IRE Journal - Youthlink

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 IRE Journal - Youthlink

    1/2THE IRE JOURN6

    extra supervision was requested for one yoman with an extensive history of gun charThe request was denied.

    One nonprot received more than $500,in DC YouthLink expenditures, but was equately documenting only 15 percent owork for the program, records showed. top mentoring provider was spending prechours playing video games with youths taking them to Burger King. A leading tutoprovider lacked something as basic as hav

    qualied teachers, and one of its high-lestaffers was red after allegedly having sex wa student. These were just some of our ndi

    HowweinvestigatedWe had signicant obstacles to overcome.

    city agency (DYRS) had a history of hidinghind juvenile condentiality laws. We didnanything fancy to get around this. It came doto developing a lot of sources. We started wactivists and community groups that worwith the kids, asking what they thought Dwas doing right and what it wasnt. Many

    Around suppertime last summer, Idrove an old white Ford Focus acrossthe Anacostia River. It was just a stones

    throw from Washington, D.C.s monuments andmemorials but couldnt have been more differ-ent. The air smelled like burning rubber. Insectsbuzzed noisily through overgrown weeds. Thebuildings were worn down.

    I pulled around the back of a small white two-story home. A new wooden ramp stuck out from

    the door, awkwardly distinct from the old struc-ture it led to. An abandoned car sat in the back ofthe dirt driveway.

    Inside, 17-year-old Maurices wheelchairhauntingly occupied a dark corner. His 40-year-old mother, Latonia, sat at her dining room tablein a red polka-dot shirt. That day her work col-leagues had said she looked like Betty Boop. Shehad just cleaned the entire ground oor to pre-pare for a television interview.

    I felt a little embarrassed as an inexperienced26-year-old. I had no photographer, lightingcrew, producer or editor. I was it. So I lugged my

    tripod, camera and microphone inside (sweatingprofusely), focused the picture, hit record andtook my seat. Latonia looked exasperated. Sheinhaled deeply and began her story.

    Maurice always loved to steal cars, she said.Her friends were constantly calling her. Hesdriving a vanjust zoomed past me, almost hitsomebody!

    Eventually, he was arrested and became a wardof the citys Department of Youth RehabilitationServices (DYRS). The agency enrolled him inDC YouthLink, a new program designed to turnyoung offenders around without locking themup. While living at home, Maurice was promised

    a mentor, tutor and behavioral health services,but only the mentor ever came by. Meanwhile,he continued to steal cars. His mother begged thecity to lock him up, but no one listened.

    Maurices story was one of hundreds. I wasso angered by what I kept hearing that I workedfor eight months to expose it. I did much of thereporting on my own time while turning severaldaily stories a week for the evening newscast.

    WhatwefoundIts important to understand that the idea be-

    hind DC YouthLink was a good one. Research

    has shown that treating young offenders in thecommunity with mentoring, tutoring and otherservices is far more effective (and less expen-sive) than incarceration. But if youre going torelease dangerous teens into the community, ithas to be done right. In this case, the programwas mismanaged and abused. The city let theteens return to their neighborhoods and thendidnt provide many with support, our inves-tigation found. In the time that followed, theytook the lives of others and themselves.

    A third of the programs participants wererearrested over just six months. From 2010to 2011 (our report aired in 2012), 15 werecharged with murder and 15 more were killed.Moreover, of the more than 750 youths servedby the program, the city could point to only 13who graduated from high school.

    In addition to the poor outcomes, we shineda light on what went wrong. An internal letterrevealed almost 30 percent of youths west ofthe river had no services in place whatsoeverin 2011. Of those who did get services, manyfaced shortages. Condential records showed

    Bad

    Alternative

    D.C. teen criminals avoid jail;

    program fails to rehabilitate them

    By Ben Eisler

  • 7/29/2019 IRE Journal - Youthlink

    2/2SUMMER 2013

    the problem was DC YouthLink, but none knewjust how bad things were.

    Those sources introduced us to others, un-til eventually we had deep contacts at variousnonprot service providers and DYRS. We got toknow a lot of parents and youths, engaged theDYRS union and tried to get as much as possibleout of the agencys press ofce. Our sources gaveus condential emails, youth rosters and invoices.They were also able to conrm (and reconrm)

    various details that we could not get documen-tation for. It was one of these sources who con-nected me with Maurice and his mother.

