45
An Efficient and Cost- Effective Approach to Medical Equipment Assessments and Acquisitions Izabella Gieras, MS, MBA, CCE Huntington Memorial Hospital , Pasadena, CA October 22, 2015

Izabella Gieras, MS, MBA, CCE Huntington Memorial Hospital, Pasadena, CA October 22, 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Clinical Engineers Can Make Healthcare Safer

An Efficient and Cost-Effective Approach to Medical Equipment Assessments and AcquisitionsIzabella Gieras, MS, MBA, CCEHuntington Memorial Hospital , Pasadena, CAOctober 22, 2015

Courtesy of Huntington Hospital

Huntington Hospital

2Huntington Hospital625 licensed bedsBariatric & Stroke CenterMagnet Recognition3 Davinci Robotic Systems18 Operating Rooms (4 MIS suites)Skills Labs5 Cath Labs & IR Suites9000 medical devices

280 applications450 servers with 200+ TB storage1000+ wireless access points4500+ end user computing devices300+ hospital owned smart phones60 Clinical & Information Technology employees Courtesy of Huntington Hospital3Agenda Healthcare Environment Building the Business Case Capital Review Process Healthcare Technology Management (HTM) Role in

Technology Management Cycle Benefits

4Healthcare EnvironmentEvolution of Healthcare - Past

Evolution of Healthcare - Present

http://www.experimentalor.org/news.html

Evolution of Healthcare - Future

http://w4.siemens.de/FuI/en/archiv/pof/heft2_01/artikel03/index.html

Regulatory Requirements

Healthcare Environment

Patient Environment

www.patientsafetyinstitute.caTotal lives lost per yearHow Hazardous is Healthcare?(Leape)10Medical ErrorsEstimated 8-12% of patients admitted to the hospital experience adverse events while receiving healthcareAdverse events include:Healthcare associated infectionsMedication related errorsSurgical errorsMedical device failuresErrors in diagnosisFailure to act on results from tests

11 Frost and Sullivan Study

11Medical Errors cont. Medical device failures account for 13% of all type of adverse eventsDevice failure types:Product defectsDesign defectManufacturing defectMisuse/abuse

12 Frost and Sullivan Study

12 Medical Errors cont.100,000 medical device reports per year received by the FDAMore than 1/3 involve use errorsUse error often linked to design flaws

44% of medical device recalls due to design problemsReported by the FDA Recall Study

ECRI Top 10 Health Technology Hazards1. Alarm hazards: Inadequate alarm configuration policies and practices2. Data integrity: Incorrect or missing data in electronic health records and other health IT systems3. Mix-up of IV lines leading to misadministration of drugs and solutions4. Inadequate reprocessing of endoscopes and surgical instruments 5. Ventilator disconnections not caught because of mis-set or missed alarms6. Patient-handling device use errors and device failures7. Dose creep: Unnoticed variations in diagnostic radiation exposures8. Robotic surgery: Complications due to insufficient training9. Cybersecurity: Insufficient protections for medical devices and systems10. Overwhelmed recall and safety alert management programs

Building the Business Case

16Business CaseStreamline the capital acquisition and assessment processCRC* and ORC* Develop a multidisciplinary capital medical equipment processThe TJC compliance Evaluation process for safety and efficacy of medical equipmentControl the capital equipment expenditureRoutine capital projectsStrategic capital projectsContingency allocationsCost effective expenditures

*CRC: Capital Review Committee*ORC: Operational Review CommitteeCapital Review ProcessCapital Review Committee (CRC)Charter. CRC is responsible for reviewing the hospitals Capital Acquisition Requests and for implementing Capital Acquisition Policy efforts throughout the organization. The Committee ensures that all elements of an effective Capital Acquisitions program are adhered to by all departments.

Membership. Decision Support, Clinical Technology, Construction, Plant Operations, Information Services, Risk Management, Safety and Security and Purchasing Department.

Courtesy of Huntington HospitalCapital Review Committee (CRC) cont.Function. 1. Assist in the monitoring of the Capital Budget, 2. Provide oversight and supervision of the Capital Acquisition related policies and procedures , 3. Establish methods to improve the efficiency and quality of service, and to achieve savings through review and coordination of effort.

Reporting Structure. CRC reports on a Monthly basis to the Operational Review Committee (ORC).

http://content.wellspan.org

Budget Process FlowCourtesy of Huntington HospitalBudget Planning & HTM Member of CRC and ORC committeesTechnology management cycleShort and long term replacement plansBudgetary quote requestSubmitting requests to the CRC databaseReview Maintenance, IT, Construction, Facilities needsMeeting with directors to prioritize requestsForce ranking

CRC databaseCourtesy of Huntington Hospital

CRC databaseCourtesy of Huntington Hospital

CRC databaseCourtesy of Huntington Hospital

Force Ranking ProcessStrategicOperationalFinancial

ClinicalRegulatory

Force Ranking Process

None = 0, Low =1, Medium=3, High=9Force Ranking Process

Criteria weight = Impact Value * Percentage of Importance Value.Total weight = all of the criteria weights for the request added together.Force Ranking Process

