79

It Takes a Village to Manage Lygus - University of Arizona

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

It Takes a Village to Manage Lygus: A Retrospective

Peter B. Goodell

Cooperative Extension Advisor, IPM

559 646-6515

[email protected]

UC Statewide IPM Program

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Explain use of term village, Ecosystem issue, cooperation essential, past and current colleagues and Those tasked with managing this complex problem, farmers and PCAs

Overview

• Lygus as a pest

• On the shoulders of giants

• Forecasting annual outbreaks

• Lygus in the landscape

• Managing the farm for Lygus

• Getting the community engaged

• Future implications

Adult

Immature Lygus hesperus

Biology

Two species in SJV, L. hesperus & L. elisus

Adults and immature can cause damage

Newly winged adults need more time to development

Native insect

Wide host range

Over winters as immature adults

5 Generations/yr

21 days per generation in summer

Lygus Population Densities Through a Year in Alfalfa Forage Field

0

100

200

300

400

500

600 1

-11-

00

2-4

-00

3/2/

00

3-2

2-00

4-1

1-00

5-2

-00

5-2

3-00

6-1

2-00

7-3

-00

7-2

0-00

7-3

1-00

8-1

5-00

8-2

5-00

9-8

-00

9-2

6-00

10-

6-00

10-3

0-00

11/2

0/00

12-1

3-00

1/4/

01

Lygu

s/10

Sw

eeps

NymphsAdults

Spring Fall Summer OW OW

L. hesperus Hosts

Asteraceae

Chenopodiaceae

Plantaginaceae

Poaceae

Others

Fabaceae

From: Scott, 1977

Brassicaceae

Crop Pest Status Alfalfa* Non-Pest, sink/source Safflower* Non-pest, source Cotton* Pest, 2-10/50 sweeps Pistachios Pest, No threshold Common beans Pest, 1-2/sweep Lima Beans Pest, 1-1.5/sweep Lettuce Pest, No threshold Strawberries Pest, 1 per 10 plants Apples & Pears Pest, 1 dmg fruit/100 Blackeye Beans* Pest, .5 – 1/sweep Seed Alfalfa* Pest, 4-10/sweep

Pest

Status

Of

Lygus

Contributions of Prof. Vern Stern, UCR

• Most cotton arthropod populations must re-build each year

• Populations must move into a field and it is the surrounding cropping environment that determines the degree of pest severity

• Some crops and weeds can act as a source or as a sink

• The landscape mosaic has both a spatial and temporal component

• The landscape can be manipulated

That Changes Through the Year

Landscape is a Mosaic of Crops, Weeds and Native Plants

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Define my use of source and sink

Spring Survey to Predict May Lygus Movement

• After 1978 Great Lygus Disaster, • Efforts were made to estimate

potential population buildup and date of mass movement

• Westside foothill area surveyed for hosts and Lygus annually since 1981

• Is there enough time for Lygus to buildup and threaten SJV crops?

• Will the population move when cotton is at a sensitive stage?

• Survey & reporting has changed over time

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Explain for those not from area or era.

West Side Fresno County, 2005

Tarweed Pistachio

Cotton Almond Cotton

Cotton

Predicting Senescing Hosts Landsat 7 NDVI Changes

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 0.5 1 1.5

Rainfall in May (in)

Estim

ated

yie

ld lo

ss d

ue

to ly

gus

(%)

Relationship Between Rainfall and Yield Loss Caused by Lygus

NOAA 3 Month Outlook March–April-May 2013

Forecasting Lygus Outbreaks

• Relationship between spring rains & seasonal Lygus population densities • Frequency, duration and amount of rainfall: o Allowing certain annual plant to build and survive into June o Providing a host bridge between over-winter and summer generations o The Green Bridge in April, May and June

A Little Lygus Diddy

When hills are brown, Hopes abound

If green in May, Prepare to pay

Foothills

Orchards

Weedy fields

Alfalfa

Seed Alfalfa

Safflower

Tomato

Beans

Cotton

Sugar Beets

Spring Summer

Autumn

Potential Spring Buildup

Annual Summer Buildup

Crops Removed from Landscape,

Concentrating Lygus

Voices from our past

“The grower, faced with rising production costs at all levels must decide if he will rely completely on insecticides to fight Lygus and accept the financial burden or if he will look for another method of control…..”

