Upload
arthur-marshall
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
James Lind AllianceTackling treatment uncertainties together
James Lind, 1716-1794
“As we know, there are known knowns. There are things we know we know.
“We also know there are known unknowns. That is to say we know there are some things we do not know.
“But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we don't know.”
Donald Rumsfeld
One creditworthy contribution to posterity
How do we determine priorities?
Collect uncertainties from patients/carers/ clinicians/researchers AND research literature Check that they are uncertainties and assemble in a
database (probably over 200 uncertainties) Analyse database, and consult with stakeholders –
what are their priorities? Aim for a shortlist of 30 uncertainties and have a
workshop so that they can be debated and consensus developed reaching a ‘top ten’ uncertainties.
Publish the results, to influence research agendas…
Scoping priority setting in the UK
To find out:
which clinical research organisations set research priorities and how they do it
whether and how patients and the public are involved in this work
how identified priorities influence what research gets funded
Methods
A review of the websites of UK clinical research organisations – 52 included
Telephone interviews with relevant staff in 22 UK clinical research funding organisations that do set priorities
A literature review
Which organisations?
Most were voluntary sector organisations or medical charities (49)
Department of Health funded organisations (2)
Research Council (1)
Wide range of research topics and budgets
Making funding decisions
Majority operate in responsive mode
Every one uses a process of peer review to decide which applications to fund – huge variation in level of PPI in this process
About 40% identify research priorities
About one third say they commission research
Setting priorities – why and how?
Most commonly part of research strategy – but lots of different reasons
Huge range of methods used to identify priorities – linked to purpose
Not often linked to JLA agenda
Do research priorities influence the research agenda?
Limited evidence of influence:
List of priorities are often so broad that they do not set any limits on researchers
Review process does not involve assessing ‘how well a proposal fits with a research priority’
How could priorities influence research agenda?
Commissioning
Barriers to commissioning
Reluctance to stifle creativity and the ‘next breakthrough’
Culture of researchers ‘know best’
It’s difficult to turn a priority topic into a research question
Lack of capacity
Fear of poor quality response
Conclusions
To make priorities count:
Challenge the dominant research culture
Share best practice in identifying priorities
Develop and support commissioning