CRC database reportCourtesy of Huntington Hospital

SAMPLE

Monthly Process FlowCourtesy of Huntington Hospital Healthcare Technology Management RoleTechnology AssessmentTechnology ImplementationTechnology AcquisitionTechnology PlanningSafetyNeeds assessmentROICost benefit analysisClinical & technical assessmentHFE assessmentRFP

NegotiationsLife cycle analysis

EducationService delivery

Technology Management Cycle Technology PlanningPerform needs assessmentConsider utilities, cabling, and other infrastructure needsConsider labor resources needs and system integrationEMR, IT applications, other medical equipment systemsConsider any new regulatory changes/impactConsider medical equipment that is standard, well supported, reliable, not at the end of its life cycleDevelop a multi year replacement plan - focus on major medical equipment categoriesComplete an ROI and cost benefit analysisConsider alternatives

Technology PlanningTechnology AssessmentRequest for Proposal (RFP) projects over $20,000ECRI RFP and RFI templatesECRI RFP assessmentVendor resourcesInternetVendor presentationsClinical evaluationsNo charge PO, eval agreement, service reports, etcHuman Factors evaluations usability testing, simulationsIT and Security assessmentsSite visitsReview of recalls, hazard alerts (FDA MAUDE database)Confirm FDA clearanceCheck references

Technology Assessment

Clinical Simulations

Courtesy of Huntington Hospital & Mount Sinai HospitalAmerican Hospital Associationhttp://www.ahaonlinestore.com

U.S. Department of the ArmyDocument TB MED 7, appendix Bhttp://www.army.mil/usapa/med/

The manufacturers sales and service team

Your own ideas

Medical Assets Useful Life Resources

Replacement life cycle document, make copies from the book MAUDE Database

www.fda.gov Sample Evaluation Tool

Technology AcquisitionVendor selectionLife cycle analysis include all costs, supplies, maintenance, labor, testing equipment, training, etcNegotiationsClinical and technical trainingTesting equipmentPm during the warranty periodExtended warranties/service contractsNo cost deliveryPayment upon clinical acceptanceLatest technology delivered especially if delays on the projectOperator and service manuals at no cost

Technology AcquisitionTechnology ImplementationAssess physical space, structural, shielding, electrical, heating, cooling & plumbingAfter delivery and before installation, inspect for damageConfirm all components have been receivedPerform incoming inspectionsInstallation/service documentationIf manufacturer is performing the installation, monitor its progress and document any difficultiesCoordinate clinical and technical trainingFinal acceptance & final payment

Technology ImplementationRisk Management and Quality ImprovementWarranty periodDowntime, failures, & problems may extend warranty or be cause for returnMaintenance and mode of communicationPrimary/Secondary FSE assignmentsUser acceptance and satisfactionPost-warrantyMaintenanceVendor relationsPatient outcomes Incident investigationsRecalls and hazard alertsStrategic replacement

At end of life, do it all over again!

42BenefitsCost-effective strategic technology planning and technology assessmentSafe and efficacious patient and user environmentPositive patient outcomesPatient and user satisfactionMaximized productivity of technology and staffCost-efficient technology maintenance

Thank you!Contact InformationIzabella Gieras, MS, MBA, CCEDirector, Clinical TechnologyHuntington Memorial HospitalPasadena, California, USAE. [email protected]

Request are entered into the Capital Request DatabaseCapital Request can be entered from Jan-Sept for next years budgetManager and director Identifies the Capital needs of their DepartmentMeet With Primary Resource Leads

a) Clinical technologyb) Information Systemsc) Constructiond) Plant OperationsReview and Negotiate Request Listwith VP Obtain information and Price Quote from vendor all request for the following year are reviewed by the Operational Review committeeThe operational review committee consist of EMT and Decision SupportThe Decision to Approve, Disapprove, or move the requestto the following year is madebased on operational needsBudget FinalizedOctoberCapital Improvement Budget ApprovedNovemberSee Section On Preparation RequirementsThe Quote obtained at this point is forPricing estimate and a new current quote will be required before the request is sent inCapital RequestReceived in Decision SupportQuote Attached and CurrentUpdate Databasethat request was received and send to purchasing for ROI quote analysisReturn Request to Requestor asking for Updated QuotePurchasing Pre Sub-Committee ProcessingRequest received back from Purchasing are put on the ORC Sub-committee AgendaThe ORC Sub-Committee Reviews the request and verifies that all documents and pre-work are complete Issue with request?The requestor is notified by the sub-committee member that has the issueIssue resolved?When the request passes the sub-committee it is sent to the operational review committeeNoYesYesNoYesOperational Review Committee Approved Request?Request sent to CFO for SignatureRequestor Is notifiedNoYesRequest Approved?Requestor NotifiedNoCopies of Request are sent to General Accounting for CIP assignmentAdditional Copies are sent to the Requestor, Information systems, facilities and constructionAll original request are sent to purchasingGeneral Accounting ProcessPurchasing Post Approval processingObtain VP Signature Before Sending Request in for ProcessingTo Make Sure we are getting the best price, MD Buyline and ECRI analysis are requested, This Process Takes Approximately 30 Days Request are returned back to before the ORC Sub-Committee Meeting