Investor Presentation December 2017 TSX: CG · PDF fileInformation contained in this presentation which are not statements of historical facts, and the documents incorporated by reference

Investor PresentationDecember 2017 TSX: CG

www.centerragold.com

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

2

Information contained in this presentation which are not statements of historical facts, and the documents incorporated by reference herein, may be “forward-looking information” for the purposes of Canadian securitieslaws. Such forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by suchforward looking information. The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “contemplate”, “plan”, “intends”, “continue”, “budget”, “estimate”, “may”, “will”, “schedule”, “understand” and similar expressions identify forward-looking information. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things: whether the arrangement to acquire AuRico Metals Inc. (“AMI”) and the related debt financing will be consummated, including whetherconditions to the consummation of the proposed transactions will be satisfied, expectations regarding the assets of AMI, including pro forma financial and operational forecasts, and potential improvements to the Kemessproperty. Forward-looking information is necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Centerra, are inherently subject to significant political, business, economic andcompetitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward looking information. Factors that could cause actual results orevents to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things: (A) the ability to consummate the proposed arrangement to acquire AMI and the related debt financing; the ability to obtain requisiteregulatory and shareholder approvals and the satisfaction of other conditions to the consummation of the proposed arrangement to acquire AMI and the related debt financing on the proposed terms and schedule, and tothe extent, anticipated the potential impact of the announcement or consummation of the proposed transactions on relationships, including with regulatory authorities, employees, suppliers, customers and competitors;changes in general economic, business and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets; changes in applicable laws; significant competition that Centerra and AMI face; compliance with extensivegovernment regulation; and the diversion of management time on the proposed arrangement to acquire AMI and the related debt financing (B) strategic, legal, planning and other risks, including: political risks associatedwith the Company’s operations in the Kyrgyz Republic and Canada; risks that any of the conditions precedent to the Strategic Agreement will not be satisfied in a timely manner or at all, particularly as the Government maynot bind the General Prosecutor’s Office or the Parliament of the Kyrgyz Republic; a decision by the General Prosecutor’s Office, or its successor the Anti-Corruption Service of the State Committee for National Security, tore-open at any time civil or criminal proceedings against Centerra, its subsidiaries or other stakeholders; the failure of the Government to comply with its continuing obligations under the Strategic Agreement, including therequirement that it comply at all times with its obligations under the Kumtor Project Agreements, allow for the continued operation of the Kumtor Mine by KGC and KOC and not take any expropriatory action; actions by theGovernment or any state agency or the General Prosecutor's Office that serve to restrict or otherwise interfere with the payment of funds by KGC and KOC to Centerra; resource nationalism including the management ofexternal stakeholder expectations; the impact of changes in, or to the more aggressive enforcement of, laws, regulations and government practices, including with respect to the environment, in the jurisdictions in whichthe Company operates including any delays or refusals to grant required permits and licenses, unjustified civil or criminal action against the Company, its affiliates or its current or former employees; risks that communityactivism may result in increased contributory demands or business interruptions; the impact of any actions taken by the Kyrgyz Republic Government and Parliament relating to the Kumtor Project Agreements which areinconsistent with the rights of Centerra and KGC under the Kumtor Project Agreements; any impact on the purported cancellation of Kumtor’s land use rights at the Kumtor Project; the risks related to other outstandinglitigation affecting the Company’s operations in the Kyrgyz Republic and elsewhere; the impact of the delay by relevant government agencies to provide required approvals, expertises and permits; potential impact on theKumtor Project of investigations by Kyrgyz Republic instrumentalities; the terms pursuant to which the Mongolian Government will participate in, or to take a special royalty rate in, the Gatsuurt Project; the impact ofconstitutional changes in Turkey; the impact of any sanctions imposed by Canada, the United States or other jurisdictions against various Russian individuals and entities; the ability of the Company to successfully negotiateagreements for the development of the Gatsuurt Project; potential defects of title in the Company’s properties that are not known as of the date hereof; the inability of the Company and its subsidiaries to enforce their legalrights in certain circumstances; the presence of a significant shareholder that is a state-owned company of the Kyrgyz Republic; risks related to anti-corruption legislation; risks related to the concentration of assets inCentral Asia; Centerra’s future exploration and development activities not being successful; Centerra not being able to replace mineral reserves; Aboriginal claims and consultative issues relating to the Company’s propertieswhich are in proximity to Aboriginal communities; and potential risks related to kidnapping or acts of terrorism; (C) risks relating to financial matters, including: sensitivity of the Company’s business to the volatility of gold,copper and other mineral prices, the use of provisionally-priced sales contracts for production at Mount Milligan, reliance on a few key customers for the gold-copper concentrate at Mount Milligan, use of commodityderivatives, the imprecision of the Company’s mineral reserves and resources estimates and the assumptions they rely on, the accuracy of the Company’s production and cost estimates, the impact of restrictive covenantsin the Company’s credit facilities which may, among other things, restrict the Company from pursuing certain business activities or making distributions from its subsidiaries, the Company’s ability to obtain future financing,the impact of global financial conditions, the impact of currency fluctuations, the effect of market conditions on the Company’s short-term investments, the Company’s ability to make payments including any payments ofprincipal and interest on the Company’s debt facilities depends on the cash flow of its subsidiaries; and (D) risks related to operational matters and geotechnical issues and the Company’s continued ability to successfullymanage such matters, including the movement of the Davidov Glacier, waste and ice movement and continued performance of the buttress at the Kumtor Project; the occurrence of further ground movements at theKumtor Project and mechanical availability; the ability of the Company to successfully ramp-up to design criteria of the secondary crusher at Mount Milligan; the success of the Company’s future exploration anddevelopment activities, including the financial and political risks inherent in carrying out exploration activities; inherent risks associated with the use of sodium cyanide in the mining operations; the adequacy of theCompany’s insurance to mitigate operational risks; mechanical breakdowns; the Company’s ability to replace its mineral reserves; the occurrence of any labour unrest or disturbance and the ability of the Company tosuccessfully re-negotiate collective agreements when required; the risk that Centerra’s workforce may be exposed to widespread epidemic; seismic activity in the vicinity of the Company’s properties; long lead timesrequired for equipment and supplies given the remote location of some of the Company’s operating properties; reliance on a limited number of suppliers for certain consumables, equipment and components; illegal miningon the Company’s Mongolian properties; the Company’s ability to accurately predict decommissioning and reclamation costs; the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; competition for mineralacquisition opportunities; and risks associated with the conduct of joint ventures/partnerships; the Company’s ability to manage its projects effectively and to mitigate the potential lack of availability of contractors, budgetand timing overruns and project resources. See section titled “Risks that can affect our business” in Centerra’s 2016 Annual Information Form available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.Furthermore, market price fluctuations in gold and copper, as well as increased capital or production costs or reduced recovery rates may render ore reserves containing lower grades of mineralization uneconomic and mayultimately result in a restatement of reserves. The extent to which resources may ultimately be reclassified as proven or probable reserves is dependent upon the demonstration of their profitable recovery. Economic andtechnological factors which may change over time always influence the evaluation of reserves or resources. Centerra has not adjusted mineral resource figures in consideration of these risks and, therefore, Centerra cangive no assurances that any mineral resource estimate will ultimately be reclassified as proven and probable reserves. There can be no assurances that forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as many factorsand future events, both known and unknown could cause actual results, performance or achievements to vary or differ materially, from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied bysuch forward-looking statements contained herein or incorporated by reference. Accordingly, all such factors should be considered carefully when making decisions with respect to Centerra, and prospective investorsshould not place undue reliance on forward looking information. Forward-looking information is as of November 7, 2017. Centerra assumes no obligation to update or revise forward looking information to reflect changes inassumptions, changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such forward-looking information, except as required by applicable law. Except as otherwise noted herein, Gordon Reid, Professional Engineer andCenterra’s Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained in this presentation. Mr. Reid is a Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101. Formore information, please refer to the properties technical reports, which are available on SEDAR. All figures are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated.

