42
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 31 OF 2017 FROM : 14-11-2017 To 16-11-2017 COURT NO. : 8 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 Crl.A. No.-1507/2009 II DHARAMVEER P. D. SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1][Gr], RISHI MALHOTRA[R-3][Pr], [R-4][Pr], [R-5][Pr], [R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], [R-8][Pr], [R-9][Pr], [R-10][Pr] FOR ON IA 8446/2015 Connected Crl.A. No.-1508/2009 II THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR Versus RAJ KUMAR . AND ORS. RISHI MALHOTRA[R-1][Pr], [R-2][Pr], [R-3][Pr], [R-4][Pr], [R-5][Pr], [R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], [R-8][Pr] READY FOR ON IA 8443/2015 2 C.A. No.-1747/2008 XI -A M/S STANDARD ESSENTIAL OIL INDUSTRIES AND ANR. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2] Versus THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER KASARGOD AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3] 3 C.A. No.-2169/2007 IV-A MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ANR. AND ANR. NANDA KISHORE, RAJESH MAHALE Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF I.T. . AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR Connected C.A. No.-2168/2007 IV-A EXCISE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY Versus MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD.& ORS. AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE, ANIL KATIYAR, NANDA KISHORE 4 C.A. No.-1491/2007 IX PLACIDO FRANCISCO PINTO(D) BY LRS AND ANR. BINU TAMTA Versus JOSE FRANCICO PINTO AND ANR. MITTER & MITTER CO. and IA No.112122/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 5 C.A. No.-4584/2008 IV-A SHYAMSUNDAR AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE Versus B.S. BRAMARAMBA AND ORS. NANDA KISHORE 6 C.A. No.-3585/2008 IV KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY SURYA KANT Versus PRITHVI SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA 7 Crl.A. No.-1261/2008 II-C MAHADEVAPPA E. R. SUMATHY Versus

IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

  • Upload
    hathu

  • View
    224

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 31 OF 2017 FROM : 14-11-2017 To 16-11-2017

COURT NO. : 8HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 Crl.A. No.-1507/2009

IIDHARAMVEER P. D. SHARMAVersus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.MILIND KUMAR[R-1][Gr], RISHIMALHOTRA[R-3][Pr], [R-4][Pr], [R-5][Pr],[R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], [R-8][Pr], [R-9][Pr],[R-10][Pr]

FOR ON IA 8446/2015ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1508/2009II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

Versus

RAJ KUMAR . AND ORS. RISHI MALHOTRA[R-1][Pr], [R-2][Pr], [R-3][Pr],[R-4][Pr], [R-5][Pr], [R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], [R-8][Pr]

READY FOR ON IA 8443/2015

2 C.A. No.-1747/2008XI -A

M/S STANDARD ESSENTIAL OILINDUSTRIES AND ANR. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE FOREST RANGE OFFICERKASARGOD AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

3 C.A. No.-2169/2007IV-A

MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD.& ANR. AND ANR. NANDA KISHORE, RAJESH MAHALE

VersusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF I.T. .AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2168/2007IV-A

EXCISE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKAAND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusMYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD.&ORS. AND ORS.

RAJESH MAHALE, ANIL KATIYAR, NANDAKISHORE

4 C.A. No.-1491/2007IX

PLACIDO FRANCISCO PINTO(D) BY LRSAND ANR. BINU TAMTA

VersusJOSE FRANCICO PINTO AND ANR. MITTER & MITTER CO.and IA No.112122/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

5 C.A. No.-4584/2008IV-A

SHYAMSUNDAR AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALEVersusB.S. BRAMARAMBA AND ORS. NANDA KISHORE

6 C.A. No.-3585/2008IV

KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY SURYA KANTVersusPRITHVI SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

7 Crl.A. No.-1261/2008II-C

MAHADEVAPPA E. R. SUMATHYVersus

Page 2: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8STATE OF KARNATAKATR.PUB.PROSECUTOR. ANITHA SHENOY

8 Crl.A. No.-417/2010II-C

BASHEERA BEGAM VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]Versus

MOHAMMED IBRAHIM AND ORS.S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1], [R-3], [R-5], [R-6], K. K.MANI[R-4], DHARMENDRA KUMARSINHA[R-7], YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-8]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-416/2010II-C

SHAHUL HAMEED GEETHA KOVILAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE REPRESENTED BY THEINSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.

M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-1], [R-5], [R-8], S. RAVISHANKAR[R-2], [R-3], [R-6], [R-7], K. K.MANI[R-4], DHARMENDRA KUMARSINHA[R-9], YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-11]

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-408-414/2010II-C

STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE,C.B.C.I.D. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1]

Versus

MOHAMMED IBRAHIM 63/91 AND ORS. K. K. MANI[R-3], YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1],[R-7]

9 C.A.No.-9118-9119/2010IV

SURAT SINGH (DEAD) KAILASH CHAND[P-1]

VersusSIRI BHAGWAN AND ORS. O. P. BHADANI[R-1]and IA No.101391/2017-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IANo.101394/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

10 C.A. No.-196/2010IV-A

JOINT DIRECTOR,SERICULTUR DEPT.AND ORS.VersusAPPAYYA ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA

11 Crl.A. No.-2155/2009II

SMT RAMA RANI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]Versus

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR. RAVINDER KUMAR YADAV[R-1], JATINDERKUMAR BHATIA[R-2]

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 16247/2016 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 16248/2016

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-2156/2009II

SMT RAMA RANI RAJESH[P-1]

Versus

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR. RAVINDER KUMAR YADAV, [R-1], JATINDERKUMAR BHATIA[R-2]

12 Crl.A. No.-1224/2008II-A

MST. ANUSUYA @ SARASWATIBAI PRADEEP MISRA, [P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABH

13 Crl.A. No.-1703/2008II-C

BALKRISHAN MALIK PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1][Gr]

14 C.A. No.-242/2010XII

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,SALEM ANIL KATIYARVersusSALEM DIST.PRINTERS SER.IND.CO-OP.STY.LT KRISHNA KUMAR

AT TOPConnectedC.A. No.-7094/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL COOPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

Page 3: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-7093/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL COOPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7096/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7095/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7098/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVESOCIETY LTD

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-12840/2007XII

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,SALEM ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.SALEM DIST.PRINTERSSER.IND.CO-OP.LTD. THR. SECRETARY KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7099/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICES INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7097/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT SERVICEINDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVE SOCIETYLTD.

