MANAGER, LABOR RELATIONS

Pacific Area

July 23, 2012

Omar Gonzalez Western Regional Coordinator, APWU 1350 Old Bayshore HWY. Suite 360 Burlingame, CA 94010

acific Area Local(s) [ 1 Western Area Local(s) oIding Info ng issue(s)

[ J Please review, take action and reduce issues to writing omments: Prepare & Review 12.5.C.5 & 12.5.C.S r M. Gonzalez, Coordinator

This is to advise you of the intent of the Sacramento District to utilize the provisions of Article 12.5.C.5 of the National Agreement to involuntarily reassign three (3) Vehicle Operations Clerks (1 Clerk, Vehicle Dispatching and 2 Vehicle Dispatchers) from the craft and/or installation at the Sacramento bid cluster (event 39856). The basis is an approved Area wide mode conversion.

The impacted employees will be notified of their involuntary reassignments by separate letter. Based upon the availability of residual/withheld assignments, it may be necessary to utilize the provisions of Article 7.2.B of the National Agreement to detail some of the impacted employees in order to provide them with a work opportunity until sufficient residual/withheld assignments can be identified for their placement.

By copy of this notice, we will withhold up to three (3) full-time residual assignments in the clerk, carrier, mail handler, vehicle maintenance or custodial crafts in sites within a 50 mile radius of the impacted bid cluster for placement of the impacted vehicle clerks.

Attached you will find copies of the automated impact statement, the operational data that supports the excessing, the list of sites at which withholding has been authorized and the names of the junior impacted vehicle clerks.

Please include this impact on the agenda for our next meeting. if you have any questions you may contact me at (858) 674-3193 or Linda Shumate, Area Complement Coordinator at (858) 674-3183,

I L ?t ~~y Roberts Manager, Labor Relations

Attachments

Manager, Area Manager, In-Plant Support District Manager, Sacramento District Area Complement Coordinator with attachments Manager, Human Resources - Sacramento District with attachments

-2

District Complement Coordinator, Sacramento District with attachments Chris Jackson, NALC with attachements Richard Siu, NPMHU with attachments HRA (2) with attachments

WorkHour Impact Report

Impacted Bid Cluster

Installation Address

Area Name

Impact Type

Date of Impact

Period (Dates) of Review Performed

Report Prepared By

Report Prepared Date

Reviewed By

Phone

SACRAMENTO POST OFFICE EVENT 39856

PVS CONVERSION - ALLIED

PACIFIC

Reduction Other Than by Attrition

12/31/2012

07/23/2011 thru 07/20/2012

Brandi Jentgen

07/24/2012

Alfred Santos

(916) 373-8001

WorkHour Impact Report Craft = MOTOR VEHICLE

A B C D E F G Current Planned Weekly Hrs Monthly Annual Annual FTE Current Average Weekly Savings Savings Work Hours Savings FTE Yearly

Weekly Hrs Hrs Savings Hr Rate

Total 3771 3662 -109 -436 -5668 -3 1976

OverTime Impact

Current OT Current Planned OT Additional Percent Planned OT Planned OT Average OT Rate per Week Planned OT Planned OT Hours per Rate

Weekly Hrs from changes per Week per Week Week

Total 108 2.9% -3 0 105 2.9%

WorkHour Impact Report Casuals

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals Hours per Month

d. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals that will be Terminated

f. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals Remaining After Impact

g. Provide Narrative Justifying need for Remaining MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals

There are no casuals in the Motor Vehicle Craft

Part Time Flexible (PTFs)

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs Hours per Month

d. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs that will have Reduced Hours

e. Will there be any MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs Excessed from Craft or Installation

If Yes how Many MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs

f. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

There are no PTF's in the Motor Vehicle Craft.

Transitional Employees (TEs)

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE TEs on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE TE Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE TE Hours per Month

d. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE TEs that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE TEs that will be Terminated

f. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE TEs After Impact

Postal Support Employees (PSE)

o o o o o o

o o o o

NO

o

o o o o o o

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE PSE Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE PSE Hours per Month

d, Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PSE that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PSE that will be Terminated

f. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PSE Remaining After Impact

g, Provide Narrative Justifying need for Remaining MOTOR VEHICLE PSE

There are no PSE Dispatchers. PSE TIO's will be separated under event #39836

1224

a

a

a

9

WorkHour Impact Report

Part Time Regular (PTRs)

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTRs on Rolls

b. Planned Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTR Positions after Impact

c. Estimated Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTR Attrition

d. Will there be any MOTOR VEHICLE PTRs Excessed from Craft or Installation

MOTOR VEHICLE PTRs

e. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

There are no PTR's in the Motor Vehicle Craft.

