8
Sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous placement of dental implants in the presence of platelet-rich plasma or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 J. Camilo Rolda ´n Sren Jepsen Christian Schmidt Helge Knu ¨ ppel David C. Rueger Yahya Ac ¸il Hendrik Terheyden Authors’ affiliations: J. Camilo Rolda ´n, Christian Schmidt, Helge Knu ¨ ppel, Yahya Ac ¸il, Hendrik Terheyden, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany Sren Jepsen, Department of Periodontology, Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Bonn, Germany David C. Rueger, Stryker Biotech, Hopkinton, MA, USA Correspondence to: Juan Camilo Rolda ´n MD, DMD Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel Arnold-Heller-Str. 16 24105 Kiel Germany Tel.: þ 49 431 597 2820 Fax: þ 49 431 597 2950 e-mail: [email protected] Key words: anorganic bovine bone, bone morphogenetic proteins, dental implants, platelet-rich plasma, sinus floor augmentation Abstract: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible benefit of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in sinus grafting as compared with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7). For this purpose, we performed a bilateral sinus augmentation with anorganic bovine bone and simultaneous insertion of a titanium screw implant in five miniature pigs. Six hundred microliters of PRP and 15%-vol. autologous bone, which was collected with a trap during preparation of the implant recipient site, were added to the right sinus and 420 ml rhBMP-7 to the left sinus. A polychrome sequential labeling was performed. The animals were sacrificed 6 weeks after surgery. Undecalcified ground sections were evaluated by microradiography, digitized histomorphometry and under fluorescent light. The mean bone–implant contact using rhBMP-7 was 45.8% and 5.7% under PRP (P ¼ 0.002). The mean height of newly mineralized bone in the augmented area using rhBMP-7 amounted to 8.3 mm as opposed to 3.6 mm under PRP (P ¼ 0.013). Using PRP, the mean area of the newly formed bone was enhanced (51.3%) as compared with rhBMP-7 (33.1%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P ¼ 0.081). In conclusion, under the selected experimental conditions the use of rhBMP-7 led to superior outcomes with regard to the osseointegration of dental implants and the height of new bone as compared with the use of PRP. The advanced atrophy of the maxilla and the subsequent pneumatization of the max- illary sinus imply a challenge for the im- plant rehabilitation. Boyne & James (1980) introduced the sinus augmentation with autogenous bone graft for implant surgery. This technique became a standard method with good results (Raghoebar et al. 1997; Lorenzetti et al. 1998). Nevertheless, the limited amount of disposable bone of the jaws for grafting purposes and the need for iliac bone to fulfill the expected bone volume for reconstruction make it neces- sary to find a substitute of autologous bone to reduce morbidity and patient discomfort associated with bone grafting (Smiler & Holmes 1987). The introduction of hydro- xylapatite (Smiler & Holmes 1987) and of the anorganic bovine bone (Wentzel et al. 1995; Hu ¨ rzeler et al. 1996; Hass et al. 1998; Valentini et al. 1998) to augment the sinus floor showed a realistic alterna- tive to the autologous bone. The most critical aspect of the latter approach is the longer time needed for bone healing (Moy et al. 1993; Lorenzetti et al. 1998; Yildirim et al. 2001). Lynch et al. (1991) reported about the increase of the bone–implant contact (BIC) after the application of re- combinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF) and recombinant human Insulin growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) 7 days after operation. In 1998, Marx et al. (1998) introduced the local application of Copyright r Blackwell Munksgaard 2004 Date: Accepted 8 January 2004 To cite this article: Rolda ´n JC, Jepsen S, Schmidt C, Knu ¨ ppel H, Rueger DC, Ac ¸il Y, Terheyden H. Sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous placement of dental implants in the presence of platelet-rich plasma or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004; 716–723 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01070.x 716

J. Camilo Rolda´n Sinus floor augmentation with S Yahya Ac ...coimplante.odo.br/Biblioteca/Enxertos prp/the presence of...N 2500, Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Gren-zach-Wyhlen, Germany)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Sinus floor augmentation withsimultaneous placement of dentalimplants in the presence of platelet-richplasma or recombinant human bonemorphogenetic protein-7

    J. Camilo RoldánS�ren JepsenChristian SchmidtHelge KnüppelDavid C. RuegerYahya AçilHendrik Terheyden

    Authors’ affiliations:J. Camilo Roldán, Christian Schmidt, HelgeKnüppel, Yahya Açil, Hendrik Terheyden,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel,GermanyS�ren Jepsen, Department of Periodontology,Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University ofBonn, GermanyDavid C. Rueger, Stryker Biotech, Hopkinton, MA,USA

    Correspondence to:Juan Camilo Roldán MD, DMDDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity of Schleswig-HolsteinCampus KielArnold-Heller-Str. 1624105 KielGermanyTel.: þ49 431 597 2820Fax: þ49 431 597 2950e-mail: [email protected]

    Key words: anorganic bovine bone, bone morphogenetic proteins, dental implants,

    platelet-rich plasma, sinus floor augmentation

    Abstract: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible benefit of platelet-rich

    plasma (PRP) in sinus grafting as compared with recombinant human bone morphogenetic

    protein-7 (rhBMP-7). For this purpose, we performed a bilateral sinus augmentation with

    anorganic bovine bone and simultaneous insertion of a titanium screw implant in five

    miniature pigs. Six hundred microliters of PRP and 15%-vol. autologous bone, which was

    collected with a trap during preparation of the implant recipient site, were added to the

    right sinus and 420ml rhBMP-7 to the left sinus. A polychrome sequential labeling was

    performed. The animals were sacrificed 6 weeks after surgery. Undecalcified ground

    sections were evaluated by microradiography, digitized histomorphometry and under

    fluorescent light. The mean bone–implant contact using rhBMP-7 was 45.8% and 5.7%

    under PRP (P¼0.002). The mean height of newly mineralized bone in the augmented area

    using rhBMP-7 amounted to 8.3mm as opposed to 3.6mm under PRP (P¼0.013). Using PRP,

    the mean area of the newly formed bone was enhanced (51.3%) as compared with rhBMP-7

    (33.1%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P¼0.081). In conclusion,

    under the selected experimental conditions the use of rhBMP-7 led to superior outcomes

    with regard to the osseointegration of dental implants and the height of new bone as

    compared with the use of PRP.

    The advanced atrophy of the maxilla and

    the subsequent pneumatization of themax-

    illary sinus imply a challenge for the im-

    plant rehabilitation. Boyne & James (1980)

    introduced the sinus augmentation with

    autogenous bone graft for implant surgery.