1. 2017e AISC: Kumtor $737 to $764/oz, Mount Milligan $483 to $523/oz. All-in sustaining costs per ounce sold is a non-GAAP measures and is discussed under “Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s MDA & news release October 31, 2017.2. Refer to Company’s news release November 7, 2017.3. As at September 30, 2017. Liquidity based on September 30, 2017 balance sheet and new credit facility; excluding AuRico Metals cash balance

Corporate Highlights

Internationally Diversified Gold Producer

Two Cornerstone Lower-Cost Quartile Assets

Gold Production up to 815kozpa gold at AISC1 of $705 to $741 per ounce and ~60M lbs of copper

Entered into a friendly acquisition of AuRico Metals;de-risked brownfield project and a high quality free-cash flow generating royalty portfolio2

Significant Operational Cash Flow Profile

Solid Late-Stage Development Pipeline

Cash2 Position of US$352MM3

Trading at a Discount to Peers, Potential Re-Rating

Liquidity of US$802MM3

Positive Retained Earnings of US$936MM3

3

Cash Reserves2 Profile (US$)

Pro-forma Consensus Asset NAV Breakdown

Centerra: Built For Success

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Q32017

Gol

d Pr

ice

(US$

/oz)

US$

Mill

ions

Cumulative Dividends Cash Balance Gold Price3

December 2017

Canada55%

Kyrgyz Republic

33%

Turkey9%

Australia2%

Mongolia1%

U.S.0%

$352

$50 $125

$150

$125

Cash Reserves EBRD Revolver Credit FacilityCBCH Revolver Credit Facility Oksut Credit FacilityNew Credit Facility

US$802MM

4

Cash$542MM

Liquidity Profile (US$MM’s)(2)

Positive Net Cash Position2 (US$MM’s)

2017 YTD: Internally Funded Business (US$MM’s)

Retained Earnings Profile (US$)

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Q32017

Gol

d Pr

ice

(US$

/oz)

US$

Mill

ions

Retained Earnings Cumulative Dividends Gold Price

Centerra: Q3 - 2017 Corporate Update

409

105 88 172

78 352

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2016 Cash Mt MilliganFCF

Kumtor FCF DebtRepayments

Other(Projects,G&A, etc)

Q3 2017Cash

(96)

18

(125)

(100)

(75)

(50)

(25)

0

25

50

75

2016 Q3-2017

1 Includes cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term investments at December 31, 2016.2 Based on September 30, 2017 balance sheet and new credit facility; excluding AuRico Metals cash balance.

December 2017

1

Centerra: AuRico Metals Transaction1 Rationale

Acquiring a de-risked brownfield project in British Columbia and cash flowing royalty portfolio

• Enhances Centerra’s high-quality asset base in a world-class jurisdiction

− Kemess can be a future cornerstone asset that will further bolster Centerra’s strong development pipeline

− Cash flowing royalty portfolio underpinned by the high-quality Fosterville and Young-Davidson mines

• Near-term de-risked growth

− Over C$1 billion of surface infrastructure, EIA and first nation agreements in place

• Numerous value creation upside opportunities at Kemess

− Integration of Kemess Underground (“KUG”) and Kemess East (“KE”) has the potential to become a 20+ year mining operation through optimization studies and potential synergy opportunities

• High-quality, free cash flowing royalty portfolio

− Acquisition of a high-quality, free-cash flow generating royalties provides immediate incremental cash flow and potential for long-term upside from high-quality underlying assets

• Accretive to NAV, reserves and resources

• Strong balance sheet maintained

− Centerra holds in excess of US$350 million in cash to fund the acquisition and has secured a new US$125 million acquisition facility

− Positioned to build out Centerra’s pipeline of development projects

− Centerra plans to restructure its current debt facilities upon close of this transaction

5December 2017

1. Refer to Company’s news release November 7, 2017.

6

Mount Milligan

Kumtor

Royalty Portfolio

Pro-Forma Free Cash Flow(US$MM’s)(1)

Consensus Asset NAV(US$MM’s)

Mount Milligan

Kumtor

Öksüt

Gatsuurt

Greenstone

Royalty Portfolio

Kemess

Pro-Forma Consensus Asset NAV

$138M

$113M

$10.5 to $11.0M

$945M

$855M

$230M

$160M

$270M

$110M

Mt. Milligan35%

Kumtor32%

Kemess10%

Öksüt8%

Greenstone6%

Royalties4%

Other4%

Gatsuurt1%

$40M

Pro-Forma Free Cash Flow by Asset (1)

Source: Centerra Gold and AuRico Metals filings, analyst estimates.(1) Mount Milligan and Kumtor Mine free cash flow figures based on Q3 2017 year-to-date operating cash flow less capital expenditures annualized for full-year 2017; AuRico Metals

royalties cash flow is based on published 2017E guidance.

