21
20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, U trecht 1 It’s all in your head: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract How to get abstract representations in there representations in there Diana Apoussidou Institute of Phonetic Sciences Universiteit van Amsterdam

It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

  • Upload
    devi

  • View
    36

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there. Diana Apoussidou Institute of Phonetic Sciences Universiteit van Amsterdam. Questions. How are grammar and lexicon acquired (at the same time)? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 1

It’s all in your head:It’s all in your head:How to get abstract How to get abstract

representations in thererepresentations in there

Diana ApoussidouInstitute of Phonetic Sciences

Universiteit van Amsterdam

Page 2: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 2

Questions

• How are grammar and lexicon acquired (at the same time)?– How do children acquire abstract

phonological representations for words from the speech signal?• How is final devoicing acquired, i.e.

how do children acquire the distinction pont/pond?

Page 3: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 3

Answers

• Grammar and lexicon can be learned simultaneously with a constraint-based grammar and lexicon– Learners/speakers can choose between

different surface forms and different underlying forms• Learners can acquire final devoicing with the

help of alternation (in e.g. singular and plural forms).

Page 4: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 4

Final devoicing

• e.g. Dutch:

Singular Plural

pont ‘ferry’: [pçnt] [pçnt´]

pond ‘pound’: [pçnt] [pçnd´]

Page 5: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 5

The modelsemantics ‘Meaning’

Lexical constraints

|UR|

phonology Faithfulness constraints

/SF/ Structural constraints

(Cue constraints)

(phonetics [OF])

Apoussidou 2007, Boersma 2007

Page 6: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 6

A paradigm of final devoicing

Singular Plural

‘ferry’ /pçnt/ /pçnt´/

‘pound’ /pçnt/ /pçnd´/

‘coat’ /bçnt/ /bçnt´/

‘union’ /bçnt/ /bçnd´/

Page 7: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 7

An artificial language

Singular Plural

Morpheme 1: /tat/ /tate/

Morpheme 2: /tat/ /tade/

Morpheme 3: /dat/ /date/

Morpheme 4: /dat/ /dade/

Page 8: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 8

The initial grammarStructural constraints: • NoVoicing• NoSyllFinalDevoicing• InterVocalicVoicing

Faithfulness:• IdVoicing

Lexical constraints:• *|tat| ‘morph1’• *|tad| ‘morph1’• *|tat| ‘morph2’• *|tad| ‘morph2’• *|dat| ‘morph3’• *|dad| ‘morph3’• *|dat| ‘morph4’• *|dad| ‘morph4’

Page 9: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 9

Error-driven, gradual learning

Comprehending /tade/ ‘morph2+Pl’

Producing /tade/ ‘morph2 +Pl’

/tade/ ‘morph2+Pl’ IDV *|tad| ‘morph2’ NV IVV *|tat| ‘morph2’ NSFV‘morph2’ |tat+e| /tade/ *! * *

O ‘morph2’ |tad+e| /tade/ * *

‘morph2-Pl’ IDV *|tad| ‘morph2’ NV IVV *|tat| ‘morph2’ NSFVñ ‘morph2’ |tat+e| /tate2/ ← * ← *

‘morph2’ |ta +t e| /t 2ade / *! * *O ‘mo 2rph ’ |t +ad e| /tade2/ *!→ *→

‘morph2’ |ta + | d e /tat 2e / *! * *

Page 10: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 10

Error-driven, gradual learning

/tade/ ‘morph2+Pl’ IDV IVV *|tat| ‘morph2’ *|tad| ‘morph2’ NV NSFV‘morph2’ |tat+e| /tade/ *! * *

O ‘morph2’ |tad+e| /tade/ * *

‘morph2-Pl’ IDV IVV *|tat| ‘morph2’ *|tad| ‘morph2’ NV NSFV‘morph2’ |tat+e| /tate2/ *! *‘morph2’ |tat+e| /tade2/ *! * *

O ñ ‘morph2’ |tad+e| /tade2/ * *‘morph2’ |tad+e| /tate2/ *! * *

Comprehending /tade/ ‘morph2+Pl’ again

Producing /tade/ ‘morph2+Pl’ again

Page 11: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 11

/tat/ ‘morph2’ IDV IVV *|tat| ‘morph2’ *|tad| ‘morph2’ NV NSFVO ‘morph2’ |tat| /tat/ * ** *

‘morph2’ |tad| /tat/ *! * ** *

‘morph2’ IDV IVV *|tat| ‘morph2’ *|tad| ‘morph2’ NV NSFVO ‘morph2’ |tat| /tat2/ *!→ **→‘morph2’ |ta | t /ta 2d / *! * * *