    This technique became a standard method

    with good results (Raghoebar et al. 1997;

    Lorenzetti et al. 1998). Nevertheless, the

    limited amount of disposable bone of the

    jaws for grafting purposes and the need for

    iliac bone to fulfill the expected bone

    volume for reconstruction make it neces-

    sary to find a substitute of autologous bone

    to reduce morbidity and patient discomfort

    associated with bone grafting (Smiler &

    Holmes 1987). The introduction of hydro-

    xylapatite (Smiler & Holmes 1987) and of

    the anorganic bovine bone (Wentzel et al.

    1995; Hürzeler et al. 1996; Hass et al.

    1998; Valentini et al. 1998) to augment

    the sinus floor showed a realistic alterna-

    tive to the autologous bone. The most

    critical aspect of the latter approach is the

    longer time needed for bone healing (Moy

    et al. 1993; Lorenzetti et al. 1998; Yildirim

    et al. 2001). Lynch et al. (1991) reported

    about the increase of the bone–implant

    contact (BIC) after the application of re-

    combinant human platelet-derived growth

    factor (rhPDGF) and recombinant human

    Insulin growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) 7 days

    after operation. In 1998, Marx et al.

    (1998) introduced the local application ofCopyright r Blackwell Munksgaard 2004

    Date:Accepted 8 January 2004

    To cite this article:Roldán JC, Jepsen S, Schmidt C, Knüppel H, RuegerDC, Açil Y, Terheyden H. Sinus floor augmentationwith simultaneous placement of dental implants in thepresence of platelet-rich plasma or recombinant humanbone morphogenetic protein-7.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004; 716–723doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01070.x

    716

  • autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to

    accelerate the maturation of grafted bone

    in maxillofacial surgery. Growth factors

    released by platelets like PDGF, IGF-I and

    transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b) areinvolved in reparative processes including

    osteogenesis (Ross et al. 1986; Noda &

    Camilliere 1989; Pfeilschifter et al. 1990;

    Nash et al. 1994). Lynch (1999) proposed

    the use of PRP in combination with a bone

    substitute for the treatment of small bone

    defects in periodontal and implant surgery.

    Since 2000, clinical studies have been

    published to evaluate the benefit of PRP

    in sinus surgery (Kassolis et al. 2000;

    Rosenberg & Torosian 2000; Lozada et al.

    2001; Philippart et al. 2003; Rodriguez

    et al. 2003;Wiltfang et al. 2003). At present,

    there are no data available from experimen-

    tal in vivo studies on the histomorpho-

    metric evaluation of new bone formation

    and osseointegration of dental implants in

    the presence of PRP.

    Bonemorphogenetic proteins (BMPs), on

    the other hand, are able to induce me-

    senchymal stem cells to differentiate into

    osteoblasts and to produce new bone tissue

    (Urist 1965). BMPs have been shown to

    shorten the healing time of sinus augmen-

    tation in combination with a bone substi-

    tute and to increase the osseointegration of

    dental implants (Boyne et al. 1997; Ha-

    nisch et al. 1997; Margolin et al. 1998;

    Terheyden et al. 1999). Therefore, the aim

    of the present study was to evaluate the

    pattern of bone formation using PRP com-

    pared with the well-documented effects of

    a recombinant BMP in the miniature pig

    model for sinus augmentation.

    Material and methods

    The study was approved by the Ministry of

    Nature, Environment and Forestry of Schles-

    wig-Holstein in accordance with the ethics

    committee of this institution (V 252-72241.

    121-14). Five miniature pigs (Ellengard Göt-

    tingen Minipigs ApS, Dalmose, Denmark),

    18 months of age, which weighed 40kg,

    were operated. They were fed with 2 �250 g standard soft diet (Altromin 9023s

    Atronium International GmbH, Lange,

    Germany) and water ad libitum.

    Anesthesia was induced with 30mg Ke-

    tamine (Ketavets, Upjohn GmbH, Hep-

    penheim, Germany) and 1mg Xylazine

    (Rompuns 2%, Bayer AG, Leverkusen,

    Germany). An intratracheal intubation

    was performed with a Miller size 4 laryn-

    goscope and a standard straight 5.5mm ID

    tube with cuff (Portex, Kent, UK). An-

    esthesia was maintained with gas (66%

    N2O and 32% O2 (Forenes, Abbot

    GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany)). One gram

    Clemizol–Penicillin (Clemizol–Penicillins

    i.m. forte, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen,

    Germany) was given preoperatively as a pro-

    phylactic antibiotic. Postoperative pain relief

    was achieved before extubation by inject-

    ing 500mg metamizol i.m. (Novalgins,

    Hoechst AG, Bad Soden, Germany), con-

    tinuing with 2 � 50mg/day p.o. Tramadol(Tramals, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen,

    Germany).

    Preparation of PRP

    Seventeen milliliters of blood were col-

    lected in two vacuum tubes of 8.5ml

    each (S-Monovettes, CPDA-1, Starstedt

    AG, Nümbrecht, Germany) from the

    vena jugularis interna in general anesthesia

    just before surgery. The method proposed

    by Marx et al. (1998) on how to prepare

    PRP was modified according to the small

    sample of blood after a statistically vali-

    dated method (Roldán et al. 2004). The

    volumes handled were proportional to the

    volumes described by Marx et al. (1998).

    The PRP was produced as follows: the

    whole blood was centrifuged for 7min at

    1700 rpm without brake. The plasma was

    decanted down to the erythrocyte sediment

    and then centrifuged again for 10min at

    3000 rpm with brake. Finally, the plasma

    was decanted and the sediment was resus-

    pendedwith 2.3ml plasma, resulting in the

    same concentration of PRP as the one

    described by Marx et al. (1998). The plate-

    lets in whole blood and PRP were counted

    manually in the Neubauer chamber in

    which the thrombocytes were stained

    with a specific reagent (TTV 55-Thrombo-

    zyten-Einzeltests KABE Labortechnik

    GmbH, Nümbrecht-Eisenroth, Germany).

    The PRP was kept in a sample shaker for

    a mean of 30min at room temperature.

    The PRP for clinical usewas activatedwith

    human lyophilized thrombin (Tissucols,

    Baxter, Heidelberg, Germany). The throm-

    bin was combined with CaCl2 10% in

    a proportion of 250 IU thrombin/500 mlCaCl2 10%. Three hundred and eighty

    microliters of activated thrombin were

    mixed with 600ml PRP. Nine hundred

    and eighty microliters of this solution

    were used in combination with the anor-

    ganic bovine bone and 15% vol. autologous

    bone for implantation in the right sinus.

