1
CERN CLIC mock-up Active alignment tests Introduction 14 th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ACCELERATOR ALIGNMENT 03 - 07 October 2016 Grenoble - France „Snake”-type girders configuration - smooths out “naturally” the pre-alignment of adjacent girders CLIC RF components installed on modular girders Motorization will be installed at one side of a girder (MASTER cradle) Non-motorized SLAVE cradle is driven by the adjacent girder The most critical CLIC RF components need to be pre-aligned within 14 μm rms with respect to a straight reference line along a sliding window of 200 m. A system based on supporting structures (girders and cradles) connected in “snake”-type configuration and equipped with linear actuators is being tested. A special test mock-up was built at CERN to demonstrate, the feasibility of remote active pre- alignment within tight tolerances. Sensors Wire Positioning Sensors (WPS) and inclinometers, gives the feedback data to compute the position of supporting structures MASTER cradles Only the MASTER cradle has an impact on the active pre- alignment process. The actuators control the X-Y position as well as the roll of a cradle, resulting in a 3 DOF mechanism Articulation point The SLAVE cradle is driven by the MASTER cradle thanks to a flexural ’Articulation point’. Mock-up validation and encountered issues Adjustable articulation point First generation of MASTER-SLAVE cradle flexural inter connection did not meet the alignment requirements. A new, adjustable solution was developed Power Extraction and Transfer Structures (PETS) positions always in tolerance maximum 80μm misalignment observed w.r.t. ±100 μm tolerance) Accelearting Structures (AS) need to improve their production technology. In the best case, the AS misalignment w.r.t. V-support’s (girder) mean axis is 60 μm w.r.t. ± 14 μm tolerance Alignment of the components on the girder The RF components should be machined in way to provide their proper alignment on the girder V-supports Cradle-girder material compatibility The temperature variations caused cradle-girder misalignment due to their materials (Al, SiC) thermal expansion coefficients differences. A temporary solution of thermally stable artificial cradle was applied. Tests were performed on the “snake”-structure of three Drive Beam girders DB2 - DB4. The girders were misaligned in random directions with a maximum position error of 0.3 – 0.8mm. The roll (Ry) of the girders was set in range of -0.4 mrad to 1.6 mrad For the tested regulation algorithm, the 10 μm tolerance zone was reached after 4 iterations, showing perfect con- vergence. The typical stabilizing time of position for single iteration was ~10s allowing for big errors corrections even within 1 minute. Issues and Feasibility Demonstration of CLIC Supporting System Chain Active Pre-Alignment Using a Multi-Module Test Setup M. Sosin, M. Gutt-Mostowy, J. Kemppinen, Z. Kostka, J. Jaros, H. Mainaud-Durand, A. Zemanek, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland V. Rude, ESGT-CNAM, Le Mans, France Case of Main Beam Quadrupole Alignment Conclusions The trajectory of MASTER cradles was slightly non linear for the first algorithm iteration due to big actuators shifts requested. The Main Beam Quadrupole (MBQ) alignment control algorithm tests were performed on a parallel test stand at CERN. The mock-up including the girder, mounted on CAM movers (CM) and equipped in WPS sensors was used. All positioning algorithms managed to reach all sequence targets within tolerances. The movement time of Syn- chronous PTP algorithm (60 – 90s) is significantly longer than that of the others (30 – 40s) Closed loop adjustment of “snake”-like girders string shows that absolute active alignment of supporting structures is feasible within the specified accuracy. Concerning the alignment of MBQ, the CLIC positioning requirements can be met in one movement by using feedback directly from alignment sensors. There are still issues linked with RF structures alignment on the girders

Issues and Feasibility Demonstration of CLIC Supporting System … · 2018. 8. 9. · the MASTER cradle thanks to a flexural ’Articulationpoint’. Mock-up validation and encountered

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Issues and Feasibility Demonstration of CLIC Supporting System … · 2018. 8. 9. · the MASTER cradle thanks to a flexural ’Articulationpoint’. Mock-up validation and encountered

