Upload
samuel-hanson
View
29
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT – F2006. Summary of Attributes. Comparison Institutions Benchmark Peer Group. Armstrong Atlantic (GA) Auburn-Montgomery (AL) Augusta State (GA) Eastern Kentucky (KY) Jacksonville State (AL) Louisiana State-Shreveport (LA) McNeese State (LA) Purdue-Calumet (IN) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Comparison InstitutionsBenchmark Peer Group
• Armstrong Atlantic (GA)• Auburn-Montgomery (AL)• Augusta State (GA)• Eastern Kentucky (KY)• Jacksonville State (AL)• Louisiana State-Shreveport (LA)• McNeese State (LA)• Purdue-Calumet (IN)• Univ. Arkansas-Little Rock (AK)• Univ. Central Oklahoma (OK)• Univ. North Alabama (AL)• Univ. North Carolina-Pembroke (NC)
Headcount & FTE
• Illustrates similarity to comparison group
• We have fewer full-time and more part-time enrollment than the average
Cost
• Our costs are lower than the comparison group every year
• Gap is growing
• Is CSU a good buy?
Aid Received by Students
• Impact of HOPE
• These are percents; are we really providing so little institutional support or is this a “HOPE effect?”
Financial Aid Received
• Answers to last slide– HOPE is a big
difference– Our institution lags
on local grants (Foundation support?)
– CSU students borrow less
Graduation Rates
• We do better than peers!– Whites do!– Blacks do much
better!!– Hispanic do better!– Asians do much
better!– Aliens do much
better!• We should make
more of this
Graduation Rates
• We compare well in graduation rate
• We have a lower transfer-out rate
• We compare well in retention rates
• Need to study at college & department level – how can we do even better?
Degrees Awarded
• We confer more graduate degrees and fewer undergraduate degrees than do our peers
• Should we continue associate degree programs?
Distribution of Revenue
• Tuition is lower than among peers
• State allocation is higher
• We do not have as high a percentage of grant & contract $ - how do we do better?
• We have more “other” (Foundation?) revenues
Expenses
• We spend less on instruction, research, academic support, & student services
• We spend more on institutional support and other core expenses
Staffing
• We have fewer instructional, administrative , and non-professional staff
• We have a lot more “other professional.”
Average Salaries
• Academic salaries are lower– Profs by 10%– Associates by 10%– Assistants by 13%– Instructors by
6.7%
Analytical Summary
• Compared to 12 peer institutions CSU:– Enrolls as many or more students– Costs the students less– Enrolls more minority students– Sustains higher retention and
graduation rates, especially with regard to minority students
– Awards more graduate and fewer undergraduate degrees