60

Kalon F. DegenhardtJack StevensonPT. Caltex

Riau

Byron GaleTom Brown

Duane GonzalezSamedan

Scott Hall

Jack MarshOlympia

Warren ZemlakSugar Land

ClearFRAC CoilFRAC CT Express DepthLOG FMIMojave NODAL PowerJet

PowerSTIM PropNet SCMTStimCADE

Englewood Taryn FrenzelBernie Paoli Badar Zia Malik

Eddie Martinez

612001

> CT Express Medicine Hat

62

2530%

25%Brent

[1]

[2]

[3]

3 4

>

300 90 6 24

63

Incr

easi

ng d

epth

2001

[4]

1992

312

1 Hatzignatiou DG Olsen TN Innovative ProductionEnhancement Interventions Through ExistingWellbores SPE 54632 SPE

1999 5 2628

2

180PFP

3 11

4 Zemlak W CT Conveyed Fracturing ExpandsProduction Capabilities The American Oil & GasReporter 43 9 2000 9 88 97

>

>

9

64

1996

[5]

4

2 3 8 2 7 8 3 1 2

CoilFRAC

2 7 8

CoilFRAC

5 Lemp S Zemlak W McCollum R An EconomicalShallow Gas Fracturing Technique Utilizing a CoiledTubing Conduit SPE 46031 SPE ICOTA

1998 4 15 16

Zemlak W Lemp S McCollum R SelectiveHydraulic Fracturing of Multiple Perforated Intervalswith a Coiled Tubing Conduit A Case History of theUnique Process Economic Impact and RelatedProduction Improvements SPE 54474SPE ICOTA

1999 5 25 26

>

652001

> >

>

66

200 1000CoilFRAC

Wildcat Hills

[6] 1958

20 90 OlympiaViking

90 3

25,485 3 40 3

11,330 3

Viking1998

3000 914Viking

3 327 5W5M 82 25

5 45 14

FMI1100psi

7.6 MPa 4 1 2

4 13 164 5

> CoilFRAC

6 Marsh J Zemlak WM Pipchuk P EconomicFracturing of Bypassed Pay A Direct Comparison ofConventional and Coi led Tubing PlacementTechniques SPE 60313 SPE

2000 3 12 15

672001

CoilFRAC

Viking12 3.7

CoilFRAC

3 3 275W5M 350psi 2.4MPa

350 3 99120 3

3350psi 600

3 171818 3

500 3 143182 3

450psi

CoilFRAC19

4

> Wildcat Hills 3 3 27 5W 5M Viking

CoilFRAC 4

> Viking CoilFRAC58% 19

4 CoilFRACOlympia Wildcat Hills

300,000 3 78%

68

3 3 2 7 5 W 5 MOlympia Wildcat Hills

6 Viking

6 3 2 3Viking

3 3 27 5W5M 3

6 13 2 4Olympia CoilFRAC

4 21 27 5W5M

2 0 0 3

57300 3

CoilFRAC400 3 128900 3

3 OlympiaCoilFRAC Wildcat Hills

Viking30

Viking

8200 2500

CoilFRAC WildcatHills

CoilFRAC

[7]

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

CoilFRACVES [8]> 4 21 27 5W5M

CoilFRAC Viking

692001

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

2 3ClearFRAC

ClearFRAC

VES

ClearFRAC

1 3 4 2 78

1 34

90000psi 621MPa20700psi 143MPa

18700psi 129MPa80%

16700psi 115MPa 1 34

6 0 % 1 2 5 0 0 p s i86MPa

9

[ 9 ]

5

UTLMDepthLOG

7 Olejniczak SJ Swaren JA Gulrajani SN OlmsteadCC Fracturing Bypassed Pay in TubinglessCompletions SPE 56467 SPE

1999 103 6

Gulrajani SN Olmstead CC Coiled TubingConveyed Fracture Treatments Evolut ionMethodology and Field Application SPE 57432

SPECharleston 1999 10 20 22

8 Chase B Chmilowski W Marcinew R Mitchell CDang Y Krauss K Nelson E Lantz T Parham CPlummer J

9 3 1997 2033

9

> CoilFRACCoilFRAC

VES 24ppa

70

30 9.110000 3048 20061 10000 UTLM

[10]

