Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000
Issues, Trends, and ChallengesEPRI Workshop – July 8, 2008
Mike HightowerSandia National Laboratories
Presentation OverviewPresentation Overview
• Energy–Water Connection and Interdependencies• Energy-Water Report to Congress Highlights• Energy–Water Regional Needs Workshops
– Regional and national issues and challenges– Summary of science and technology needs identified
• Potential impact of energy development and growth on national and regional water resources
Background info @ www.sandia.gov/energy-water
Energy and Water are … Interdependent
Water for Energy and Energy for Water
Energy and Water are … Interdependent
Water for Energy and Energy for Water
Energy and power production require water:• Thermoelectric
cooling• Hydropower• Energy minerals
extraction/mining• Fuel Production
(fossil fuels, H2 , biofuels)
• Emission control
Water production, processing, distribution, and end-use require energy:• Pumping• Conveyance
and Transport• Treatment• Use conditioning• Surface and
Ground water
Water Withdrawal Trends by Sector Water Withdrawal Trends by Sector
[USGS, 2004]
Water Consumption by SectorWater Consumption by SectorU.S. Freshwater Consumption, 100 Bgal/day
Livestock3.3%
Thermoelectric3.3%
Commercial1.2%
Domestic7.1%
Industrial3.3%
Mining1.2%Irrigation
80.6%
Energy accounts for 27 percent of non-agricultural fresh water consumption
[USGS, 1998]
Growing Limitations on Fresh Surface and Ground Water Availability Growing Limitations on Fresh Surface and Ground Water Availability
• Little increase in surface water storage capacity since 1980
• Concerns over climate impacts on surface water supplies
• Many major ground water aquifers seeing reductions in water quality and yield
( Based on USGS WSP-2250 1984 and Alley 2007)
(Shannon 2007)
Growing Use of Non-traditional Water Resources Growing Use of Non-traditional Water Resources
• Desal growing at 10% per year, waste water reuse at 15% per year• Reuse not accounted for in USGS assessments• Non-traditional water use is energy intensive
(From EPA 2004, Water Reuse 2007, Mickley 2003)
0123
456789
10
Kw
h/m
^3
1 2 3 4 5Sea WaterRO
Today The Future
ConventionalTreatment
BrackishRO
BrackishNF
Power Requirements For Treating
(Einfeld 2007)
Most State Water Managers Expect Shortages Over The Next Decade Under Average
Conditions
Most State Water Managers Expect Shortages Over The Next Decade Under Average
Conditions
TX
CA
MT
AZ
ID
NV
NM
COIL
OR
UT
KS
WY
IANE
SD
MN
ND
OK
FL
WI
MO
AL
WA
GA
AR
LA
MI
IN
PA
NY
NC
MS
TN
KYVA
OH
SC
ME
WV
MI VTNH
MD
NJ
MACT
DE
RI
g
AK
AK
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
shortageStatewideRegionalLocalNoneNo response or uncertain
Source: GAO 2003
Water challenges are nationwideWater challenges are nationwide
Projected Population Growth (2000-2020)Source: Campbell (2000)
50%
%
30%
30%
40%
10%
10%
30%
15%
5%
15%
20%
35%
20%
EPRI 2003
2003 Heat Wave Impact on French Electric Power Generation 2003 Heat Wave Impact on French Electric Power Generation• Loss of 7 to 15% of
nuclear generation capacity for 5 weeks
• Loss of 20% of hydro generation capacity
• Large-scale load shedding and shut off transmission to Italy
• Sharp increase of spot- market prices: 1000 to 1500 $ / MWh for most critical days
Bort-les-Orgues Réservoir
Normal conditionsin August
August 27, 2003
Emerging Interest in Energy and Water Issues and Challenges Emerging Interest in Energy and Water Issues and Challenges
• State and national water and energy groups– 24 invited presentations in FY07
and 08 on energy and water challenges
– Research and regulatory groups considering future energy and water needs
• Increased media interest– NATURE, ECONOMIST– Technical magazines
• NSF/NRC interest in energy debate and interdependencies research
• Growing international concerns and challenges
– Europe, Australia, Asia, Canada
