15
SCOTLAND COUNTY The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity and Disease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Health and Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide program is supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust. NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical education groups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative North Carolina. IsPOD Data Results Spring 2010

IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - SCOTLAND 10OCT04

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

IsPOD Data Results Spring 2010 2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation All rights reserved. % Needy ID School Name Grades 3-5 Grades 1-2 SPARK Trained? 2009- 2010 ADM Using FG? FG Response Rates 2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved. # Staff Trained

Citation preview

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation All rights reserved.

SCOTLAND COUNTY

The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation,

and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity and Disease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Health and Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue Cross

Blue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide program

is supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust. NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical education

groups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative North Carolina.

IsPOD Data Results

Spring 2010

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation

Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved.

Scotland County

SPARK Training

Staff from Scotland County began receiving SPARK training in the 2008-2009

school year with the KBR Grant. Scotland County has 14 K-8 public schools. Of

these 14 schools, 10 schools (or 71%) have received SPARK training. At these

schools, a total of 16 PE teachers and 0 coordinators have been trained in

SPARK. Table 1 shows the Scotland County K-8 schools that have received

SPARK training and the number of staff trained. FitnessGram Response Rates

are also given for each of the K-8 schools.

Table 1

Scotland County K-8 Schools

Schools with SPARK Training and FitnessGram Response Rates

ID School Name

DEMOGRAPHICS SPARK FITNESSGRAM

2009-2010 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

304 Carver Middle 481 78% YES 1 NO NA NA 0%

312 Covington Street Elem 322 69% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

316 East Laurinburg 69 95% NO 0 NO NA NA 0%

320 I E Johnson Elementary 370 98% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

328 Laurel Hill Elementary 464 73% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

336 North Laurinburg Elem 242 98% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

344 Pate-Gardner Elementary 160 81% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

345 Scotland Accelerated 145 100% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

347 Shaw Elementary 181 89% NO 0 NO NA 0% NA

349 Spring Hill Middle 473 66% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

350 Sycamore Lane Middle 528 70% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

356 South Scotland Elementary 376 56% YES 2 YES 98% 99% NA

360 Wagram Primary 335 90% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

364 Washington Park Elem 349 59% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

2

Scotland County

FitnessGram Response Rates

In spring 2010, 1 of the Scotland County K-8 schools, or 7%, conducted

FitnessGram assessments and submitted their data. Table 2 shows the

FitnessGram Response Rates by grade for all Scotland County K-8 schools

combined.

Table 2

FitnessGram Response Rates

For 1 K-8 Schools in Scotland County

Grade 2009-2010

Average Daily Membership

FitnessGram Response Rate

Number of FG Student Ids

Percent of ADM

1st 530 62 12%

2nd 487 64 13%

3rd 489 63 13%

4th 512 63 12%

5th 477 66 14%

6th 502 0 0%

7th 515 0 0%

8th 486 0 0%

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

3

Body Mass Index (BMI)

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 56% 57% 937 528 884 500

2nd 55% 57% 1175 642 1209 689

3rd 57% 55% 9670 5556 10075 5558

4th 54% 52% 9624 5227 10103 5260

5th 53% 51% 9396 4961 9857 5043

6th 54% 50% 3528 1893 3550 1785

7th 57% 52% 3315 1897 3149 1644

8th 56% 54% 3174 1780 3321 1802

56%

55% 57%

54%

53%

54% 57%

56%

57%

57%

55%

52%

51%

50%

52%

54%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

4

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Scotland County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 1 K-8 Schools in Scotland County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 39% 47% 28 11 34 16

2nd 45% 35% 33 15 34 11

3rd 39% 33% 33 13 27 9

4th 35% 38% 26 9 37 14

5th 39% 37% 36 14 30 11

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

39% 45%

39%

35% 39%

47%

35%

33% 38%

37%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

5

PACER

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

4th 95% 61% 6952 6625 7321 4485

5th 82% 58% 6569 5398 6994 4047

6th 77% 54% 1882 1452 1936 1039

7th 68% 50% 1787 1222 1825 906

8th 58% 52% 1774 1036 1908 997

95%

82%

77%

68%

58%61%

58%

54%

50% 52%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

6

PACER

Scotland County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 1 K-8 Schools in Scotland County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