Centerra: Pro-Forma Asset Breakdown

Kumtor 43%

Mt. Milligan53%

Royalties4%

December 2017

High-Quality Free Cash Flowing Royalty Portfolio

Producing Royalty

Non-Producing Royalty

Canada

USA

Mexico

Australia

Fosterville2.0% NSR

(Kirkland Lake Gold)

Young-Davidson1.5% NSR(Alamos Gold)

Hemlo-Williams0.25% NSR(Barrick Gold)

Eagle River0.5% NSR(Wesdome Gold Mines)

Stawell1.0% NSR

(Kirkland Lake Gold)

GJ & GJ NorthernBlock1.0% & 0.5% NSRs(Skeena Resources)

4Producing Royalties

19Total

Royalties

4Countries

Top-Tier Assets

World-Class Mining

Jurisdictions

Valued Operating Partners

7

Source: AuRico Metals filings.

Royalty Revenue (US$MM’s)

2016A 2017 Guidance

$8.1

$10.5 - $11.0

December 2017

8

Mt. Milligan MineAu, CuCanada

Kumtor MineAuKyrgyz Republic

Greenstone Project (50%)AuCanada

Öksüt ProjectAuTurkey

Gatsuurt ProjectAuMongolia

Kemess Underground and East ProjectsAu, CuCanada

Operations

Development

Molybdenum Asset

Producing Royalty AssetsFosterville(2.0% NSR)AuAustralia

Hemlo-Williams(0.25% NSR)AuCanada

Eagle River (0.5% NSR)AuCanada

Young-Davidson (1.5% NSR)AuCanada

Pro-Forma High-Quality Producing and Growth Assets

December 2017

9

Expected Catalyst Schedule

Kemess Underground EA Approval Received – Q1 2017

First Nations IBA Received – Q2 2017

Kemess Underground Permit Application

Anticipated – Q2 2018

Mount Milligan

KemessProject Tsay Keh

Kwadacha(Fort Ware)

Dawson Creek

Prince GeorgePrinceRupert

Terrace SmithersFort St. James

TaklaLanding Mackenzie

Kemess Project

Omineca Resource Access RoadForest Service Road

Kemess: De-Risked Brownfield Project(1)

0 200

Kilometers

100

Endako

• Established mining jurisdiction

• Advanced-stage− EA Approved, IBA in hand, FS complete

• Low-risk brownfield development

• C$1 billion of existing infrastructure− 25,000 tpd mill, road, power, tailings, rail load-

out, camp, airstrip

• Sizeable resource− KUG: P&P of 1.9Moz gold and 0.6Blbs copper and

M&I (exclusive of P&P) of 3.3Moz gold and 1.2Blbs copper

− KE: M&I of 1.7Moz gold and 1.0Blbs copper

• Long life − 12 years at Kemess Underground plus further 12

years at Kemess East

• Highly marketable clean concentrate

• Robust Kemess Underground economics with significant upside

• Continued exploration success− Kemess East and Kemess Offset Zone

December 2017(1) Refer to National Instrument 43-101 technical report dated July 12, 2017 for Kemess Underground and Kemess East available in the AuRico Metals filings.

Kemess: Site Layout – C$1Billion of Infrastructure

Fly-in, Fly-out Work Camp South Open Pit (Tailings Storage Facility)

Metallurgical Facility Kemess Underground & East Deposits

10December 2017

11

Kemess Underground (Feasibility – 2016)(1)

• Reserves of 1.9Moz Au and 0.6Blbs Cu• LOM of 12 years at 106koz Au/p.a. and 47Mlbs/p.a. at

AISC(2) of $244/oz on a by-product basis • Environmental approvals and IBA received• Awaiting receipt of permit application

Kemess East (PEA – May 2017)(1)

• M&I resources of 1.7Moz and 1.0Blbs Cu• LOM of 12 years at 80koz Au/p.a. and 57Mlbs/p.a. at

AISC(2) of (US$69/oz) on a by-product basis• Additional ~12,000m of drilling planned for 2017

Kemess South (Past Producer: 1998 – 2011)

• ~C$1 billion of infrastructure in-place (including a 25,000 tpd mill, grid power, road, maintenance shop, etc.)

• Past production of 3.0Moz Au and 750Mlbs Cu− Brownfields opportunity significantly reduces risk

(1) Refer to National Instrument 43-101 technical report dated July 12, 2017 for Kemess Underground and Kemess East available in the AuRico Metals filings.(2) AISC is a Non-GAAP measure

Kemess: Overview

December 2017

12

Kemess Underground – 2016 Feasibility Highlights(1)

Mine Type Underground Block Cave

Avg. LOM Gold Production (koz) 106

Avg. LOM By-Product AISC (US$/oz)(2) $244

Reserve Mine Life (years) 12

Development Capex (C$MM)(3) $604

P&P Au Reserves (Moz) 1.9

P&P Au Reserve Grade (g/t) 0.54

P&P Cu Reserves (Mlbs) 629.6

P&P Cu Reserve Grade (%) 0.27%

After-tax IRR 12.6%

After-tax NPV5% (C$MM) $289

Kemess East– 2017 PEA Highlights(1)

Mine Type Underground Panel Cave

Avg. LOM Gold Production (koz) 80

Avg. LOM By-Product AISC (US$/oz)(2) ($69)

Reserve Mine Life (years) 12

Development Capex (C$MM) $327

M&I Au Resource (Moz) 1.7

M&I Au Grade (g/t) 0.46

M&I Cu Resource (Mlbs) 954.0

M&I Cu Grade (%) 0.38%

After-tax IRR 16.7%

After-tax NPV5% (C$MM) $375

Kemess: Large, Low-Cost Production

KE Gold and Copper Production(1)KUG Gold and Copper Production(1)

December 2017

--

20

40

60

80

--

40

80

120

160

Y-2 Y-1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Y11 Y12 Y13

Cop

per

(Mlb

s)

Gol

d (k

oz)

Project Schedule YearAu Cu

0

20

40

60

80

--

40

80

120

160

Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Y11 Y12 Y13 Y14 Y15 Y16 Y17

Cop

per

(M

lbs)

Gol

d (

koz)

Project Schedule YearAu Cu

(1) Refer to National Instrument 43-101 technical report dated July 12, 2017 for Kemess Underground and Kemess East available in the AuRico Metals filings.(2) AISC is a Non-GAAP measure(3) Includes pre-commercial net revenue and capitalized pre-production operating expenditures.