Cumberland River Basin Integrated Resources Planning Pilot Results Cumberland River Basin Integrated Resources Planning Pilot Results
")
") ")
")") ")")")")") ")") ")") ") ")") ") ")")
")")") ")") ")
")
")")") ")")")")")")")")")")")
")")")")")
")")
")")
")
")")") ")")")
") ")")
#0 #0
• Integrated short-term (daily) planning (TVA, SEPA, Corps)
• Interested in long-term planning, but missions and activities are distinct– Authority or incentives not aligned
with energy-water efficiency
• Growing need for both water and power– Dam (rehabilitation and
improvements) and drought impacts are major challenges to future water-energy planning
• Need better operational and planning tools
Energy-Water Regional Needs Workshops Energy-Water Regional Needs Workshops
• Congressionally funded and coordinated with DOE
• Coordinated by Sandia with support from all the national laboratories
• Needs driven research directions and solutions focus
Roadmap Regional Needs Workshops
Energy Water Roadmap OverviewEnergy Water Roadmap Overview
• Three regional needs assessment workshops: Nov 2005 through mid-January 2006– Kansas City, Baltimore, Salt Lake City– Almost 350 participants from 40 states involved – Focus on emerging user and stakeholder problems and challenges and science
and technology role in effective solutions – captured high-level issues, needs, and directions
• Broad spectrum of regional, state, and local participation and input– Representatives from energy companies, electric utilities, water utilities, water
managers, economic development groups, energy regulators, environmental groups, tribal nations, other water-use sectors
• Gaps and Technical Innovations Workshops to capture science and technology research and development priorities– Almost 150 researchers and technology developers involved
Better resources planning and management• Integrated regional energy and water resource planning and decision
support tools• Infrastructure and regulatory and policy changes for improved
energy/water efficiency• Improved water supply and demand characterization, monitoring, and
modelingImproved water and energy use efficiency • Improved water efficiency in thermoelectric power generation• Improved biofuels/biomass water use efficiency• Reduced water intensity for emerging energy resources Development of alternative water resources and supplies• Oil and gas produced water treatment for use• Energy efficiency and assessment of impaired water treatment and use
www.sandia.gov/energy-water
Summary of Major National Needs Summary of Major National Needs and Issues Identified in Regional and Issues Identified in Regional Workshops
Research and Development Program for Integrated Resources Management Research and Development Program for Integrated Resources Management
– Accelerate water resources forecasting and management
– Evaluate impacts of climate variability and improve hydrological forecasting
– Improve common decision support tools
– Develop system analysis approaches for: Co-location of energy and water facilities, improved national transmission capabilities to support renewables, distributed generation of biofuels
Projected New Electric Power Generation Capacity through 2035 Projected New Electric Power Generation Capacity through 2035
• Coal– 350, 400 MW steam turbine plants
(140,000 MW)
• Natural Gas– 150, 100 MW natural gas combined
cycle (15,000 MW)
• Renewables– 125, 200 MW wind or solar farms
(25,000 MW)
• Nuclear– 5, 1000 MW nuclear reactors
(5,000 MW)
• Hydroelectric – None (~40,000-60,000 MW available)
Water Use and Consumption for Electric Power Generation Water Use and Consumption for Electric Power Generation
Plant-type Cooling Process
Water Use Intensity (gal/MWhe )
Steam Condensing Other Uses
Withdrawal Consumption Consumption
Fossil/ biomass steam turbineOpen-loop 20,000–50,000 ~200-300
~30Closed-loop 300–600 300–480
Nuclear steam turbine
Open-loop 25,000–60,000 ~400~30
Closed-loop 500–1,100 400–720
Natural Gas Combined- Cycle
Open-loop 7,500–20,000 1007–10
