Upload
vonhan
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
5c7 baelt-*:v- c&a+ayv
Iteration andthe Peircean Habit*
IntroductionLnplicit in Peirce's undersanding of the semiotics of habit is a general model ortypology of iteration. Since semiosis encornpasses cognition and language(Nesher 194), Peirce's account of habit models not only verbal iteration but alsoiteration as a cognitive or conceptual phenomenon. The fact that a framework forunderstanding cognitive and linguistic iteration is inherent in the peircean habitshould hardly be surprising since Peirce intended his semiotic to be a .real scienceof sign phenomena' (Short l9gr, r97) and,his phenomenologicar categories ofFirstness, secondness, and rhirdness to be ubiquiuous and olctly observableelements (or modes of being) in the sign_perfused universe (Cp 1:p"1r" e l93l_35; 19581 1.23, 5.41, 5.IZI).
In this paper, I intend to sketch the model of iteration impricit in peirce,s dis_cussion of habit or Thirdness, or more specifically in the relations between theIevels of secondness and rhirdness witnrn a habit. In brief, peirce implies thenecessary existence oftwo poles ofiteration: iteration at the level ofsecondness,or what I will calr simpre iteratton, and iteration with respect to Thirdness, or whatI will call hobitmr iteration. Simple and habituar iteration do not represent dis_crele categories mutually exclusive ofeach other; a Peircean account ofiterationpresumes a continuum Tdg between the poles and therefore the potential ofgrowth fromonepole (simpre iterarion) to fhe other (habituat iteratioo). rnrougnthis t5,polory, I will be arguing that the two kinds of iteration are reflections of themore general distinction which peirce makes between secondness and rhirdness.
Passing from theory to practice, I will then attempt !o show the usefurness ofthe Peircean typology for mebng sense of iteratioo io nu*an conceptualization,generally speaking, and in language, in particular. In treating iteration in lan_guage' I will limit myself !o a consideration of some aspects of the behavior of averb form in czech which I have previously argued (Danaher 1995, 1996) must beunderstood, first and foremost, as a habitual verb in the peircean sense of habit.
The Peircean Habit: from Simple to Habitual Iteration
(:;-*.'!:;{; ln
€
i{
Habit, as a semiotic type with different system-specific realizations, is obviously
E-
gsagggg-oct
H{)(JF.Q)
Aic,ilii'gtr!octtkc)
it)\ou')
E€ ?ElEt ggg$E; E6*gEEt; F€iEe EErp;t ;alsneE;ggA fiflEg fig Agg:e aElll B;eaa1 [g!$!g$g6EI [llg gg ggg€g .I 8E::
{E,E{;il, €EFeaI lfl;flffigggEs saEe e! atlkC}
€HAu,€(\to
rif\o\n
gg€EgFFsE g€igFigFi$€gig iEigaggg g ggFgEEgFFBEEggEEFEF€iE$sE?E €€ HgEqEE EEEE€g g Ei g ggl gggg ggi ggigg ig gE ;$gFgagg*E gff g€ g $ggggigg gggE rgi igggggggFgiaggggs €gg $sEIE:g€i
.oGI
Fc)C)t{c)A.c)a.oHaoG!l-.c)
: ir EEF$sF EE*aiExeEEg F;g€g€giEg$g€ i5 EbEE€$ E;eEf;EE$g*E E€at€ €t H;EEg; t=*rn;cgiilB iEEg*=E€i€sigag-agaiagggagg;ggiiIaEggggggiggi€ EEeiE=EEE UEFE:E;*€ig e€gEE€EfEI€EE* F$g HEAggg Ett:iEnsiEE.ggf FEEa:E€iEEE FaE eE gEEE EfitiiEEEFE$Fa$€iiBgEEigB:: ; E * F"HcEE g EI HEi$ffifl8*3gEgEg;g::E?:aHE :H.€.9
iE E€g giE€'a{. st$gf,i€te{EHEsErEf €€;Ens.E€ EEE E€eEEE B *€B:e!EiaHss-EEsEgEc€s E B
k0)ctclAt/,€(lta
\c|\otn
S,*'E€gtsa l Al ) Er oi i i leeo r td q )) H.E c)q g
sg' E ' o
5E56x E lF8r i 9sEa U to oR€
C) F:.EgEE66(! g.
€.H9gE8.gE€EEH
rt)-oL.c.)
GI3
.octt r {F{
o(l)NU
<|.aokosO(,)E(l)
cr.out()(t)o(t)c)Eou,
o\@t.)
€3lt
trlCIt(D()l-.(DA()EctFtro(tkc)
F'S g ,.e HS tr Es $gE H-8fi.EHd b O d @ s t ' E | - rs s8r*FE;egT H P€{AT g:3 Hi g: t E E e E f,e €F E E 8.5 F.T FgE EJ l o o o . c 6 ' o E S c or \ r O O o O o O O O o o
g6*8 ' *'RPE. '
SsE g-€ *tE{ f€[- gt € s c" BE Et e I Hx s€€; s€;E€?s3F$535FFF5
kc)€Fa
V'€alA
@\ota,
€al
EIt)Ohq)
prQ)
€'ogaI
ctkg
-6--tEiEg=igi$g$EF;EFgqigEeEgigS,*$ o )
t $i-, Ffi$g $$fg*ga6r r. EggBFii{FEg $$g3 F$FgFfg$$ gs gFEEiEgFg$ $FgFfg gggg agggegg;ggggg$ ig ggggggiilg g$ggin : eE H f js vHHo -{EEEu.H€E
LQ)
€gAa.c,
6tA
ol*-rn
$$iiiggggggiggggg
IT
cflF\
-oc\t
Hc)okE0)
E!,Htractl-E
E* Fsg ;gEgFi;gggE g$$i$$gaigg$Fgggggcg iI;€
F F "E * lEg
igl€gFBigFigg{hll)€alt
EAu,'c'
cto
C\a-rr!
