J Infect Dis.-2000-Hang-1738-48

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Articulo cientifico del receptor de IL-8.

Citation preview

  • Figure 7. Neutrophil accumulation in the tissues of murine interleukin-8 receptor homologue (mIL-8Rh) knockout (KO) mice after 35 days.Sections were obtained from mIL-8Rh KO mice 35 days after inoculation and were stained with RB6-8C5 antibody, to detect neutrophils. A,Section from the renal medulla. B, Section from the renal cortex. Magnification, 3200.

    at Pontificia Universidad C

    atolica de Valparaiso on A

    ugust 6, 2013http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/

    Dow

    nloaded from

  • JID 2000;182 (December) IL-8 Receptor KO Mice and Neutrophil Entrapment 1747

    Figure 8. Trichrome staining for fibrosis in kidneys of Balb/c controland murine interleukin-8 receptor homologue (mIL-8Rh) KO mice.Arrows show blue areas indicating fibrosis. Magnification, 3100.

    edema, with an increase in overall size, hyperemia, neutrophilinflux, and the formation of abscesses that were visible to thenaked eye. Tissue sections of these areas showed accumulationof neutrophils but little destruction of surrounding tissue. Theacute changes were followed by chronic tissue damage in themIL-8Rh KO mice. After 35 days, a reduction in overall renalsize occurred, and the kidneys were pale, reflecting a reducedblood flow. Areas of scar tissue caused an irregular kidneyoutline. There was parenchymal thinning, with loss of corticaltissue in large areas, as well as fibrosis and diffuse inflammatory

    infiltrates. These acute and chronic changes make the mIL-8RhKO mice a unique model for studying the natural history andmechanisms of renal scarring.

    Several experimental approaches have been taken to studythe mechanisms of renal scarring. Earlier models have requiredsurgical manipulations or other invasive procedures to renderthe tissues vulnerable to infection [23, 24]. Anti-inflammatorydrugs or oxygen radical scavengers have been used to modifythe inflammatory response to UTI and to link the inflammatoryresponse to the scarring process [17], but tools to directly ad-dress the role of neutrophils have not been used. Different lym-phocyte populations accumulate in the kidney, and immuno-logic mechanisms have been proposed to contribute to tissuedestruction [23, 25]. Our findings show that the chemokinereceptor dysfunction renders the mIL-8Rh KO mice susceptibleto UTI, and that dysfunctional neutrophil recruitment into thekidney is a powerful mechanism of tissue destruction.

    About 30% of children with acute pyelonephritis have >1recurrence, and, of them, 60% continue to recur, and somego on to develop renal scarring [26]. The defects that renderthese patients susceptible to infection and the molecular mech-anisms of renal scarring are poorly understood. The presentstudy suggests that defects in chemokine receptor expressioncause dysfunctional neutrophil migration and tissue damage.In preliminary studies, we examined chemokine receptor ex-pression on neutrophils from children with recurrent UTI andrenal scarring. These studies demonstrated that cell surface ex-pression of the CXCR1 receptor is low in children with recur-rent episodes of acute pyelonephritis, compared with age-matched controls [10].

    The following scenario may now be proposed. Infection ofthe urinary tract triggers the secretion of epithelial chemokinesand expression of chemokine receptors. Neutrophils are re-cruited into the kidneys and bladders and kill the bacteria ontheir way through the tissues. There is no tissue damage as theneutrophils rapidly cross the mucosal barrier and are excretedin the urine. In the absence of functional chemokine receptors,neutrophils are trapped, tissues are damaged, and renal scarringmay develop. In addition, the clearance of bacteria from thetissues is impaired. We have shown that one specific moleculardeficiency may underlie both disease susceptibility and the ten-dency to develop tissue pathology. In addition, the results un-derline the important role of innate defense mechanisms in boththe prevention and promotion of disease. This work thereforeprovides a new approach for studying the pathogenesis of scar-ring and to understand its basis in this important group ofpatients.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank P. Alm (Dept. of Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Swe-den) for assistance with the staining for fibrosis in figure 8.

    at Pontificia Universidad C

    atolica de Valparaiso on A

    ugust 6, 2013http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 1748 Hang et al. JID 2000;182 (December)

    References

    1. Kishimoto T, Jutila M, Berg E, Butcher E. Neutrophil Mac-1 and MEL-14

    adhesion proteins inversely regulated by chemotactic factors. Science

    1989;245:123841.2. Mantovani A, Dejana E. Cytokines as communication signals between leu-

    kocytes and endothelial cells. Immunol Today 1989;10:3705.3. Weber C, Springer TA. Interaction of very late antigen-4 with VCAM-1

    supports transendothelial chemotaxis of monocytes facilitating lateral mi-

    gration. J Immunol 1998;161:682534.4. Hang L, Haraoka M, Agace WW. Macrophage inflammatory protein2 is

    required for neutrophil passage across the epithelial barrier of the infected

    urinary tract. J Immunol 1999;162:303744.5. Shahin R, Engberg I, Hagberg L, Svanborg-Eden C. Neutrophil recruitment

    and bacterial clearance correlated with LPS responsiveness in local gram-

    negative infection. J Immunol 1987;138:347580.6. Agace W, Hedges S, Ceska M, Svanborg C. IL-8 and the neutrophil response

    to mucosal gram-negative infection. J Clin Invest 1993;92:78085.7. Hagberg L, Hull R, Hull S, McGhee JR, Michalek SM, Svanborg-Eden C.