Closed-loop 230 180
Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle Closed-loop 200 180 150
Carbon sequestration for fossil energy generation ~25% increase in water withdrawal and consumption
Geothermal Steam Closed-loop 2000 1350 50
Concentrating Solar Closed-loop 750 740 10
Wind and Solar Photovoltaic N/A 0 0 1-2
Water Demands for Future Electric Power Development Water Demands for Future Electric Power Development
• Water demands could almost triple from 1995 consumption for projected mix of plants and cooling
• Carbon emission requirements will increase water consumption by an additional 1-2 Bgal/day 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1995 2005 2015 2025 2035
Year
Wat
er C
onsu
mpt
ion
( bill
ion
gallo
ns p
er d
ay)
Source: NETL 2006
• Most growth in water stressed regions
• Most new plants expected to use evaporative cooling
Growth in Thermoelectric Growth in Thermoelectric Power GenerationPower Generation
Source: NETL, 2004
Projected Thermoelectric Increases(Capacity in 2025 vs 1995)
EMM Region 11
EMM Region 9
EMM Region 5
EMM Region 12
EMM Region 2
EMM Region 10
EMM Region 1EMM Region 4EMM Region 13
EMM Region 7
EMM Region 3
EMM Region 8
EMM Region 6
0 300 600 900 1,200150Miles
4
Estimated Capacity Change 1995-2025 (Gw)AEO Estimates
LegendMajor Lakes (National)
regions4
Totcapchg-9.050000 - 0.000000
0.000001 - 11.630000
11.630001 - 26.920000
26.920001 - 44.560000
44.560001 - 133.230000
AK
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
Regional Variations in Water Laws and Nuclear Reactor Applications Regional Variations in Water Laws and Nuclear Reactor Applications
Appropriation States
Riparian States
Hybrid States
Alternative Cooling Issues and ChallengesAlternative Cooling Issues and Challenges
• High capital cost and large footprint
• Hot weather penalties– Power capacity reduced during
peak summer electricity demand – Grid stability concerns with many
regional air cooled plants during summer months
– Increased GHG emissions for most thermoelectric plants
• Wind effects reduce cooling efficiency
• Not currently licensed for nuclear power plants
Pilot Spray-enhanced Dry Cooling
Research Program for Electric Power Sector Research Program for Electric Power Sector • Improve dry and hybrid
cooling system performance
• Improve ecological performance of intake structures for hydro and once-through cooling
• Improve materials and cooling approaches compatible with use of degraded water
• Electric grid infrastructure upgrades to improve low water use renewable technology integration
Hybrid Wet-Dry Cooling System
Water Demand/Impact of Transportation Fuels
Emerging Water Demands for Alternative Fuels Development Emerging Water Demands for Alternative Fuels Development
• Irrigation of even small percentage of biofuel acreage will increase water consumption by an additional 3-5 Bgal/day 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1995
2005
2015
2025
2035
Year
Wat
er C
onsu
mpt
ion
(bi
llion
gallo
ns p
er d
ay) Alt Fuels
Biofuels
TraditionalRefining
Biomass and Water Use Impacts Will be Regional Biomass and Water Use Impacts Will be Regional
Oil Shale development will be regional and impact water availability and quality Oil Shale development will be regional and impact water availability and quality
• Reserves are in areas of limited water resources
• Water needed for retorting, steam flushing, and cooling up to 3 gallons per gallon of fuel
• Concerns over in situ migration of retort by- products and impact on ground water quality
Research Program for Alternative Fuels Sector Research Program for Alternative Fuels Sector
• Reduce water use for cooling in biofuels and alternative fuels production
• Reduce water use in processing
• Develop low fresh water use technologies such as algal biodiesel
• Assess non-traditional water use for fuels applications
• Assess hydrologic impacts of large cellulose biofuels scale-up and oil shale