4
Figu re 1 . Fron t el evati on . Figure 2. Top viewport . Study of the Initial Prestress for Guyed Transmission Tower Wei Kong, Xin Xiong, and Qinglian Xue  Northeast Dianli University / School of Civil Engineering, Jilin, China Email: gflkw @163.com  Abstract—In this paper the conception of initial equilibrium sta te is introduce d to ana lyze the str ained condit ion of guyed tra nsmiss ion tower for the fir st time. Pri nc iple of fin ite -el eme nt me thod is applied to ded uce the sti ffnes s matrix which is based on UL (Update Lagrange Description) method with the consideration of bi-nonlinearity, also, the stiffness matrix of beam element with one rigid joint and one hinged joint is worked out. Taking a guyed transmission tower as an example, cable-beam assembly nonlinear finite eleme nt mod el is bui lt by usi ng gen eral fin ite ana lyt ic sof tware ANSYS . On these bas es, the ini tial pre str ess of guyed transmission tower under initial equilibrium state is figur ed out . At las t, the resul t of numerical analys is is proved by model test.  Index Terms —guyed transmission tower, initial equilibrium state, prestress, nonlinear finite element I. I  NTRODUCTION Guy ed tra nsmissi on tower is ma inly compos ed of angle steels and stay guy which is characterized by self- equi li br ium pre -st ress. Connecti on mode of guye d transmission towe r is different from that of self - sup port ing tra nsmissi on tower. The con nec tion mod e  between column and foundation applies spherical hinge  joint, at the same time connection mode between column and cross-arm applies unidirectional hinge joint (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Under every working condition, the stay guy is used to balance the lateral loads, while tower body is used to ba la nc e the ve rt ic al load . Me ch anic al characteristics of stay guy and steels are given full play, so the stee l is saved. As one kind of prestr ess space st ru ct ur e, the st at es of  guyed transmission tower can be divided into null state, original state and working state. Aggregation of cable and truss whi ch are proc esse d is named nul l sta te of the structure. Self-equilibrating state when initial stress has  been applied is named original state of the structure. The equilibrium state after the exterior load has been applied is named wor king state [4] . Unlike common prestresse d structure, pre stre ss which is imp ose d upo n the guy ed tra nsmissi on tower is one importa nt fac tor of glo bal stif fne ss. The sha pe of structure , sel f-st res s, structure stiffness will change when the pre-stress changes. So the accura te calculation of the dist ributi on of pre stresse d under the initial state the guyed transmission tower is one important factor which cannot be ignored in the process of the design and construction. But in the book named  Hi gh Vol tage Transmission Lines Des ign Man ual of  Po wer Eng ine eri ng the Sec ond Editi o n ignored the ca lc ul at ion unde r this state in the desi gn of guye d transmission tower . The cabl e-beam assembly nonlinear finite element model of this kind of tower is built by ANSYS software in th is pa pe r unde r the above  back ground . Then the distri bution of prestr ess is figur ed out, and the result of numerical analysis is proved by model test. II. FINITE ELEMENT MODEL  A. Basic Assumptions It is a kind of isotropical hardened material in keeping with V.Mises initial yield condition and interrelated flow rule. The movement of the structure is characterized by large displacement and small deformation. Component processing, the installation of the initial error and material defects are neglected.  Nodes are ideal space rigid joint or ideal space hinged  joint. Bar unit endures axial force, and cable unit endures  pulling force, and beam unit is Timoshenko beam unit whose shear strain and section warping is ignored.  B. Choose of the La grange Description Method The re are UL and TL(To tal Langra nge Des cri pti on Method) two methods which are used to distribute the nonlinearity of objects. The main difference is in that TL me thod used conf igu ratio n of tim e t 0 as ref ere nce conf igurati on while UL metho d used configura tion of time t as ref erence conf igur at ion. The refe renc e configuration of time t can avoid the solving the initial Project supported by the technology research project of Northeast China Grid Company Limited of China. ISBN 978-952-5726-06-0 Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Information Security and Application (IWISA 2009) Qingdao, China, November 21-22, 2009 © 2009 ACADEMY PUBLISHER AP-PROC-CS-09CN004 405

iwisa09p405

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/8/2019 iwisa09p405

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/iwisa09p405 1/4

8/8/2019 iwisa09p405

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/iwisa09p405 2/4

displacement stiffness matrix, and its stiffness matrix is

simpler. At the same time, TL method can used to solve

the problems of moderate rotation, but the UL method

can get accurate results even to large rotation problem

under the appropriate load step[1]. Therefore, the UL

method is applied in this paper to distribute structuralnonlinear.

C. Element Stiffness Matrixes for Bar Unit Based on the

Material Nonlinearity and Geometric Nonlinearity

There is derivation of element stiffness matrixe for bar 

unit in Ref. [3] with the consideration of geometric

nonlinearity.

t  t t 

 L N   K K K   (1)

t T t 

t V   L L T L

  K B D B dV     (2)

t t  T T t    L T N N T LV  N 

t T 

t V  N T N 

  K B D B B D B dV  

  B D B dV  

 

 

(3)

Where: t 

 L K  is linear stiffness matrixe, and t 

 N  K 

is nonlinear stiffness matrixe.  L

 B is linear strain matrix,

and  N 

 B is nonlinear strain matrix. T 

 D is linear 

elastic matrix.

According to Ref. [6], uilibrium equation described by

geometric nonlinearity holds even for bi-nonlinear 

 problem if the linear elastic matrix T 

 D is replaced by

elastic plastic matrix ep

T  D in rigidity matrix.

Furthermore, elastic plastic matrix can be regard as an

superposition of elastic matrix and plastic matrix, and the

following expressions are valid.

t  t T   p ept V   L L T L

t T t   pt V   L L T L

  K B D B dV  

  K B D B dV  

 

 

(4)

t t  p T T ep ep

t    L T N N T LV  N 

t T  ept V  N T N 

t T   pt V   N L T N  

t T T  p p

t    N T L N T N  V 

  B D B B D B

 B D B B D B

  K dV  

  B D B dV  

  K B D B dV  

dV 

 

 

 

 

(5)

Where:p

T  D is plastic matrix, and its expression as

following,

  p T T  

T  T 

  D f f D

 D h f D f  

 

. Here  

is material constant, and h is plastic modulus.

  y xy yz    x zx z 

  f f f   f f  f  f 

    

.

Therefore

element stiffness matrixes for bar unit withthe consideration of bi-nonlinearity which is based on UL

method can be expressed as:

t t t   p p p

 L N 

t t t 

  L N P  

  K K K  

  K K K  

(6)

t  t T T  p pt V L T L L T N   P 

t T T  p pt V N T L N T N  

  K B D B B D B dV  

  B D B B D B dV  

 

 

(7)

Here t 

 P  K  is plastic correction matrix.

The expression of beam element stiffness matrixes

with the consideration of bi-nonlinearity can be deduced

in a similar way therefore will not be discussed here.

 D. Treatment of Nonlinear Space Cable Unit 

Cable is a kind of flexible construction whose change

in length includes elastic stretching and sag fix under the

effect of deadweight and tension. The stay guy of guyed

transmission tower has the characteristic of high tension

and small span. According to Ref. [5], the authors use

 Ernst formula to modify slack and sag of the cable on the basis of bar unit, that is to modify the elastic modulus of 

cable unit.Cable units only endure axial tensile stress. In the

calculation process, if the internal force of cable unit is

negative, making it zero, and removing the contribution

of cable unit stiffness on the entire structure.

 E. Condensation of Element Degrees of Freedom and Coordinate Transformation of Characteristic Matrix

There are three types of element existing in the finite

element model of guyed transmission tower, includingordinary beam element, bar element and cable element,

and meanwhile in the model there is beam element with

one rigid joint and one hinged joint. So it should use a

uniform expression form for stiffness matrix of each

element before assembling global stiffness matrix.

The first case: condensation of rod-cable element

degrees of freedom.

Each node of beam element has three linedisplacements and three angular displacements, and each

node of bar element only has three line displacements,

then it just need to expand the rod-cable element stiffness

matrix to 12 * 12 matrix, compared with the beamelement stiffness matrix, adding zero elements in the

rows and columns related with angular displacement to

ensure them maintain the same order of the elementstiffness matrix.

The second case: condensation of degrees of freedom

of beam element with one rigid joint and one hinged joint.

406

8/8/2019 iwisa09p405

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/iwisa09p405 3/4

Assumed that beam element with node i (rigid) and j(hinged), the balance equation of the beam element is:

11 12 13 14

21 22 23 24

31 32 33 34

41 42 43 44

i i

i i

 j j

 j j

u N k k k k  

M k k k k  

u N k k k k  

k k k k   M 

 

 

(8)

Where:mn

k  (m, n = 1-4) is 3 * 3 matrix (partitioning of 

element stiffness matrix);i

u ,i

  ,i

 N  andi

M  is

respectively line displacement vector, angular 

displacement vector, node internal force vector and

moment vector of node i; j

u , j

  , j

 N  and j

M  is

respectively line displacement vector, angular 

displacement vector, node internal force vector and

moment vector of node j.

 jM  =0then the forth formula of (8) shows

1

44 41 42 43  j i i jk k u k k u  

(9)

We can see from (9): hinged end angular displacement

of beam element is not necessarily zero, and it is related

with stiffness matrix, node line displacement and angular displacement of the other side.

Substituting (9) into the first three formulas of (8), it

can get equilibrium equations of beam element with one

rigid joint and one hinged joint after condensation:

1 1 111 14 44 41 12 14 44 42 13 14 44 43

1 1 1

21 24 44 41 22 24 44 42 23 24 44 43

1 1 1

31 34 44 41 32 34 44 42 33 34 44 43

i

i

 j

i

i

 j

k k k k k k k k k k k k   u

k k k k k k k k k k k k  

uk k k k k k k k k k k k  

 N 

 N 

 

(10)

Adding zero elements in the related rows and columns

 by condensation in the beam element stiffness matrix,so

as to maintain the original order of the element stiffness

matrix.After condensation , all element stiffness matrixes

 become 12 * 12 matrix, and then using the coordinate

transformation matrix 0  , transform the element

characteristic matrix in the local coordinate to the systemglobal coordinate, at last assemble the stiffness matrix,

displacement vector and load vector.

