Upload
ilene-barton
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IP Management at Massey
1.national collaborative infrastructure
Intellectual Property Policy
• Ensures IP rights generated by Massey staff and students are used to maximise the flow of benefits to the community, enhance the reputation and wealth of the University, encourage staff and students to benefit from their commercially viable activities and to protect the rights of staff, student and the University where IP rights are concerned.
• The Commercialisation Office evaluates the exploitation of IP
Ownership of IP rights • Legal and beneficial ownership in all new IP rights vests with
the University except for:– Copyright in scholarly works– Copyright in Student works– Moral rights – Where otherwise agreed in writing by the Commercialisation Office
• Ownership may change as a consequence of the – Terms and conditions of the Research Contract that generated the IP– Results of commercialisation evaluation
Allocating the benefits of IP • Net revenue from the Commercialisation will be shared
equally between the:– Creators– College– University
• Allocation of shares in spin-out companies– In some circumstances the creators may negotiate to receive shares in
entities into which the new IP has been licensed or assigned.• Where there are multiple creators a benefit sharing agreement
needs to be negotiated
Students• Participation in research should not interfere with the
assessment of the students academic performance• Any delays in the publication of the students thesis as a result
of a confidentiality agreement should be consistent with the Universities embargo policy
• University has a “Duty of Care” to its students
Scenarios
• Student has bright idea, normal supervision from University and technician support plus $300 from SEAT.– University owns IP– Student likely to be dominant Creator– Commercialisation pathway options
Scenarios
• Student has bright idea, supervisor makes significant creative contribution and technician support plus $300 from SEAT.– University owns IP– Student and Supervisor likely to be equal Creators– Commercialisation pathway options
Scenarios
• Student works on project, supervisor has the bright idea and makes creative contribution and technician support plus $300 from SEAT.– University owns IP– Supervisor dominant Creator – maybe 95:05– Commercialisation pathway options
Scenarios
• Company X has bright idea and they want confidentiality and IP benefits and fund direct expenses– University agree to assign IP to company– Report/thesis likely to be embargoed– Creators of IP would have patent in their name– Commercialisation managed by Company X – No benefit share to University & Creators unless agreed
upfront often as a result of background IP
Scenarios
• Company X has bright idea and they want confidentiality and IP benefits and fund direct expenses– University agree to assign IP to company– Report/thesis likely to be embargoed– Creators of IP would have patent in their name– Commercialisation managed by Company X – No benefit share to University & Creators unless agreed
upfront often as a result of background IP