Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Investigation of Plasma Instabilities by Fast ProfileReflectometer Measurements in DIII-D
Lei Zeng
G. Wang, E.J. Doyle, T.L. Rhodes, W.A. Peebles,
G.R. McKee1, R.Fonck1, K. H. Burrell2 , J. Boedo3, R. Moyer3
Dept. of Electrical Engineering and PSTI, University of California,Los Angeles, CA 90095
1Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison2General Atomics, San Diego, California
3Univ. of California at San Diego
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Outline
• Motivation
• Investigation of Edge Localized Mode (ELM) by fastprofile reflectometer measurements
• Investigation of Edge Harmonic Oscillation (EHO ) by fastprofile reflectometer measurements
• Summary
UCLAUCLA UCLA
• The improved fast profile reflectometer (Q-band, 33-51 GHz)has:– high temporal resolution (10 µs)
– high spatial resolution ( ≥ 2 mm)
– The measured density range from 0 to 3.2x1019 m-3 for high time resolutionin dual-polarization (X- and O- modes) received simultaneously
• The profile measurement can provide profile modificationassociated with plasma instabilities– Edge localized mode ( ELM ) in H-mode plasma
– Edge harmonic oscillation (EHO ) in quiescent double barriers (QDB) plasma
Motivation
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Some Key Improvements of Q-band Systemfor Instability Investigation
• The detail improvements for our system presented by Dr. GuidingWang
• Hardware– Optimization of polarization match, reducing the spurious reflections and
increasing the SNR
– Currently, dual-polarization simultaneous operation, increasing densitycoverage up to 3.2x1019 m-3 in high performance measurement
• Software– Implementation of robust method for automated identification of the zero
density start position, reducing uncertainties associated with automaticanalysis
– Implementation of robust and automatic profile analysis program to copewith large volume of reflectometer data, up to 60 MB per shot
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Fast Profile Reflectometer Can Track SOL DensityProfile Evolution for Type I ELMs in Long Time Record
• SOL density rise up duringevery ELM
• Robust Analysis of 6000density profilesdemonstrates the goodcapability of our fast profilereflectometer to study theedge density modification byELMs in long time record.
• Reflectometer : X- mode
• Plasma condition:– Ip = 1.4 MA
– <ne> =4.5 x1013 cm-3
– Lower single nodeconfiguration
2500 2600 2700 2800 2900Time (ms)
02
4
6
810
shot 100399Dα (a.u.)
2400 3000
2.26
2.28
2.30
2.32
2.34
2.36
2.38
2.40
R (m
)
9x1018 0.0ne (m-3)
separatrix
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Reflectometer Profiles Are in Good Agreementwith Thomson Scattering Data During ELMs
0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.150
1x1019
2x1019
3x1019
4x1019n e
(m-3
)
ρ
pre-ELMpost-ELM
TS Data
Reflectometer (in X mode)
Reflectometer Profiles Compared to Thomson Data pre- and post- ELM
110399
UCLAUCLA UCLA
SOL Density Profile Modification by TypeI ELM-Density Expands to Wall
• Profile timeresolution is 25 µs
• Profile isexpanded to thewall position atthe onset of TypeI ELM.
• Calculation of Vr
of density layerwill show next
7.2 0.0ne (1018 m-3)
2.25
2.30
2.35
R (m
)
2779 ms2779.5 ms2780.2 ms2782 ms2783 ms
Major Radius (m)
shot 111279
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.0250.03
2776 2778 2780 2782 2784Time (ms)
Dα (a.u.)
n e (
m
-3)
1018
2.25 2.30 2.35 2.400
2
4
6
8
Separatrix
Tile Position
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Measured Density Profile Expansion Velocity isClose to EθθθθxB Drift Velocity During ELM
• At onset of ELM, Langmuirprobe measured Eθ , and Vr=EθxB/B2 similar to theradial velocity measured byfast reflectometer.
• BES result : Vr ~ 500 - 1000m/s for other shot, close toour measurement
• The measurement isconsistent with the ELMfilaments expand radially atEθxB drift velocity
2.262.282.302.322.342.362.38
R (m
)
7.2 0.0ne (1018 m-3)
111279
Radi
al Vo
locit
y (m
/s)Computed from reflectometer data @5x1018 m-3Computed from reflectometer data @2x1018 m-3
Time (ms)
-200
0
200
400
600
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
2779 2779.5 2780 2780.5
Dα (a.u.)
Vr measured by Langmuir probe
UCLAUCLA UCLA
SOL Density Evolution Can Be Tacked During ShortDuration and Varied Repetition Type III ELMs
• Fast profilereflectometermeasurement cantrack the densitymodifications byType III ELMs withshort duration (1 ms)and varied repetition.
• Profile timeresolution is 25 µs
Time (ms)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5Dα (a.u.)
111149
1300 1320 1340 1360 1380
2.26
2.28
2.30
2.32
2.34
2.36
2.38
R (m
)
8x1018 0.0ne (m-3)
separatrix
UCLAUCLA UCLA
SOL Density Profile Modification by Type IIIELM
• Profile expansiondistance duringType III ELM issmaller than duringType I ELM
• Profile temporalresolution is 25 µs
2.28 2.30 2.32 2.34 2.36 2.38 2.400
2x1018
4x1018
6x1018
8x10181307.4 ms1307.5 ms
1307.9 ms1308.13 ms
1307.6 ms
Major Radius (m)
n e (m-3
)
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25Dα (a.u.)