 F. Establishing and Solving of Nonlinear Finite Element 

 Equilibrium Equations

Under initial prestress state, the guyed transmission

tower reach balance state of self-stress by the role of 

  prestress and gravity. In this process, based on ULmethod, in the overall coordinate system, the load stepfrom time t  to  , the non-linear incremental

equilibrium equations of the structure is:

t t t t 

  K d u R F  

(11)

Where: t 

 K  is the total tangent stiffness matrix of the

structure at time t , d u is the nodes displacement

increment vector from time t to t+t , t t 

 R

is the node

load vector at time t+t , t 

 F  is the equivalent nodes

load vector at time t .According to Ref. [3], using Newton-Raphson iterative

method to calculate is better to reflect the merits of UL,

so this method is adopted in this paper. The influence that

deformation has on structural stiffness in the process of 

finite element calculate is treated with large deformation

effects and stress stiffening effects.

. CALCULATING EXAMPLE

Taking LM21 (33m) guyed tower in DongChangHa

transmission line as an example, establish a finite element

model. Principals and diaphragm were simulated byBeam189 in the model, auxiliary bars are simulated by

Link8, and stay guys are simulated by Link10. The pre-

stress of stay guys was carried out by using the method of 

initial strain simulation, this method can consider thecontribution of cable element stiffness on global stiffness

of the structure. Furthermore, it can solve two problems:

 balance of node prestress and the deformation harmony

of cable. Hinge between cross arm and main column was

carried out by mans of freedom degree coupling.

The table below lists the numerical analysis andmeasured results comparison of axial force (see table ).

. CONCLUSION

From Table , we can see most of the numerical

analysis results are larger than the measured values. The

reason for this error is mainly due to the straining of the

 bars can not be measured under the effect of deadweight.

TABLE I.COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND TEST RESULTS

Measuring point

number 

Value of  Numerical

Analysis(MPa)

Measuredvalue

(MPa)Error Remarks

1 37.99 40.11 0.05 Iron274

2 32.37 24.68 -0.31

3 32.38 24.5 -0.32Iron236

4 24.57 22.19 -0.11

5 24.94 22.47 -0.11Iron272

6 33.21 32.74 -0.01 Iron153

7 12.89 12.26 -0.05

8 14.34 13.83 -0.04

9 13.45 13 -0.03

10 13.87 12.94 -0.07

Iron301-303

407

8/8/2019 iwisa09p405

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/iwisa09p405 4/4

Table shows that some member bars have relatively

 big errors. The reason is in that all nodes in numerical

analysis are ideal while allowable space has been shown

 between node and bolt in practical engineering. For this

reason, element 274 sustains pulling force which is

applied by stay guy in the process of stretch-draw. After this element is out of shape, the member bars connected

with 274 come into effect. This also explains why the

element 274 which is satisfied with the designrequirements produces obvious bending deflection.

Furthermore, detail design of member bars which

connected with stay guy must be taken into consideration

during the design of prestress space steel structure.

R EFERENCES

[1] Dong Chen, and Cimian Zhu, “Feasibility of finite elementmethods for the annlysis of geometrically nonlinear 

trusses,” Building Science Research of Sichuan, Chengdu,China, vol. 26, No. 3, September, 2000.

[2] Hongzhou Deng, and Xiaoming Chen, “Experimentalstudy on model of jiangyin long span transmission tower,” Journal of Buiding Structures, Beijing, China, vol. 22, No.6, December, 2001.

[3] Zhihong Zhang, “Theoretical research on large-span tensile

spatial structures composed of cables, bars and beams,”doctoral dissertation, Zhe Jiang University, Hangzhou,China, 2003.

[4] Zuyan Shen, Guoqiang Li, Yiyi Chen, Qilin Zhang,

Yongfeng Luo, “Steel Structure,” China Building Industry

 Press, Beijing, China, 2005.[5] Yuanpei Lin, “Cable Stayed Bridge,” China

Communications Press, Beijing, China, 2004.[6] Haojiang Ding, Fubao He, Yiquan Xie and Xing Xu,

“Finite Element Method in Elasticity and Plasticity,”Machinery Industry Press, Beijing, China, 1984.

[7] Xucheng Wang, “Finite Element Method,” TsinghuaUniversity Press, Beijing, China, 2003.

[8] Mingxiang Chen, “Elasticity and Plasticity,” Science Press, Beijing, China, 2007.

[9] Xinmin Wang, “Numerical Analysis of EngineeringStructure Based on ANSYS,” China Communications

 Press, Beijing, China, 2007.

408