CERN CLIC mock-up

Active alignment tests

Introduction

14

thIN

TE

RN

AT

ION

AL

WO

RK

SH

OP

ON

AC

CE

LE

RA

TO

R A

LIG

NM

EN

T

03 -

07 O

cto

ber

2016

Gre

no

ble

-F

ran

ce

„Snake”-type girders configuration - smooths out “naturally” thepre-alignment of adjacent girders• CLIC RF components installed on modular girders• Motorization will be installed at one side of a girder (MASTER

cradle)• Non-motorized SLAVE cradle is driven by the adjacent girder

The most critical CLIC RF components need to be pre-aligned within 14 μm rms with respect to a straight reference line alonga sliding window of 200 m.A system based on supporting structures (girders and cradles) connected in “snake”-type configuration and equipped withlinear actuators is being tested. A special test mock-up was built at CERN to demonstrate, the feasibility of remote active pre-alignment within tight tolerances.

SensorsWire Positioning Sensors (WPS) and inclinometers, gives thefeedback data to compute the position of supportingstructures

MASTER cradles

Only the MASTER cradle has animpact on the active pre-alignment process. The actuatorscontrol the X-Y position as well asthe roll of a cradle, resulting in a 3DOF mechanism

Articulation point

The SLAVE cradle is driven bythe MASTER cradle thanks to aflexural ’Articulation point’.

Mock-up validation and encountered issues

Adjustable articulation point

First generation of MASTER-SLAVEcradle flexural inter connection didnot meet the alignmentrequirements. A new, adjustablesolution was developed

Power Extraction and TransferStructures (PETS) positions always intolerance → maximum 80µmmisalignment observed w.r.t. ±100 µmtolerance)

Accelearting Structures (AS) need toimprove their production technology.In the best case, the AS misalignmentw.r.t. V-support’s (girder) mean axis is60 µm w.r.t. ± 14 µm tolerance

Alignment of the components on the girderThe RF components should be machined in way to provide their proper alignment on the girder V-supports

Cradle-girder material compatibility

The temperature variations causedcradle-girder misalignment due totheir materials (Al, SiC) thermalexpansion coefficients differences.A temporary solution of thermallystable artificial cradle was applied.

Tests were performed on the “snake”-structure of three Drive Beam girders DB2 - DB4.The girders were misaligned in random directions with a maximum position error of 0.3 –0.8mm. The roll (Ry) of the girders was set in range of -0.4 mrad to 1.6 mrad

For the tested regulation algorithm, the10 μm tolerance zone was reached after4 iterations, showing perfect con-vergence. The typical stabilizing time ofposition for single iteration was ~10sallowing for big errors corrections evenwithin 1 minute.

Issues and Feasibility Demonstration of CLIC Supporting System

Chain Active Pre-Alignment Using a Multi-Module Test Setup

M. Sosin, M. Gutt-Mostowy, J. Kemppinen, Z. Kostka, J. Jaros, H. Mainaud-Durand, A. Zemanek, CERN, Geneva, SwitzerlandV. Rude, ESGT-CNAM, Le Mans, France

Case of Main Beam Quadrupole Alignment

Conclusions

The trajectory of MASTER cradles was slightly non linear for the first algorithm iterationdue to big actuators shifts requested.

The Main Beam Quadrupole (MBQ)alignment control algorithm testswere performed on a parallel teststand at CERN. The mock-up includingthe girder, mounted on CAM movers(CM) and equipped in WPS sensorswas used.

All positioning algorithmsmanaged to reach all sequencetargets within tolerances. Themovement time of Syn-chronous PTP algorithm (60 –90s) is significantly longer thanthat of the others (30 – 40s)

Closed loop adjustment of “snake”-like girders string shows thatabsolute active alignment of supporting structures is feasible withinthe specified accuracy. Concerning the alignment of MBQ, the CLICpositioning requirements can be met in one movement by usingfeedback directly from alignment sensors.There are still issues linked with RF structures alignment on the girders