Full Time Regular (FTRs)

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE FTRs on Rolls

b. Planned Number of MOTOR VEHICLE FTR POSitions After Impact

c. Estimated Number of MOTOR VEHICLE FTR Attrition

d. Will there be any MOTOR VEHICLE FTRs Excessed from Craft or Installation

If Yes how Many MOTOR VEHICLE FTRs

e. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

Based upon California emissions regulations, it has been determined that contracting PVS operations is more efficient and cost effective. Therefore, the Vehicle Dispatching positions will be eliminated.

o o o

NO

o

92

89

o YES

3

WorkHour Impact Report-MOTOR VEHICLE

Preliminary Summary

a. Total Planned Non-aT Reduction per Month for Regulars and PTRs

b. Planned Reduction in Total aT Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Casual Non-aT Hours per Month

d. Planned Reduction in PTF Non-aT Hours per Month

e. Planned Reduction in TE Non-aT Hours per Month

f. Planned Reduction in PSE Non-aT Hours per Month

g. Total Planned Non-aT Hours per Month

h. Total FTE Savings

-436

-12

o o o o

14648

-3

US POSTAL SERVICE

Area-wide Mode Conversion Proposal Pacific Area

NATIONAL AGREEMENT ARTICLE 32

SUBCONTRACTING

February 28,2012

CURRENT

ARTICLE 32 SUBCONTRACTING PROPOSAL & COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Area-wide Mode Conversion Vehicle Highway Contract Service

BACKGROUND

Network with Headquarters the Vehicle Operations disbanded), considered the following alternatives that wouid enable and ensure compliance with legislation:

Retrofit the fleet with particulate matter (PM) filters kits Lease compliant vehicles

T'\",-r""T,,-.n services to highway contract route suppliers

most economicaily feasible alternative, the functional departments "'<:liM""", to assess the and financial impact of each option

Alternative Analyzed - Retrofit Fleet (Not Recommended)

Installation of PM filters on an would be a temporary soiutjon and not the best use of aiternative the lowest cost

total cost since the fleet is approaching for and installation of filters

is \1<::1I"HI"'I"" X 457

not realize the best return on investment since the \JO,,,,!"'.,,,

Alternative Analyzed - Purchase (Not Recommended)

This is not

Alternative Analyzed - Outsource (Recommended)

Justification:

The Postal Service is mandated to procure transportation that meets all service ""CI"I"'>QTUC by the most economical means. !n regards to highway transportation,

service may be via Highway Contract Route (HCR) or Postal Vehicle Service (PVS). After comprehensive evaluation and due consideration of all critical (as cited in Subcontracting ",rtide 32.2A of the national agreement between USPS and APWU), resuits that Service wili benefit from subcontracting PVS at all Pacific Area and net'Nork distribution facilities except HI. Supporting

each critical factor are as follows:

Public Interest

public win not change under operation nor will mail availability at 10'-,,, .. ,,,,,,,,, change under HCR operations. points and their I

in current PVS are exactly in proposed HeR Under the HCR operations to to situations

Under resource

Availability Equipment

HeR an advantage since these suppliers would be more responsive in obtaining the to perform the operation. be required to comply with federal. state and local law to provide appropriate equipment including servicing of that equipment that should provide increased availability of equipment In addition Posta! Service should reduce their need for future capitol investment and VMF work hours cost.

Equipment Requirement

AXLE - Leased 7-TON 11-

- SINGLE

#OF PVS VEHICLES (CURRENTLY IN USE)

32 102 109

21

29

446

# VEHICLES REQUIRED

32 1 1

121

45

457

vehides are

Area

Job Title

TOTAL PVS Operators

284

513 137

797

pn'lnll"\I~'''''<:; are located within the established commuting guidelines of & distribution facilities. Placement of all impacted

employees will to Article 12 of the national agreement and other applicable contract provisions

6591$ COST EVALUATION - CALlFORNIA PQSTALVEHICLE SERVICE VS HIGHWAY CQNTRACT SERVICE

:mat2012

U~R Postal Service COST EVALUATION - POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVtCE

6.$64.00

--$:14.912 OS S43.078.0C

1.899,988.57

Tractor (TA)

Box

intermediate 7 -T Cargo Van 11- Van Tractor (SA) Tractor (TA)

Box 22 Trailer Cost

N-East East PacTic South Central

Box 25

Tort Claim Cost Per Mile

Box 27

Box

PVS Field Operations

Management Costs (Administrative CostS)

3

5

MVO ITO

INT VAN VP..N SAT TAT

INT 7-TON 1 :-TON

SAT TAT

N-East East West South

Central

Nat'!

pvs

$1~3OC

$1

$1 $1 $129<J

1 7i6 OD

U.S. Postal Service

COST EVALUATION POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

Sox2C Ir\!ermedia!e

IntermedIate 7 ~T CsrgoVan 11-T Carg{l Van Tractor (SA) Tractor (T A)

Box 22

Trailer COS!

8{lX 25

N-East East Pacific Scuth Cenlral

Tort Claml Cost Per ~1iie

80)(27

PVS Field OperE!!ic'1S Management Cos!:; (Admini$lratille

Box

SAT TAT

INT 7-TON l1-TON

SAT TAT

N-East Eas.t West South

Centra!

Nat'!

$

S S $ S

$UOO $1.400 SU80 $1260 S1290

43.98

716.00

o

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION - POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

45~)

11;. Adjt. ... tl>d rer C""tinq"""'''s (line 15 x I

TIC

$91.90996

100.00%

3)

I I ,

pcerallng COW>

~atilJ(lCOS!

$ 573.78729

5.148.00

~

--iI> $69.266.60 !

--iI> 1$ 3,022.344.05

Bo)( 17 ~JfVO 43.98

Tractor no 44.72

3

Box 20 Iniennediate INT $130D 7-T Cargo Van VAN $1400

1-T Van VAN $1.380 SAT $1.260 TAT $1.290

6 Box 21

Intermediate iNT 8.38 7·T Van 7-TON 11.80 11-T Van 11-TON 13.45 Traetor (8/\) St'\T 13.78 T raetar (TAl TAT 13.98

Box 22 Trailer Cost

N-East N-East East East Pacific West .716.00 South South Central Central

Box 25

Tort Claim Cosl Per Mile Nar!

8ox27

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION - POSTAL VEHICLE SERVlCE VS. CONTRACT SERViCE

I 559647.08 i

$1.7 HU:JO 386.100,00

!13 T 0:21 Veruc!€ Cosl [ (JUtes t 21 21)

4C{)32.!l

S1.790,230 ~ 5 Miles (Line 3)

$0,00

2.BaS.256.93

FORM

80x -r--

Motor Vehicle MVO $ Tractor Trailer $

Bo)[20 Intermediate INT $1300 7-T VAN $lAoo

VAN $1.380 SAT $1.260 TAT 51.290

Box 21

intermediate INT $ 838 7 -T Cargo Van 7·TON $ 1.80 11-T Cargo Vall 11-TON $ 13.45 Tractor SAT $ 13.78 TraClor TAT 13.98

80:.:22 Trailer Cost

N-East N-East East East Pacific INest South South Central Central

80x25

Tort Claim Cos! Per Mile Nat'l

80:.:27 2

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION - POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

100.00%

TIC

$742,130.94

i1il1es 19 + 2:l • 24 + 25) $

4,783,826.27

I 18Ui96 00 I

$7.741,929.98

24,217,249.71

Box Vehtoe

Tractor Trailer vcenaltor

80)(20 Intermediate 7-T Cargo Van 11-T Van

60)(21

Intermediate 7 -T Van 11-T Cargo Van Tractor Tractor (I A)

Box 22 Trailer Cost

N-East East Pacific South Central

Bo)( 25

Tort C!alm Cost Per Mile

Bo)(27

PVS Field Operations

2

MVO no

tNT VAN VAN SAT TAT

INT 7-TON l1-TON

SAT TAT

N-East East 'West

South Central

Nat'!