“In attacking the Lygus problem, chemicals are used when absolutely necessary; but first a major change must be made in farm practices to keep Lygus out of cotton”

Dr. Vern Stern, 1967

Buttonwillow Kern Co

Five Points,Fresno

Co

Woodville, Tulare

Chowchilla, Madera County

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is an example of early work, taking existing GIS maps and analyzing for crop diversity and illustrating the spatial arrangement across different landscapes in SJV This illustrations reflects 6 mile square areas north to south and east to west in SJV. Differences in field size and crop diversity are all visually apparent. This provides a powerful visual statement to land owners, ading us in getting a message across about dangerous crop assemblages. It also begged another question: how importnat to cotton is alfalfa forage in managing Lygus populations?

Risk Factors in Lygus Movement Into Cotton

• Distance - How far from Source?

– There is an inherent limitation to how far an individual Lygus can fly

– Understanding the scale of the landscape in relation to insect capabilities for movement

• Strength - How “strong” is the Source?

– What is the host suitability/capacity for reproduction and completion of life cycle?

– Are the sources synchronous in their senescence?

• Timing - When does the Source release the insects?

– When is the crop most susceptible and how is it timed to Lygus movement?

• Landscape Configuration - What is between you and the Source?

– Are there sufficient sinks to absorb the population surge?

Distance from Source

Near

Far

Weak Source Strength of Host Strong Source

Risk Factors in Lygus Movement into Cotton

Distance & Strength Intertwined

• Distance – How far-reaching is a source on population

density of Lygus in a cotton field – Focused research over past 5 years has provided

good evidence

• Strength – How good is a host for building Lygus – Decades of qualitative information – Above studies help to quantify

Developing and Implementing Field and Landscape Level Reduced-risk

Management Strategies for Lygus in Western Cropping Systems

Carriere (UA)

Palumbo (UA)

Ellsworth, Fournier (UA)

Naranjo, Blackmer, Hagler

(USDA) Parajulee (TX A&M)

Bundy (NMSU)

Goodell (UC-IPM)

Godfrey, Rosenheim (UC-Davis)

Ellsworth/UA

RAMP Project Relating Surrounding Crops to Lygus Density

• Which crops are most related to high Lygus densities

• Focus cotton field is sampled weekly for Lygus

• Crops in area around focus field is mapped

• Ring slices surrounding focus field

• ½ mile, 1 mile , 2 miles

Rings of equal width: area of each crop

and non-cultivated vegetation is

quantified in each ring

Source: Carrière et al

Presenter
Presentation Notes
My final example of our research activities in understanding Lygus movemetn in the landscape is a our multi-state USDA RAMP grant (Risk Avoidance and Mitigation Program). In 2007, we initiated a large area wide program to measure the movement of Lygus. This map illustrates the size of the area, almost 70 miles in length. We sampled 40-50 cotton fields weekly and sample the surrounding border fields less frequiently. The landscape was extensively mapped as illustrated in tis figure,

Results from Multistate RAMP SJV Data

Habitat 2007 2008 2009 Distance of Association

Meters Miles

Cotton Sink Sink Sink 2700 1.7

Alfalfa Source Sink 1500 1.0

Uncultivated Sink 1200 0.75

Safflower Source Source Sink 2700 1.7

Seed Alfalfa Source 2700 1.7

Tomato Sink

Carrière Y, Goodell PB, Ellers-Kirk C, Larocque G, Dutilleul P, et al. (2012) Effects of Local and Landscape Factors on Population Dynamics of a Cotton Pest. PLoS ONE 7(6)

Timing Distance Strength x y z

1 Alfalfa Managed -1 5 5

2 Alfalfa

unmanaged -4 -1 -1

3 Safflower managed -5 -5 -1

4 Safflower

unmangaged -5 -5 -5 5 Neutral 0 0 0

6 Weedy but

neutral -3 -2 -3 7 Cotton 4 4 4 8 Sugar beets -2 -4 -3

2

4

1

3

8

5

7

6

Alfalfa Forage is a Key Crop

• It is a preferred Lygus host but not susceptible to damage

• It is one of the few crops grown for vegetative rather reproductive part

• Crop is continually in vigorous pre-reproductive state, always in a vegetative state of growth

