76
HOW SEISMIC ISOLATION WORKS

Isolation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Isolation

Citation preview

  • HOW SEISMIC ISOLATIONWORKS

  • BEHAVIOUR OF CONVENTIONAL &BASE ISOLATED STRUCTURE

  • Basic ElementsHorizontal Flexible SupportDamping by Energy Dissipation

  • Acceleration Response Spectrum

  • Displacement Response Spectrum

  • Rollers

  • Lead Rubber Isolators

  • FlexibilityIncreased Flexibility May Make Structure More Responsive to Wind and Service Loads

  • FlexibilityLengthens PeriodReduces Acceleration and ForcesIncreases Displacements

  • Energy DissipationSubstantial Increases In Damping Will:1. Reduce Displacements2. Reduce Sensitivity to Earthquake Characteristics3. Provide Wind Restraint

  • Displacement Response Spectrum

  • Acceleration Response Spectrum

  • Force Displacement Trade-Off

  • Design Principles of Seismic IsolationPeriodEarthquake ForceCapacityEarthquake DemandIsolated DemandCode Design Force1 SEC2 SEC3 SEC

  • Design Principles of Seismic Isolation

  • Hysteresis LoopForceDisplacementPlastic Deformation

  • Our Objective Should Be -- And Can BeTo Eliminate Earthquake Damage as a Business Risk

  • In Summary...Seismic Isolation provides major economic advantages:Protection of occupants, contents, structureDramatic reduction in damageminimal business disruptionAnd.....for comparable costSeismically Isolated StructureDISSeismic Isolator

  • In Summary...Earthquakes are inevitableConsequences are frequently catastrophicMany businesses never recoverThe risks can be avoidedConventional Structure

  • Building CodesMinimum StandardBased on Past Earthquake ExperienceLife Safety OrientedDo Not Directly Protect Property Loss Do Not Directly Protect Business Disruption

  • Quote from SEAOC Blue Book Commentary, Source of the Uniform Building CodeThese Recommendations primarily are intended to safeguard against major failures and loss of life, NOT to limit damage, maintain functions, or provide for easy repairs.

  • Seismic Isolation GoalsProtection of LifeProtection of Building FrameProtection of ContentsProtection of Operation

  • SEISMIC ISOLATIONTECHNOLOGY

  • DISSEISMIC ISOLATOR TMCover RubberEnergy Dissipation CoreSteel Reinforcing PlatesInternal Rubber LayersBottom Mounting Plate(Top Mounting Plate Not Shown) Integral with Isolator Connects to structure above and below isolator Protects steel plates Provides lateral flexibility Reduces earthquake forces & displacements by energy dissipation Provides wind resistanceSeismic Isolation SystemIllustrated here is one ofseveral designs of seismicisolators. Vulcanized rubber layers that can move in anyhorizontal direction arelaminated between steelsheets to form a movable,flexible base.

    USA Patent Nos. 4,117,637, 4,499,694 and 4,593,502 Provides vertical load capacity Confines lead core

  • During a Richter 8.0 Earthquake a Seismically Isolated Building Will Behave as if it Were Experiencing a 5.5 Earthquake

  • Global Cost IssuesFirst CostLife Cycle CostsEarthquake DamageDisruption/Security

  • Economic FeasibilityCost of ConstructionEarthquake Insurance PremiumCost of Earthquake DamageCost of Disruption

  • Total Damage Comparison

  • Short Term CostsSeismic IsolatorsArchitectural ModificationsUtility Connections

  • Conventional ApproachesStiff BuildingLow DriftsHigh AccelerationsFlexible BuildingLow AccelerationsHigh Drifts

  • Damage CostsCaused by HighFloor Accelerations

    Ceiling & LightsBuilding EquipmentElevatorsContents

    Caused by LargeInterstory Drift

    Structural FramePiping & DuctworkFacade & WindowsPartitions

  • Damage MitigationHow Does Seismic Isolation Reduce Damage?

    Essentially elastic response Reduces forces on structure Reduces floor accelerations Reduces interstory drift

  • Short Term SavingsReduced Member SizesReduced Equipment BracingAlternative Configurations and Materials

  • Long Term BenefitsIncreased SafetyReduced LossesReduced Repair Costs Continuous Operation

  • Good CandidatesHistoric Buildings

  • Good CandidatesExpensive ContentsManufacturing FacilityComputer Data CenterMuseum

  • Good CandidatesEssential FacilitiesHospitalsEmergency OperationsFireMilitarySecurity/Defense Police CommunicationsUtilitiesComputer Data Centers

  • Good CandidatesCosts of DisruptionAlmost any BusinessExamples:HotelsBanks Down-Time Causes Severe Economic Loss

  • DisruptionLoss of FunctionLost RevenueLiabilityEmployee ExpensesLost Market Share

  • Whats at RiskCorporateHeadquartersManufacturing and Process FacilitiesCommunication and Data Centers Research and Development Facilities Hospitals/EmergencyResponse CentersMuseums/Historical StructuresStructures

  • Whats at RiskPersonnelIndustrial EquipmentIn-Process ProductsSystems Equipment Research and Data Medical EquipmentHistorical Assets

  • Whats at RiskLoss of ProductionLoss of Market ShareLoss of Projected SalesLoss of Customer FulfillmentLoss of RevenueLoss of Stock Value Business Interruption

  • World Wide UseCanadaItalyChileJapanChinaMexicoEnglandNew ZealandFranceRussiaGreeceSouth AfricaIcelandUnited StatesIran/IraqYugoslavia

  • Retrofit GoalsReliable Capacity Exceeds Elastic Demand(Isolation)orCombined Ductility and Capacity is Sufficientto Resist Demand (Conventional)

