that need correcting. Upgrades are also needed to separate parking and drop off.

26 of the 33 classrooms plus the library and teacher's lounge are clustered around a looped core. 7 classrooms including pre-school and kindergarten are in a separate

Campus Entry

Goethe Road

James W. Marshall Elementary School

James W. Marshall Elementary School

SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master Plan

June 2012

School Mission Statement

‘Student Centered Education’

Site Plan of Campus

School Location Legend

JMES-I

•Ensuring that teaching is effective and engaging to all students.•Ensuring the delivery of standards based instruction is differentiated to meet the needs of every student.•Empowering students to make good decisions and create a safe environment through clear, consistent, school-wide expectations.•Engaging the community in a variety of activities to reinforce a better understanding of our shared responsibility.

Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition and drainage poses safetyrisk and limits use of facilities.

Sustainable Sites Campus CoreNon-compliant barrier free surfaces exist. This space does not promote educational and informal gathering opportunities.

Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Parking conflicts with drop off. Barrier free drop ff space is needed.

SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master Plan

June 2012

Utility (Water) Efficiency Exterior Aged and inefficient irrigation system and controls need replacement.

Energy & AtmosphereOld and inefficient equipment and managementSystems are at the end of their useful life.

Materials & Resources ExteriorInadequate roof slopes and drains create roof problems.

Indoor Environmental Quality Insufficient and inadequate storage impairs barrierFree access.

James W. Marshall Elementary School

Water Efficiency InteriorLeaking and inefficient fixtures need replacement.

Materials & Resources InteriorNon-compliant code issues need correcting.

JMES-II

High Performance Transformation

Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.

Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.

Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.

Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.

Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.

Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.

James W. Marshall Elementary School

SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master Plan

June 2012Site Plan – Concept Study

JMES-III

‘Student Centered Education’The following is a site organizational concept of James W. Marshall Elementary School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards.

SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off

Visitor/Staff Parking

Garden/Quad/Outdoor Learning

CAREER & COLLEGE READYCore Academic Pathway Transformation

Kindergarten (K)Elementary; Lower 1-3, Upper 4-6

Project Lab Transformation (2,880 sf)Project Labs (PL) Art/Science

Support Support Spaces – distributed

FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (4,279 sf)

Media Center & Computer LabParent Center & Conference RoomTeacher Planning CenterNote: Transformation of (E) MP

Multi-Purpose (MP) Expansion (7,536 sf)Dining / Gym / Assembly / Stage Restrooms / Kitchen / Storage

ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (0 sf)

Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals of 522 – 672 students. No additional classrooms required

PL

TC

MP

MP

TC

Admin

PL

Goethe Road

James W. Marshall Elementary School

JMES-IV

James W. Marshall Elementary School

SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012

School Site Facility(s) Needs The following list was provided by the school’s principal which was generated from school site council and community meetings:

CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools

Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”

In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.

SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points

Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1

Sustainable Sites 14 4 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental

Quality 23/25 2

TOTAL 118 10

Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing

0 10 25 118 PointsJMES

- Size of the classrooms are too small to hold 30+ students

- Multipurpose Room needs to be bigger to accommodate all students and more activities

- Lack of shade/cover for rain

- Front office area (for parents) is too small, often not enough room to get in the door

- More restrooms needed by the playground

- Additional Play Structure

- Need watering options for garden

- Repair sinkholes in the playground

- Library/Computer Lab

Indoor Environmental Quality

- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems

Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems

Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off

- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure

Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure

- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems

Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish

Leadership, Education & Innovation

- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation

Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost

Cod

e, L

ife S

afet

y &

Acc

ess

Mai

nten

ance

&

Ope

ratio

ns

High

Per

form

ance

Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n

Project Cost Summary Matrix

Schools as Teaching Tools

$ 154,960

$ 24,440

$ 0

$ 102,570

$ 32,890

$ 0

$ 314,860

$ 60,190

$ 7,020

$ 12,740

$ 367,250

$ 499,460

$ 0

$ 946,660

$ 811,200

$ 109,850

$ 100,360

$ 1,432,340

$ 462,150

$6,399,640

$9,315,540

$ 1,026,350

$ 141,310

$ 113,100

$ 1,902,160

$ 994,500

$6,399,640

$10,577,060

Sust

aina

ble

Cat

egor

y To

tal