• A field can absorb lygus from surrounding area, acting as sponge

• Within a field, split harvest schedule

• ½ of field is cut every 14 days

• Concept acceptable, execution cumbersome

• Interferes with custom harvest, irrigation management

• Not widely accepted

Regional Approach Circa 1960’s Strip Cutting Alfalfa Fields

Regional Approach Circa 1960’s Interplanting Alfalfa and Cotton

• Alfalfa placed with cotton

• Both crops managed for production

• Strip cut to maintain attractiveness

• Adopted and used in large fields

• Not widely accepted due to crop production incompatibilities

-

0 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.60.45Miles

Cotton

Alfalfa

Hwy 65

Excellent spatial arrangement of cotton & alfalfa

Poor spatial arrangement of cotton & alfalfa

Cotton

Alfalfa

Why is Safflower Such An Important Source of Lygus?

• Provides Green Bridge between for spring and summer populations

• Provides habitat for extended period (1-2 gen.)

• Lygus is NOT normally treated as pest Is a good host for Lygus to build & to inflict damage on susceptible cotton

Presenter
Presentation Notes
So why the emphasis on safflower? Safflower has been mentioend several times as a key source. Why is it so important in the Lygus landscape It provides early critical habitat It Provides habitat for extended period (1-2 gen.) Lygus is NOT normally treated as pest Is a good host for Lygus to build & to inflict damage on susceptible cotton Pre-adult population should be suppressed with a timed insecticide to prevent adult movement into cotton

Fragmenting IPM • What happens to an established and

successful IPM program when the landscape in which it was developed, no longer exists?

-

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

Acr

es

California Cotton Acreage 1984-2006

2000 2000 5 Points

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sea of cotton in the landscape. 2000 acreage statewide was below 1 million acres. Only cotton is represented in next 3 slides. Cotton borders cotton; if located inside a large cluster, well insulated from surrounding area. Fewer neighbors to supply migrants during harvest Cotton does not act as source for pests except at the very end of season. Source: CDFA Cotton Pink Bollworm mapping program

2005 5 Points

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fewer acres of cotton means more fragmentation. While some clustering is apparent, due to farms owning contiguous acres and maintaining commitment to cotton production, average distance between cotton fields increases. As fewer cotton fields border cotton fields, other sources of Lygus are available to allow Lygus to easily get access to cotton fields due to their proximity and shared perimeter with cotton fields.

2008 5 Points

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fewer cotton fields fill in the Westside landscape. Much more isolation of fields creates an island effect for remaining cotton fields. Fields are more fragmented and more potential sources border individual fields. Fragmentation itself is not the only problem, but also what is being produced instead of cotton. Is it a major source or sink? Does it allow Lygus populations to build and then release them during critical fruiting periods? Most crops allow some Lygus to develop but safflower, alfalfa seed and deficit irrigated alfalfa hay can locally influence the Lygus landscape. If grown in large acreage and widely dispersed thru the landscape, can dominate Lygus management.

Safflower in Westside Fresno & Kings Co 2007

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The following three slides illustrates real conistions in the Westside of Fresno co between 2007 and 2009. This is the Safflower acres in 2007, Westside Fresno/Kings co This is more typcial of planting for past many years, scattered, distributed and limited

Safflower in Westside Fresno & Kings Co 2007, 2008

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is Safflower plantings in 2008 Note the Large increase, and widely scattered locaitons. this rapid shift in the local landscape was due to Price increase due to biofuel markets, limited availablity of irrgation water for cotton cultivation but suffiicent for safflower The Land owners with safflower were not interested in managing Lygus as they are not a pest and farmers were not cotton growers at this stage

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

Cotton Safflower

20072008

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This illustrates the dramatic shift between years in the number of cotton and safflower acres. In this local landscape in 2008, the acres of safflower equaled the number of cotton.

Average Number Insecticide Applications

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2007 2008

4.1 N=40

11.1 N=39

Can We Assign Risk for a Specific Cotton Field?

• What role does the diversity of the landscape surrounding a cotton field play in the risk of Lygus infestations?