$0

$250

$500

$750

$1,000

$1,250

$1,500

$1,750

$2,000

$2,250

$2,500

730 9,100 16,008 23,666 30,082 36,417 39,898 42,962

AIS

C, n

et (

US$

/oz

Au)

Cumulative Gold Production (koz Au)

75%

Centerra: Lower-Cost-Quartile Asset Base

13

AISC Industry Curve (By-Product Basis)

100%50%25%0%

Kumtor(US$737-764/oz)

Centerra Gold(US$705-741/oz Au)

• Kemess underground represents a potential fourth Centerra mine in the bottom quartile of global gold producers

• Royalty cash flow provides additional margin enhancement

Source: SNL Metals.Notes: Centerra AISC figures based on 2017 revised cost guidance, unless noted.(1) Kemess Underground based on LOM plan as per National Instrument 43-101 technical report dated July 12, 2017 for Kemess Underground and Kemess East available in the AuRico Metals filings.(2) Öksüt AISC based on LOM plan as per the NI 43-101 technical report dated September 3, 2015.

Mount Milligan(US$483-523/oz)

Öksüt(US$490/oz)(2)

Kemess Underground(US$244/oz)(1)

December 2017

TSX: CGwww.centerragold.com

Appendices

Kemess: Low-Cost Brownfield Gold-Copper Project in British Columbia

Greenstone: Large Scale Open Pit Gold Project

Over C$1 billion of surface infrastructure, EIA and First Nation agreement in place

KUG and KE optimization and potential synergy opportunities

One of Canada’s largest undeveloped open pit gold deposits

Bankable feasibility study completed, final EIS/EA filed, IBA and mine permitting work underway

15

Öksüt: High Margin Open Pit Heap Leach Gold Project

Funded, late-stage gold development project

Near-term high margin gold production

Gatsuurt: Open Pit Gold Project with Established Infrastructure

Updated feasibility study completed

Surface processing infrastructure in-place

Centerra: Enhanced Project Pipeline

December 2017

16

Pro-forma Consensus Asset NAV by Geography(1)

Pro-forma M+I Resource (Inclusive) by Geography(3)Pro-forma Consensus Asset NAV by Stage

Pro-forma P+P Reserves by Geography(2)

Source: Company filings, AuRico Metals filings, and analyst estimates.(1) Does not include assets classified as ‘Other’.(2) See Reserves and Resources details on slides 22 and 42 in the appendix, excludes royalties.(3) Resources are shown inclusive of reserves. Minerals resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Excludes royalties.

Canada55%

Kyrgyz Republic

33%

Turkey9%

Australia2%

Mongolia1%

U.S.0%

Producing70%

Development26%

Exploration4%

Canada57%

Kyrgyz Republic

29%

Turkey7%

Mongolia7%

Canada59%

Kyrgyz Republic

28%

Turkey5%

Mongolia8%

Diversified Portfolio with Balanced Geographical Profile

December 2017

16 16

13

1111 11

9

7

6 6 6

2

Yamana Pro-FormaCenterra

Centerra New Gold Detour Kinross IAMGOLD Alamos SEMAFO SSR Mining B2Gold Randgold

17

Company Gold M&I Resources per US$1,000 Invested (Gold Ounces)(1)

Source: Company filings, AuRico Metals filings.(1) Calculated as total M&I gold resource (inclusive of P&P gold reserves) / market capitalization as at November 16, 2017. Based on Centerra current equity value.

Centerra: Significant Leverage to Gold

December 2017

18

Net Debt / 2017E EBITDA(1)

Source: Company filings, S&P Capital IQ.(1) Consensus Net Debt / 2017E EBITDA is calculated based on each company’s latest filings divided by the median research analyst estimate for that same company as at November 6, 2017.

Centerra based on pro-forma company cash and debt balances, and includes 2017E EBITDA estimates from both Centerra and AuRico Metals.

Centerra: Attractive Debt Repayment Capacity

2.7x2.6x2.4x

0.7x0.5x

0.4x

(0.9x)(0.9x)(0.9x)(1.0x)

(1.6x)

B2GoldYamanaNew GoldDetourKinrossPro-FormaCenterra

AlamosSSR MiningRandgoldIAMGOLDSEMAFO

December 2017

19

Transaction Summary

• Total transaction value of C$310 million

Consideration

• Each existing AuRico share outstanding at closing will be exchanged for C$1.80 in cash pursuant to a plan of arrangement

• 38% premium to AuRico’s closing price on November 6, 2017 and a 37% premium based on AuRico’s 20-day volume-weighted average price

Financing of Acquisition

• Cash on hand

• New US$125 million acquisition credit facility

Conditions• AuRico shareholder approval (66⅔% of shareholder votes cast)

• Customary regulatory and court approvals

Other

• Unanimous support from AuRico’s Board of Directors (subject to abstentions)

• AuRico’s Officers, AuRico’s Board of Directors and Alamos Gold, collectively representing 11.4% of common shares outstanding, have entered into voting support agreements

• Customary non-solicitation covenants and a C$12 million termination fee is payable in customary circumstances

Anticipated Timeline

• AuRico shareholder meeting in December 2017

• Expected to close in January 2018

Centerra: AuRico Metals Transaction1 Summary

December 2017

1. Refer to Company’s news release November 7, 2017.

20

Kemess Timeline

Copper Outlook

10

15

20

25

2015 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030

Mt

Base Probable Projects Primary Demand

Large ~6Mtdeficit expected by 2030

Deficit

Source: Wood Mackenzie.

Kemess: Timeline – And Copper Outlook

December 2017

21

• Optimization opportunities through the integration of KUG and KE− Economies of scale in ore processing, G&A, and site

services− Optimize tailings management− Optimize mining and development of KUG and KE to

access highest grade areas of both deposits during the early years

− Enhance recoveries by blending KUG and KE ore

• Exploration Upside− 2017 drill program consisting of ~12,000 metres at

Kemess East commenced in July 2017 with infill drilling and growth on outer edges of deposit

− Drill program to also target the high-grade Kemess Offset Zone, located between Kemess Underground and Kemess East

• Potential operational synergies with Centerra’s existing operations in British Columbia

Kemess: Value Creation Opportunities

December 2017

Source: Refer to National Instrument 43-101 technical report dated July 12, 2017 for Kemess Underground and Kemess East available in the AuRico Metals filings.

