67
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy Regan Department of Physics University of Surrey Guildford GU2 7XH

Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei

  • Upload
    blanca

  • View
    53

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei. Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy Regan Department of Physics University of Surrey Guildford GU2 7XH. Outline. What is an isomer ? Electromagnetic transition rates. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei

Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and

Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’

IIT Roorkee, October 2009

Paddy ReganDepartment of Physics

University of SurreyGuildfordGU2 7XH

Page 2: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Outline• What is an isomer ? • Electromagnetic transition rates.• Weisskopf Single-Particle Estimates• Shell Structure in near spherical nuclei.

– Odd-A singly magic nuclei (e.g., 205Au126)

– Why are E1s ‘naturally’ hindered ?

• Seniority isomers, j2 & jn configurations ?• Near Magic nuclei.

– Limited valence space? Core breaking?

• Magnetic properties: g-factors in seniority isomers.

Page 3: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 4: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

What is an isomer ?

Why/when do nuclear isomers occur ?(i) large change in spin (‘spin-trap’)(ii) small transition energy between states (seniority isomers) (iii) dramatic change in structure/shape (fission isomers) and/or underlying symmetry (K-isomers)

What information do isomers gives you ? Isomers occur due to single particle structure. For example, transitions are hindered between states with different structures (note, this is not case for seniority isomers).

Metastable (long-lived) nuclear excited state.‘Long-lived’ could mean: ~10-19 seconds, shape isomers in a-cluster resonances or ~1015 years 180Ta 9-→1+ decay.

Page 5: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

‘High-spin’ and-decaying isomers just above 208Pb, basicallyas a result of ‘yrast’ (spin) traps..

9/2+

11/2+

(13/2+)99.984% -decay branch, 91% to 13/2+ isomer in 207Pb,7% to 1/2- ground state in 207Pb, Q ~ 9 MeV per decay

0

687

1065

1428 (17/2+)

1462 (25/2+)

211Po

T1/2=25secs

T1/2=0.5 secs

0

115

238

1-

2-

0-

9- 250

T1/2 = 61 min

T1/2 = 25 min- branch =33% branch = 67%

212Bi

212Bi, Z=83, N=129, 9- from vg9/2 x h9/2

Yrastness is what causes these isomers…they simply have ‘nowhere’ to go to (easily).This yrastness is itself caused by high-j intrudersin the nuclear single particle spectrum….

Page 6: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Ex>1MeV, T1/2>1ms (red), T1/2>1hour (black)

From P.M. Walker and G.D. Dracoulis, Nature 399, p35 (1999)

Page 7: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

EM Transition Rates

2

22

20 !!12

12Lm

cLL

cLLP

L

Classically, the average power radiated by an EM multipole field is given by

m(L) is the time-varying electric or magnetic multipole moment.is the (circular) frequency of the EM field

dvLmLm iffi *

For a quantized (nuclear) system, the decay probability is determined by the MATRIX ELEMENT of the EM MULTIPOLE OPERATOR, where

i..e, integrated over the nuclear volume.

(see Introductory Nuclear Physics, K.S. Krane (1988) p330).

We can then get the general expression for the probability per unit time forgamma-ray emission, (L) , from:

2

12

20 !!12

121lm

cLL

LLPL fi

L

Page 8: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Note: Transition rates get slower (i.e., longer lifetimes associated with) higher order multipole decays

Page 9: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Weisskopf Single Particle Estimates:

These are ‘yardstick’ estimates for the speed of electromagnetic decays for a given electromagnetic multipole.

They depend on the size of the nucleus (i.e., A) and the energy of the photon (E

2L+1)

They estimates using of the transition rate for spherically symmetricproton orbitals for nuclei of radius r=r0A1/3.

Page 10: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 11: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Weisskopf estimates

sp for 1Wu at A~100 and E = 200 keV

M1

2.2ps

M2

4.1s

M3

36 s

M4

43Ms

E1

5.8fs

E2

92 ns

E3

0.2s

E4

66Ms

i.e., lowest multipole decays are favoured….but need to conserve angularmomentum so need at least = Ii-If for decay to be allowed.

Note, for low E and high-l, internal conversion also competes/dominates.

Page 12: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The EM transition rate depends on E2+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

Page 13: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The EM transition rate depends on E2+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

Page 14: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The EM transition rate depends on E2+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

Page 15: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The EM transition rate depends on E2+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

Page 16: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The EM transition rate depends on E2+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

= gamma-ray between yrast states

Page 17: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The EM transition rate depends on E2+1, (for E2 decays E5)

Thus, the highest energy transitions for the lowest are usually favoured. Non-yrast states decay to yrast ones (unless very different , K-isomers

= ray from non-yrast state.