• Are some landscape more prone to Lygus infestations than others?

• How complex does the diversity need to be?

• What can be done to mitigate the risk?

Host Status of Kern Crops

Cy_crops-teale2.shpUnknown StatusPoor HostFair HostGood HostExcellent Host

-

Alfalfa is abundant & close

Alfalfa is scarce & distant

Urban areas

Spatial Arrangement of Cotton & Alfalfa

Lygus Insecticide Use in Cotton During June & July

Total Insecticides Applied (lbs)June & July 00

0.0000

0.1 - 350

351 - 700

701 - 1050

1050 - 1400

1401 - 1770

Risk Factors a

Focus Field a

High Low

No risk or unknown

Risk Factors

Focus Field a

High

Low

No risk or unknown

The Landscape Can be Managed

• Increasing diversity of preferred Lygus sinks

• Configuring your farm to minimize risk

• Cooperating as a community to reduce risk

• Challenges: – Cooperation

– Appreciation for the problem

– Working toward the greater good

Buffer Strips Help to Manage Lygus

• Cowpea/Lima Bean

• More attractive than cotton

• 30 foot strip on upwind side

• Snow fence

• Slows migration

– provides lead time

• Concentrates population

– creates killing zone

– reduces area to be treated

• Management similar to cotton North

Cotton Beans

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

5-May 20-May

28-May

3-Jun 11-Jun

18-Jun

24-Jun

2-Jul 9-Jul 16-Jul 23-Jul 30-Jul 6-Aug

Numb

er of

bugs

/50 pa

ces

BeansCotton 1Cotton 5Cotton 15

Lygus Populations in Cotton & Cowpea Buffer 1997

Do Buffer Strips Work?

J/J 1

0102030405060708090

6/9/98

6/16/9

8

6/23/9

8

6/30/9

87/7

/98

7/14/9

8

7/21/9

8

7/28/9

88/4

/98

8/11/9

8

8/18/9

8

8/25/9

89/1

/989/8

/98

Lygu

s/50

sw

p

BeansCotton

Leaving Habitat for Lygus in Alfalfa

R. Vargas

R. Vargas R. Vargas

Adult Lygus Population Densities In Alfalfa and Cotton

KREC June 2001

R. Vargas

020

4060

80100

120

0 hr 4 hr 8 hr 24 hr 48 hr

Bug

s/5

sq ft Alfalfa 2.5%

Alfalfa 10%Cotton 2.5%Cotton 10%

Safflower in Westside Fresno & Kings Co 2007, 2008

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is Safflower plantings in 2008 Note the Large increase, and widely scattered locaitons. this rapid shift in the local landscape was due to Price increase due to biofuel markets, limited availablity of irrgation water for cotton cultivation but suffiicent for safflower The Land owners with safflower were not interested in managing Lygus as they are not a pest and farmers were not cotton growers at this stage

Safflower in Westside Fresno & Kings Co 2007, 2008, 2009

Presenter
Presentation Notes
After this disaster, I was asked to consult with a large farming organization to review a cropping landscape plan. Blue represents the safflower acres in 2009. Based on my interpetations of landscape, safflower was concenterated, its interface with cotton was minimized and the safflower received a timed Lygus insecticide to reduce popualtion and mitugate movement The result was very successful, allowing safflower to be produced and cotton to be protected..

Average Number Insecticide Applications On Cotton within RAMP Study Area

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2007 2008

4.1 N=40

11.1 N=39

4.6 N=45

2009

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The insecticde use in 2009 retruned to previous levels of even with the increased acres of a key Lygus source.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 1 2 3

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

2007 2008 2009

Mile

s

Acr

es

Area (acres)

Perimeter (miles)

Safflower in West Fresno Co, 2007-09 Area vs. Perimeter

Management of Fragmented Landscapes Planning Landscapes for IPM

• Where key sources are intermixed with cotton sinks, problems arise

• Important to minimize boundary and interface

9 units of area 12 boundary units

9 units of area 36 boundary units

Concentrating sources Minimize borders, Maximize interior

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Why is this important in IPM? In the past, large blocks of contagious cotton provided “buffering” against Lygus, a pest EXTERNAL to the field For example in the following examples, 9 units of area are reorganized at the same landscape scale. In a highly contiguous arrangement: only 12 border units for the 9 units of area In an extreme fragmented condition, 3 X the borders become available as interface for the same internal area. In a similar way, safflower can be concentrated to minimize the border and maximize the internal area for management. In the following slides, I will present an example of this where safflower acres increases in a fragmented cotton landscape