    Difference in susceptibility to gram-negative urinary tract infection be-

    tween C3H/HeJ and C3H/HeN mice. Infect Immun 1984;46:83944.8. Haraoka M, Hang L, Frendeus B. Neutrophil recruitment and resistance to

    urinary tract infection. J Infect Dis 1999;180:12209.9. Godaly G, Proudfoot AEI, Offord RE, Svanborg C, Agace W. Role of epi-

    thelial interleukin-8 and neutrophil IL-8 receptor A in Escherichia coli

    induced transuroepithelial neutrophil migration. Infect Immun 1997;65:34516.

    10. Frendeus B, Godaly G, Hang L, Karpman D, Lundstedt AC, Svanborg C.

    Interleukin 8 receptor deficiency confers susceptibility to acute experi-

    mental pyelonephritis and may have a human counterpart. J Exp Med

    2000;192:88190.11. Wolpe SD, Sherry B, Juers D, Davatelis G, Yurt RW, Cerami A. Identification

    and characterization of macrophage inflammatory protein2. Proc Natl

    Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:6126.

    12. Cacalano G, Lee J, Kikly K, et al. Neutrophil and B cell expansion in mice

    that lack the murine IL-8 receptor homolog. Science 1994;265:6824.

    13. Marild S, Jodal U, Orskov I, Orskov F, Svanborg-Eden C. Special virulence

    of the Escherichia coli O1:K1:H7 clone in acute pyelonephritis. J Pediatr1989;115:405.

    14. Connell H, Agace W, Klemm P, Schembri M, Marild S, Svanborg C. Type1 fimbrial adhesion enhances Escherichia coli virulence for the urinarytract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:982732.

    15. Hagberg L, Engberg I, Freter R, Lam J, Olling S, Svanborg-Eden C. As-cending, unobstructed urinary tract infection in mice caused by pyelo-nephritogenic Escherichia coli of human origin. Infect Immun 1983;40:27383.

    16. Greenberger MJ, Strieter RM, Kunkel SL. Neutralization of macrophageinflammatory protein2 attenuates neutrophil recruitment and bacterialclearance in murine Klebsiella pneumonia. J Infect Dis 1996;173:15965.

    17. Kunin C. Detection, prevention and management of urinary tract infections.Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1987.

    18. Godaly G, Hang L, Frendeus B, Svanborg C. Transepithelial neutrophilmigration is CXCR1 dependant in vitro and is defective in IL-8 receptor

    mutant mice. J Immunol (in press).

    19. Heinzelmann M, Mercer-Jones MA, Passmore JC. Neutrophils and renal

    failure. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;34:38499.20. Elsbach P, Weiss J. Oxygen-independent antimicrobial systems of phagocytes.

    In: Gallin JI, Goldstein IM, Snyderman R, eds. Inflammation: basic prin-

    ciples and clinical correlates. New York City: Raven Press, 1992: 60336.21. Nadel JA. Role of enzymes from inflammatory cells on airway submucosal

    gland secretion. Respiration 1991;58:35.22. Steer HW. Ultrastructure of cell migration through the gastric epithelium and

    its relationship to bacteria. J Clin Pathol 1975;28:639.23. Smith JW, Adkins MJ, McGreary D. Local immune response in experimental

    pyelonephritis in the rabbit. I. Morphological and functional features of

    the lymphocytic infiltrate. Immunology 1975;29:106776.24. Kaack MB, Dowling KJ, Patterson GM, Roberts JA. Immunology of py-

    elonephritis. VIII. E. coli causes granulocytic aggregation and renal is-

    chemia. J Urol 1986;136:111722.25. Miller T, Phillips S. Pyelonephritis: the relationship between infection, renal

    scarring, and antimicrobial therapy. Kidney Int 1981;19:65462.26. Andersen H. Studies of urinary tract infections in infancy and childhood.

    VII. The relation of E. coli antibody in pyelonephritis as measured by

    homologous and common (Kunin) antigens. J Pediatr 1966;68:54250.

    at Pontificia Universidad C

    atolica de Valparaiso on A

    ugust 6, 2013http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/