= ray between yrast states

Page 18: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The EM transition rate depends on E2+1, (for E2 decays E5)

Thus, the highest energy transitions for the lowest are usually favoured. Non-yrast states decay to yrast ones (unless very different , K-isomers

= ray from non-yrast state.

= ray between yrast states

Page 19: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The EM transition rate depends on E2+1, (for E2 decays E5)

Thus, the highest energy transitions for the lowest are usually favoured. Non-yrast states decay to yrast ones (unless very different , K-isomers

= ray from non-yrast state.

= ray between yrast states

Page 20: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

Yrast Traps

The yrast 8+ state lies lower in excitation energy than any 6+ state…i.e., would need a ‘negative’ gamma-ray energy to decay to any 6+ state

Page 21: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

'Near-Yrast' decays

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spin of decaying state, I

Ex

cit

ati

on

en

erg

y

The yrast 8+ state can not decay to ANY 6+.

The lowest order multipole allowed is =4 I=8+ →4+ i.e., an E4 decay.

Yrast Traps

Page 22: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Clusters of levels + Pauli Principle magic numbers, inert cores

Concept of valence nucleons – key to structure. Many-body few-body: each body counts.

Addition of 2 neutrons in a nucleus with 150 can drastically alter structure

Page 23: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Independent Particle Model

• Put nucleons (protons and neutrons separately) into orbits.• Key question – how do we figure out the total angular momentum of a

nucleus with more than one particle? • Put 2j + 1 identical nucleons (fermions) in an orbit with angular momentum

j. Each one MUST go into a different magnetic substate. • Angular momenta add vectorially but projections (m values) add

algebraically. So, total M is sum of m’s

M = j + (j – 1) + (j – 2) + …+ 1/2 + (-1/2) + … + [ - (j – 2)] + [ - (j – 1)] + (-j) = 0

M = 0. So, if the only possible M is 0, then J= 0

Thus, a full shell of nucleons always has total angular momentum 0. This simplifies things.

Page 24: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 25: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 26: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 27: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 28: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 29: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Podolyak et al., Phys. Lett. B672 (2009) 116

N=126 ; Z=79. Odd, single proton transition; h11/2 → d3/2 state (holes in Z=82 shell).

Selection rule says lowest multipole decay allowed is =11/2 - 3/2 = 4.Change of parity means lowest must transition be M4.

1Wu 907 keV M4 in 205Au has T1/2= 8secs.

‘Pure’ single particle (proton) transition from 11/2- state to 3/2+ state.

(note, decay here is observed following INTERNAL CONVERSION).These competing decays (to gamma emission) are often observed in isomeric decays

Page 30: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

More complex nuclei…

• Signatures of nuclear structure help show us which regions of the nuclear chart are explained by ‘single-particle’ excitations

• or deformed regions (see Phil Walker’s lecture).

Page 31: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

2

8

20

28

(40)

50

V= SHO + l2.+ l.s.

82

1s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

3s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

2d3/2

2d5/2

1g7/2

1g9/2

1h11/2

1f7/2

1f5/2

2p3/2

2p1/2

2f7/2

1h9/2

1i13/2Why are E1 s isomeric?

E1 single particle decays need to proceed between orbitals which have Delta L=1 and change parity, e.g.,

f7/2 and d5/2

or g9/2 and f7/2

or h11/2 and g9/2

or p3/2 and d5/2

What about typical 2-particle configs. e.g.,

I=5- from (h11/2)-1 x (s1/2)-1

I=4+ from (d3/2)-1 x (s1/2)-1

Page 32: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 33: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

R(E(4+) / E(2+)) Systematics plot from Burcu Cakirli

Page 34: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

e.g., 128Cd, isomeric 440 keV E1 decay.1 Wu 440 keV E1 should have ~4x10-15s; Actually has ~300 ns (i..e hindered by ~108

Page 35: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

2

8

20

28

(40)

50

V= SHO + l2.+ l.s.

82

1s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

3s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

2d3/2

2d5/2

1g7/2

1g9/2

1h11/2

1f7/2

1f5/2

2p3/2

2p1/2

2f7/2

1h9/2

1i13/2ASIDE:Why are E1 s isomeric?

E1s often observed with decay probabilities Of 10-5 →10-9 Wu

E1 single particle decays need to proceed between orbitals which have l =1 and change parity, e.g.,

f7/2 and d5/2

or g9/2 and f7/2

or h11/2 and g9/2

or i13/2 and h11/2

or p3/2 and d5/2

BUT these orbitals are along way from each other in terms of energy in the mean-fieldsingle particle spectrum.