111149
1307.2 1307.4 1307.6 1307.8 1308.0 1308.21307Time (ms)
2.30
2.32
2.34
2.36
2.38
R (m
)
8x1018 0.0ne (m-3)
separatrix
Tile Position
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Dual-Polarization Profile Measurement Can TrackDensity Modification Inside Separatrix During ELMs
• The measureddensity range from 0to 3.2x1019 m-3 withtime resolution is 25µs
• Density increaseoutside theseparatrix , butdecrease inside theseparatrix duringELMs
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
840 850 860 870 880 890 9000
5
10
15
200
3.2
n e (1019
m-3
)
113679
Maj
or ra
dius
(m)
Dα (a.u.)
Time (ms)
Sepa
ratri
x
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Edge Profile Including Pedestal DensityEvolution During ELM
• Time slices show , density expanded to the wall first,followed by density pedestal collapses, then pedestalgradually re-builds up.
2.20 2.25 2.30 2.35 2.400
1
2
3
4
Major Radius (m)
n e (1019
m-3
)
113679
1 234
51 892 ms 2 892.3 ms 3 892.5 ms 4 893 ms 5 895.6 ms
time
sequ
ence
separatrix before ELM
Tile Position
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Time History of Typical QDB Plasma
• QDB, Quiescent DoubleBarriers —highperformance steady stateregime
• EHO, Edge HarmonicOscillation— a continuousmagnetic and electrostaticoscillation, provides theedge particle transportnecessary for QDB regime.
-1.2-0.8-0.40.0
024
024
6
0 2000 4000 60000
1020
Dα
B amplitude (a.u.)~
Line-averaged Density (1019 m-3)
Plasma Current (MA)
ELM-free , QH-mode Edge
Time (ms)
(a.u.)6
110899(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
UCLAUCLA UCLA
SOL Profile Modulation by the EdgeHarmonic Oscillations in QDB Plasma
•Time resolution: 10 µs•Total 200 profiles in 2ms•SOL density profile ismodulated at the EHOfundamental frequency(about 6 kHz)•Corresponding well totime history ofassociated with EHO
˜̇B
Time (ms)
2.29
2.28
2.27
2.26
2.25
2.24
Majo
r Rad
ius (
m)
2974 2974.5 2975 2975.5 2976
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
ne (1018 m-3)4.5 0.0
Separatrix
110899B (a.u.)~.
UCLAUCLA UCLA
No Profile Modulation When EHO isAbsent
• The same dataacquisition analysisparameters as in EHOcase
• The residualfluctuations are about2 mm, 5 timessmaller than theprofile modulationgenerated by EHO
2.29
2.28
2.27
2.26
Maj
or R
adus
(m)
2691 2692 2693 2694
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
ne (1018 m-3)4.5 0.0
Separatrix
Time (ms)
110899B (a.u.)~.
2.25
2.24
UCLAUCLA UCLA
SOL Density Fluctuation Profile Associated withEHO
• RMS of density profileperturbation associatedwith EHO fundamentalfrequency (5-9 kHz)
• The peak of fluctuationsis at the large densitygradient regime
• Consistent with theLangmuir probemeasurement at 5 cmoutside the separatrixposition in shot 1038180
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0
1
2
3
2 2.1 2.2 2.3
Thomsonreflectometer
Separatrix
n e (1
013
cm-3
)δn
e (1
013 c
m-3
)
R-Rsep (cm)
Separatrix
Separatrix
SOLdensityprofile
Major Radius (m)
Density fluctuation associated with EHO
(5 - 9 kHz)
(a)
(b)
Langmuir probe result
110399
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Double Peaks Structure in FluctuationProfile Is Observed By BES Measurement
• BES measures notonly SOL densityfluctuation profilebut also inside theseparatrix, so willdual-polarizationreflectometer try tomeasure in future
• Double peakslocalized in twolarge densitygradient regimes
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
EHO
Am
plitu
de (
/n, %
)
230225220215
Major Radius (cm)
Separatrix
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Separatrix
Edge
Den
sity
Pro
file
(101
9 m
-3)
Thomson scattering dataSpline fit of Thomson dataReflectometer profile
Shot: 110899 time: 2814 ms
BES data
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Double-Peak Structure in Fluctuation Profile Could BeDerived from Assumption of Edge Profile Rigid Movement
• When edge density profile rigid movement atEHO frequency is assumed , the fluctuationprofile could be double-peak structure
• The simulation indicates that EHO actuallycould locate inside or within the separatrixand rigidly modulate the edge density profile.
• There is discrepancy in fluctuation amplitudebetween reflectometer and BESmeasurements
• Further more investigation is neededseparatrix
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
220 222 224 226 228 2300
20
40
60
Reflectometer profile
Perturbation due to profile shift 1 mm
n n~A
mpl
itude
of
(%)
Major radius (cm)
Assumed Profile shifted Rigidly
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Summary
• The improved fast profile reflectometer has been successfully applied to studythe edge density profile modifications due to edge localized mode (ELM) andedge harmonic oscillation (EHO) in DIII-D plasma.
• The radial density velocity of in Type I ELM is about 500 m/s , which isconsistent with Langmuir probes and BES measurements, also consistent withELM radial motion velocity close to EθxB drift velocity.
• SOL Density profile is expanded at onset of ELM, indicating the enhancedradial particle and energy transports to wall during ELM.
• Inside separatrix density profile evolution , especially pedestal densityevolution, during ELM is observed by reflectometer with dual-polarizationreceived simultaneously.
UCLAUCLA UCLA
Summary (continued)
• SOL density profile is modulated at the fundamental frequency of theedge harmonic oscillation (EHO)
• Both BES and fast reflectometer data shows that the fluctuation profileassociated with EHO peaks in the large density gradient regimes. Thefluctuation amplitude measured by Langmuir probe at far away fromthe separatrix is consistent with reflectometer measurement.
• Assumption of rigid edge profile modulation by EHO fundamentalfrequency could also produce double-peak structure in fluctuationprofile.