$1 $1.400 $1.380 $1.260 $1.290

$ 8.38 $ 11.80 $ 13.45 $ 13.78

---.!.. 13.98

$ $ $ 1.716.00 $ $

0.;]

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION· POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

2.461.678.62

3,207,869.53

320.892,00

, T alai VelW:l<! Cos~ ., 21 "'22}

$5,990,440 15

$381,655,60

- s

Box Motor Vehicle Tractor Trailer

Box 20 Interme<Hate 7-T Van

Van

Box 21

Intermediate 7 . T Cargo Van 11-T Cargo Van Tractor (SA) Tractor (TA)

80x22 T r,uler Cost

N-Eas! East Pacific South Central

Box 25

Tort Cla,m Cost Per Mile

80x27

2

TIO

$1.300 VAN $1400 VAN $1.380 SAT $1.260 TAT $1.290

INT $ 7-TON $ 11·TON $

SAT $ TAT $

-l N-East $ East $ West $ 1716.j Boutl1 $

Centra! $

Nat'l

U,S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION - POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

5562,554.94

S 2,877,850.68 ~.CO!ll

$ 2,780,63934

! 123,552.00 I

I

$5,782,042.02

$446,178.40

15,685.638.81

Box 1 Motor

no 44.72

80)(20 I Intermediate INT $1.300 I 7-T Van VAN $1.400

J 11-T Cargo Van VAN $1.380 Tractor SAT $1.260 Tractor (T A) TAT $1.290

6 Box 21

~ Intermediate INT

1 8.38

7 -T Cargo Van 7-TON 11.80 11-T Cargo Van 11-TON 13.45 Tractor (SA) SAT 13.78 Tractor TAT 13.98

Box 22 Trailer Cost

]I N·East N-East East East Pacific Il'·!est 1,716.00 South South Centrai Central

80:<:25

Tort Claim Cost Per Mile Nat'f

80x21

999. 2

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION· POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

12'.

16. MjIJStstl for Ccnlil1g'lndes

fl1ne t5x 1

ITO ... Cos(

(Requires Enlry £ vef1 ---+

Z" TOlal V~ ~ost {lines 2fl ... 21 ,. 22;

3:);1002

----+-

---111' M!Iell {Une 3)

-+-

-+-

\Jehic.le ~ <As!

S 27fU42.53 ~CO$l

S 425,833.46

S I

29,172,00 I I ! !

$733,847,99

$43,231,40

S 2,214,867.14

Box 17 Motor Vehicle MVO Tractor Trailer TIO

Box 20 l Intermediate INT $1.300 7-T Cargo Van VAN $1.400 I

I 11-T Cargo Van VAN $1.380

J TractOf' (SA) SAT $1.260 Tractor (T A) TAT $1.290

Box 21

Intermediate r INT 8.38 7 ·T Cargo Van 7·TON 11.80 11-T Cargo Van L 11·TON 13.45 Traaor(SA) SAT 13.78 Traaor{TA) TAT 13.98

6

80)(22

T railer Cost

N·East N·East $ East East $ Pacific 'West $ 1.716.00 South South $ Central Central $

Bo)(25

Tort Claim Cost Per Mile Nat'l

80x27 2

PVS Fie!d Operations

(.Administrative Costs} HCR Area Choice Sheet

16. MjUSted lot Conti~"" {Uoo i~ xl

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION· POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

$005,318,44

--Ii"

S!:HiS

i 10 x AnIllie: Cost

23. T <:ta1 Vehiem Cost (~M.s 20 + 21 + 22)

3,515,874.36

3.400,54790

188.150.00

S7,1()5,182.26

$545,09UO

19.133,458.90

Box Motor Vehicle MVO T factor Trailer Operator ITO

3

Box 20 Intermediate INT $1.300 7-T VAN $1.400 11-T VAN $1.380

SAT $1.260 Tractor rTA) TAT $1.290

6 Box 21

Intermediate I INT $ 838 7 -T Van L 7-TON $ 1180 11-T Cargo Van 11-TON $ 13.45 Tractor (SA) SAT $ 13.78 Tractor (TA) TAT $ 13.98

6

Box 22

T raller Cost N-East N-East $ East East $ Pacific west $ 1,716.00 Sotlt'1 South $ Central Central $

Bo:<25

Tort Claim ~ 0;] Cost Per Mile Nat'j

Bo.:<27

HCR

566791SACRAMENTO P&D 56679 SACRAMENTO P&DC 56679 SACRAMENTO P&DC

RANDALL IL GARLAND F PIARA S

7 1533A 31 7m19~4 6 1533A 31 5/4/1991 7 1533A 31 1/1/2000

~~