  • Retrofit GoalsFunctionalityContents ProtectionInvestment ProtectionHistoric PreservationDesign Economy

  • Retrofitting with Seismic IsolationExisting Structural CapacityElastic Performance LimitsLimited Base ShearPlane of IsolationControl of Displacements

  • Retrofit Design IssuesCapacity of Existing BuildingPlane of IsolationFoundation LevelBasement LevelTop or Mid-Height at Columns

  • Benefits of Seismic Isolation RetrofitEliminates Ductility DemandWork is Primarily Confined to BasementBuilding Can Continue to be OccupiedOften the Most Economic Solution

  • Suitability of StructureHeight to Width Ratio Prevents Gross OverturningLocal Column Uplift is OK

  • Constructability1.Seismic Isolator Location2.Allow for Building Movement Above Seismic Isolators3.Allow for Mechanical and Electrical Service Movement4.Installation Details5.Access and Instrumentation

  • Practical LimitationsSoft SoilBuilding Period > 1.5 sec.Wind Load > 10% Building WeightInadequate Space to Move

  • Performance Based Code Choices Fully Operational Partially Operational Life Safety

  • Progress of Seismic Isolation Technology

  • Structural DescriptionNon-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Frame260,000 sq. ft. floor area8 Floors plus basement

  • SummaryWhen earthquake demand exceeds capacity, damage occurs.The ability to absorb this excess demand but not collapse is called ductility.Conventional construction is analogous to the Volvo automobile design. Damage occurs, but occupants are safe.Code buildings are not necessarily usable after an earthquake.Isolation by intent and design provides for post-earthquake functionality.

  • Earthquake Hazard MitigationPassive TechnologiesBase IsolationEnergy DissipationDevicesStructuralSystemHysteretic FrictionViscousMoment FrameSlip BoltedBase Isolation Controls Input to the SystemEnergy Dissipation Controls System Response to Input FCI Rubber HDR FPS W-B Lead Ext. Yield Steel Hydraulic Any Slider Materials 3MElasticSpringSlidingHystereticViscousVisco-elasticExoticFrictionDuctilityEnhance-ment

  • Earthquakes HappenLoma Prieta, CA 10/17/896.9 (Mw) moment magnitude earthquake15 seconds duration$7 billion in damageNorthridge, CA 01/17/946.7 (Mw) moment magnitude earthquake15 seconds duration$30 billion in damageKobe, JAPAN 01/17/956.9 (Mw) moment magnitude earthquake20 seconds duration$150-200 billion in damage4% of Japans GDP

  • Unimaginably ExpensiveLoma Prieta = $450 million per secondNorthridge = $2 billion per second!Kobe = $7.5 billion per second!!

  • Loma Prieta: October 17, 1989X axis = YearNorthridge: January 17, 1994Y axis = # of IsolatedKobe: January 17, 1995 Structures

    1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996Seismic Isolation Trends in JapanSince the 1995 Kobe Quake

  • Only Life Safety RiskCurrent Building Codes Provide for Life-Safety Protection OnlyRecommendations primarily are intended to safeguard against major failures and loss of life, not to limit damage, maintain functions, or provide for easy repair. (Source: SEAOC Blue Book)A high-value, heavily occupied building is, in effect, designed to the same performance level as a low-value farm building if the basic [building] code is merely followed. (Source: EQE Summary Report on the Kobe Earthquake, p. 91.)

  • Property Damage RiskMajor value lies in the facilities, equipment and product, not the structureAgain, earthquakes pose greater vulnerability to nonstructural damage

  • Whats at RiskStructures Corporate Headquarters Research & Development Manufacturing, Distribution Facilities & Process Facilities Hospitals/Emergency Data & Communications Response Centers Centers Museum/Historical StructuresAssets Personnel Research & Data Industrial Equipment Medical Equipment In-Process Products Historical Systems EquipmentBusinessInterruption Loss of Production Loss of Customer Fulfillment Loss of Market Share Loss of Revenue Loss of Projected Sales Loss of Stock Value

  • Retrofit Goals

  • Energy Dissipation -- How it WorksEnergy Dissipation vs. Without Energy Dissipation With Energy DissipationInter-story drift is reduced bya factor of approximately twowith the installation of energy dissipators.Without EnergyDissipation

  • One and Two Story Buildings

  • Applications30 U.S. Buildings75 Japanese Buildings90 U.S. Bridges400 Structures Worldwide

  • Isolated0.12gWest Japan Postal Savings Computer CenterKobe - January 17, 19950.40g0.12gAmplification of forces

  • ConventionalInstrumented Conventional StructureKobe - January 17, 19951.18g0.37gAmplification of forces0.37g

  • IsolatedUSC University HospitalNorthridge - January 17, 19940.11g0.49g0.37gAmplification of forces0.13gB1234567

  • ConventionalOlive View HospitalNorthridge - January 17, 19942.30gAmplification of forces0.80g0.80g

  • Business Interruption Can Be Fatal43% of business closed by a catastrophe never re-open

    28% of those that do re-open, fail within 3 to 5 years

    29% survive

  • The Goals of Seismic IsolationProtection of LifeProtection of Building FrameProtection of Non-Structural Components and ContentsProtection of Processes and FunctionProtection of Market ShareProtection of Research and Development Projects

  • Damped StructureUndamped StructurePerformance Comparison

  • 20 Story Building in Japan

  • Recommendation: When you build your next new facility, you should know that for a 2-3% increase in the cost of of the building you can significantly reduce your business risk.

  • Probabilities are Small, But Significant67% chance of a 7.0 (Mw) moment magnitude earthquake in the Bay Area during the next 30 years 30 year timeline provides a false sense of remoteness and securityProbability converts to a 3.6% chance every year of the earthquake happening during that year