Page 36: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

2

8

20

28

(40)

50

V= SHO + l2.+ l.s.

82

1s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

3s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

2d3/2

2d5/2

1g7/2

1g9/2

1h11/2

1f7/2

1f5/2

2p3/2

2p1/2

2f7/2

1h9/2

1i13/2Why are E1 s isomeric?

E1 single particle decays need to proceed between orbitals which have Delta L=1 and change parity, e.g.,

What about typical 2-particle configs. e.g.,

I=5- from mostly (h11/2)-1 x (s1/2)-1

I=4+ from mostly (d3/2)-1 x (s1/2)-1

No E1 ‘allowed’ between such orbitals.

E1 occur due to (very) small fractions of the wavefunction from orbitals in higher shells.

Small overlap wavefunction in multipole Matrix element causes ‘slow’ E1s

Page 37: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

2

8

20

28

(40)

50

V= SHO + l2.+ l.s.

82

1s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

3s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

2d3/2

2d5/2

1g7/2

1g9/2

1h11/2

1f7/2

1f5/2

2p3/2

2p1/2

2f7/2

1h9/2

1i13/2Why are E1 s isomeric?

E1s often observed with decay probabilities Of 10-5 →10-8 Wu

E1 single particle decays need to proceed between orbitals which have Delta L=1 and change parity, e.g.,

f7/2 and d5/2

or g9/2 and f7/2

or h11/2 and g9/2

or p3/2 and d5/2

BUT these orbitals are along way from each other in terms of energy in the mean-fieldsingle particle spectrum.

Page 38: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 39: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 40: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

2 valence nucleon j2 configurations in magic; magic+-2 nuclei

Page 41: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Seniority (spherical shell residual interaction) Isomers

Page 42: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 43: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 44: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Geometric Interpretation of the residual

interaction for j2 configuration coupled to Spin J

1

121cos for

cos11111

cos2

121

22112211

2122

21

2

jj

jjJJjjj

jjjjjjjjJJ

therefore

jjjjJ

111 jj 1JJ

Use the cosine rule and recall that the magnitude of the spin vector of spin j = [ j (j+1) ]-1/2

122 jj

Page 45: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

interaction gives nice simple geometric rationale for Seniority Isomers from

E ~ -VoFr tan (/2)

for T=1, even J

0

2

4

6

8

180

E(j2J)

90 0

2

468

e.g. J= (h9/2)2 coupled to

0+, 2+, 4+, 6+ and 8+.

Page 46: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

interaction gives nice simple geometric rationale

for Seniority Isomers from E ~ -VoFr tan (/2)

for T=1, even J

02

4

68

See e.g., Nuclear structure from a simple perspective, R.F. Casten Chap 4.)

Page 47: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Study the evolution of shell structure as a function of N:Z ratio.

208Pb (Z=82, N=126)

132Sn (Z=50, N=82)

56Ni (Z=28, N=28)

50

82

126

28 (Proton) holes in high-j intruders (f7/2, g9/2 and h11/2) gives rise to ‘seniority isomers’ ‘below’ doubly magic shells.

Expect 8+ and 10+ isomers in 130Cd and 206Hg.

Page 48: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 49: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 50: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

config.) or (i.e.,current of

sign direction/ and state) of mom.

ang. (i.e. loopcurrent of size

reflectsmoment magnetic

x y classicall

AI

g = / I , can use ‘Schmidt model’ to give estimates for what the g-factors should be for pure spherical orbits.

Can measure g directly from ‘twisting’ effect of putting magnetic dipole moment, , in a magnetic field, B. Nucleus precesses with the Larmor frequency, L = gNB

Page 51: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

EM Selection Rules and their Effects on Decays

• Allows decays have:

M9 M7, M5, M3, and ; E10 and E8 E6, E4, E2,

torestricted now decays Allowed :nrestrictiofurther a adds This

parity. thechangenot can n transitio thehere thus,

states, final and intialbetween parity conserve toalso Need

. 10 and 7,8,92,3,4,5,6,

of momentumangular carrying

photons with proceed toallowed are

4 to6 from decays e.g.,

II

IIII fifi

e.g., 102Sn52

Why do we only observe the E2 decays ?

Are the other allowed decays present ?

Page 52: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

E E2 (1Wu)

M3

(1Wu)

E4

(1Wu)

48

(6+→4+)

112s 782,822 s 2.5E+14s

555 (6+→2+)

66,912s

497

(4+→2+)

0.9ns 61ms 180,692s

1969

(4+→2+)

751ms

102Sn

Conclusion, in general see a cascade of (stretched) E2 decays in near-magic even-even nuclei.

