2
Erasmus Religion and public policy Islam in Britain No Charlies here Feb 25th 2015, 16:57 by B.C. WE ARE certainly not Charlie, but most of us (not all) can relate to Ahmed. That would be one way of summarising the results of a survey of British Muslim opinion that was published today (http://comres.co.uk/polls/bbcradio4today muslimpoll) by the BBC. You'll remember that in the immediate aftermath of last month's terrorist outrages in Paris (the killing of 12 people at Charlie Hebdo magazine, and then an attack on a kosher supermarket, where four people died) many different slogans popped up. "Je suis Ahmed" was a popular alternative (or complement) to the nearubiquitous "Je suis Charlie". Ahmed Merabet was a French Muslim police officer who was killed in the Charlie attack, and his cause was adopted in a popular tweet: "I am not Charlie, I am Ahmed the dead cop. Charlie ridiculed my faith and culture and I died defending his right to do so." How, then, did respondents to the BBC poll signal their identification with Ahmed? Some 95% of respondents said they felt loyal to Britain, and 93% said that Muslims should always obey British laws. However 78% agreed with the statement that it was "deeply offensive" to publish images of the prophet Muhammad, and worryingly, 11% assented to the proposition that organisations which publish such images "deserve to be attacked". Some 68% agreed that "acts of violence" against those who publish images of the prophet "can never be justified" while 24% could not concur with that statement. Indeed more than 27% were willing to express "some sympathy for the motives" behind the attacks on Charlie Hebdo in Paris.

Islam in Britain_ No Charlies Here _ the Economist2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Islam in Britian. Tight Secity forces

Citation preview

  • ErasmusReligionandpublicpolicy

    IslaminBritain

    NoCharlieshereFeb25th2015,16:57byB.C.

    WEAREcertainlynotCharlie,butmostofus

    (notall)canrelatetoAhmed.Thatwouldbeone

    wayofsummarisingtheresultsofasurveyof

    BritishMuslimopinionthatwaspublishedtoday

    (http://comres.co.uk/polls/bbcradio4today

    muslimpoll)bytheBBC.

    You'llrememberthatintheimmediateaftermath

    oflastmonth'sterroristoutragesinParis(thekillingof12peopleatCharlieHebdomagazine,

    andthenanattackonakoshersupermarket,wherefourpeopledied)manydifferentslogans

    poppedup."JesuisAhmed"wasapopularalternative(orcomplement)tothenearubiquitous

    "JesuisCharlie".AhmedMerabetwasaFrenchMuslimpoliceofficerwhowaskilledinthe

    Charlieattack,andhiscausewasadoptedinapopulartweet:"IamnotCharlie,IamAhmed

    thedeadcop.CharlieridiculedmyfaithandcultureandIdieddefendinghisrighttodoso."

    How,then,didrespondentstotheBBCpollsignaltheiridentificationwithAhmed?Some95%

    ofrespondentssaidtheyfeltloyaltoBritain,and93%saidthatMuslimsshouldalwaysobey

    Britishlaws.However78%agreedwiththestatementthatitwas"deeplyoffensive"topublish

    imagesoftheprophetMuhammad,andworryingly,11%assentedtothepropositionthat

    organisationswhichpublishsuchimages"deservetobeattacked".

    Some68%agreedthat"actsofviolence"againstthosewhopublishimagesoftheprophet"can

    neverbejustified"while24%couldnotconcurwiththatstatement.Indeedmorethan27%were

    willingtoexpress"somesympathyforthemotives"behindtheattacksonCharlieHebdoin

    Paris.

  • Howdoallthesefindingsfittogether?TheproportionofMuslimsdeclaringstrongloyaltyto

    Britainwasinlinewithmanypreviouspolls,showingthatMuslimsprofesstobepatrioticand

    lawabidinginslightlyhigherpercentagesthanotherBritonsdo.Itmaybeworthrecallingthat

    manyBritishMuslimcommunitiesoriginatefrom,andstillidentifywith,deeplyconservative

    placesinsouthAsia(ruralKashmirorBangladesh,forexample)whereloyaltytoestablished

    authorityisawidelyacknowledgedvirtue.Islamitself,intheformthatistaughtinmanyBritish

    mosquesandmadrassas,regardsobediencetoauthority(andtheavoidanceoffitnaor

    anarchy)assomethingselfevidentlydesirable.

    Thatdoesnotmean,though,thatMuslimsinBritain(or,Isuspect,mostotherWestern

    countries)haveboughtintosecularistlibertarianism,whichregardsthe"righttoridicule"asan

    importantentitlement.Amajorityaredeeplyunamusedbyantireligiouscartoonsbutofthose,

    most,butnotall,arewillingtoreactstoically,eveniftheycanunderstandthosewhosestoicism

    fails.

    Thevastandinspiringdemonstrations,inParisandelsewhere,thatfollowedtheterrorist

    attacksmighthavegivenmanypeopletheimpressionofanearuniversalconsensusonthe

    sanctityoffreedomofspeech,includingoutrageousspeech.That,ifitwerecompletelytrue,

    wouldbeanencouragingstartingpointforadrivetoopposethe"tiny"minoritywhodonot

    entirelysharethatview.

    Unfortunatelytheminorityisnottiny.Butitisprobablystillthecasethatmostcitizens,

    includingmostMuslimcitizens,arewillingonbalancetoacceptthebargainof"freedomof

    speechunderthelaw"inwhichthepainofhearingandseeingdeeplyunpleasantthingsis

    worthenduringinexchangeforthelibertytosaythingswhichchallengeorupsetothers.Thatis

    therealstartingpoint.