James D. Hess, Ed.D. Chair OSU School of Healthcare Administration

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • James D. Hess, Ed.D. Chair OSU School of Healthcare Administration
  • Slide 2
  • A competitive or opposing action of incompatibles Antagonistic state or action Mental struggle resulting from incompatible or opposing needs, drives, wishes or demands The opposition of persons or forces that give rise to dramatic action Fight, battle, war Basically: a disagreement
  • Slide 3
  • A disagreement through which the parties involved perceive a threat to their needs, interests or concerns. Key elements: Disagreement Parties involved Perceived threat Needs, interests or concerns Power
  • Slide 4
  • Perceived threat to ones well-being or interests Response is based on the persons perceptions and/or feelings about the situation (not objective review of it) Conflicts contain substantive, procedural, and psychological dimensions To a large degree, conflicts are predictable and expectable situations that naturally arise Creative problem-solving strategies are essential
  • Slide 5
  • Consider either your workplace or a relationship and think about the following: What are some key sources of conflict in your workplace and/or relationship? When do they tend to occur? How do people respond to these conflicts as they arise? When you solve problems, do you do so for the moment, or do you put in place systems for addressing these types of concerns in the future?
  • Slide 6
  • In smaller work groups and in personal settings: Ongoing conflicts are rarely about the issue It is almost always about the relationship.
  • Slide 7
  • Competing Harmonizing or Accommodating Avoiding Compromising Collaborating Which is your conflict resolution style?
  • Slide 8
  • Competing Authoritarian approach Relies on aggressive communication -low regard for relationships; low level of trust Pros Goal oriented, quick Cons May breed hostility Descriptors I would argue my case and insist on the merits of my point of view. I find conflicts challenging and exhilarating; I enjoy the battle of wits that usually follows I can figure out what needs to be done and I am usually right
  • Slide 9
  • Harmonizing or Accommodating Giving in to maintain relationships Ones needs are yielded to others needs; preserving the relationship is most important Pros Minimizes injury when we are outmatched Cons Breeds resentment; exploits the weak Descriptors I try to meet the expectations of others I try to accommodate the wishes of my friends and family I may not get what I want but its a small price to pay for keeping the peace
  • Slide 10
  • Avoiding Non-confrontational approach If we ignore it, it will go away; instead, conflict festers Pros Does not escalate conflict; postpones difficulty Cons Unaddressed problems; issues unresolved Descriptors When I find myself in an argument, I usually say very little and try to leave as soon as possible Being at odds with other people makes me feel uncomfortable and anxious I avoid hard feelings by keeping my disagreements with others to myself
  • Slide 11
  • Compromising The middle ground approach Series of tradeoffs; satisfactory but not satisfying Pros Useful in complex situations without simple solutions; all parties have equal power Cons No one is ever clearly satisfied; less than optimal solutions are usually implemented Descriptors I try to negotiate and adopt a give-and-take approach to problem situations I prefer to compromise when solving problems and just move on To break deadlocks, I would meet people halfway
  • Slide 12
  • Collaborating Problems are resolved in which the optimal results are attained; Both parties get what they want and negative feelings are minimized Pooling of individual needs and goals toward a common goal; win-win Pros Creates trust; maintains positive relationships Cons Time consuming; lots of energy expended Descriptors I explore issues with others so as to find solutions that meet everyones needs I try to see conflicts from both sides. What do I need? What does the other person need?
  • Slide 13
  • Emotional responses Feelings we experience in conflict - Range from anger and fear to despair and confusion Cognitive responses Our ideas and thoughts about conflict such as the inner voice or internal observations we have Physical responses Include such responses heightened stress, bodily tension, increased perspiration, shallow or accelerated breathing, nausea, and rapid heartbeat Stress management techniques needed
  • Slide 14
  • Keep in mind that each party involved in the conflict may have a different perception of the situation, and part of this difference may be due to: Culture, race, religion and/or ethnicity Gender differences Knowledge (general and situational) Impressions of the messenger Previous experiences with this party and others
  • Slide 15
  • Make sure that good relationships are the first priority Keep people and problems separate Pay attention to the interests that are being presented Listen first: talk second. Set out the Facts. Explore options together.
  • Slide 16
  • Step 1: Know thyself and take care of thyself Understand your perceptual filters, biases, and triggers Create a personally affirming environment (eat, sleep, exercise)
  • Slide 17
  • Step 2 : Clarify personal needs threatened by a dispute Substantive, procedural and psychological needs Look at BATNA, WATNA, and MLANTA
  • Slide 18
  • BATNA: Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement WATNA: Worst Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement MLANTA: Most Likely Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement Identify desired outcomes from a negotiated process
  • Slide 19
  • Step 3 : Identify a safe place for negotiation Appropriate place for discussion/private and neutral Mutual consent to negotiate/appropriate time Role of support people (facilitators, mediators, advocates), as needed Agreement to ground rules
  • Slide 20
  • 1) One person speaks at a time 2) We will make a sincere commitment to listen to one another, to try to understand the other person's point of view before responding. 3) What we discuss together will be kept in confidence, unless there is explicit agreement regarding who needs to know further information.
  • Slide 21
  • 5) We agree to talk directly with the person with whom there are concerns, and not seek to involve others in "gossip" or "alliance building. 6) We agree to try our hardest and trust that others are doing the same within the group. 7) We will support the expression of dissent in a harassment free workplace. 8) We agree to attack the issues, not the people with whom we disagree.
  • Slide 22
  • Step 4: Take a listening stance into the interaction Seek first to understand, then to be understood Use active listening skills: Take a breath Remove distractions as much as possible Sit or face the other person directly with an open posture Focus on listening as your first priority
  • Slide 23
  • Step 5: Assert your needs clearly and specifically Use I messages as tools for clarification Build from what you have heard continue to listen well Remain open Remain flexible
  • Slide 24
  • Step 6: Approach problem-solving with flexibility Identify issues clearly and concisely Brainstorm or generate options while deferring judgment Be open to problem definitions Clarify criteria for decision-making
  • Slide 25
  • Step 7: Manage an impasse calmly, patiently and respectfully Clarify feelings Focus on underlying needs, interests and concerns Caucus, if appropriate
  • Slide 26
  • Step 8: Build an agreement that works Is the agreement fair? Balanced? Realistic? Implement and evaluate
  • Slide 27
  • When you feel conflict coming, pause for a moment to reflect on your style and that of the other person Set the stage from the beginning to allow for conflict resolution to occur deescalate the emotions Establish a consistent pattern of how conflicts will be resolved with the other person Humans are creatures of habit. Learn from experience There is life after the conflict. Act accordingly