    Experimental procedure

    After harvesting of blood to prepare PRP, the

    cheek was shaved and cleaned with povi-

    done–iodine solution and drapedwith sterile

    towels. The augmentation of the sinus was

    achieved by an infraorbital access and sub-

    periosteal preparation of the facial maxillary

    bone, the crista zygomaticoalveolaris and

    the malar prominence, as previously de-

    scribed (Terheyden et al. 1999). The access

    to the sinus was achieved by thinning the

    facial wall with a surgical bur. The Schnei-

    derian membrane was carefully elevated

    within the sinus, particularly below the

    malar prominence, where the dental im-

    plant in a latero-cranial direction was in-

    serted. The malar bone, as an implant site,

    was reduced to a height of 5mm for stan-

    dardization according to the clinical situa-

    tion (Tidwell et al. 1991; Triplett & Schow

    1996). Solid screw titanium implants (SLA-

    ITIs, Strauman AG, Waldenburg, Switzer-

    land), 16mm long with a diameter of

    4.1mm, were used. The right sinus was

    augmentedwith 3ml anorganic bovine bone

    (Bio-Osss Granulat 0.25–1mm, E. Geis-

    tlich Söhne AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland),

    15%-vol. autologous bone collected during

    preparation of the implant recipient site

    with a bone trap in a suction device (Kno-

    chenfilter T2, SchlumbohmOHGs, Broch-

    stedt, Germany) and 600ml PRP. The leftsinus was augmented with 3ml Bio-Osss

    and 420ml recombinant BMP-7 (rhBMP-7)(Stryker Biotech, Hopkinton MA, USA) in

    600ml acetate buffer. No autologous bonewas grafted into the left sinus.

    Polychrome sequential labeling

    A polychrome sequential labeling of miner-

    alizing tissues according to Rahn (1976)

    was performed as previously described (Ter-

    heyden et al. 1999). Intraperitoneal injec-

    tion of fluorochromes under i.m. anesthesia

    with 250mg Zolazepam/250mg Tiletamin

    (Tilests 500 Parke-Davis, Freiburg, Ger-

    many) started 2 weeks after the surgical

    procedure and continued for 3 weeks with

    one labeling per week as follows: xylenolor-

    ange (6% in 2%NaHCO3 solution, 1.5ml/

    kg body weight), calcein green (1% in 2%

    NaHCO3 solution, 5ml/kg body weight),

    Roldán et al . Sinus floor augmentation in presence of PRP or rhBMP-7

    717 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 716–723

  • alizarin complexon (3% in 2% NaHCO3solution, 0.8ml/kg body weight) and dox-

    ycyclines (1mg/kg body weight, Doxy-

    cyclin-Rathiopharm SFs, Rathiopharm

    GmbH & Co., Ulm, Germany).

    Sacrifice

    The animals were sacrificed 6 weeks post-

    surgery in general anesthesia (see above)

    by an intravital and intracardial perfusion.

    For this purpose, the ascending aorta, after

    a median thoracotomy, was canulated

    through an incision of the left ventricle.

    Prior to this, heparin 40 IU/kg (Liquemins

    N 2500, Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Gren-

    zach-Wyhlen, Germany) had been admi-

    nistered. The right atrium was opened by

    an incision to release the venous blood

    flow. Two liters of Ringer solution was

    perfused at a temperature of 36–371C under120mmHg pressure in order to wash out

    the blood. Subsequently, the animals were

    perfused for tissue fixation with a 500ml

    solution composed of 25% glutaraldehyde

    (2.5%), formaldehyde (1.5%) and Sören-

    sen’s phosphate buffer (100mMKH2PO4,

    100mMNa2HPO4 � 2H2O, pH 7.4). Acoronal computed tomography (CT) Scan

    (Siemens Somatom Plus, Siemens AG,Mu-

    nich, Germany; 120kV, 33mA) was con-

    ducted. The explanted sinus was immersed

    in 10% formalin, Sörensen’s phosphate buf-

    fer and 70% isopropyl alcohol for 10 days.

    Histology

    Undecalcified specimens were prepared ac-

    cording to themethod described by Donath

    & Breuner (1982). The process consists in

    a gradual dehydration of the specimen

    in ethyl alcohol and a final embedding in

    acrylic resin (Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs,

    Switzerland). The block was cut in the

    coronal plane after placing an implant abut-

    ment that indicated the axis of the implant

    body. The retrieved specimens, in 0.5mm

    slices, were fixed on an acrylic carrier and

    ground and polished down to approxi-

    mately 90 ml. A microradiograph (Type1A, Microchrome Technology Inc., San

    José, CA, USA) was taken at 3mA and

    25kV using a microradiography device

    (Faxitron X-ray systems, Hewlett Packard

    GmbH, Böblingen, Germany). The histo-

    morphometry of the total core was evalu-

    ated after digitalization of the microscope

    image. The software detected a variety of

    different gray tones, which allowed to

    distinguish the newly mineralized bone

    (Q500MCs, Leach Cambridge Ltd., Cam-

    bridge, UK). Fluorescence microscopy was

    performed under UV light. The parameters

    to be evaluated according to Parfitt et al.

    (1987) were the following:

    � Bone–implant contact: Mineralizedbone in direct contact to the implant

    (%), where 100% is the total length of

    the implant in the augmented sinus.

    � The area of newly mineralized bone inthe lower third of the augmented area

    (mm2)

    � Height of newly mineralized bone inthe augmented area (mm).

    Statistical analysis

    The data for the three outcome variables

    were analyzed with a paired t-test. The

    correlation in the thrombocyte count in

    whole blood and PRP was analyzed with

    a Spearman test. The significance level

    was set at Po0.05.

    Results

    Validity of the preparation of PRP

    The mean number of thrombocytes in

    whole blood was 450.20 � 103 cells/ml.The PRP mean platelet count was

    1.592 � 103 cells/ml. Thus, the concentra-tion of the thrombocytes in PRP was in-

    creased by a factor of 3.5. The thrombocyte

    count in whole blood in the different ani-

    mals was variable, ranging from 173 � 103

    to 620 � 103 cells/ml. No statistically sig-nificant correlation between the thrombo-

    cyte concentration in the whole blood and

    in PRP could be observed (P¼ 0.1).

    CT scan

    Six weeks after the operation no signs of

    infection in themaxillary sinus, of any loss

    of implant integration or any apparent

    differences in the imaging of the augmenta-

    tion with PRP or with rhBMP-7 could be

    observed (Fig. 1).