15 C.A. No.-4639/2009XVI

CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONAND ORS. AND ORS. L. C. AGRAWALA

VersusCALCUTTA SOFT DRINKS PVT. LTD. DIPAK KUMAR JENA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4640/2009XVI

CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORP. L. C. AGRAWALA

VersusPEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.AND ANR. S. NARAIN & CO.

16 Crl.A. No.-1032/2007II

GORUSU NAGARAJU VIJAY KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

17 C.A. No.-4783/2009IV

HARYANA STATE COOP.SUPPLY MONIKA GUSAIN[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

18 Crl.A. No.-1676/2009II-B

SUBHASH CHANDER BANSAL SHALU SHARMA[P-1]Versus

Page 4: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

GIAN CHAND ANDMUSHTAQ AHMAD, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3], KULDIPSINGH[R-1], KAILASH CHAND[R-4], JASPREETGOGIA[R-6]

19 C.A. No.-10164/2010XII

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI B. V. BALARAM DASVersusM/S. S. AJIT KUMAR THR. ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR

ConnectedC.A. No.-10165/2010XII

C.I.T, COIMBATORE B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusP.K.GANESHWAR BINA GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No.-10917/2013XVI

C.I.T-I KOLKATA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBRAJ BINANI KUNAL CHEEMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-4449/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusYASHODA SHETTY K. V. MOHAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-5255/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXMANGALORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusYASHODA SHETTY K. V. MOHAN[R-1]

20 C.A. No.-5932/2010XIV

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX-XVII,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S DOORDARSHAN COMMERCIALSERVICES RAJEEV SHARMA

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-3320-3321/2011XI -A

THE DIR. PRASAR BHARATI RAJEEV SHARMA

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,THIRUVANANTH ANIL KATIYAR

21 C.A. No.-3370/2007IX

MAHARASHTRA STATEELECT.DISTRN.CO.LTD. A. S. BHASME

VersusAPPELLATE AUTHORITY . AND ANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI

ConnectedC.A.No.-3377-3381/2007IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECT.BD. A. S. BHASME

Versus

CHIEF ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) ANDANR. ARUN KUMAR BERIWAL, S. RAMAMANI

ConnectedC.A. No.-3376/2007IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITYBD. AND ORS. A. S. BHASME

VersusM/S SHEEL ENTERPRISES AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A.No.-3371-3375/2007IX

MAHARASHTRA ST.ELEC.BD.DIST.CO.LTD. A. S. BHASME

Versus

M/S. NARMADA PLASTICS AND ANR. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI, ANAGHA S.DESAI

Page 5: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

22 C.A. No.-6262/2010IV-A

INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(GWALIOR) M.P. LTD.(FORMERLYKNOWN AS MADHYA PRADE

RANI CHHABRA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

23 C.A.No.-5256-5257/2007III-A

KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITISAHARANPUR THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ANR.

E. C. AGRAWALA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusITC LTD. THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTEDATTORNEY RAJAN NARAIN

ConnectedC.A. No.-5255/2007III-A

ITC LTD. RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

Versus

MARKET PARISHAD, U.P. . AND ANR. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD, PRADEEPMISRA[R-2]

24 Crl.A. No.-2161/2009II-A

KHALIL PASHA . AND ORS. AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHIVersus

ABDUL GANI AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-2]

25 C.A. No.-7004/2009XV

BASHIRU @ BASHIRAM AND ORS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]VersusMADAN NEELGAR . AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

26 C.A.No.-8649-8650/2011XIV

ASST DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES ANDANR. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

27 Crl.A.No.-1359-1361/2007II-B

THE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI[P-1]

VersusANWAR OSMAN SUMBHANIYA ANDORS. NIDHI, [R-1], [R-2]

28 C.A.No.-3964-3971/2007IV-A

M/S. BANGALORE CLUB GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAXAND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

29 Crl.A. No.-2393/2009II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHVersusGANGABISHAN @ VISHNU NIRAJ SHARMAFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 12915/2007 FOR ON IA 19229/2009FOR ON IA 28753/2009

30 Crl.A. No.-1309/2010II-B

UNITED BREWERIES LTD. KHAITAN & CO.VersusBANGUR FINANCE LTD. AND ORS. NARESH BAKSHI

31 C.A.No.-6088-6089/2009IV-A

NORTH WEST KARNATAKARD.TRANSPORT CORP. RAJEEV SINGH

VersusH.G.CHAKKALER AND ANR. K. K. MANI, NAVEEN R. NATH

32 C.A. No.-976/2010XIV

M/S VANGUARD SERVICES PVT.LTD.AND ORS. ARUN K. SINHA[P-1]

Versus

DELHI DEVT.AUTHORITY . AND ORS.SUDHIR NAAGAR[R-1][INT], SAHARYA &CO.[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], RAKESHKUMAR-I[R-3]

Page 6: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-977/2010XIV

SUNNY UPPAL AND ORS. RUBY SINGH AHUJA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[R-2], RAKESH KUMAR-I[R-3],ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[R-4], R. P. SHARMA[R-6]

and IA No.88700/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSConnectedC.A. No.-979/2010XIV

VIJAY UPPAL RUBY SINGH AHUJA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAKESH KUMAR-I, R. P. SHARMA, ASHAGOPALAN NAIR, SAHARYA & CO.

and IA No./- and IA No./- and IA No.88688/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.88691/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-978/2010XIV

VINEY UPPAL RUBY SINGH AHUJA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[R-2], RAKESH KUMAR-I[R-3],ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[R-4], R. P. SHARMA[R-6]

and IA No.91237/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

33 C.A. No.-3880/2009XII

VENKATARAMAYYA AND ANR. ANDANR. JOHN MATHEW

VersusSUNGAPPA AND ORS. AND ORS. K. K. MANI

34 C.A. No.-7684/2011XI -A

BHAGAVATHY MADOM TRUST . ANDANR. JOHN MATHEW

VersusHARIHAR IYER . AND ORS. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN[R-5]FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 11/2015 MAY BE READ ASAPPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION AND IMPLEADMENT AS ADDITIONALAPPELLANTS IN THE CIVIL APPEAL FOR INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION ON IA12/2015 : APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO PROSECUTE THE CIVIL APPEAL.FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 9/2015 MAY BE READ ASAPPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION AND IMPLEADMENT AS ADDITIONALPETITIONERS IN SLP.FOR INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION ON IA 10/2015 :APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO PROSECUTE THE SLP.

