Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20093rd Freiberg Conference on IGCC and XtL Technologies, May 2009, Dresden
Investigations about cofiring of herbaceous biomass in an
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
J. Judex, S. Daniele, J.-L. Hersener, S. Biollaz, P. Jansohn
presented
by
Tilman Schildhauer
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20092
Motivation
•
Background: increasing electricity demand, but shutdown of old nuclear power plants in Switzerland• Using biomass for CO2
reduction and improved sustainability• Limited biomass resources• Testing grass/hay as additional bio fuel for power production via B-IGCC
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20093
Structure of the presentation
• GIS analysis (availability)• Gasification experiments with grass as fuel (gas quality)•
Combustion experiments with product gas-natural gas mixtures
(combustion characteristics)
availability
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20094
Structure of the presentation
• GIS analysis (availability)• Gasification experiments with grass as fuel (gas quality)•
Combustion experiments with product gas-natural gas mixtures
(combustion characteristics)
gas quality
availability
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20095
Structure of the presentation
• GIS analysis (availability)• Gasification experiments with grass as fuel (gas quality)•
Combustion experiments with product gas-natural gas mixtures
(combustion characteristics)combustion
characteristics
gas quality
availability
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20096
GIS analysis
• Base material (Swiss „Areal Statistik“): grassy
grounds• Filters: tilt, orientation, elevation, precipitation, exposition• Restrictions: only
minor
soil
quality
(no competition
energy
vs. food!)
each circle contains 32 ktdry substanceper year of herbaceous material
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20097
10 : 90 %LHV biomass to natural gas IGCC: size, efficiency
6000 operating hoursNG : Biosyngas10% : 90% by LHV45% : 55% by gas
volumeLHV mixed gas 21 MJ/m3
37 MWel total
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20098
Gasifcation of grass: trace species in the fuel
0
5
10
15
20
Ca K Mg Na Ba S Si
[g/k
g]
hay wood
Johannes Judex, 18.5.20099
►Cofiring fraction ~ 45% ►dilution factor 0.65►Volume increase during combustion (λ = 4 incl. secondary air) ► 5.7
Fuel quality requirements by GT
http://ec.europa.eu/
Element Limit average lit. Current mixtureK, Na < mg/m3 0.27 0.05V,< mg/m3 0.01 0.0001Ca, < mg/m3 0.04 0.002Ba, < mg/m3 NA 0.006P, < mg/m3 NA 0.006Cd, < mg/m3 NA 0.0001
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200910
Gasification experiments in bubbling fluidised bed
• Continuous operation for grass and air• Accumulation of ash in the bed• Variation of bed materials, λ, T, ..• Conversion, trace elements and slagging
grass pellet container
filter
air
bubblingfluidised bed
flare
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200911
Sampling and measurements
continuouswet sampling
raw gas permanent gases
solvent, tars, particles (99%)
Micro-GC
ICP-OES
filtersolvent
• Continuous operation for grass and air• Accumulation of ash in the bed• Variation of bed materials, λ, T, ..• Conversion, trace elements and slagging
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200912
Gas species (micro-GC) and metal traces (ICP-OES)
12:00:00 15:00:00 18:00:000
20
40
60
clock time
Con
cent
ratio
n, %
vol
N2
CO2H2
CH4
CO
C2H6
12:00 15:00 18:0010-6
10-4
10-2
100
clock time
Con
cent
ratio
n, μ
g/l ga
s
KNaBaPCaCdV
LHV 4.7 MJ/m3
Fuel dried hayBedmat. SiO2
Temp. 700°CPress. ambient
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200913
Optically accessible combustion test rig (LIF, chemoluminiscence)
Air flow rate: max. 270 g/sAir preheating temperature: max. 823 K Pressure: max. 30 bar Thermal power: max. 400 kW
Syngas / Air
To ICCD CameraTo PMs Array
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200914
Combustion chraracteristics: turbulent flame speed
• Co-firing looks achievable for a GT requiring only minor modifications• A fully fuel flexible engine represents still a major challenge
Turbulent Flame Speed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1650 1850
adiabatic flame temperature [K]
turb
ulen
t fla
me
spee
d [m
/s]
CH4H2-CO-CH4 20-20-60H2-CO 33-67H2-CO 50-50
Increasingsyngas
fractionIncreasing
syngas
fraction
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200915
NOx emissions depend on gas mixture and temperature
Lower NOx for co-firing mixture: Different pathway for Hx
Cy
oxidation
CH 4co-firin
g syngaspure syngas
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200916
Conclusions
►Grass is an available fuel for gasification►Grounds are possessed by mostly private persons►Amount in CH is significant but the security of supply is critical
►Gasification experiments proved stable operation at certain conditions►Contaminants in the gas phase are below the limits►Ammonia content in syngas
< ca. 450 ppmv
to limit NOx
►Combustion with proposed mixtures (co-firing 10% of LHV) is possible with only minor adaption of burner and chamber
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200917
Thank you for your attention
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200918
Gas mixture composition
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200919
BFB in detail
(1)
Fuel
storage(2)
rotary
feeder(3)
feeder(4)
auger
(water
cooled)(5)
inlet
gasification
agent(6)
reactor(7)
freeboard(8)
sampling
ports(9)
cyclone(10)
flare(11)
warm gas particle
filter
1
2
45
36
7
89
1011
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200920
Flame Speed
Laminar Flame Speed
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
1650
1850
adia
batic
flam
e te
mpe
ratu
re
[K]
laminar fame speed [m/s]
CH4H2-CO-CH4 20-20-60H2-CO 33-67H2-CO-N2 40-40-20H2-CO 50-50
Normalized Turbulent Flame Speed
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
1650
1850
adia
batic
flam
e te
mpe
ratu
re
[K]
turbulent flame speed factor wrt CH4
CH4H2-CO-CH4 20-20-60H2-CO 33-67H2-CO-N2 40-40-20H2-CO 50-50
Depending on their hydrogen-content the fuel mixtures have the ability to propagate faster, independently on the temperature
The ability to propagate faster, depends on the temperature; the effect is due to the
different physical properties of H2
• co-firing looks achievable for a GT requiring only minor modifications• a fully flexible engine represents still a major challenge
Johannes Judex, 18.5.200921
Experimental matrix
green: stable
process
yelllow: unstable
process
red: not conducted
because
of risk
of slagging
gray: not yet
conducted
dolimite: tensile
strength
is
too
weak
for
fluidized
bed
gasification
(Mohs
hardness
4)
SiO2: shows
melting
behaviour
at 750°C because
of alkali
influence
Al2O3: unfavorable
carbon
conversion
Olivin: NaN
dolomite700°C
750°C
800°C
SiO2
Al2O3
Olivine
0.17
0.20
0.25
ER