    Fig. 1. Coronal CT Scan (Siemens Somatom Plus, 120 kV, 33mA) of the midface of a miniature pig 6 weeks

    after sinus-lift with anorganic bovine bone in association with platelet-rich plasma and 15%-vol. autologous

    bone on the right side and with bone morphogenetic protein-7 on the left side. A titanium screw implant was

    primarily inserted into the zygomatic bone in a latero-cranial direction on both sides. No sinus pathology or

    apparent difference in the radio-opacity of the augmentation is seen on both sides. The right maxillary sinus is

    outlined in red, the left sinus in blue; the infraorbital nerve (n) is demarked in yellow on both sides.

    Roldán et al . Sinus floor augmentation in presence of PRP or rhBMP-7

    718 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 716–723

  • Microradiography

    In the presence of PRP, the apposition of

    new bone could be seen in the proximity of

    host bone but not on top of the augmenta-

    tion (Fig. 2a). The formation of new bone

    in the presence of rhBMP-7 appeared to be

    homogeneous in the whole augmented area

    and limited to the area augmented with

    bone substitute (Fig. 2b).

    Toluidine blue histology

    No inflammatory reaction was seen on

    any section and individual animal. An

    enhancement of bone apposition in the

    proximity of host bone in the presence

    of PRP was clearly detected; however,

    the osseointegration of the dental im-

    plants was not improved in this site. The

    tip of the dental implant was surround-

    ed by connective tissue in all cases treated

    with PRP (Fig. 3a). In contrast, bone

    marrow was observed in the whole aug-

    mented sinus in the presence of rhBMP-7

    and the implants were surrounded

    by newly formed bone in all the cases

    (Fig. 3b).

    Fluorescence microscopy

    The apposition of new bone was observed

    in the presence of rhBMP-7 after the second

    week postsurgery; in the presence of PRP it

    occurred 1 week later, as indicated by the

    second labeling (Fig. 4). Bone apposition

    was enhanced on the sinus floor showing

    wider labeled bands in both experimental

    groups. No bone apposition was seen on

    the tip of the implants in sites treated with

    PRP. In the presence of rhBMP-7, however,

    a homogeneous bone apposition on the top

    of the implants and around the Bio-Osss

    Fig. 2. Solid screw titanium implant (ITIs) in the maxillary sinus augmented with anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Osss) 6 weeks postoperatively. (a) Situation following

    application of platelet-rich plasma and 15%-vol. autologous bone graft: the apposition of new bone takes place in a gradual fashion from the host bone to the top of the

    augmentation. The sinus wall is outlined in red, see Fig. 1. (b) Situation following application of recombinant human bonemorphogenetic protein-7: Homogeneous new

    bone formation in thewhole augmented sinus. The formation of new bonewas determined by the shape of the implantedmaterial and did not exceed it. The sinus wall is

    outlined in blue, see Fig. 1. (Microradiography of undecalcified ground sections.)

    Fig. 3. Solid screw titanium implant (ITIs) in the maxillary sinus augmented with anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Osss) 6 weeks postoperatively. (a) Situation following

    application of platelet-rich plasma and 15%-vol. autologous bone graft: The apposition of new bone takes place in a gradual fashion from the host bone to the top of the

    augmentation. Enhanced bone apposition on the sinus floor is evident; however, osseointegration is not improved. Bio-Osss particles on top of the dental implant are

    surrounded by connective tissue. The sinus wall is outlined in red; the arrow indicates apposition of new bone on the implant. (b) Situation following application of

    recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7: Homogeneous new bone formation with bone marrow in the whole augmented sinus. Osseointegration of the

    titanium implant is seen on its entire length. The sinus wall is outlined in blue; the arrow indicates apposition of new bone on the tip of the implant (toluidine blue

    staining).

    Roldán et al . Sinus floor augmentation in presence of PRP or rhBMP-7

    719 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 716–723

  • particles could be seen after the second

    postoperative week.

    Histomorphometry

    In all but one specimen, apposition of bone

    on dental implants was seen in the PRP

    group. The mean BIC in the presence of

    PRP amounted to 5.76%, whereas in the

    rhBMP-7 group BIC was observed over the

    entire implant length with a mean value of

    45.8%. This difference was statistically

    significant (P¼ 0.002). The mean heightof the newly formed bone in the augmented

    area in rhBMP-7 treated sites was 8.3mm,

    which is in contrast to a mean height

    of 3.6mm in the PRP group (P¼ 0.013).The area of the newly mineralized bone

    on the sinus floor was larger in the pre-

    sence of PRP (51.32%) than in the presence

    of rhBMP-7 (33.12%); however, this

    difference was not significant (P¼ 0.081)(Table 1).

    Discussion

    Since the first description of local applica-

    tion of PRP produced by a gradient density

    cell separator (Electro Medics 500s, Med-

    tronics, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to accel-

    erate the maturation of bone transplants in

    maxillofacial surgery (Marx et al. 1998),

    many methods have been proposed to pro-

    duce PRP by using a conventional centri-

    fuge to facilitate its application for implant

    surgery in clinical practice (Landesberg et al.

    2000; Weibrich et al. 2001). In the present

    study, we chose a validated method to

    produce PRP (Roldán et al. in press), which

    resembles the method of Marx et al. (1998),

    but is adapted to the handling of smaller

    volumes of blood according to the animal

    model. The mean value of the concentra-

    tion factor of thrombocytes in PRP was 3.5,

    which is comparable with the factor 3.4

    reported by Marx et al. (1998). Neverthe-

    less, a statistical correlation between the

    thrombocyte count in whole blood and in

    PRP was not seen, possibly due to the small

    sample size (n¼ 5). Moreover, a high varia-bility in the thrombocyte count in the

    whole blood of the experimental animals

    was observed (maximum: 620 � 103 cells/ml and minimum: 173 � 103 cells/ml). Thisis a critical aspect because the application of

    thrombocytes and the contained growth

    factors is not standardized. Experiments on

    local application of recombinant growth

    factors showed a dose-dependent effect

    (Noda & Camilliere 1989; Pfeilschifter et al.

    1990; Nash et al. 1994; Ripamonti et al.

    1997). The effect of the local application of

    growth factors also depends on the applica-

    tion site (Fujimoto et al. 1999), age and

    animal model (Ripamonti et al. 1997).

    The effect of TGF-b has been shown to bebiphasic depending on the dose; at a high

    concentration an inhibition of osteoblast

    proliferation has been seen (Centrella et al.

    1994; Fujimoto et al. 1999). Further inves-

    tigations have to be undertaken to clarify

    the interaction of growth factors at higher

    levels in a PRP model.