ConnectedC.A. No.-7686/2011XI -A

K.P.KARUNAKARAN (D) BY LRS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusBRAHMANA SAMOOHAM R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-7685/2011XI -A

M.VIJAYAN NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusBRAHMANA SAMOOHAM R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

35 C.A. No.-3195/2008XII

THE UNION TERRITORY OFPUDUCHERRY AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusM. LATUCHUMANAN RAKESH K. SHARMA

36 Crl.A. No.-899/2010II-B

PARGAT SINGH KAILASH CHAND[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

37 C.A. No.-5057/2009XII

NARAYANA GRAMANI AND ORS. ANDORS. A. T. M. SAMPATH

VersusMARIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS.and IA No.66440/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

38 C.A. No.-2799/2011III-A

ASHOK SINGH . AND ORS. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[P-1]Versus

Page 7: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

STATE OF U.P . AND ORS.ASHOK K. SRIVASTAVA[R-1], RAVI PRAKASHMEHROTRA[R-1], PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], (MRS.) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1]

39 Crl.A. No.-601/2009II-C

C.B.I. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusPRATAP CHANDRA REDDY BINA GUPTA, P. N. PURI[R-2][Pr]and IA No.112852/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IANo.112854/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

40 C.A. No.-3031/2009XV

UMRAO SINGH MEHTA PRATIBHA JAINVersusRAM SWAROOP AND ANR. SANJEEV MALHOTRA

41 Crl.A. No.-1243/2011II-C

SAMPATLAL BALRAJ DEWANVersusSTATE OF M.P.(NOW CHHATTISGARH)

42 C.A. No.-5782/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEYVersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYARand IA No.96571/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-7688/2009IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LIMITED MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYARand FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96574/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-5784/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA(PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96568/2017ConnectedC.A. No.-5785/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA(PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96579/201743 C.A. No.-2095/2007

IXVILAS DINKAR BHAT NARESH KUMARVersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

44 Crl.A. No.-1305/2008II-C

BILAL HAJAR @ ABDUL HAMEED K. K. MANIVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

45 Crl.A. No.-2493/2009II-B

DILRAJ SINGH SHIVAJI M. JADHAVVersus

STATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD, KAMAL MOHANGUPTA

46 C.A. No.-5870/2015XV

GHEWARCHAND AND ORS. AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAINVersusM/S. MAHENDRA SINGH AND ORS. ANDORS.and IA No.94110/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.94111/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.97674/2017-I/A UNDERORDER 6 RULE 17 CPC R/W SECTION 151 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE FORAMENDMENT OF PLAINT IN

47 C.A. No.-5105/2009XIV

NATIONAL CO-OP.DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR

PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

Versus

Page 8: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5106/2009XIV

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEV. CORPN.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5107/2009XIV

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEV. CORPN.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

48 Crl.A. No.-2218/2011II-B

THE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAINVersusRAJESH AGGARWAL AND ANR. SANJAY JAIN

49 C.A. No.-1756/2010XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION JAIPUR S. K. BHATTACHARYA[P-1]

VersusPHOOL CHAND (D) THROUGH LRS. ANOOP KR. SRIVASTAV[R-1]FOR ON IA 2/2010 FOR ON IA 65460/2010

50 C.A. No.-2342/2008IV-A

MUNI REDDY AND ANR. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusC.NAGARAJU AND ORS. PROMILA, S. THANANJAYAN

51 C.A. No.-10303/2010XII

THE CHIEFENGINEER(GENERAL),PUBLIC WORKSDEPTT. AND ORS.

B. BALAJI

VersusS.PATRAJAN G. INDIRA

52 Crl.A. No.-5/2010II

N.RAGHAVENDER VIKRAM SINGHVersusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BYCBI MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

FOR ON IA 18929/2009

53 Crl.A. No.-1550/2010II-A

DAHISAR SARASWATI COOP. HSG. SCY.LTD NITIN BHARDWAJ

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

SHEKHAR KUMAR, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

54 Crl.A. No.-361/2010II-A

ARIFVALI MUHAMMED SHAIKH HIMANSHU MUNSHIVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

55 C.A.No.-6511-6518/2010XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, N.DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALAAT THE TOP

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21850/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT-11) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBBC WORLDWIDE PVT. LTD. YOGINDER HANDOO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21849/2012XIV

DIR. OF I.T.(INTER. TAX.-1) DELHI, N.D. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBBC WORLDWIDE LTD. YOGINDER HANDOO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-24324/2012XIV

DIR.OF I.T(INTERNATIONAL) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusB.B.C WORLDWIDE LTD. YOGINDER HANDOO

Page 9: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34800/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LIT (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-7520/2011XIV

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34801/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE ( INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4872/2014XIV

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34811/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34812/2010XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL I) COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34816/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) INCOME TAXDEPARTMENT COMMISSIONER

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34802/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34815/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusJET LITE (INDIA ) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-2606/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-58/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-533/2011XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-379/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

Page 10: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No.-534/2011XIV

C.I.T, CENTRAL-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3084/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3088/2011XIV

C.I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3807/2011XIV

C.I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE(INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3087/2011XIV

C.I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-5376/2011XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL I) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SAHARA AIRLINES LTD. THR.DIRECTOR GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3086/2011XIV

THE COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA)LTD. THROUGH ITSMANAGER GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-12614/2011XIV

C.I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-9528/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No.-3221/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T(INTERNATIONALTAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-10931/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-12613/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4219/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Page 11: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No.-13938/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE GLBL INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4319/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-16971/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. THROUGH DIRECTOR RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17134/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T(INTERNAL.TAXN) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17419/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17353/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMERICAN AIRLINES INC. THROUGHM.D. KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17355/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17422/2011XIV

DIRERCTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-18692/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T(IT) DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-19698/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17354/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17425/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17423/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLIQUIDATOR M/S ABACUS DIS.SYSTEMP.LTD. KHAITAN & CO.

Page 12: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17421/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLIQUIDATOR OF M/S ABACUSDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-22279/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T(INTERNATIONALTAXN.) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLIQUIDATOR M/S ABACUSDISTRN.SYSTEM P.LT KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-16972/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-10494/2013XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABER INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8059/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA KAVITA JHA

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF I.T.-I INTER. TAX.,N.D.

ConnectedC.A. No.-8055/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA KAVITA JHA

VersusDIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-I INTR. TAX.N.D.