SCP Community

Lake Bottom Community

2012

Tulare Lake Bottom

Safflower

Cotton

Alfalfa

Tulare Lake Bottom

Sustainable Cotton Project

Safflower

Cotton

Alfalfa

Sustainable Cotton Project Focal Cotton Fields

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Lake Bottom 11 SCP 11 SCP 12

Mean Field size (ac)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Lake Bottom 11 SCP 11 SCP 12

No. of fields

0

5

10

15

20

25

Lake Bottom 11 SCP 11 SCP 12

Total No. of Habitats

Comparison of 2 SJV Agricultural Landscapes

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Lake Bottom 11 SCP 11 SCP 12

Diversity (Shannons's Index)

Comparison of Two SJV Agricultural Landscapes

Future Implications

• Approaches have application to other pests

• Creating cooperative community based pest management “districts” – Teaching the value of IPM at landscape scale

• Addressing multiple issues – Landscape planning can provide documentation

for environmental and regulatory issues

– NRCS links

Primary Challenge: Avoid Tragedy of the Commons

• Social challenge, not scientific

• Getting people to work together when their own best interest may not be rewarded (or harmed)

• Where large scale farms manage the landscape, many of these ideas have been implemented – Motivated landowners

• Where many landowners operate within the critical landscape scale, more challenging

Thank You for Your Attention

Working with the Landscape It’s Not Easy, But Has its Rewards

Lygus Density in Tarweed 2005 – Three Rocks, CA

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

6/1/05 6/8/05 6/15/05 6/22/05 6/29/05 7/6/05

Bug

s/50

sw

eeps

TotalAdultsNymphs

Bloom

Five “Groups or classes” Tarweed (n=4) Frontage (n=5) Onion (n=3) Almond (n=6) Mid-Cotton (n=3)

Lygus Density in Cotton

0

1

2

3

6/2/2005

6/9/2005

6/16/2005

6/23/2005

6/30/2005

7/7/2005

7/14/2005

Adu

lt L

ygus

/50

Swp

s

Acala

Pima

0

1

2

3

4

6/2/2005

6/9/2005

6/16/2005

6/23/2005

6/30/2005

7/7/2005

7/14/2005

Tot

al A

dults/

50 s

wee

ps Tarweed

Frontage

mid-Cotton

Lygus Densities in Cotton by “Class”

0

1

2

3

4

6/2/2005

6/9/2005

6/16/2005

6/23/2005

6/30/2005

7/7/2005

7/14/2005

Tot

al A

dults/

50 s

wee

ps Tarweed

Onions

Almonds

Lygus Densities in Cotton by “Class”

Crops Associated with Lygus Densities in Focal Cotton Fields

Increased Densities Decreased Densities

Crop

Distance Crop

Distance

Meters Miles Meters Miles

Safflower 3000 1.9 Almond 3000 1.9

Oat 2000 1.2 Pistachio 1000 0.62

Grape 3000 1.9 Alfalfa 2000 1.2

Onion 3000 1.9 Potato 1000 .62

Uncultivated 1000 0.62 Cotton 3000 1.9

Source: F. Sivakoff, PhD Thesis, Figure 1, Influence of the Surrounding Landscape on Crop Colonization by an Insect Pest (With JA Rosenheim, P. Dutilleul, and Y. Carrière)

North

Field 97

10%

2.5%

Cotton

Cotton

June 8, 2001

Presenter
Presentation Notes
If alfalfa provided critical habitat and acted as a sponge to absorb Lygus from surrounding fields, it is important to preserved alfalfa during harvest and baling operations. In this field trial, we evaluated the effect on Lygus populations in cotton by manipulating the amount of alfalfa left ucut. In this trial we left 2.5% or 10% of the alfalfa field uncut. These fields were replicated 4 times over the field station.