    In the literature, no data are reported on

    the influence of PRP on BIC. BMPs, pre-

    viously shown to be an effective approach

    to enhance osseointegration of dental im-

    plants applied in a mineral or collagen

    scaffold (Bessho et al. 1999; Terheyden

    et al. 1999), were chosen as a control group

    Table 1. Parameters (mean values and standard deviation) of bone formation 6 weeks aftersinus augmentation with 3 ml anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Osss) and primary insertion of atitanium implant (ITIs) combined with 600ll of PRP (in 15%-vol. autologous bone) or420ll of rhBMP-7

    Bio-Osss-15%-vol.autologous bone/PRP

    Bio-Osss/rhBMP-7

    P-valuesBMP vs. PRP

    Bone–implant contact (%) 5.76 � 11.8 45.80 � 18.58 0.002n

    Area of newly mineralized boneon the sinus floor (%)

    51.32 � 20.83 33.12 � 13.65 0.081

    Height of the newly mineralizedbone in the augmented area (mm)

    3.58 � 3.3 8.35 � 2.74 0.013n

    nStatistically significant difference (t-test).

    rhBMP, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein; PRP, platelet-rich plasma.

    Fig. 4. Basal aspect of the augmented sinus with anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Osss) and primary inserted ITIs-Implant 6 weeks postoperatively. (a) Situation following

    application of platelet-rich plasma and 15%-vol. autologous bone graft: Beginning of the bone apposition after the third postoperatively week (calcein green). The arrow

    indicates newly formed non-fluorochrom-labeled bone, indicating bone formation after the fifth postoperative week; implant (n). (b) Situation following application of

    recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7: Homogeneous bone apposition after the first labeling, injected in the second postoperative week; implant (n).

    (Fluorescence microscopy in composite slides technique).

    Roldán et al . Sinus floor augmentation in presence of PRP or rhBMP-7

    720 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 716–723

  • in order to evaluate the efficiency of PRP

    to improve BIC. In the present study, the

    achieved BIC 6 weeks following PRP ap-

    plication was 5.76% compared with

    45.8% in the presence of rhBMP-7. The

    achieved BIC in the PRP model has to be

    considered inadequate in a clinical setting

    and does not show a benefit compared with

    reported studies on sinus augmentation

    with Bio-Osss alone, as shown by Hass

    et al. (1998), who informed about a BIC of

    27.4% 12 weeks after sinus augmentation

    in sheep. Others reported about a BIC of

    63% in beagles (Schlegel et al. 2003) or

    38% in miniature pigs (Terheyden et al.

    1999) after an observation period of 6

    months. Lynch et al. (1991) demonstrated

    a statistically significant enhancement of

    the BIC 7 days after the application of

    rhPDGF und rhIGF-I. This positive effect

    of growth factors on osseointegration sug-

    gests that in the present study the required

    concentration of growth factors contained

    in PRP may not have been achieved.

    The mean BIC in sites conditioned with

    rhBMP-7 was 45.8%. Terheyden et al.

    (1999), using the same experimental

    model, reported a mean BIC of 80% after

    6 months for the rhBMP-7 group. The

    present study shows the strong effect of

    BMP at the very beginning after applica-

    tion. In vitro studies by the same authors

    on Bio-Osss loaded with rhBMP-7 showed

    a release of 98% of BMP into simulated

    body fluid within 24h (Jepsen et al. 1999).

    The evaluation of the effectiveness of BMP,

    compared with PRP after 6 weeks, is there-

    fore appropriate. An evaluation of the effect

    of BMP or PRP after 6 or 9 months is not

    appropriate, because a bone integration of

    anorganic bone in the absence of bone-

    stimulating factors is to be expected after

    that time (Hürzeler et al. 1996; Hass et al.

    1998; Valentini et al. 1998).

    The area of newly mineralized bone on

    the sinus floor is expected to be larger in

    the vicinity of the residual host bone (Qui-

    ñones et al. 1997). In the present study, the

    area of newly mineralized bone on the floor

    of the sinus was higher in the presence of

    PRP (51.32%) than under the influence of

    rhBMP-7 (33.12%), although this differ-

    ence was not statistically significant. The

    observed increase in trabecular bone area

    on bone grafts treated with PRP by Marx

    et al. (1998) declined from the second to

    the sixth month after surgery. Schmitz &

    Hollinger (2001) discussed this work, and

    extrapolated the curve of the area of the

    trabecular bone in the bone graft to 1 year

    and concluded that in the long term there

    may be no observable advantage in bone

    density of treated bone grafts with PRP.

    Fürst et al. (2003) performed sinus eleva-

    tion procedures in mini-pig using hydroxy-

    lapatite for augmentation. PRP was added

    to the test side; however, no dental implant

    was inserted. An enhanced bone density

    was seen on the base of the sinus in the

    presence of PRP 3 weeks after surgery; at 6

    weeks the bone density declined and at 12

    weeks there was no difference to the con-

    trol side (Fürst et al. 2003). The observed

    enhancement of the trabecular bone area at

    the beginning of the observational period

    could be of no clinical interest in the long

    term, as it has to be realized that the

    trabecular bone area will undergo contin-

    uous remodeling in response to the me-

    chanic and the endocrine demands.

    In the present study, the mean height of

    newly mineralized bone in the augmented

    areawas 8.3mm in the presence of rhBMP-

    7, which corresponded to the total height of

    the implanted anorganic bovine bone. In

    the presence of PRP, the achieved value

    was 3.6mm. It is expected that the aug-

    mentation of the sinus with Bio-Osss in

    the absence of bone-stimulating factors has

    to be integrated into new bone, if it takes

    6–9 months (Hürzeler et al. 1996; Hass

    et al. 1998; Valentini et al. 1998). The very

    slow resorption rate of Bio-Osss, a prop-

    erty of this material that is often criticized

    (Skoglund et al. 1997), could be of advan-

    tage in sinus surgery (Schlegel et al. 2003),

    because it permits a full bone integration of

    implanted anorganic bovine bone before

    the resorption of the scaffold starts, as

    demonstrated by Hürzeler et al. (1996)

    and Hass et al. (1998).

    The rationale of adding autologous bone

    to PRP was to supply osteoblasts to support

    the proposed mitogenic effect of PRP (Wei-

    brich et al. 2002). As shown in the extra-

    skeletal model in the rat PRP is not os-

    teoinductive and could not enhance bone

    formation on Bio-Osss in skeletal sites

    (Roldán et al. 2004). Because of the known

    osteoinductive effects of BMPs, no autolo-

    gous bone was grafted into the correspon-

    dent sinus.

    Autologous bone (15% vol.) collected

    during the preparation of the implant site

    was mixed with Bio-Osss to enhance bone

    formation in the presence of PRP as it is

    recommended when Bio-Osss is applied in

    the clinical setting (Yildirim et al. 2001). In

    spite of the addition of autologous bone to

    Bio-Osss in the PRP model, vital bone

    could only be seen in the proximity to the

    sinuswalls. In the future, it has to be tested

    if the addition of more autologous bone can

    improve the osteogenesis in a PRP model.