ConnectedC.A. No.-8056/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ENTITY INWHICH AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA HAS MERGED)

KAVITA JHA

VersusDIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-IINTERNATIONAL TAXATION

ConnectedC.A. No.-8058/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ENTITY INWHICH AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA HAS MERGED)

KAVITA JHA

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-I

ConnectedC.A. No.-8057/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ENTITY INWHICH AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA HAS MERGED)

KAVITA JHA

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX 1for pre final hearing

ConnectedC.A. No.-8060/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION S.A. (ENTITY IN WHICHAMADEUS MARKETING S.A. HASMERGED)

KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-7779/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION KAVITA JHA

Page 13: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-8061/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVEL DISTRN.S.A KAVITA JHAfor pre final hearing

ConnectedC.A. No.-526/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) . ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION S.A. (ENTITY IN WHICHAMADEUS MARKETING S.A. HASMERGED)

KAVITA JHA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-32062/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRICUTION KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4571/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRN.SA KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2227/2012XIV

DIR.OF I.T.INTERNL.TAXN.NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA C/O VAISHASSOCIATES

KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-783/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8963/2012XIV

ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusROLLS ROYCE SINGAPORE PVT. LTD.C/O LUTHRA AND LUTHRA CAS

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-8961/2012XIV

ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusROLLS ROYCE SINGAPORE PVT. LTD.C/O LUTHRA AND LUTHRA CAS

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-8962/2012XIV

ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusROLLS ROYCE SINGAPORE PVT.LTD. C/OLUTHRA AND LUTHRA CAS

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-2241/2013XIV

DIRECTOR I.T.,INTERNATIONALTAXATION ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-7222/2013XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Page 14: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-2956/2014XIV

THE DIR. OF I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2242/2013XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX,INTL.TAXATION ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-1596-1598/2014XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA KAVITA JHA

Versus

DIT -1 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION NEWDELHI

ConnectedC.A. No.-391/2015XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GALILEO NEDERLAND BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-3779/2015XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GALILEO NEDERLAND BV (NOWTRAVELPORT GLOBAL DISTRIBUTIONSYSTEMS BV)

RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1297/2015XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GALILEO NADERLAND BV. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-3780/2015XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GALILEO NADERLAND BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-6079-6080/2016XIV

ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-1(2), NEW DELHI AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S TRAVELPORT GLOBALDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BV (EARLIER,GALILEO NEDERLAND BV)

RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-6077-6078/2016XIV

ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. TRAVELPORT GLOBALDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-6081-6082/2016XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. TRAVELPORT GLOBALDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-7373-7374/2016XIV

ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX,C-1(2) (IT) . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. TRAVELPORT GLOBALDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Page 15: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-4332/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P., USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX(INTERNATIONAL) TAXATION 3NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-4333/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P., USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3, NEWDELHI

ConnectedC.A. No.-4552/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P., USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3, NEWDELHI

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-16376-/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P. USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

FOR ADMISSIONConnectedSLP(C) No.-16416-/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P. USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

Diary No. 15633/2017 has been linked with Diary No. 15637/2017 as both arearising out of common order.

ConnectedC.A. No.-10023/2017XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ERSTWHILEAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION)

KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATIONFOR ADMISSION

ConnectedC.A. No.-10024/2017XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ERSTWHIELAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION)

KAVITA JHA

VersusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION NEWDELHIFOR ADMISSION

56 Crl.A. No.-38/2011II-B

ROHTAS AND ANR. RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, MONIKA GUSAIN

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-775/2011II-B

BIJENDER RISHI MALHOTRA

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

57 C.A. No.-7041/2011IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 11 ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S C.C.CHOKSHI AND CO. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Page 16: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

ConnectedC.A. No.-2916/2012IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX11 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. C.C. CHOKSHI AND CO. THROUGHITS DIRECTOR RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21852/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S C.C. CHOKSHI AND CO. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-6173/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MADRAS ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. KANGA AND CO. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-1764/2017IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S. RSM AND CO. AMBIT HOUSE RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

58 Crl.A. No.-1768/2010II

SURENDRA SINGH AND ANR. C. N. SREE KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

59 Crl.A. No.-720/2012II-C

JITENDER KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

60 Crl.A. No.-440/2013II-A

SANJAY SINGH T. N. SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHand IA No.83878/2017-XTRA

61 C.A. No.-2913/2013XI -A

BINDU PHILIPS REP. BY P.O.A. KAMINI JAISWALVersusSUNIL JACOB SANAND RAMAKRISHNANlist in the first week of november 2017 IA No.56523/2017-APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS FOR [Application for Direction] ON IA 8/2014 FOR [PER BYCM(IA FOR DIRECTIONS)] ON IA 33306/2017 FOR ON IA 11/2017

62 C.A.No.-10359-10361/2014XII

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUMCORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. SANJAY KAPUR

VersusV. SREEHARI AND ORS. AND ORS. MEENA C. R., SENTHIL JAGADEESANFOR [I/A FOR BRINGING ON RECORD THE LEGAL HEIRS] ON IA 45413/2017 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 45418/2017

63 Crl.A. No.-184/2013II-A

SANJAY TIWARI RUKHSANA CHOUDHURYVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABHApplication for Bail (IA No.75808/2017) and Application for exemption from filingofficial translation (IA No.75811/2017)

64 C.A. No.-149/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORP OF DELHI PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusSRI AUROBINDO EUDCATION SOCIETY .AND ANR.AT TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-697/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI(S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusGR GOENKA EDUCATION SOCIETY(REGD) RAKHI RAY

Page 17: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-704/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST AND ANR. RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-695/2013XIV

MCD PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusGR GOENKA EDUCATION SOCIETY(REGD) RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-152/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY (REGD.) ANDANR.

RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-698/2013XIV

M.C.D.(N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-1104/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusSRI AUROBINDO EDUCATION SOC(REGD) AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-699/2013XIV

M.C.D.(N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY (REGD.) ANDANR.

RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-701/2013XIV

M.C.D.(N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY (REGD.) ANDANR.

RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-702/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST AND ANR. RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-151/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusSRI AUROBINDO EDUCATION SOC(REGD) AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-150/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusGR GOENKA EDUCATIONSOCIETY(REGD) RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-707/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusVASUDEVA EDUCATIONALFOUNDATION SOCIETY (REGD) ANDANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-709/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORP OF DELHI(E) PRAVEEN SWARUP

Versus

Page 18: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8SANATAM DHARAM ADARSH SIKSHASANSTHAN (REGD)

ConnectedC.A. No.-706/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORP OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusGR GOENKA EDUCATION SOCIETYREGD . AND ANR. RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-696/2013XIV

MCD RAKESH KUMAR-I

VersusTAGORE EDUCATION SOCIETY LTD .AND ORS. N. ANNAPOORANI

ConnectedC.A. No.-1102/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI(S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusSUMERMAL JAIN EDUCATIONAL ANDWELFARE SOCIETY(REGD) RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-1103/2013XIV

M.C.D. PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusMOUNT CARMEL SCHOOL SOC. . ANDORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17978/2014XIV

M.C.D (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED (REGD.). AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-39787/2013XIV

M.C.D. PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

VersusMAHARAJA AGARSEN TECH. EDUC.SOC.(R. AND ANR.

VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-39786/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHITHROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST THROUGH ITSSECRETARY RAKHI RAY

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-24732/2015XIV

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHITHROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY THORUGH ITSSECRETARY

ConnectedC.A. No.-5935/2014XIV

M.C.D. PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY SHUBHANGI TULI

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4926/2014XIV

M.C.D. (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusMAHAVIRA FOUNDATION (REGD)

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-5344/2014XIV

M.C.D. (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST RAKHI RAY

Page 19: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17980/2014XIV

M.C.D. (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-24351-24359/2013XIV

PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN ETC. ETC. ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-10728/2013XIV

MOUNT CARMEL SCHOOL SOCIETY .AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA A. N. ARORA, PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2]

65 C.A. No.-11128/2016XIV

C.I.T.,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHAAT THE TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-11129/2016XIV

CIT ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11131/2016XIV

CIT, DELHI-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI HEXACOM LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11148/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI TELENET LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11134/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11130/2016XIV

C.I.T.,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11132/2016XIV

C.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11136/2016XIV

COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11133/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11135/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI CELLULAR LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11137/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 20: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11146/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI TELENET LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11138/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATION LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11140/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTIINFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11141/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11139/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11142/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11143/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11144/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL - III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONSLTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11145/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(CENTRAL) - III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONSLTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11147/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11149/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. THROUG ITSDIRECTOR E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1564/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-10524/2017IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD THROUGH ITSM.D. E. C. AGRAWALA

Page 21: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-4839/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3/2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-7164-/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLEMON TREE HOTELS LTD. SUBODH S. PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17501-/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[caveat]FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.

ConnectedC.A. No.-9488/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLEMON TREE HOTELS PVT LTD SUBODH S. PATIL[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.53069/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-10529/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW DELHI TELEVISION LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

66 C.A. No.-4443/2017III-A

RADHEY SHYAM MISHRA PETITIONER-IN-PERSONVersusTHE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OFINDIA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ELECTIONCOMMISSIONER AND ORS.

MOHIT D. RAM, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-3]

As per Court's order dated 13.09.2017, let this matter be listed on 31.10.2017before some other Bench.

67 C.A. No.-1364/2017III

BOMBAY GOODS TRANSPORTASSOCIATION AND ORS AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW

VersusMUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. SRI KRISHNA PD. LATH, ABHIJAT P. MEDH

68 C.A. No.-132/2016XIV

CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAOVersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

AT THE TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-134/2016XIV

DAIKIN AIRCONDITIONING INDIAPRIVATE LIMITED ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-133/2016XIV

DAIKIN AIRCONDITIONING INDIAPRIVATE LIMITED ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-135/2016XIV

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT.LTD.(NOW) MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD) NEW DELHI

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Page 22: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

ConnectedC.A. No.-138/2016XIV

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD.(NOW MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD)

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-137/2016XIV

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-136/2016XIV

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-139/2016XIV

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-141/2016XIV

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. THR. MASAONAKA, MD KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-140/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S. CANNON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-2669/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-143/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DAIKIN AIR-CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-2668/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. HAIER APPLICANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-142/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-144/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS INDIALTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-151/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 23: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8M/S. DAIKIN AIR - CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-145/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No.-147/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. (P) LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No.-146/2016XIV

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-148/2016XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3 (1) NEW DEHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-3937/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-150/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTRYKER INDIA PVT. LTD. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No.-149/2016XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

M/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-521/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-527/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-526/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARPA BUSINESS SYSTEM(INDIA) PVT. LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-152/2016XIV

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-1219/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-2703/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 24: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

M/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-4808/2016XIV

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA ) P. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-5024/2016XIV

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-4809/2016XIV

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-4412/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IVNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A.No.-5905-5906/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-5903/2016XIV

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-5904/2016XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-6485/2016XIV

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX RANGE 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA )PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A.No.-11110-11111/2016XIV

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2572/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AVERY DENNISION (INDIA) PVTLTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

and IA No.109421/2017-I/A FOR DE-TAGGING SLP BEING CA NO. 2572 OF 2017FROM CA NO. 132 OF 2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-2430/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BAUSCH AND LOMB EYE CAREINDIA PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

Page 25: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-3070/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]and IA No.109423/2017-I/A FOR DE-TAGGING SLP BEING CA NO. 3070 OF 2017FROM CA NO. 132 OF 2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5514/2017XIV

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-09 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-11201/2017XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.80934/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.80937/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-15498/2017XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.90874/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.90879/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-17811/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE INDIAPVT LTDIA No.103152/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.103155/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

69 C.A.No.-8595-8596/2016XII

VENUGOPALASWAMY TEMPLE REP. BYEXECUTIVE OFFICER, ETC. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

VersusK.T. VENUGOPALAN AND ORS. ETC.AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY, K. KRISHNA KUMAR

ONLY IA 8-9/2016 and IA No.54675/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.54677/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. FOR[DIRECTIONS] ON IA 8/2016

70 C.A. No.-5265/2012IX

JANARDHAN WAMAN SARODE ANAGHA S. DESAIVersusARUN RAU PAWAR ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

71 C.A. No.-1381/2010XII

CHENNAI PORT TRUST SUSMITA LALVersusTHE CHENNAI PORT TRUSTINDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES CANTEENWORKERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION ANDORS.

SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY, T. HARISH KUMAR,P. V. DINESH

and IA No.100753/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION72 C.A. No.-3018/2008

XVIKANAKLATA DAS RANJAN MUKHERJEEVersusNABA KUMAR DAS RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } As per Court's Order dated 10.10.2017 listed thematter on 14.11.2017.