    This may seem obvious, but I cant emphasizeenough how important it is for your sources tounderstand why you do what you do. I explainedto almost everyone I spoke to that my goal wasto do a balanced story that benetted the pub-lic. I wanted to explore what was working andwhat wasnt, and bring about real change thatimproved things for people. Thats the only rea-son I do what I do, and once they understoodthat, they were innitely more willing to help.

    Its also worth noting that the parents are cru-cial to reporting personal stories. Due to con-dentiality laws, they and the youths are the onlyones legally able to share their experiences. Findthem through the nonprots working with themand government sources. If you know theyvebeen through a lot, consider bringing them ow-ers (if they wont talk to you, leave them at theirdoor). Works like a charm.

    In addition to sourcing, we led an extensiveFOIA request. After the deadline passed, we bad-gered DYRS every few days until they responded.We also sent a threatening legal letter. The FOIAprovided us with inspection reports and spending

    gures that conrmed much of what we had beenhearing from sources. Our request was broad buttargeted. We had our sources identify suspiciousnonprots and then asked for all documents thatshowed any deciency or potential deciencyon the part of those groups. My apartment wasburied by stacks of audits, quarterly and annualreports, inspection reports and budgets. Much ofit was useless, but I annotated and cataloged ev-erything in case it might come in handy.

    The other challenge was that our story target-ed a number of ex-cons who now headed non-prots but still associated with violent groups.

    I found myself alone in high-crime neighbor-hoods, face to face with a teen offender or theteens family. My wife scolded me on multipleoccasions for going at night. Always go withsomeone else if you can.

    This area is really ripe for investigative work inother cities. It involves not just public money butpublic safety of the teens as well as all otherresidents. The stakes are huge, and it is extremelydifcult to rehabilitate these youths, so even smallmistakes can become big problems. As a result,I got the impression that many of those workingwith them have become cynical and feel their ef-forts are futile, which adds to the dysfunction.

    ConfrontingthemayorThis story would not have been what it was with-

    out the guidance of my supervisors Bill Lord andDoug Culver and the web layout by Justin Karp.

    Our interest in the subject was sparked by re-ports in The Washington Times about individualcrimes by these youths. Prior to our report, DCYouthLink had gone entirely uncovered by themedia. Shortly after we published it, DC Youth-Link assembled a new pool of service providers,selected through a competitive process. Previ-ously, there was no such thing there werenteven contracts. There was also an ofce estab-

    lished to advocate for parents. City council andgovernment agency sources said the changeswere a direct result of our work.

    Over the course of our reporting, D.C. MayorVincent Gray and DYRS Director Neil Stanleyrepeatedly refused our interview requests. Soone summer morning, we went to the mayorsweekly press brieng. The focus was taxis notremotely related to DYRS but Gray knew wewere coming, so he asked Stanley to attend. Hekept us waiting until the end, calling on everyother reporter with a hand raised rst. My heartwas racing. It wasnt that I hadnt prepared Ihad lived and breathed this material for eight

    months. No one knew it better. I just hate cfrontations.

    I told the mayor that DYRS had releahundreds of its youths into the community not supported many of them at all, and dozwere killed or charged with murder. Whasked for his response, he called Stanley topodium. Stanley claimed they had vastly proved the program and as a result, no par

    pants were victims or suspects in a homicin 2012.

    I knew that to provide the additional osight Stanley was touting, the city hired a mer nonprot director who himself had baccused of misusing city funds, despite the that the investigation into those allegations never completed. I posed this point duringpress brieng.

    The mayor pulled Stanley from the podand told me that they would be happy for mprovide additional information that would hthem improve the program.

    After the press conference, the mayor cafor an investigation by the attorney general misspent funds. Unfortunately for Maurice many others, it was too late. The city never lochim up or gave him the support it promised. Onight he was riding in the back of a stolen when someone started shooting. He took a buto the spine, and will never walk again.

    Ben Eisler is a former reporter, photographer and e

    for WJLA-Washington, D.C. He is now a health care

    ducer for CBS This Morning.

    To view this story, visit http://wj.la/RuHZZ8.

    Thecitylettheteens

    returntotheirneighborhoods

    andthendidntprovide

    manywithsupport,our

    investigationfound.

    Latonia Halls son, a teen offender, was enrolled in the DC YouthLink program. It gave him little support, ahe continued to steal cars.