ñ ‘mo 2rph ’ |tad| /t 2ad / ← * * ← *‘morph2’ |ta | /d tat2/ *! * **

Comprehending /tat/ ‘morph2-Sg’

Producing /tat/ ‘morph2-Sg’

Error-driven, gradual learning

Page 12: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 12

Computer settings• Praat programme (Boersma & Weenink 2007)• 10 virtual learners• Constraints: 8 lexical, 3 structural, 1 faithfulness• Training data: 8 “words”

– Amount of training data: 10 000 (randomly chosen from the set of 8)

• Gradual Learning Algorithm (Boersma 1997, Boersma & Hayes 2001)– Evaluation noise: 2.0 – “Symmetric all”– Plasticity: 1.0, decrement 0.1, spreading 0.1

Page 13: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 13

Results

• The learners found the correct ‘lexicon’ and the correct ‘grammar’

• Integration of the two can lead to variation

Page 14: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 14

Intertwined lexicon and grammar

NoSFV>>

IDVoi, *|tad| ‘morph1’, *|dad| ‘morph3’>>

*|tat| ‘morph2’, *|dat| ‘morph4’>>

IVV, NoVoi>>

*|tat| ‘morph1’, *|tad| ‘morph2’, *|dat| ‘morph3’, *|dad| ‘morph4’

Page 15: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 15

Intertwined lexicon and grammar

IdVoice >> *|tat| ‘morph2’, *|dat| ‘morph4’‘morph2’ NSFV IDV *|tat| ‘morph2’ IVV NV *|tad| ‘morph2’F ‘morph2’ |tat| /tat2/ * **

‘morph2’ |tat| /tad2/ *! * * * ‘morph2’ |tad| /tad2/ *! * *

L ‘morph2’ |tad| /tat2/ *! ** *

‘morph2’ NSFV *|tat| ‘morph2’ IDV IVV NV *|tad| ‘morph2’ ‘morph2’ |tat| /tat2/ *! **‘morph2’ |tat| /tad2/ *! * * *

‘morph2’ |tad| /tad2/ *! * *J ‘morph2’ |tad| /tat2/ * ** *

*|tat| ‘morph2’ >> IdVoice

Page 16: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 16

Distribution of variationSingular: Plural:`morph1’: |tat| /tat/ 100 |tat+e| /ta.te/ 98.6

`morph2': |tad| /tat/ 25.9 |tad+e| /ta.de/ 98.3|tat| /tat/ 73.6

`morph3': |dat| /dat/ 100 |dat+e| /da.te/ 98.7

`morph4': |dad| /dat/ 31 |dad+e| /da.de/ 98.8|dat| /dat/ 68.3

Page 17: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 17

The final ‘grammar’

NoSFV >> IDVoi >> IVV, NoVoi:

Sg Pl

morph1: /tat/ /tate/

morph2: /tat/ /tade/

morph3: /dat/ /date/

morph4: /dat/ /dade/

Page 18: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 18

The final ‘lexicon’

*|tad| ‘morph1’ >> *|tat| ‘morph1’

*|tat| ‘morph2’ >> *|tad| ‘morph2’

*|dad| ‘morph3’ >> *|dat| ‘morph3’

*|dat| ‘morph4’ >> *|dad| ‘morph4’

=

|tat| ‘1’, |tad| ‘2’, |dat| ‘3’, |dad| ‘4’

Page 19: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 19

Discussion & Conclusion• Lexicon and grammar can be learned

simultaneously• The ranking of lexical constraints has a clear

preference for certain underlying representations, and the ranking of the ‘grammar’ constraints has a clear preference for other candidates.

• Variation can arise due to constraint interaction

Page 20: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 20

Outlook

• Test the model with other words (not minimal pairs)

• Test the model with positive lexical constraints (e.g. Boersma & Pater in prep.)

• Alternative: Serial production?

Page 21: It’s all in your head: How to get abstract representations in there

20.12.2007 Dag van de Fonetiek 2007, Utrecht 21

ReferencesApoussidou, D. (2007). The learnability of metrical phonology. Doctoral

dissertation, LOT Dissertation Series 148.

Boersma, P. (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. IFA Proceedings 21:43-58.

Boersma, P. (2007). Some listener-oriented accounts of h-aspiré in French. Lingua 117:1989-2054.

Boersma, P. & D. Weenink (2007). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4). [Computer program]. www.praat.org.

Boersma, P. & B. Hayes (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32:45-86.