73 C.A. No.-5397/2010XII

M/S NATESAN AGENCIES(PLANTATIONS) V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[P-1]

Versus

Page 26: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8STATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT ANDFORESTS DEPARTMENT

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

74 C.A.No.-6015-6018/2010XII

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. A. V. RANGAM

VersusV. ELAYAPERUMAL AND ANR. S. R. SETIA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

75 C.A. No.-5360/2010III

CEMENT WORKERS MANDAL ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIAVersusGLOBAL CEMENTS LTD(HMP CEMENTSLTD.) AND ORS. SAURABH TRIVEDI, GAUTAM AWASTHI

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

76 C.A. No.-8113/2009XVII

THE VICE CHANCELLOR RANCHIUNIVERSITY GOPAL PRASAD

VersusJHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARDTH CHAIRMAN

MANOJ SWARUP AND CO., [R-5][LR/S], PAVANKUMAR, HIMANSHU SHEKHAR

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }77 Crl.A. No.-1955/2009

II-ANAYAN PRASAD AND ORS. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIRVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH, SHEKHAR KUMAR{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

78 Crl.A. No.-1122/2011II-C

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAM[P-1]VersusSURAIN SINGH LANGEH UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 5826/2007

79 C.A. No.-1933/2009XII

MANGAMAL @ THULASI AND ANR. ANDANR. REVATHY RAGHAVAN[P-1]

VersusT.B.RAJU AND ORS. AND ORS. MOHIT PAUL[R-1], [R-2][Pr]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } PART HEARD

80 C.A. No.-3548/2007XVI

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,WESTBENGAL ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSBI HOME FINANCER LIMITED{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } As directed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated05.10.2017 list the matter on 2.11.2017. And also please show the name of Mr. S.K.Bagaria, Senior Advocate in the cause list on the next date of hearing.

81 C.A. No.-2404/2016XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOEME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusM/S BAJRANG TEXTILES P. V. YOGESWARAN{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

82 C.A. No.-3529/2008IX

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S PREMIER LIMITED (FORMERLYPREMIER AUTOMOBILES LTD.) ANDORS.

RAJAN NARAIN[R-1], MANISH K. BISHNOI[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }83 C.A. No.-5199/2007

XII-AADAPA KRISHNA KUMARI SUDHA GUPTAVersusMEESALA SRINIVASARAO D. MAHESH BABU{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

84 C.A. No.-4247/2009XII-A

N.RAVINDRA MURTHY ANJANI AIYAGARIVersus

Page 27: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

VEERBHADRA SWAMY TEMPLEV. N. RAGHUPATHY, [R-4][Pr], GUNTURPRABHAKAR, C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2][Pr],[R-3][Pr]

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } and IA No.89629/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

85 C.A. No.-2145/2010IX

C.I.T.,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYARVersusVARUN SHIPPING CO.LTD. BINA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2146/2010IX

C.I.T 5 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVARUN SHIPPING CO.LTD. BINA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5350/2010IX

C.I.T-5 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVARUN SHIPPING CO.LTD. THR. ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR BINA GUPTA

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5576/2010IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IILUDHIANA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HERO CYCLES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-4318/2011IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HERO CYCLES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-16126-16127/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX5 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

VARUN SHIPPING CO.LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER BINA GUPTA

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9102/2012XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEWDELHI INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8055/2015IV

COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRIDENT LIMITED SIDDHARTH MITTAL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5170/2016IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MAX INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1][Pr]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2444/2017IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR-I, JALANDHAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MAX INDIA LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1][Pr]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

Page 28: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

ConnectedC.A. No.-3662/2017IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJALANDHAR-I, JALANDHARCOMMISSIONER

ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. MAX INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1][Pr]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3063/2017IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. MAX INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1][Pr]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3661/2017IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR I, JALANDHAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MAX INDIA LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1][Pr]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5330/2017XIV

INDIABULLS FINANCIAL SERVICESLIMITED (SINCE MERGED WITHINDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD.)

KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-4934/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusADANI ENTERPRISES LTD Taruna Singh Gohil[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-12446/2017IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJALANDHAR I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MAX INDIA LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.79148/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.79149/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedDiary No. 25400-2017IV-B

PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MAX INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1][Pr]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.81289/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

86 C.A. No.-8900/2012XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CONTAINER CORPORATION OFINDIA LTD. RANI CHHABRA

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } AT THE TOPConnectedC.A. No.-8901/2012XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIALTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-4409/2014XIV

ASSTT. C.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CONTAINER CORPN. I LTD. THR.ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

Page 29: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-4983/2015XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. A.L. LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8546/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCONTINENTAL WAREHOUSINGCORPORATION (NHAVA SHEVA) LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-14702/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. APAR INDUSTRIES LTD. BINA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-14250/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III-MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S APAR INDUSTRIES LTD. BINA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-66/2016XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. KAILASH SHIPPING SERVICES PVTLTD JAYANT MOHAN

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-14251/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAPAR INDUSTRIES LTD BINA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4069/2016IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusASHISH BAJAJ PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-652/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6407/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (C) - I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMGF AUTOMOBILES LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6412/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(CENTRAL) - III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKABUL CHAWLA KAUSHIK PODDAR{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6408/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL ) -III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKABUL CHAWLA KAUSHIK PODDAR{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

Page 30: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-6411/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(C)-1,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMGF AUTOMOBILES LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6415/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKABUL CHAWLA KAUSHIK PODDAR{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6413/2016XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL- II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-4090/2016III

INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTCOMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGURINDER SINGH BAWA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6416/2016XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL -II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6414/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6418/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL - II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6417/2016XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL - II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6419/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5472/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8034/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. J.H. FINVEST PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

Page 31: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-6982/2016XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -07, NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. RRJ SECURITIES LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6635/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. TEXEFX MARBLE INDUSTRIES{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9651/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-07 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. RRJ SECURITIES LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7211/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 7 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRRJ SECURITIES LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7210/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S J H FINVEST PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7209/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SVIL MINES LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8033/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S J. H. FINVEST PVT LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8032/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. J.H. FINVEST PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10336/2016XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSANTOSH KUMAR GARG SUNNY CHOUDHARY{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-24512/2016XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIALTD. RANI CHHABRA

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-8755/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S J.H. FINVEST PVT LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9158/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 32: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8TEXEFX MARBLES INDUSTRIES{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9157/2016XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, DELHI 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSANTOSH KUMAR GARG SUNNY CHOUDHARY{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8352/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(CENTRAL- III) RAIPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SVIL MINES LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9159/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. TEXEFX MARBLE INDUSTRIES{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10307/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. J.H. FINVEST PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9744/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. J.H. FINVEST PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9743/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) - III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SVIL MINES LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10308/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE -III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SVIL MINES LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2994/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJIV GUPTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10662/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(CENTRAL) III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SVIL MINES LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-11709/2016XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AL LOGISTICS P. LTD. THR. ITSDIRECTOR V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[R-1][Pr]