4th 100% 49% 26 26 37 18

5th 69% 50% 36 25 30 15

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

100%

69%

49%

50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

7

CURL-UP

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 83% 84% 917 759 879 742

2nd 78% 79% 1260 989 1300 1032

3rd 82% 82% 11285 9254 11683 9544

4th 80% 81% 11221 8954 11729 9512

5th 78% 80% 10865 8483 11370 9152

6th 86% 87% 3857 3316 3895 3373

7th 86% 87% 3477 2978 3427 2990

8th 84% 88% 3402 2869 3448 3029

83%

78% 82%

80%

78%

86%

86%

84%

84%

79% 82%

81%

80% 87%

87%

88%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

8

CURL-UP

Scotland County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 1 K-8 Schools in Scotland County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 100% 100% 28 28 34 34

2nd 100% 90% 33 33 31 28

3rd 88% 86% 34 30 28 24

4th 96% 86% 26 25 37 32

5th 81% 87% 36 29 30 26

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

100%

100%

88%

96%

81%

100%

90%

86%

86%

87%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

9

PUSH-UP

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 50% 63% 627 314 592 372

2nd 48% 62% 935 451 924 573

3rd 56% 70% 9157 5163 9527 6638

4th 52% 68% 9129 4713 9510 6475

5th 52% 66% 8900 4642 9309 6117

6th 68% 72% 3092 2093 3165 2272

7th 69% 72% 2768 1912 2742 1984

8th 68% 70% 2696 1830 2811 1965

50%

48%

56%

52%

52%

68%

69%

68%

63%

62%

70%

68%

66% 72%

72%

70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

10

PUSH-UP

Scotland County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 1 K-8 Schools in Scotland County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 93% 88% 28 26 34 30

2nd 76% 74% 33 25 31 23

3rd 62% 61% 34 21 28 17

4th 50% 57% 26 13 37 21

5th 42% 77% 36 15 30 23

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

93%

76%

62%

50%

42%

88%

74%

61%

57%

77%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

11

SIT AND REACH

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 66% 64% 702 460 664 423

2nd 68% 66% 922 629 935 618

3rd 70% 69% 6371 4486 6681 4581

4th 69% 65% 6229 4292 6596 4319

5th 62% 62% 6219 3839 6558 4060

6th 58% 58% 2371 1376 2445 1413

7th 66% 65% 2197 1447 2134 1382

8th 66% 67% 2131 1411 2247 1510

66% 68%

70%

69%

62%

58%

66%

66%

64% 66% 69%

65%

62%

58%

65% 67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

12

SIT AND REACH

Scotland County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 1 K-8 Schools in Scotland County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 79% 76% 28 22 34 26

2nd 45% 68% 33 15 31 21

3rd 71% 68% 34 24 28 19

4th 62% 81% 26 16 37 30

5th 61% 63% 36 22 30 19

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

79%

45%

71%

62%

61%

76%

68%

68%

81%

63%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

13

TRUNK LIFT

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 91% 88% 744 680 746 659

2nd 91% 92% 1063 963 1056 971

3rd 93% 91% 10281 9572 10608 9648

4th 84% 80% 10205 8587 10688 8573

5th 81% 77% 9821 7973 10336 8001

6th 83% 79% 3438 2859 3361 2646

7th 82% 77% 3231 2656 3086 2364

8th 84% 79% 3136 2631 3161 2492

91%

91% 93%

84%

81%

83%

82%

84%88% 92%

91%

80%

77%

79%

77%

79%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

14

TRUNK LIFT

Scotland County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 1 K-8 School in Scotland County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 96% 97% 28 27 34 33

2nd 100% 100% 33 33 31 31

3rd 94% 86% 34 32 28 24

4th 100% 84% 26 26 37 31

5th 89% 93% 36 32 30 28

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

96% 100%

94% 100%

89%

97% 100%

86%

84%

93%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male