Classification Quantity(t)

Grade Contained Metal

Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Silver (g/t) Gold (koz) Copper (klbs) Silver (koz)

Proven and Probable

Proven - - - - - - -

Probable 107,381 0.54 0.27 1.99 1,868 629,595 6,878

Total P&P 107,381 0.54 0.27 1.99 1,868 629,595 6,878

Measured - - - - - - -

Indicated 246,400 0.42 0.22 1.75 3,328 1,195,300 13,866

Total M&I(1) 246,400 0.42 0.22 1.75 3,328 1,195,300 13,866

Inferred 21,600 0.40 0.22 1.70 277 104,700 1,179

Classification Quantity(t)

Grade Contained Metal

Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Silver (g/t) Gold (koz) Copper (klbs) Silver (koz)

Indicated

Potassic Strong 67,200 0.60 0.43 2.06 1,292 640,000 4,457

Potassic Moderate 40,000 0.27 0.32 1.81 352 286,000 2,336

Potassic Weak 5,100 0.19 0.22 1.45 31 24,000 238

Phyllic + Propylitic 800 0.20 0.21 1.40 5 4,000 36

Total Indicated 113,100 0.46 0.38 1.94 1,680 954,000 7,066

Potassic Strong 15,200 0.51 0.41 2.05 249 137,000 1,003

Potassic Moderate 41,900 0.26 0.34 1.91 353 311,000 2,579

Potassic Weak 6,000 0.17 0.20 1.42 32 27,000 274

Phyllic + Propylitic 700 0.24 0.21 1.42 6 3,000 33

Total Inferred 63,800 0.31 0.34 1.90 640 478,000 3,889

Kemess Underground

Kemess East

Source: Refer to National Instrument 43-101 technical report dated July 12, 2017 for Kemess Underground and Kemess East available in the AuRico Metals filings.(1) M&I resources are inclusive of reserves.

22

Kemess: Reserves & Resources

December 2017

Fosterville (2.0% NSR)

Mine Operator Kirkland Lake Gold

Mine Type Underground

2017 Production Guidance 250-260koz Gold

P&P ReservesM&I (exclusive)Inferred

1,190koz @15.3 g/t1,940koz @ 4.4 g/t1,040koz @ 5.8 g/t

Highlights• 12-year operating history with strong track record• Kirkland Lake Gold has revised Fosterville production

guidance upwards in FY2017 from 140-145koz to 250-260koz

• Achieved monthly production record in October of over 30koz

• Mineral reserves more than doubled at Fosterville with an 83% increase in average reserve grade from 9.8 g/t to 17.9 g/t in June 2017

• In-mine and step-out exploration is focused on accelerating conversion in three production horizons in the Swan Zone (reserves of 532koz at 58.8 g/t Au)

23Source: AuRico Metals, Alamos Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold filings.

Young-Davidson (1.5% NSR)

Mine Operator Alamos Gold




3,687koz @ 2.7 g/t1,246koz @ 3.1 g/t314koz @ 2.8 g/t

Highlights• 6-year operating history with strong track record• One of Canada’s largest underground mines• 15-year mine life based on year-end 2016 reserves• Large resource base and exploration potential to

support mine life extension• Achieved record gold production of 55.8koz ounces in

Q3/17 as the mine continues to ramp-up to 7,500 tpdthroughput, having achieved 6,544 tpd in Q3/17

Royalty Portfolio: Cornerstone Royalty Assets

December 2017

24

Fosterville (2.0% NSR)

Mine Operator Kirkland Lake Gold




1,190koz @ 15.3 g/t1,940koz @ 4.4 g/t1,040koz @ 5.8 g/t

Highlights• Achieved monthly production record of over 30koz in October • Mineral reserves more than doubled with an 83% increase in

average reserve grade

Young-Davidson (1.5% NSR)

Mine Operator Alamos Gold





Highlights• One of Canada’s largest underground mines• 15-year mine life based on year-end 2016 reserves• Open at depth

Hemlo – Williams (0.25% NSR)

Mine Operator Barrick Gold





Highlights• 73% increase in reserves announced in February 2017• Has been producing for 30+ consecutive years

Eagle River (0.5% NSR)

Mine Operator: Wesdome Gold Mines

Mine Type Open Pit


P&P ReservesInferred

344koz @ 9.2 g/t85koz @ 8.1 g/t

Highlights• Continuous production since 1995 (>1Moz)• Significant upside from continued exploration of identified ore

zones (incl. 300 Zone)

Producing Royalties

December 2017

Source: AuRico Metals, Alamos Gold, Kirkland Lake Gold, Barrick Gold and Wesdome Gold Mines filings.

25

Asset Date Acquired(1)

Primary Metal Location NSR Rate Operator Notes

Boulevard Mar-17 Gold Yukon 1.00% Independence Gold Adjacent to Goldcorp’s Coffee project

Cumobabi Mar-17 Copper Mexico 0.50% Evrim Resources Under option to First Majestic Silver

East Timmins Mar-17 Gold Ontario 0.50% Kirkland Lake Gold

19 near-mine targets & 81 regional targets (claim progressing in court)

Eskay Creek Area Dec-16 Gold/Silver British Columbia 0.50% Eskay Mining Corp

Area surrounding past producing Eskay Creek mine and near to Brucejack and KSM

GJ / GJ Northern Block Dec-16 Gold/Copper British Columbia 0.98% / 0.49%

Skeena Resources

PEA released April 2017; M&I resources of 2.1Moz Au and 1.2Blbs Cu

Goodpaster Mar-17 Gold Alaska 1.00% MillrockResources Eligible for advanced royalty payments

Grizzly Sept-17 Copper/Gold British Columbia 1.00%International

Samuel Exploration

Located in BC’s Golden Triangle

Hemlo – David Bell Sept-15 Gold Ontario 1.50% Barrick Gold Historic operation – adjacent to Williams (on strike)

Leviathan Jul-15 Gold Australia 1.00% Kirkland Lake Gold Exploration stage

Madsen Area Dec-16 Gold Ontario 1.00% Frontline Gold Exploration stage

Mt. Dunn Mar-17 Copper/Gold British Columbia 2.00% MetallisResources Located in BC’s Golden Triangle

Rainy River Area Feb-17 Gold Ontario 0.75% Private Exploration stage

RDN Mar-17 Gold British Columbia 1.33% Aben Resources Located in BC’s Golden Triangle

Red Lake Area Mar-17 Gold Ontario 1.00% Frontline Gold Exploration stage

Stawell Jul-15 Gold Australia 1.00% Kirkland Lake Gold

Care & Maintenance / “operationally ready”; P&P of 132koz and M&I of 114koz

Source: AuRico Metals filings.(1) Date AuRico Metals acquired the royalty.