5 1.5 10000

11 3.4 100004 1.2

2 0.6

> UTLM

> Hiawatha Hiawatha150 200 46 61

10 20 3 2832 5663 3

712001

DepthLOG

12

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

TEPICoilFRAC

Moffat West Hiawatha [11]

20 30 35001067 18

Wasatch Fort UnionFox Hills Lewis Mesaverde

4 1 2 5 7

1999 TEPI

Duncan 1 3

CoilFRACWasatch Fort Union

2000 4000 600 12005 60 1.5 18

3 13CoilFRAC

7230 3 65900 3

8

2003 3200psi 22MPa

7000psi 48MPa10 15 3 4.6

0.7311psi 16.5122.6kPa

> HiawathaWasatch

StimCADE 2 350%

10 Pessin JL Boyle BW Accuracy and Reliabilityof Coiled Tubing Depth Measurement SPE 38422

Montgomery 1997 4 1 3

11 DeWitt M Peonio J Hall S Dickinson RRevitalization of West Hiawatha Field Using Coiled

Tubing Technology SPE 71656 SPE

2001 9 30 10 3

72

8 2000 52001 7 Hiawatha 9 Wasatch Fort

Union CoilFRAC4000 1220

Fox Hills Lewis Mesaverde

1992 1996 CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC 78.73 22500 3

114%

1993 1996 Hiawatha 700 3 200500 3

1600 3 460000 3

12

11003 315000 3 22003 630000 3

80

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC Mojave

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC Mojave4 1 2 7

10000 4000

2 0.64

30CoilFRAC

300000 136100

500000226800

CoilFRAC Mojave

4 12 7 CoilFRAC

Mojave

0.4psi9kPa

SamedanNorth Rincon

> Hiawatha CoilFRAC

6 CoilFRAC 78.7 3

22500 3 114%

732001

6000 7000 1800 2100Vicksburg Martinez

B54 25 7.6450

3 100 3

2000 12 Samedan

2001 2PowerSTIM

[12]

Samedan PowerSTIM

19 7700 2

NODAL 100 3

[13]

Samedan

700 213 577 23

1 2

PowerSTIMCoilFRAC

52

SCMT

CoilFRAC

> CoilFRAC Mojave CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

12 Al Qarni AO Ault B Heckman R McClure SDenoo S Rowe W Fairhurst D Kaiser B LoganD McNally AC Norville MA Seim MR RamseyL

12 4 2000 2001 4260

13 Nodal

74

2001 5 Samedan5 CoilFRAC

PowerJet 5

1103 31500 3

5 CoilFRAC Mojave

CoilFRAC136000 617000

24 8 101.3 1.6 3

11000psi 76MPaPropNET

[14]

5103 146000 3 120

5 Vicksburg 4

5003

3 Samedan3

5

CoilFRAC2 5

Martinez B54 5 CoilFRAC >

752001

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

PropNET

80%PT. Caltex

Central Sumatra Duri [15]

35000 14000 2

280000 44500 3

4000 mDX430 X700

140 43 36001600

> CoilFRAC

PropNET

14 Armstrong K Card R Navarrete R Nelson ENimerick K Samuelson M Collins J Dumont GPriaro M Wasylycia N Slusher G AdvancedFracturing Fluids Improve Well Economics

3 1995 34 51

15 Kesumah S Lee W Marmin N Startup ofScreenless Sand Control Coiled Tubing Fracturing inShallow Unconsolidated Steamflooded ReservoirSPE 74848 SPE ICOTA

20024 9 10

> Martinez B54 North Rincon Samedan

76

47 9 5

8

Duri CoilFRAC

[16]

1995 Duri

X450 Rindu

50 100 15 50

CoilFRAC

6 1 3

8ppa

257 2

12

9CoilFRAC

0.5 3632000 5080 3

CoilFRAC0.14

5CoilFRAC 35 59

> Duri

16

772001

CoilFRAC375 F 191

400 F 204

450 F 232 PropNET

Duri8

PropNETPropNET

CoilFRAC

CoilFRAC

2 0 0 012000 CoilFRAC

122003720 8 251.3 4 3

5 12ppa

CoilFRAC

850000385555

C o i l F R A CMojave

9123 94642781 2885

CoilFRAC10990 3350

Sonatrach

MET

> CoilFRAC Duri

> Medicine HatCoilFRAC