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2995/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJIV GUPTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

Page 33: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-3354/2017III

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 4 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

SAUMYA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1441/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 7 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRRJ SECURITIES LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-15617/2017XIV

DAYAWANTI PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10267/2017XIV

DAYAWANTI THROUGH SMT. SUNITAGUPTA (LEGAL HEIR) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ONIA 58058/2017 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING/REFILING SLP ON IA58058/2017 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RE-FILING APPEAL ON IA58058/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 58059/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20559-/2017XIV

DAYAWANTI PRAVEEN SWARUP

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.62022/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-10266/2017XIV

DAYAWANTI PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.58470/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-10268/2017XIV

DAYAWANTI THROUGH SMT. SUNITAGUPTA (LEGAL HEIR) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILINGON IA 61191/2017 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING/REFILING SLP ONIA 61191/2017 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RE-FILING APPEAL ON IA61191/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 61193/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-4458/2017XIV

PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) -3, NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARICHIKA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.NEW DELHI AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C)No.-17056-17057/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

KHAITAN CHEMICAL AND FERTILIZERSLTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

Page 34: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-4459/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARICHIKA PROPERTIES PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5571/2017XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S A.L. LOGISTICS PRIVATE LTD. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[R-1][Pr]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5573/2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AL LOGISTICS PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5590/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6800-/2017XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S A.L.LOGISICS PRIVATE LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-11075/2017XIV

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBABA GLOBAL LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.74644/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.74649/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.74648/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-18849-/2017XIV

PR.COMMR.OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S JAIPURIA INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.49141/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.49144/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-9364/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGURNAM ARORA PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.53626/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-9487/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHRI MAHESH KUMAR GUPTA KAVITA JHA[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.52950/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-9277/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. JAIPURIA INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

Page 35: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-10236/2017XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMOHD. YASIN ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.63355/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-14900/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSEABIRD MARINE SERVICE PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.85599/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-16162/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSEABIRD MARINE SERVICES PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.97984/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-11202/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSEABIRD MARINE SERVICES PVT. LTD. ANEESH MITTAL[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.80595/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-23116-/2017XII

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 CHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ENNORE CARGO CONTAINERTERMINAL PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA78123/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 78126/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-15028/2017III

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX1 AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDEVANGI @ RUPA DIPAK PANCHAL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.80251/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-11117/2017III

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDEVANGI @ RUPA DIPAK PANCHAL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.76294/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-15033/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDEVANGI @ RUPA DIPAK PANCHAL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.87803/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-11160/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJEEV BEHL Srishti Singh[R-1]{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.77184/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.77185/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

Page 36: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No.-23115-/2017XII

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ENNORE CARGO CONTAINERTERMINAL P. LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.76965/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.76966/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedC.A. No.-15494/2017III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSEABIRD MARINE SERVICES PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.89679/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.89680/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedC.A. No.-15497/2017III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSEABIRD MARINE SERVICES PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.90667/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-17315/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJEEV BEHL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 101 I.E.C.A. NO. 8900/2012 ETC.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.101173/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.101176/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.101174/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 26081-2017III

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 1 AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDEVANGI ALIAS RUPA DIPAK PANCHAL{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.92093/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-17534/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVIJAY KUMAR KATARIA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.105360/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.105361/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-17317/2017XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVIJAY KUMAR KATARIA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 101 I.E.C.A. NO. 8900/2012 IA No.98940/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING andIA No.98941/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-17318/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVIJAY KUMAR KATARIA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 101 I.E.C.A. NO. 8900/2012 ETC.

ConnectedC.A. No.-18272/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJEEV BHEL

Page 37: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.107373/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-17986/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. APURVA NATVAR PARIKH AND CO.PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } [TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 14 I.E.D.NO.30990/2017]

ConnectedC.A. No.-18011/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NATVAR PARIKH AND CO. PVT.LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.101373/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-17533/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ORCHID INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.104081/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.104084/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-18271/2017XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAM AVTAR VERMA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 } IA No.110748/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

87 C.A. No.-10683/2017III

THE NEW INDIA COPERTIVE HOUSINGSOCIETY LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. K. RAJEEV

IA No.100002/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS88 Crl.A. No.-1279/2014

II-AMD. ISRAR KHAN @ ISRAR KHAN PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-1], MD. SHAHIDANWAR[R-2], [R-3]

ONLY CRIMINAL APPEAL TO BE LISTED

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-5078/2016II-A

MD. ISRAR KHAN @ ISRAR KHAN ANDORS. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI

Versus

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND TAPESH KUMAR SINGH, RAJESH SINGHCHAUHAN, [R-2]

89 C.A.No.-3018-3019/2013XII

J. BOORARM @ J.B. CHOUDHARY ETC. REKHA PANDEY

VersusB. MOHAN AND ANR. AND ANR. K. K. MANIand IA No.91903/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION

90 C.A.No.-1082-1083/2017III-A

NEENA JAIN AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

VersusSTATE OF U.P. DEPARTMENT OF URBANPLANNING SECRETARIAT THROUGHSECRETARY AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

Page 38: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-1085/2017III-A

MILAP CHANDRA JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusROOP KISHORE AND ORS. VIKRANT SINGH BAIS{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1086/2017III-A

SHREE CHAND JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusHOTCHAND ABHA JAIN{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1089/2017III-A

MILAP CHANDRA JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusNANAK CHAND @ NANAK RAM PUJA SHARMA{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1088/2017III-A

SHREE CHAND JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusSRI LAXMAN PRASAD AGRAWAL (D)THR. LRS. ABHA JAIN

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-1087/2017III-A

MILAP CHANDRA JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

Versus

NEENA JAIN AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

{Fixed Date for 14-11-2017 }91 Crl.A. No.-497/2017

II-CYOGESH BAKHSHI JAY KISHOR SINGH[P-1]VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-496/2017II-C

M/S. BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD. ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONINSPECTOR OF POLICE MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

92 C.A. No.-3834/2017XIV

ANIL GULATI BHARTI TYAGIVersusSMT. PROMILA GULATI WAJEEH SHAFIQand IA No.98681/2017-PERMISSION TO ADD FURTHER ADDITIONAL PRAYERS INTHE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONCourt vide order dated 3.3.2017 directed tolist the matter in the second week of April 2017

93 C.A. No.-4746/2017XVI

SARAF INFRA PROJECTS LTD. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[P-1]Versus

STATE OF WEST BENGAL . AND ORS.NANDINI SEN MUKHERJEE[R-1], [R-2], L. C.AGRAWALA[R-3], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-4]

C.A. NO.4746/2017 be de-tagged from the batch of 6079/2017 and be listed afterfour weeks as per court's order dated 16.8.2017.