    However, if more bone than 15% vol. has

    to be applied, it will be necessary to harvest

    the additional bone-graft from a second

    donor site. The augmentation of the sinus

    with Bio-Osss in the presence of rhBMP-7

    was carried out without the addition of

    autologous bone. Nevertheless, homoge-

    neous bone formation was seen in the

    whole implanted area.

    To our knowledge, this is the first report

    to compare the effect of rhBMP-7 and PRP

    in implant surgery. PRP could not improve

    the osseointegration of dental implants in

    regenerated sinus bone after an observation

    time of 6 weeks. Our data support the

    concept that recombinant BMPs in combi-

    nation with an appropriate matrix carrier

    may become clinically effective to improve

    and accelerate osseointegration of dental

    implants.

    Acknowledgements: The authors

    thank Mrs. M. Hermann and G. Otto, of

    the Department of Experimental

    Maxillofacial Surgery of the University

    of Kiel, for their excellent technical

    assistance.

    Résumé

    Le but de l’étude présente a été d’évaluer le bénéfice

    possible du plasma riche en plaquettes (PRP) dans le

    greffage sinusal comparé à la protéine-7 morpho-

    génétique osseuse humaine recombinante (rhBMP-

    7). Un épaississement du sinus bilatéral a été effec-

    tué avec de l’os bovin anorganique et l’insertion

    simultanée d’un implant vis en titane chez cinq

    mini-porcs. Six cents ml de PRP et 15% /vol d’osautogène, qui avait été prélevé dans une trappe

    durant la préparation du site implantaire receveur,

    ont été placés dans le sinus droit et 420 ml de rhBMP-7 dans le sinus gauche. Un marquage séquentiel

    polychrome a ensuite été effectué. Les animaux ont

    été euthanasiés six semaines après la chirurgie. Des

    coupes épaisses non-décalcifiées ont été évaluées par

    microradiographies, histomorphométrie digitale et

    sous lumière à fluorescence. Le contact os-implant

    moyen en utilisant rhBMP-7 était de 45,8% et 5,7%

    sous PRP (p¼ 0,002). La hauteur moyenne de l’os

    Roldán et al . Sinus floor augmentation in presence of PRP or rhBMP-7

    721 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 716–723

  • minéralisé nouveau dans la partie épaissie rhBMP-7

    montait à 8,3 mm contre 3,6 mm pour le PRP

    (0,013). En utilisant PRP, l’aire moyenne de l’os

    néoformé était augmentée (51,3%) comparée à

    rhBMP-7 (33,1%), cette différence n’étant cepen-

    dant pas significative (p¼0,081). En conclusion,sous des conditions expérimentales sélectionnées,

    l’utilisation de rhBMP-7 apporte des avantages

    supérieurs en ce qui concerne l’ostéoı̈ntégration

    des implants dentaires et la hauteur de l’os néoformé

    comparé à l’utilisation du PRP.

    Zusammenfassung

    Sinusbodenelevation mit gleichzeitiger Platzierung

    von dentalen Implantaten mit plättchenreichem

    Plasma oder rekombiniertem menschlichem kno-

    chenmorphogenetischem Protein-7

    Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war, dem mögli-

    chen positiven Effekt von plättchenreichem Plasma

    (PRP) im Vergleich zu rekombiniertem menschli-

    chem knochenmorphogenetischem Protein-7

    (rhBMP-7) bei der Sinusbodenelevation zu untersu-

    chen. Zu diesem Zweck wurde bei fünf Minipigs

    eine bilaterale Sinusbodenelevation mit anorga-

    nischem bovinem Knochen und gleichzeitig die

    Implantation eines Schraubenimplantats durchge-

    führt. Sechshundert ml PRP und 15%-vol. autologerKnochen, welcher bei der Präparation des Implan-

    tatbettes gewonnen wurde, wurden im rechten Si-

    nus dazu gefügt und 420 ml rhBMP-7 wurden in denlinken Sinus eingebracht. Es wurde eine polychrome

    Sequenzmarkierung durchgeführt. Sechs Wochen

    nach dem Eingriff opferte man die Tiere. Die nicht

    entkalkten Schliffpräparate wurden mittels Mikror-

    adiographie, digitalisierter Histomorphometrie und

    unter fluoreszierendem Licht untersucht. Der

    mittlere Knochen-Implantat-Kontakt betrug mit

    rhBMP-7 45.8% und mit PRP 5.7% (P¼0.002).Die mittlere Höhe an neu gebildetem mineralisier-

    tem Knochen im Augmentat erreichte 8.3mm bei

    rhBMP-7 und 3.6mm bei PRP (P¼ 0.013). Mit PRPwar die Fläche an neu gebildetem mineralisiertem

    Knochen grösser (51.3%) als mit rhBMP-7 (33.1%),

    jedoch war dieser Unterschied nicht statistisch sig-

    nifikant (P¼ 0.081). Es wird die Schlussfolgerunggezogen, dass unter den ausgewählten experimentel-

    len Bedingungen die Verwendung von rhBMP-7 im

    Vergleich zu plättchenreichem Plasma zu besseren

    Resultaten bezüglich Osseointegration von Dental-

    implantat und der Höhe von neuem Knochen führt.

    Resumen

    La intención del presente estudio fue evaluar el

    posible beneficio del plasma rico en plaquetas

    (PRP) en el injerto del seno en comparación con la

    proteı́na-7 morfogenética ósea humana recombi-

    nante (rhBMP-7). Para este propósito, llevamos a

    cabo aumento del seno bilateralmente con hueso

    bovino anorgánico e inserción simultanea de un

    implante roscado en cinco cerdos miniatura. Se

    añadieron 600 ml de PRP y 15%-vol. de huesoantólogo, que fue recolectado usando una trampa

    durante la preparación del lugar receptor del im-

    plante, al seno derecho y 420 ml de rhBMP-7 alseno izquierdo. Se llevó a cabo un marcado poli-

    cromo secuencial. Los animales se sacrificaron seis

    semanas tras la cirugı́a. Se evaluaron las secciones

    descalcificadas microrradiograficamente, histomor-

    fometricamente y bajo luz fluorescente. El contacto

    hueso a implante medio usando rhBMP-7 fue 45.8%

    y 5.7% bajo PRP (P¼ 0.002). La altura media delhueso neomineralizado en el área aumentada usando

    rhBMP-7 llegó a 8.3mm frente a 3.6mm bajo PRP

    (P¼ 0.013). Usando el PRP, el área media de huesoneoformado aumentó (51.3%) en comparación con

    rhBMP-7 (33.1%), sin embargo esta diferencia no fue

    estadı́sticamente significativa (P¼ 0.081). En con-clusión, bajo las condiciones experimentales selec-

    cionadas, el uso se rhBMP-7 condujo a unos

    resultados superiores respecto a la osteointegración

    de implantes dentales y a la altura del nuevo hueso

    en comparación con el uso de plasma rico en

    plaquetas.