i$ggg$gggg€ggggggggg;gggggEi'gEgs.E€cttEHQ)c)kc)
AQ)'s€Fao(tkg
ggBggEg-'-geaEggrggHagBEEagiEF
gigggig, ffisgggg giggggiggggggggg sggko?Fo
(t,'c'
GIa
r*c-in
t-.r-tn
-oGI
alq)(JkIt)
A(D€.oFoatk{)
U * E ; H c o fB F a * 9 a E '
Eg riE€€g; i E $i aes s F*gE* E i s€ s #B g € * HE tiBeEEE€,ts 8 b i > € Ri?:tEeaiiE 9 P X ' t ' 8 f l ; !Bg.grsiFiga a € ' - 6 E i
L.a)€FaqgGIo
\or\lr)
$l$afEe;s*se;sr{gg$ggggggggggg$ggFgggerEgg$sF$F$;F €:i eE
gg g$igffFg gF I Ff;g$$$s$ggfFfFfH$g$$i
o\t--ial
ts
q)c)Frq)
Ac)
1J
octLao
EHE.E.qg.F2 - g q 5 O . > . =O H A - . 4 - g
€ $ E -F$8,
arEtEfi$ikc)€Hov,gC'a
oor
,oct
alq)ok(uo.c)tlgFo(tLc)
:S:E$--EggigEiEgaBgggF EglggiEggg *sse :a* f,;aFFiu*-€ HEii €fiE $FE€saEEaEEs stgag;tgglgi giigg gggrg;*gggggHggiEr aiereE*iFE €a$Ea u*iEEigiEE€gugF1tgs ggE€ggg*€g BflEBg, EigFE FF$€iEE€g{FgBg SfiEgfl$g$g$* slrf Ea $$g$agig5$gig$g3;E
kc)oHou,'('GIA
o@r/)
€Fgflg E$ $p €;ggagg ?6q $;E EsT€*g$fgEEEEfgEEEEEgEF$fEF€F$FEt:niEESE:E EF* Eb Fq€;E€igggeg Ega gg ggi;gFg. ggg ggs gggfg
cr)@i
Iqt
F()C)lict
A{c)€'oEEio(\tktD
gg€iggggEgiggggg+sg;giggggggggs
Fgga'agg;$igI$FE fl s-E€s€E'EE
HIt)
€Ea
qE
GIA
a.l@|rl
r
$$f$,f$fg$F;$i$€ggg$€̂ ggf$ gH E g g ; $i EEB $-ggagggggggggggg€$$gs
lr|@\n
o(l
Fq)okc)Aq)
€EFtrto3\tLc)
E EFE{ $AF€ R E E f,FEE€Ef;EEEgAEraggggt€gFiEEgg€g€ggggg$E,a"' F tig---ea€ag,gg*g$g$gg$$$gg$ggEfi HAggEI FIEE €EeEFggiFFgEa$*EgFiggEE€igiFgEigFeg gEs* aeBs Et F= g* auBEE'--H*=eE;E E S'i d.d rs# ,;e $E =EnE s: iB ig ;i$g3fig$F$gg$$
1-c)6
aa(t>€ato
v@tr|
$ a b. r .s 3R F €}g $T # EHE SF * gFg $,s f'+:Ee€e f ;$*sEs s *ug$ gE$ s c5*u E$; s Fg;; ts; E ne#e :
e$Ef;gffi*g* F= E'* F
doq)
q)
la
\)OO\lOO\J
riIsssso
h , Bd 9F AE.F$ s ?
t t 6n >( a AOO FJo\ jg
. El€II
s g b4 'g s do-a € eE € I .ss s E4 ; s 5S * EEr"d 8.5; g F s'd -Er €e' .s B fi,fr g5 E-5 5 3 lg i;s$ F $ $: p$sS i e vE ?S sb' e { :s 3'$E$eS .1 $e g$$$E€ $*$,E ESFSAT SqRrE $sF.;SE Si€xE J^. ...8: SE S-g';' :.d*.8€R qsl.$r iH E$' i' gF i€s; dH q$: e€ ;f $€:T:! *HT }E.RE 5'EE s H€ EES €E ?.e gEE H P F"d g
-o
(l)c)kQ)
Aq)
T'ct
oqlkq)
f Fg ;€ if 1*F $,H 5 $E rE*$$$ag;glg'gggiggssgggg$sg*$g ;s $F Fi s€ ; $E $I $ $[ sg$ $3ge;E* €F gr sEE s:fg$ 5E i€iSfgecEE Ff $; ;is€F.gg€S,FH €F€E€gjg gg, i ;* {g* gs i j i$ F$ ig iI f i€ $fFfg fru i $e f$s ?s g i gs ?s gs €s, g is F;s
ka)€Ha
(t,I
o
\oooto