94 ORGNL.SUITNo.-2/1996XVII

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH NARESH K. SHARMA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA &ORS. SUSHMA SURI, KAMINI JAISWAL, HARINDERMOHAN SINGH, ANISH KUMAR GUPTA

AS FIRST CASE

95 C.A.No.-6949-6950/2004IX

THE COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 39: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD.THROUGH M.D. KHAITAN & CO.

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 } ON 11.10.2017 AS FIRST CASE.

ConnectedC.A. No.-5320/2012IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOMBAY CYCLE RAKESH K. SHARMA{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5319/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOMBAY CYCLE RAKESH K. SHARMA{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20625/2012III

C.I.T AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCORE PARENTERALS LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-890/2012XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXII INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT . B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusJINDAL EQUIPMENTS LEASINGANDCONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. KAVITA JHA

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-10169/2010IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BOMBAY CYCLE AND MOTORAGENCY P.LTD RAKESH K. SHARMA

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-10168/2010IX

C.I.T, MUMBAI B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusM/S. BOMBAY CYCLE &MOTOR AGENCYLTD.{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3624/2012XI -A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE I KERALA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S ACCELERATED FREEZE DRYINGCO.LTD. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-5751/2011XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S ISKAEMECO REGENT LIMITED BHARTI TYAGI[R-1]{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 } and IA No.100994/2017-APPLICATION FOR BRINGON RECORD THE NEW INCORPORATED NAME OF RESPONDENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-1214/2012XIV

M/S. ROLLATAINERS LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-780/2012XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKOTHARI SUGARS CHEMICALS LIMITED PAREKH & CO.{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

Page 40: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-2164/2012XIV

DCM SHRIRAM INDUSTRIES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL III{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20144/2012III

C.I.T-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCORE PARENTERALS LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7951/2012IX

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOMBAY CYCLE AND MOTORAGENCY LTD. RAKESH K. SHARMA

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4008/2014III

CIT ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT STATE FERTILISERS ANDCHEMIALS LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-5782/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT STATE FERTILIZER ANDCHEMICAL LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-4345/2014XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INNVOL MEDICAL INDIA LTD RABIN MAJUMDER{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-18964/2014IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DHOLGIRI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-24752/2014III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IBARODA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT STATE FERTILIZERS ANDCHEMICAL LIMITED BHARGAVA V. DESAI

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4977/2015IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S WEIZMANN LTD RASHMIKUMAR MANILAL VITHLANI{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6942/2015III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX.-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SANTOGEN SILK MILLS LTD. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-6648/2016IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -8 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 41: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8PAL CREDIT AND CAPITAL LTDTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MANISH K. BISHNOI

{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 } Connected with D.No.26580/2003ConnectedSLP(C) No.-29776/2016XII

M/S. RAMANIYAM HOMES P. LTD. K J JOHN AND CO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 } List alongwith Civil Appeal No. 5751/2011.

ConnectedC.A. No.-6931-/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IBARODA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALEMBIC LTD BARODA KHAITAN & CO.{Fixed Date for 15-11-2017 } and IA No.94002/2017-APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS

96 C.A. No.-3727/2007XII-A

P. NARASAIAH S. USHA REDDYVersusK. MAISAIAH AND ORS. AND ORS. RAM SWARUP SHARMA[R-1][Pr], , [R-2][Pr]FOR ON IA 1/2017 FOR ON IA 2/2017

97 C.A. No.-8319/2012IX

SHAIKH ABDUL REHMAN BABUMIYANAND ANR. AND ANR. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIAAND ORS. AND ORS.

NARESH KUMAR, J S WAD AND CO, ANNAM D.N. RAO

ConnectedT.C.(C) No.-30/2010XVI -A

SHRI KRISHNA N. DANDAWATE ANDORS. ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DEPARTMENT OF CULTURESECRETARY AND ORS.

ANNAM D. N. RAO, J S WAD AND CO

and IA No.103454/2017-AMENDMENT OF THE PETITION and IA No.106904/2017-AMENDMENT OF THE PETITION

ConnectedC.A.No.-8320-8322/2012IX

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. ANNAM D. N. RAO

Versus

M/S. NAIKNAWARE AND ASSCIATES.AND ORS. AND ORS.

V. D. KHANNA, SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, NARESHKUMAR, J S WAD AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No.-8323/2012IX

SHRIKRISHNA NARAYAN DANDWATE .AND ORS. ABHA R. SHARMA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. J S WAD AND CO, ANNAM D. N. RAO,RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-5]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-96/2011X

LUNAWAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANYREP. BY MANIKLAL PEERCHANDLUNAWAT

V. D. KHANNA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFCULTURE SECRETARY AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO[R-2]

and IA No.105951/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.105953/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-36/2012X

HEMANT NAIKNAVARE AND ANR. V. D. KHANNA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. J S WAD AND COFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2012

98 C.A. No.-684/2007XVII

POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA PRAMOD DAYALVersus

Page 42: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES …sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/wk/2017-11-14_2017-11-16/8.pdf · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 8

TAMIL NADU GENERATION ANDDISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. ANDORS.

SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY, T. HARISHKUMAR, PRADEEP MISRA, M. T. GEORGE,GOPAL PRASAD, DEVASHISH BHARUKA,ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, ASHIESH KUMAR, A.S. BHASME

ConnectedC.A. No.-13452/2015XVII

NTPC LIMITED K. V. MOHAN

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION & OTHERS AND ORS.

SUNIL FERNANDES, SAURABH MISHRA,PRADEEP MISRA, DIVYA ROY

[Amendment of Cause title] ON IA 2/201799 Crl.A. No.-1373/2008

IIC. SHIVA NARAYANA REDDY M. VIJAYA BHASKARVersus

PONNAPU REDDY RAMASUBBAREDDYAND ORS.

C. S. N. MOHAN RAO, VINOD KUMAR TEWARI,D. BHARATHI REDDY, AMIT K. NAIN, S..UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR, [R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1374/2008II

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR

VersusPONNAPU REDDY RAMASUBBA REDDYAND ORS. D. MAHESH BABU, AMIT K. NAIN

NEW DELHI10-11-2017 19:07:54

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR