IS800-5LSM_642

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    1/27

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    2/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 2

    Designer has to ensure the structures, hedesigns are:

    Fit for their purpose

    Safe

    Economical and durable

    INTRODUCTION

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    3/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 3

    Following Uncertainties affect the safetyof a structure

    about loading

    about material strength and

    about structural dimensions

    about behaviour under load

    INTRODUCTION

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    4/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 4

    LIMIT STATE DESIGN

    Limit State: State at which one of the conditions pertainingto the structure has reached a limiting value

    Limit States

    Limit States of Strength Limit States of Serviceability

    Strength as governed by material Deflection

    Buckling strength Vibration

    Stability against overturning, sway Fatigue cracks (reparable damage)

    Fatigue Fracture Corrosion

    Brittle Fracture Fire resistance

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    5/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 5

    RANDOM VARIATIONS

    Resistance, S

    Load effect, Q

    f(S)f(Q)

    Qm

    Frequency

    Probabil i ty density functions for strength and load effect

    Sm

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    6/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 6

    LIMIT STATES DESIGN

    Basis of Limit States

    Design

    Fig. 1 Probabil ity distr ibution of the safety margin R-Q

    R-QR-Q0

    (R-Q)m

    f(R-Q)(R-Q)

    2Q

    2s

    mm QS

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    7/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 7

    PROBABILITY OF FAILURE

    2Q

    2R

    mm

    QRmf

    QR

    QRP

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    8/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 8

    SAFETY INDEX

    2Q

    2S

    mm QS

    Pf= [- ] 2.32 3.09 3.72 4.27 4.75 5.2 5.61

    Pf= (-) 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    9/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 9

    PARTIAL SAFETY FACTOR

    mukfk SQ /

    )V1(S)V1(Q 2ssqm2qqsm

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    10/27

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    11/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 11

    ALLOWABLE SRESS DESIGN (ASD)

    Allowable stress = (Yield stress) / (Factor of

    safety)

    Limitations

    Material non-linearity

    Non-linear behaviour in the postbuckled state

    and the property of steel to tolerate high

    stresses by yielding locally and redistributingthe loads not accounted for.

    No allowance for redistribution of loads in

    statically indeterminate members

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    12/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 12

    LIMIT STATES DESIGN

    Limit States" are various conditions in which astructure would be considered to have failed to fulfilthe purpose for which it was built.

    Ultimate Limit States are those catastrophic

    states,which require a larger reliability in order toreduce the probability of its occurrence to a verylow level.

    Serviceability Limit State" refers to the limits on

    acceptable performance of the structure duringservice.

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    13/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 13

    General Principles of

    Limit States Design

    Structure to be designed for the Limit States atwhich they would become unfit for their intendedpurpose by choosing, appropriate partial safetyfactors, based on probabilistic methods.

    Two partial safety factors, one applied to loading(f) and another to the material strength (m)shallbe employed.

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    14/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 14

    f allows for;

    Possible deviation of the actual behaviour of the

    structure from the analysis model

    Deviation of loads from specified values and

    Reduced probability that the various loads acting

    together will simultaneously reach the characteristic

    value.

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    15/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 15

    LIMIT STATES DESIGN

    (Load * Load Factor) (Resistance )(Resistance Factor)

    mtakes account;

    Possible deviation of the material in thestructure from that assumed in design

    Possible reduction in the strength of the

    material from its characteristic value

    Manufacturing tolerances.

    Mode of failure (ductile or brittle)

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    16/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 16

    IS800 SECTION 5 LIMIT STATE DESIGN

    5.1 Basis for Design

    5.2 Limit State Design 5.3 Actions

    5.4 Strength

    5.5 Factors Governing the Ultimate Strength 5.5.1 Stability

    5.5.2 Fatigue

    5.5.3 Plastic Collapse

    5.6 Limit State of Serviceability 5.6.1 Deflection

    5.6.2 Vibration

    5.6.3 Durability

    5.6.4 Fire Resistance

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    17/27

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    18/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 18

    5.1.3

    The potential for catastrophic damage shall be limited or

    avoided by appropriate choice of one or more of thefollowing:

    i) avoiding, eliminating or reducing exposure to hazards,

    which the structure is likely to sustain.

    ii) choosing structural forms, layouts and details anddesigning such that

    the structure has low sensitivity to hazardous conditions.

    the structure survives with only local damage even after serious

    damage to any one individual element by the hazard.

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    19/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 19

    Conditions to be satisfied to avoid a

    disproportionate collapse

    building should be effectively tied together at

    each principal floor level and each column shouldbe effectively held in position by means of

    continuous ties (beams) nearly orthogonal

    each storey of the building should be checked toensure disproportionate collapse would not

    precipitate by the notional removal, one at a time,

    of each column.

    check should be made at each storey byremoving one lateral support system at a time to

    ensure disproportionate collapse would not

    occur.

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    20/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 20

    Actions

    5.3.1 Classification of Actions

    by their variation with time as given below: a) Permanent Actions (Qp): Actions due to self-

    weight of structural and non-structural components,

    fittings, ancillaries, and fixed equipment etc.

    b) Variable Actions (Qv): Actions due to constructionand service stage loads such as imposed (live) loads

    (crane loads, snow loads etc.), wind loads, and

    earthquake loads etc.

    c) Accidental Actions (Qa):Actionsdue to

    explosions, impact of vehicles, and fires etc.

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    21/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 21

    Combination

    Limit State of Strength Limit state of Serviceability

    DLLL WL

    /

    EL

    AL DLLL WL

    /ELLead

    ing

    Accompa

    Nying

    Leadi

    ng

    Accompan

    ying

    DL+LL+CL 1.5 1.5 1.05 1.0 1.0 1.0 DL+LL+CL

    +

    WL/EL

    1.2

    1.2

    1.2

    1.2

    1.05

    0.53

    0.6

    1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8

    DL+WL/EL

    1.5

    (0.9)

    *

    1.5 1.0 1.0

    DL+ER1.2

    (0.9)1.2

    DL+LL+AL 1.0 0.35 0.35 1.0

    Partial Safety Factors (Actions)

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    22/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 22

    PARTIAL SAFETY FACTORS (Strength)

    Sl.

    No

    Definition Partial Safety Factor

    1 Resistance, governed by

    yielding mo

    1.1

    2 Resistance of member to

    buckling mo

    1.1

    3 Resistance, governed by

    ultimate stress m1

    1.25

    4 Resistance of connection m1

    Bolts-Friction TypeBolts-Bearing Type

    Rivets

    Welds

    Shop

    Fabrication

    s

    Field

    Fabricatio

    ns

    1.25

    1.25

    1.25

    1.25

    1.25

    1.25

    1.25

    1.50

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    23/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 23

    5.5 Factors Governing the Ultimate Strength

    frame stability against overturning and sway

    Fatigue design shall be as per Section 13 of this

    code. When designing for fatigue, the load factor

    for action,f, equal to unity shall be used for the

    load causing stress fluctuation and stress range. Plastic Collapse Plastic analysis and design may

    be used if the requirement specified under the

    plastic method of analysis (Section 4.5) are

    satisfied.

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    24/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 24

    5.6 Limit State of Serviceability

    Deflectionsare to be checked for the most

    adverse but realistic combination of service loadsand their arrangement, by elastic analysis, using a

    load factor of 1.0

    Suitable provisions in the design shall be made forthe dynamic effects of live loads, impact loads and

    vibration/fatiguedue to machinery operating loads.

    The durabilityof steel structures shall be ensured

    by following recommendations of Section 15. Design provisions to resistfireare briefly

    discussed in Section 16.

    LIMITING DEFLECTIONS under LL Only

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    25/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 25

    LIMITING DEFLECTIONS under LL Only

    Type of

    building

    Deflectio

    nDesign Load Member Supporting

    Maximum

    Deflection

    Indus

    trial

    building

    Vertical

    Live

    load/Wind

    load

    Purlins and

    GirtsPurlins and

    Girts

    Elastic claddingBrittle cladding

    Span / 150Span / 180

    Live load Simple span Elastic cladding Span / 240

    Live load Simple span Brittle cladding Span / 300

    Live load Cantilever span Elastic cladding Span / 120

    Live load Cantilever span Brittle cladding Span / 150

    Live load or

    Wind load

    Rafter

    supporting

    Profiled Metal

    SheetingSpan / 180

    Plastered Sheeting Span / 240

    Crane load

    (Manualoperation)

    Gantry Crane Span / 500

    Crane load

    (Electric

    operation

    over 50 t)

    Gantry Crane Span / 1000

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    26/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 26

    DEFLECTION LIMITS under LL Only

    DeflectionDesign Load Member Supporting

    Maximum

    DeflectionLateral

    Crane+

    wind

    No cranes ColumnElastic

    claddingHeight / 150

    No cranes ColumnMasonry/brittle

    claddingHeight / 240

    Crane Gantry(lateral) Crane Span / 400

    Vertical

    Live load Floors & roofs

    Not

    susceptible

    to cracking

    Span / 300

    Live load Floor & RoofSusceptible to

    crackingSpan / 360

    Lateral Wind Building --- Height / 500

    WindInter storey

    drift

    ---Storey height /

    300

  • 7/27/2019 IS800-5LSM_642

    27/27

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 27