    References

    Bessho, K., Carnes, D.L., Cavin, R., Chen, H.-Y.

    & Ong, J.L. (1999) BMP stimulation of

    bone response adjacent to titanium implants

    in vivo. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10:

    212–218.

    Boyne, P.J. & James, R.A. (1980) Grafting of the

    maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow

    and bone. Journal of Oral Surgery 38: 613–616.

    Boyne, P.J., Marx, R., Nevins, M., Tripplett, G.,

    Lazaro, E., Lilly, L.C., Alder, M. & Nummikoski,

    P. (1997) A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/

    absorbable collagen sponge for maxillary sinus

    floor augmentation. Journal of Periodontics &

    Restorative Dentistry 17: 11–25.

    Centrella, M., Horowitz, C., Wozney, J.M. & Mac-

    Carthy, Th.L. (1994) Transforming growth factor-

    � gene family members and bone. Endocrinology

    Review 15: 27–39.

    Donath, K. & Breuner, G. (1982) A method for the

    study of uncalcified bones and teethwith attached

    soft tissues: the Säge–Schliff (sawing and grind-

    ing) technique. Journal of Oral Pathology 11:

    318–326.

    Fürst, G., Gruber, R., Tangl, S., Zechner, W., Haas,

    R., Mailath, G., Sanroman, F. & Watzek, G.

    (2003) Sinus grafting with autogenous platelet-

    rich plasma and bovine hydroxyapatite. A histo-

    morphometric study in minipigs. Clinical Oral

    Implants Research 14: 500–508.

    Fujimoto, R., Tanizawa, T., Nishida, S., Yamamoto,

    N., Soshi, S., Endo, N. & Takahashi, H.E. (1999)

    Local effects of transforming growth factor-b onrat calvaria: changes depending on dose and injec-

    tion site. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabo-

    lism 17: 11–17.

    Hanisch, O., Tatakis, D.N., Rohrer, M.D., Wöhrle,

    P.S., Wozney, J.M. & Wikesjö, U.E. (1997) Bone

    formation and osseointegration stimulated by

    rhBMP-2 following subantral augmentation pro-

    cedures in nonhuman primates. International

    Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 12:

    785–792.

    Hass, R., Donath, K., Födinger, M. & Watzek, G.

    (1998) Bone hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus

    grafting: comparative histomorphometric findings

    in sheep. Clinical Oral Implants Research 9:

    107–116.

    Hürzeler, M.B., Kirsch, A., Ackermann, K.L. &

    Quiñones, C.R. (1996) Reconstruction of the

    severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants

    in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clin-

    ical investigation. International Journal of Oral &

    Maxillofacial Implants 11: 466–475.

    Jepsen, S., Chang, A.C., Terheyden, H., Rueger, D.

    & Tucker, M. (1999) In vitro release of recombi-

    nant human osteogenetic protein-1 (rhOp-1) from

    different carrier materials. Journal of Periodontol-

    ogy 70: 337.

    Kassolis, J.D., Rosen, P.S. & Reynolds, M.A. (2000)

    Alveolar ridge and sinus augmentation utilizing

    platelet-rich plasma in combination with freeze-

    dried bone allograft: case series. Journal of Perio-

    dontology 71: 1654–1661.

    Landesberg, R., Roy, M. & Glickman, R.S. (2000)

    Quantification of growth factor levels using a

    simplified method of platelet-rich plasma gel pre-

    paration. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Sur-

    gery 58: 297–300.

    Lorenzetti, M., Mozzati, M., Campanino, P.P. &

    Valente, G. (1998) Bone augmentation of the

    inferior floor of the maxillary sinus with autoge-

    nous bone or composite bone grafts: a histologic–

    histomorphometric preliminary study. Interna-

    tional Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants

    13: 69–76.

    Roldán et al . Sinus floor augmentation in presence of PRP or rhBMP-7

    722 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 716–723

  • Lozada, J.L., Caplanis, N., Proussaefs, P., Willard-

    sen, J. & Kammeyer, G. (2001) Platelet-rich

    plasma application in sinus graft surgery: Part I –

    Background and processing techniques. Journal of

    Oral Implantology 27: 38–42.

    Lynch, S.E., Buser, D., Hernandez, H.P., Weber,

    H.P., Stich, H., Fox, Ch.H. & Williams, R.C.

    (1991) Effects of the platelet-derived growth fac-

    tor/Insulin-Like growth factor-1 combination on

    bone regeneration around dental implants. Results

    of a pilot study in beagles dogs. Journal of Perio-

    dontology 62: 710–716.

    Lynch, S.E. (1999) Introduction. In: Lynch, S.E.,

    Genco, R.J. & Marx, R.E., eds. Tissue engineer-

    ing: applications in maxillofacial surgery and

    periodontics. 1st edition, XI–XVIII. Illinois: Quin-

    tessence.

    Margolin, M.D., Cogan, A.G., Taylor, M., Buck, D.,

    McAllister, T.N., Bradley, S. & McAllister, S.

    (1998) Maxillary sinus augmentation in the non-

    human primate: a comparative radiographic and

    histologic study between recombinant human

    osteogenic protein-1, and natural bone mineral.

    Journal of Periodontology 69: 911–919.

    Marx, R.E., Carlson, E.R., Eichstaed, R.M., Schim-

    mele, S.R., Strauss, J.E. & Georgeff, K.R. (1998)

    Platelet-rich plasma: growth factor enhancement

    for bone grafts. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral

    Pathology 85: 638–646.

    Moy, P.K, Lundgren, S. & Holmes, R.E. (1993)

    Maxillary sinus augmentation: histomorpho-

    metric analysis of graft materials for maxillary

    sinus floor augmentation. Journal of Oral and

    Maxillofacial Surgery 51: 857–862.

    Nash, T.J., Howlett, C.R., Martin, C., Steele, J.,

    Johnson, K.A. & Hicklin, D.J. (1994) Effect of

    platelet-derived growth factor on tibial osteo-

    tomies in rabbits. Bone 15: 203–208.

    Noda, M. & Camilliere, J.J. (1989) In vivo stimula-

    tion of bone formation by transforming growth

    factor-b. Endocrinology 124: 2991–2994.Parfitt, A.M., Drezner, M.K., Glorieux, F.H., Kanis,

    J.A., Malluche, H., Meunier, P.J., Ott, S.M. &

    Becker, R.R. (1987) Bone histomorphometry:

    standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and

    units. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2:

    595–610.

    Pfeilschifter, J., Oechsna, M., Naumann, A., Gron-

    wald, R.G.K., Minne, H.W. & Ziegler, R. (1990)

    A stimulation of bone apposition in vitro by local

    growth factors: a comparison between insulin-like

    growth factor I, platelet-derived growth factor and

    transforming growth factor b. Endocrinology 127:69–75.

    Philippart, P., Brasseur, M., Hoyaux, D. & Pochet,

    R. (2003) Human recombinant tissue factor, pla-

    telet-rich plasma, and tetracycline induce a high-

    quality human bone graft: a 5-year survey. Inter-

    national Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Im-

    plants 18: 411–416.

    Quiñones, C.R., Hürzerer, M.B., Schüpbach, P.,

    Arnold, D.R., Strup, J.R. & Caffesse, R.G.

    (1997) Maxillary sinus augmentation using differ-

    ent grafting materials and dental implants in

    monkeys: Part IV. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-

    coated implants. Clinical Oral Implants Re-

    search 8: 497–505.

    Raghoebar, G.M., Vissink, A., Reinstsema, H. &

    Batenburg, R.H.K. (1997) Bone grafting of the

    floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of

    endosseous implants. British Journal of Oral and

    Maxillofacial Surgery 35: 119–125.

    Rahn, B.A. (1976) Die polychrome Fluoreszensmar-

    kierung des Knochenanbaues. Zeiss Information-

    en 85: 22–36.

    Ripamonti, U., Duneas, N., van den Heever, B.,

    Bosch, C. & Croocks, J. (1997) Recombinant

    transforming growth factor-b-1 induces endocon-dral bone in baboon and synergizes with recombi-

    nant osteogenetic protein-1 (bone morphogenetic

    protein-7) to initiate rapid bone formation. Journal

    of Bone and Mineral Research 12: 1584–1595.

    Rodriguez, A., Anastassov, G.E., Lee, H., Buchbin-

    der, D. & Wettan, H. (2003) Maxillary sinus

    augmentation with deproteinated bovine bone

    and platelet rich plasma with simultaneous inser-

    tion of endosseous implants. Journal of Oral and

    Maxillofacial Surgery 61: 157–163.

    Rosenberg, E.S. & Torosian, J. (2000) Sinus grafting

    using platelet-rich plasma initial case presenta-

    tion. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Den-

    tistry 12: 843–850.

    Roldán, J.C., Jepsen, S., Miller, J., Freitag, S., Rue-

    ger, D., Acil, Y. & Terheyden, H. (2004) Bone

    formation in presence of platelet-rich plasma vs.

    bone morphogenetic protein-7. Bone 34: 80–90.

    Ross, R., Raines, E.W. & Bowen-Pope, D.F. (1986)

    The biology of platelet-derived growth factor. Cell

    46: 155–169.

    Schlegel, K.A., Fichter, G., Schulze-Mosgau, St. &

    Wiltfang, J. (2003) Histologic findings in sinus

    augmentation with autogenous bone chips vs. a

    bovine bone substitute. International Journal of

    Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 18: 53–58.

    Schmitz, J.P. & Hollinger, J.O. (2001) The biology

    of platelet rich plasma. Journal of Oral and Max-

    illofacial Surgery 59: 1119–1120.

    Skoglund, A., Hising, P. & Young, C. (1997) A

    clinical and histologic examination in humans of

    the osseous response to implanted natural bone

    mineral. International Journal of Oral & Max-

    illofacial Implants 12: 194–199.

    Smiler, D.G. & Holmes, R.E. (1987) Sinus proce-

    dure using porous hydroxyapatite: a preliminary

    clinical report. Journal of Oral Implantology 13:

    239–253.

    Terheyden, H., Jepsen, S., Möller, B., Tucker, M.M.

    & Rueger, D. (1999) Sinus floor augmentation

    with simultaneous placement of dental implants

    using a combination of deproteinized bone xeno-

    graft and recombinant human osteogenetic pro-

    tein-1: a histometric study in miniature pigs.

    Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 510–521.

    Tidwell, J.K., Blijdorp, P.A., Stoelinga, P.J., Brouns,

    J.B. & Hindereks, F. (1991) Composite grafting of

    the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal

    implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients.

    International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial

    Surgery 21: 204–209.

    Triplett, R.G. & Schow, S.R. (1996) Autologous

    bone grafts and endosseous implant: complemen-

    tary techniques. Journal of Oral andMaxillofacial

    Surgery 54: 486–494.

    Urist, M.R. (1965) Bone: formation by autoinduc-

    tion. Science 150: 893–899.

    Valentini, P., Abensur, D., Densari, D., Graziani,

    J.N. & Hämmerle, C.H.F. (1998) Histological

    evaluation of Bio-Osss in a 2-stage sinus floor

    elevation and implantation. Clinical Oral Im-

    plants Research 9: 59–64.

    Wentzel, A.C., Stich, H. & Caffesse, R.G. (1995)

    Bone apposition onto oral implants in the sinus

    area filled with different grafting materials. Clin-

    ical Oral Implants Research 6: 155–163.

    Weibrich, G., Kleis, W.K.G., Kunz-Kostomanolakis,

    M., Loos, A. & Wagner, W. (2001) Correlation of

    platelet-rich plasma to the extractionmethod, age,

    sex, and platelet count of the donor. International

    Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 16:

    693–699.

    Weibrich, G., Gnoth, S.-H., Otto, M., Reichert, T.E.

    & Wagner, W. (2002) Wachstumsstimulation von

    humanen osteoblatenähnlichen Zellen durch

    Thrombozytenkonzentrate in vitro. Mund-, Kie-

    fer- und Gesichtschirurgie 6: 168–174.

    Wiltfang, J., Schlegel, K.A., Schultze-Mosgau, St.,

    Nkenke, E., Zimmermann, R. & Kessler, P.

    (2003) Sinus floor augmentation with b-trical-ciumphosphate (b-TCP): does platelet-rich plasmapromote its osseous integration and degradation.

    Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 213–218.

    Yildirim, M., Spiekermann, H., Handt, S. & Edelh-

    off, D. (2001) Maxillary sinus augmentation with

    the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral

    bone for qualitative improvement of the implant

    site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical

    study in humans. International Journal of Oral &

    Maxillofacial Implants 16: 23–33.

    Roldán et al . Sinus floor augmentation in presence of PRP or rhBMP-7

    723 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 716–723