Page 53: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

What about core breaking?We can have cases where low-energy (~100 keV) E2 decays competing with high-energy (~4 MeV) E4 transitions across magic shell closures, e.g. 54Fe28.

Z=26; N=28 case. • 2 proton holes in f7/2 shell.• Maximum spin in simple valence space is I=6+. • i.e., (f7/2)-2 configuration coupled to I= 6+

Additional spin requires exciting (pairs) of nucleons across the N or Z=28 shell closures into the f5/2 shell.

E E2 (1Wu)

M3

(1Wu)

E4

(1Wu)146 keV

(10+→8+)

1.01s 613s 20.9E+6s

3578 keV (10+→6+)

6.5ms

Page 54: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

2

8

20

28

(40)

50

V= SHO + l2.+ l.s.

82

1s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

3s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

2d3/2

2d5/2

1g7/2

1g9/2

1h11/2

1f7/2

1f5/2

2p3/2

2p1/2

2f7/2

1h9/2

1i13/2Basic, independent particle model (with very simple residual interactions added,such as - (contact) interaction) predictslarge host of isomers in the vicinity of closed shells / magic numbers.

Two categories

1) Spin-trap isomers - from particularly favoured coupling of (often high-j intruder) particles gives rise to high-spin state at low excitation energy. This state ‘has nowhere to decay to’ unless decays by high multipolarity (thus slow) transition. |Ji+Jf| > J > |Ji-Jf|

2) Seniority isomers – -interaction can demonstrate with geometric picture how (single) jn multiplet looks like j2 multiplet. Small energy difference between Jmax and (Jmax-2) states cause ‘seniority isomers’.

Page 55: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Study the evolution of shell structure as a function of N:Z ratio.

208Pb (Z=82, N=126)

132Sn (Z=50, N=82)

56Ni (Z=28, N=28)

50

82

126

28 (Proton) holes in high-j intruders (f7/2, g9/2 and h11/2) gives rise to ‘seniority isomers’ ‘below’ doubly magic shells.

Expect 8+ and 10+ isomers in 130Cd and 206Hg.

Page 56: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

What happens next?

Q. How do you generate higher angular momentum states when the maximum spin that valence space is used up (i.e. j2 coupled to Jmax = (j-1)) ?

A. Break the valence core and excite nucleons across magic number gaps. This costs energy (can be ~3-4 MeV), but can result in large spin increases.

Page 57: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Information gathered from Passive Stopper RISING Stopped Beam (A~200)

Within red line: nuclei populated measured using FRS + RISING with 1 GeV/u 208Pb beam.

205Au

204Pt?

S.J. Steer et al., IJMP E18 (2009) 1002

N=126

Page 58: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Aside interest….is there N=126 shell quenching ?

Assumption of a N=126 shell quenching leads to a considerableimprovement in the global abundance fit in r-process calculations

r-p

roce

ss a

bu

nd

ance

s

mass number A

exp.pronounced shell gapshell structure quenched

Page 59: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

S.J. Steer et al., Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. E18 (2009) 1002

Page 60: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

204Pt126

Page 61: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 62: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Probing deeper into the N=126 shell closure: First structural information on 203Ir (Z=77, N=126)

S.J. Steer et al., Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. E18 (2009) 1002

Page 63: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Study the evolution of shell structure as a function of N:Z ratio.

208Pb (Z=82, N=126)

132Sn (Z=50, N=82)

56Ni (Z=28, N=28)

50

82

126

28 (Proton) holes in high-j intruders (f7/2, g9/2 and h11/2) gives rise to ‘seniority isomers’ ‘below’ doubly magic shells.

Expect 8+ and 10+ isomers in 130Cd and 206Hg.

Page 64: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Is there evidence for a N=82 shell quenching ?

Assumption of a N=82 shell quenching leads to a considerableimprovement in the global abundance fit in r-process calculations !

r-p

roce

ss a

bu

nd

ance

s

mass number A

exp.pronounced shell gapshell structure quenched

Page 65: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei
Page 66: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

The A~200, neutron-rich region of the nuclear chart before

RISING

Compiled using the ENSDF and XUNDL databasesAll of the indicated isomers have T1/2 ~ 10 ns 1 ms

204Pt

Z = 82 >>

>>

N = 126

Page 67: Isomer Spectroscopy in  Near-Spherical Nuclei

Submitted to PRL, Sep. 09