Non-Producing Royalties

December 2017

26

2016 2017E Guidance

Gold Production (koz) 205 235-255

Copper Production (Mlbs) 59 55-65

All-In Sustaining Costs (US$/oz)(1) $509 $483-$523

Sustaining Capital ($MM)(1) NA $26

Remaining reserve life (years) +20

Gold Copper

P&P Reserves(2) 5.8Moz 2,049Mlbs

Grade 0.4g/t 0.187%

Royal Gold Stream 35% @ US$435/oz

18.75% @ 15% of spot Cu price

+20 years of production from existing P&P reserves(2)

5.8M gold reserve ounces(2)

Low cost, long life production

Stable, mining-friendly jurisdiction

Restructured stream provides additional gold upside

Tax loss pools, no cash taxes until 2022/2023

December 2017

Mount Milligan: Long Life, Low Cost Gold Copper Mine

Significant Gold and Copper ProductionSignificant Open Pit Gold and Copper Production

218

245

59

71

60205

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2015 2016 2017E 2015 2016 2017ECOPPER

Copp

er M

lbs

Gold ou

nces (0

00’s)

GOLD(1) Non-GAAP measure and is discussed under “Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s MDA and news release October 31, 2017. 2016 AISC is for the period Oct.20 to Dec.31.(2) Refer to February 23, 2017 mineral reserves and resources news release.

Mount Milligan Q3 Drill hole Plan Map

Q3 Drill hole Section; looking North within Ultimate Pit Boundary

Mount Milligan: Exploration Update

27December 2017

Q3 2017 Exploration UpdateThis information should be read together with our news release of October 31, 2017.C. Paul Jago, a Member of the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia, is Centerra’s qualified person for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101.

Mount Milligan: Resource Expansion Potential

December 2017

C. Paul Jago, a Member of the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia, is Centerra’s qualified person for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101.

28

Mount Milligan: Exploration Targets

29December 2017

170U/G miners

207U/G miners

240U/G miners

240U/G miners

2015 2016 2017EGuidance

Gold Production (koz) 521 551 540-560

Adjusted Operating Costs ($/oz) (1) $326 $342 $320-$331

All-In Sustaining Costs ($/oz) (1) $758 $640 $737-$764

Sustaining Capital ($MM)(1) $51 $61 $68

Growth Capital ($MM)(1) $14 $15 $28

Projected Asset Life (years) +9

Reserves (Moz) 5.1

Au Grade (g/t) 2.5

Resources M&I (Moz) 2.6

Au Grade (g/t) 2.8

World Class Cornerstone Asset Significant Open Pit Gold Production to 2026

YE target of 4,000tpd

20 years of uninterrupted profitable production

Over 11M ounces produced since 1997

More than 5M ounces remaining in open pit reserves

Low cost, long life production

Underground opportunity (inferred 3.4Moz @ 7.3 g/t)

Strong stable platform to grow Centerra

30December 2017

Kumtor: World Class Open Pit Gold Mine

(1) Non-GAAP measure and is discussed under “Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s MDA and news release October 31, 2017.

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

200,000

350,000

500,000

650,000

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

grade g/t

Oun

ces

31

Mine Type Open Pit, Heap Leach

Avg. LOM Annual Production 110koz Au

Avg. LOM AISC(1) (US$/oz) $490

Reserve Mine Life 8 years

Development Capex (US$MM) $221

P&P Reserves(2)(Moz) 1.2

Au grade (g/t) 1.40

Life of Mine Recovery 77%

Life of Mine Strip Ratio (w:o) 2:1

First Gold Pour 2019

IRR (after tax) 43%

NPV(8%) - after tax (US$MM) >$240

2015 Feasibility Highlights

EIA approval received in November 2015

Forestry Permit & GSM License received July 2016

Construction expected in 2017

Powerline construction completed

Bought back Stratex and Teck royalties

US$150MM low-cost +5-year financing in-place

Significant exploration potential

Projected Near-Term Gold Production

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

0

50

100

150

200

250

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Proc

ess

Gra

de (

g/to

nne)

Oun

ces

(000

's)

Catalyst Schedule

Öksüt Gold Project

(1) Non-GAAP measure see “Non-GAAP Measures in the MDA and news release of October 31, 2017.(2) Company filings. Technical Report on the Öksüt Gold Project dated September 3, 2015.

0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8Years:

December 2017

Öksüt: Funded High Margin Gold Production

Öksüt: Powerline Construction Complete

32December 2017

33

2017 Feasibility Highlights(1)

In-Place 5ktpd Processing Facility (Boroo)Boroo’s Historical Cumulative Net Cash Generation (US$MM)

(100)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

US$

Mill

ions

(1) See Gatsuurt Project Update in Company’s news release October 31, 2017.

The Gatsuurt Project is ~90 km north of Ulaanbaatar

December 2017

Gatsuurt: Gold Development Project

Mine Type Open Pit



Reserve Mine Life 10 years

LOM Development Capex (US$MM) $245

LOM Sustaining Capital (US$MM) $37


Au grade (g/t) 2.7


Life of Mine Strip Ratio (w:o) 4.7:1

IRR (after tax) 9%

NPV(5%) - after tax (US$MM) $39

34

Cornerstone Canadian Development Project

50:50 development partnership with Premier Gold

Open pit reserves(1) (100%) 4.7Moz Au @ 1.02 g/t

Historic gold production of 4.12M oz (~1934-1970)

Large land package covers 337km2, good infrastructure

Significant exploration and underground resource potential

2017 final EIS/EA filed, mine permitting and IBA work underway

Ontario: Top Tier Mining Jurisdiction

Greenstone GoldProperty Greenstone Development Project

Location: Ontario, Canada

December 2017

2016 Feasibility Highlights (100%)

Mine Type Open Pit, CIP Mill

Mill Throughput design 27,000 tpd



Reserve Mine Life 14.5 years

Development Capex (US$MM) $962

Sustaining Capital(2) (US$MM) $101


Au grade (g/t) 1.02


Life of Mine Strip Ratio (w:o) 3.87:1

IRR (after tax) 14.4%

NPV(5%) - after tax (US$MM) $545

Projected Gold Production (100%)

Greenstone: One of Canada’s Largest Undeveloped Open Pit Gold Mines

(1) See Technical Report on the Hardrock Project dated December 21, 2016. (2) Non-GAAP measure, see “Non-GAAP Measures” in Company’s MDA and news release October 31, 2017.

Greenstone: One of Canada’s Largest Undeveloped Open Pit Gold Mines

35

Cornerstone Canadian Development Project

50:50 development partnership with Premier Gold

Open pit reserves(1) (100%) 4.7Moz Au @ 1.02 g/t

Historic gold production of 4.12M oz (~1934-1970)

Large land package covers 337km2, good infrastructure

Significant exploration and underground resource potential

Bankable feasibility study completed in November 2016

2017, final EIS/EA filed, mine permitting and IBA work underway

Ontario: Top Tier Mining Jurisdiction

Greenstone GoldProperty Greenstone Development Project

Location: Ontario, Canada

Geraldton

Beardmore

JellicoeBrookbank

HardrockViper

11

Beardmore – Geraldton Greenstone Belt +110 km

Brookbank Deposit

Hardrock Deposit

December 2017 (1) Technical Report on the Hardrock Project dated December 21, 2016.

Centerra: Potential Upside Optionality - Molybdenum

36

Molybdenum business

Well-established molybdenum business

Consists of the Langeloth Metallurgical Facility and two mines: Thompson Creek Mine and Endako Mine

Langeloth can produce a suite of premium molybdenum products that raise the average realized price

Significant defined resources and infrastructure in place

Ability to be one of the first movers upon moly market recovery

Lower cost to restart production compared to greenfield project

Molybdenum business well positioned to recover once market conditions and pricing improve

Thompson Creek Mine

Endako Mine

● Located in Idaho, is the world’s fourth largest open-pit primary

molybdenum mine

● Operations began in 1983, using conventional open-pit mining and a on-

site 25,500 tpd mill

● In December, 2014 placed on care and maintenance

● Endako Mine is a fully integrated molybdenum facility located in BC

● TCM is the operator and 75% owner; Sojitz owns 25%

● Endako consists of three adjoined pits and a fully integrated operation

with on-site mill and multiple hearth roasting facility

● New 55,000 tpd processing facility was completed in 2012 for~US$500MM

● In July 2015 placed on care and maintenance

Langeloth Metallurgical Facility

● Located 40 km west of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

● Operates both as a toll processor and as a purchaser of molybdenum

concentrates from third parties

● Cash flows from the Langeloth operations are expected to cover care and

maintenance expenses associated with the molybdenum mines for 2017

Historical Molybdenum Segment EBITDA(1)

$444

$126

$269 $265

$18

$126 $124

($21)

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

(US$MM)

(1) Prior to intersegment eliminations. Historical EBITDA not reported, therefore calculated based on historical segment disclosure.December 2017

Centerra: Q3 - 2017 Corporate Update

37

Safety – Continue to roll out “Work Safe : Home Safe” Program Across the Company

Q3 2017 Net Loss $0.8MM, includes $60MM one-time charge and $6.9MM gainQ3 2017 Adjusted Earnings1 $52.3MM or $0.18 Per Share

Comprehensive Settlement Agreement Signed: September 11, 2017

Kumtor’s Cash Released

Strong Q3 Gold Production of 200,201 Ounces and Copper Production of 13.7 million pounds

Centerra’s Q3 2017 All-In Sustaining Cost1 on a by-product basis $722 Per Ounce

Mount Milligan achieved All-In Sustaining Cost1 on a by-product basis of $437 Per Ounce in Q3

Cash Provided by Operations of $120 Million ($0.41 per share) & YTD $331 Million ($1.14 per share)

YTD: Free Cash Flow1 Generation of $105 Million at Mount Milligan & $88 Million at Kumtor

September 30, 2017 Cash Position of $352 Million Following $172 Million in YTD Debt Repayments

Company-wide Liquidity $677 Million at September 30, 2017

1. Non-GAAP measure and is discussed under “Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s MD&A and News Release dated October 31, 2017.December 2017

Centerra: Q3 – 2017 Operating Highlights

38

Q3 2017 Q3 20161

Gold ounces produced(1) 200,201 166,030

Copper produced (000’s payable lbs)(1) 13,677 -Kumtor All-in Sustaining Costs on a by-product basis perounce sold(2) $807 $555

Mt. Milligan All-in Sustaining Costs on a by-product basis per ounce sold(1),(2) $437 -

Consolidated All-in Sustaining Costs on a by-product basis per ounce sold(1),(2) $722 $591

1. Mount Milligan numbers 100% basis, 2016 numbers for gold ounces produced excludes any ounces from the Boroo mine and results exclude Mt. Milligan, since the Company closed the Thompson Creek acquisition in October 2016, therefore no comparative numbers.

2. Non-GAAP measure and is discussed under “Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s MD&A and News Release dated October 31, 2017.

Q3 2017 gold production - Kumtor 138,561 ounces, Mount Milligan 61,640 ounces1

Q3 2017 copper production - Mount Milligan 13,677,000 pounds1

Favourably revised guidance at Kumtor, increased gold production 540,000 – 560,000 oz,and lowered all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounce sold2 to $737 - $764

Lowered gold production guidance at Mount Milligan to 235,000 – 255,000 oz,and revised all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounce sold2 to $483 - $523

Completed Feasibility Study on the Gatsuurt Project

Continuous Improvement Initiatives Continue at Both Operations

December 2017

Centerra: Q3 – 2017 Financial Highlights1

39

(in thousands, except ounces, per share amounts, and average realized price3)

Quarter EndedSeptember 30,

2017

Quarter EndedSeptember 30,

20162

Revenue $276,237 $218,745

Total gold ounces sold 174,099 164,847

Total copper pounds sold (000’s) 18,644 -

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital(3) $108,027 $119,265

Cash provided by operations $119,454 $134,375

Net (loss) earnings ($841) $66,938

Adjusted earnings $52,298 $66,938

Adjusted earnings per share, basic $0.18 $0.28

Average realized gold price per ounce(3) $1,142 $1,327

1. U.S. dollars2. No comparative results from Thompson Creek operations presented.3. Non-GAAP measure and is discussed under “Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s MD&A and News Release dated October 31, 2017.

December 2017

Centerra: 2017 Revised Guidance – Q3

40

2017 Gold Production 2017 Copper Production2017 All-in Sustaining Costs on a By-product

basis1

(ounces) (millions pounds) (per ounce sold)

Kumtor Mine 540,000 – 560,000 - $737 – $764

Mount Milligan 235,000 – 255,000 55 – 65 $483 – $523

Centerra 775,000 – 815,000 55 – 65 $705-$741

1 Non-GAAP measure discussed under “Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s MD&A and news release dated October 31, 2017.2 Greenstone growth capital includes capitalized amounts for Premier’s 50% share of the Greenstone costs funded in full by Centerra.

Projects 2017 Sustaining Capital1 2017 Growth Capital1

(millions) (millions)

Kumtor Mine $68 $28

Mount Milligan Mine $26 -

Öksüt Project - $11

Mongolia/Gatsuurt Project - $5

Greenstone Property2 - $8

Corporate and other $2 -

Consolidated Total $96 $52

2017

(millions)

Exploration $10.5

Corporate Administration $35

Community Investment $5

December 2017

1 Appreciation of currency against the U.S. dollar will result in higher costs and lower cash flow and earnings, depreciation of currency against the U.S. dollar results in decreased costs and increased cash flow and earnings.2 All-in sustaining costs per ounce sold (“AISC”) on a by-product basis is a non-GAAP measure discussed under “Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s news release October 31, 2017.3 The Company has recalculated the sensitivities for its revenues, earnings and cash flows for the remaining three months of 2017 to movements in copper price changes following the commencement in the first quarter of 2017 of a hedging program to mitigate copper price risk by purchasing fixed price forward sales contracts and zero-cost collar.

Centerra: 2017 Guidance Sensitivities

41

Material Assumptions and RisksMaterial assumptions or factors used to forecast production and costs for the remaining three months of 2017 include the following:• a gold price of $1,275 per ounce,• a copper price of $2.90 per pound,• exchange rates:

• $1USD:$1.25 CAD,• $1USD:68.5 Kyrgyz som,• $1USD:0.84 Euro,

• diesel fuel price assumption: • $0.44/litre at Kumtor,• $0.65/litre at Mount Milligan.

Change

Impact on Impact on ($ millions) ($ per ounce sold)

Costs Revenues Cash flows Net Earnings(after tax)

AISC(2) on by-product basis

Gold Price $50/oz 1.3 – 1.6 8.9 – 10.5 7.6 – 8.9 7.6 – 8.9 - Copper Price(3) 10% 0.4 0.1 – 1.6 0.1 – 1.2 0.1 – 1.2 0.1 – 1.9 Diesel Fuel 10% 2.1 - 2.1 2.1 2.6 – 2.7

Kyrgyz som(1) 1 som 0.5 - 0.5 0.5 0.6 – 0.7

Canadian dollar(1) 10 cents 6.0 - 6.0 6.0 7.3 – 7.6

December 2017

Centerra: Mineral Reserves - Proven & Probable1

Proven and Probable Gold Mineral Reserves Increase to 16 million ounces

Proven and Probable Copper Mineral Reserves are 2,049 million pounds

Copper Mineral Reserves

Proven Probable Total Proven and Probable

Property Tonnes Grade Contained Tonnes Grade Contained Tonnes Grade Contained(kt) (%) Copper (Mlbs) (kt) (%) Copper (Mlbs) (kt) (%) Copper (Mlbs)

Mt Milligan 256,847 0.187 1,059 239,362 0.188 991 496,209 0.187 2,049

December 2017 421) As at December 31, 2016, see Mineral Reserves and Resources News Release February 23, 2017.

Centerra: Investor Relations Highlights

43

Research Coverage

Brokerage Firms Rating Target

1. BMO Capital Markets Market Perform C$10.50

2. BofA Merrill Lynch Neutral C$9.25

3. Canaccord Genuity Hold C$8.50

4. CIBC World Markets Neutral C$11.00

5. Cormark Securities Buy C$12.00

6. Credit Suisse Hold C$9.75

7. Global Mining Research Speculative Buy C$10.70

8. Macquarie Capital Markets Outperform C$12.00

9. National Bank Financial Sector Perform C$9.00

10. RBC Capital Markets Sector Perform C$10.00

11. Scotiabank Sector Outperform C$10.00

12. TD Securities Hold C$9.50

Average C$10.18

Top Ten (10) Institutional Shareholders

Institution/Firm Q3-2017

1. Blackrock 13.10%

2. Van Eck 8.65%

3. Paulson & Co 7.80%

4. Dimensional 2.39%

5. Capital Research 1.75%

6. Kopernik Global 1.61%

7. Vanguard Group 1.50%

8. Franklin Advisors 1.42%

9. USAA 1.36%

10. Newton 1.33%

TOTAL 40.91%

December 2017

Industry Experience Background

20 years• Appointed Chief Executive Officer in November, 2015

• Former Chief Executive Officer at AuRico Gold

25 years • Appointed President in November, 2015

• Joined Centerra in 2004

30 years• Appointed Chief Operating Officer in January, 2013


18 years• Appointed Chief Financial Officer in April, 2016


SCOTT PERRYChief Executive Officer

FRANK HERBERTPresident

GORDON REIDChief Operating Officer

Centerra: Senior Management

DARREN MILLMANChief Financial Officer

44December 2017

Board of Directors Background

STEPHEN A. LANG Chairman Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, June 2008

BRUCE V. WALTER Vice Chair Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, May 2008

SCOTT G. PERRY Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, January 2016

RICHARD W. CONNOR Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, June 2012

EDUARD KUBATOV Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, March 2016

NURLAN KYSHTOBAEV Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, May 2016

MICHAEL S. PARRETT Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, May 2014

JACQUES PERRON Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, October 2016

SHERYL K. PRESSLER Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, May 2008

TERRY V. ROGERS Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, February 2003

BEKTUR SAGYNOV Director Appointed Director of Centerra’s Board, March 2016

Centerra: Directors

45December 2017

TSX: CGwww.centerragold.com

Documents

Investor Presentation December 2017 TSX: CG · PDF fileInformation contained in this presentation which are not statements of historical facts, and the documents incorporated by reference